OAI Archive: ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst
Download type: sets
A 'sets' download type means that only articles categorized under certain sets will be indexed. Click here to edit this archive's configuration or view the sets it offers.
-  Philosophy : complete
-  Philosophy Department Dissertations Collection : complete
-  Philosophy Department Faculty Publication Series : complete
100 entries most recently downloaded from the archive "ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst"
This set has the following status: sets.
- Christopher J. Kosciuk, Human Freedom in a World Full of Providence: An Ockhamist-Molinist Account of the Compatibility of Divine Foreknowledge and Creaturely Free Will.I defend the compatibility of the classical theistic doctrine of divine providence, which includes infallible foreknowledge of all future events, with a libertarian understanding of creaturely free will. After setting out the argument for theological determinism, which purports to show the inconsistency of foreknowledge and freedom, I reject several responses as inadequate and then defend the ‚Ockhamist‛ response as successful. I further argue that the theory of middle knowledge or ‚Molinism‛ is crucial to the viability of the Ockhamist response, and (...)
- Katja Hahn D. Errico, The Impact of Spirituality on the Work of Organization Development Consulting Practice.The purpose of this study was to learn how spiritual attitudes and beliefs impact the work of external organization consultants. The growing interest in spirituality in the workplace and in organization development (OD) are the background for this study. The twelve participants were women and men from different racial and religious backgrounds, including African-Americans, Asians, Latino/as, South African white males, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, and those with no religious affiliation. This study reviewed two distinct literatures: spirituality/religion and organization development. Participants discussed (...)No categories
- Dennis Farrell Thompson, Hume's Skepticism.David Hume has traditionally been regarded as a skeptic, perhaps the most formidable in the history of Western philosophy. Since the publication of Norman Kemp Smith's Philosophy of David Hume in 1941, however, there has been an increasing tendency to downplay the skeptical dimension of Hume's philosophy, in some cases to the point of denying that Hume is a serious skeptic, or even a skeptic at all. Much of the motivation for a nonskeptical reading of Hume comes from recognition of (...)