36 found

Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Vahram Atayan (forthcoming). Generi testuali argomentativi e traduzione in prospettiva storica: qualche osservazione sulla base delle informazioni fornite dalla Saarbrucker Ûbersetzungsbibliographie a proposito delle traduzioni dal francese, dall'italiano e dallo spagnolo in tedesco. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Christina Becker (forthcoming). Dinamizar, impulsar-élargissement, approfondissement: Zum Zusammenhang zwischen konzeptuellen Metaphern und Argumentation am Beispiel politischer Sprachverwendung in Spanien und Frankreich. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Anthony Blair (forthcoming). Probative Norms for Multimodal Visual Arguments. Argumentation:1-17.
    The question, “What norms are appropriate for the evaluation of the probative merits of visual arguments?” underlies the investigation of this paper. The notions of argument and of multimodal visual argument employed in the study are explained. Then four multimodal visual arguments are analyzed and their probative merits assessed. It turns out to be possible to judge these qualities using the same criteria that apply to verbally expressed arguments. Since the sample is small and not claimed to be representative, this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (forthcoming). L'emploi de Portante (Donc) Dans des Textes Écrits En Portugais du Brésil Ana Lûcia Tinoco Cabrai (Sâo Paulo). Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marion Carel (forthcoming). L'ambivalence argumentative: sous-détermination des énoncés par les phrases. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Begoña Carrascal (forthcoming). Proofs, Mathematical Practice and Argumentation. Argumentation:1-20.
    In argumentation studies, almost all theoretical proposals are applied, in general, to the analysis and evaluation of argumentative products, but little attention has been paid to the creative process of arguing. Mathematics can be used as a clear example to illustrate some significant theoretical differences between mathematical practice and the products of it, to differentiate the distinct components of the arguments, and to emphasize the need to address the different types of argumentative discourse and argumentative situation in the practice. I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sivan Cohen-Wiesenfeld (forthcoming). Argumentation logique et subjectivité masquée: le cas de la note diplomatique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Carolyn Cusick & Mark Peter (forthcoming). The Last Straw Fallacy: Another Causal Fallacy and Its Harmful Effects. Argumentation:1-18.
    We have noticed a pattern of arguments that exhibit a type of irrationality or a particular informal logical fallacy that is not fully captured by any existing fallacy. This fallacy can be explored through three examples where one misattributes a cause by focusing on a smaller portion of a larger set—specifically, the last or least known—and claiming that that cause holds a unique priority over other contributing factors for the occurrence of an event. We propose to call this fallacy the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Giovanni Damele (forthcoming). Rhetoric and Persuasive Strategies in High Courts' Decisions: Some Remarks on the Recent Decisions of the Portuguese Tribunal Constitutional and the Italian Corte Costituzionale on Same-Sex Marriage. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (forthcoming). Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. F. H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser (forthcoming). Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. B. Freeman (forthcoming). Weinstein, Mark: Logic, Truth and Inquiry. Argumentation:1-17.
    In this essay, Weinstein wants to address the issue of argument strength, of how strongly the premises of an argument support a conclusion. Using the framework of the Toulmin model, arguments have warrants which indicate some general connection between the premises and the conclusion of the argument. We may ask for the backing of the warrant, evidence for it. If the connection is an empirical generalization, the backing includes data supporting the generalization. But the backing may include theoretical generalizations, which (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Emily Friedrich (forthcoming). The Toulmin Brief. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anca Gâjà (forthcoming). La dissociation argumentative: composantes, mise en discours et ajustement stratégique. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Godden (forthcoming). Images as Arguments: Progress and Problems, a Brief Commentary. Argumentation:1-4.
    This brief editorial considers a special issue of Argumentation edited by Jens Kjeldsen on visual, multimodal argumentation. It provides a commentary on important advances on interpretative problems such as the propositionality of argument, the reducibility of images to words, whether argument products are primarily cognitive artifacts, and the nature of a modality of argument. Concerning the project of argument appraisal, it considers whether visual arguments call for a revision of our normative, evaluative apparatus.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Leo Groarke (forthcoming). Going Multimodal: What is a Mode of Arguing and Why Does It Matter? Argumentation:1-23.
    During the last decade, one source of debate in argumentation theory has been the notion that there are different modes of arguing that need to be distinguished when analyzing and evaluating arguments. Visual argument is often cited as a paradigm example. This paper discusses the ways in which it and modes of arguing that invoke non-verbal sounds, smells, tactile sensations, music and other non-verbal entities may be defined and conceptualized. Though some attempts to construct a ‘multimodal’ theory of argument are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Dale Hample & Amanda L. Irions (forthcoming). Arguing to Display Identity. Argumentation:1-28.
    A rarely studied motive for engaging in face-to-face arguing is to display one’s identity. One way people can manage their impressions is to give reasons for their commitments. This appears to be the first study to focus on this reason for arguing. 461 undergraduates recalled an episode in which they had argued to display own identity. They filled out trait measures as well as instruments describing the episode. Identity display arguments do not require controversy, are not very emotional episodes, can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Robert Hariman (forthcoming). Between Confusion and Boredom in the Study of Visual Argument. Argumentation:1-4.
    After reading the careful, thoughtful, carefully circumscribed scholarship that characterizes the study of argumentation, I can’t help but think that the study of visual argument might be, at least some of the time, a MacGuffin. That label comes from Alfred Hitchcock and now is enshrined in the lore of cinematic composition: the MacGuffin is a device whose presence motivates dramatic action yet proves to be “nothing” , whether trivial or unknowable or nonexistent. In like manner, the visual image has provided (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Lukáš Hlouch (forthcoming). Models of Legal Reasoning: An Attempt of a Practical View. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Dale Jacquette (forthcoming). Jan Willem Wieland: Infinite Regress Arguments. Argumentation:1-10.
    This compact booklet addresses informal logical aspects of infinite regress arguments. We know what infinite regress arguments are from such examples as Plato’s Third Man problem. It is presented here for tradition sake in its original formulation, where for convenience ‘man’ does duty for ‘human being’. Plato’s theory of abstract Ideas or Forms, in order to explain how it is that Phaedo and Meno are both men, posits their belonging to, participating in or falling under a higher ideal abstract universal (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Constanza Ihnen Jory (forthcoming). Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference. Argumentation:1-21.
    Negotiation and deliberation are two context types or genres of discourse widely studied in the argumentation literature. Within the pragma-dialectical framework, they have been characterised in terms of the conventions constraining the use of argumentative discourse in each of them. Thanks to these descriptions, it has become possible to analyse the arguers’ strategic manoeuvres and carry out more systematic, context-sensitive evaluations of argumentative discussions. However, one issue that still must be addressed in the pragma-dialectical theory—and other contextual approaches to argumentation—is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jens E. Kjeldsen (forthcoming). The Rhetoric of Thick Representation: How Pictures Render the Importance and Strength of an Argument Salient. Argumentation:1-19.
    Some forms of argumentation are best performed through words. However, there are also some forms of argumentation that may be best presented visually. Thus, this paper examines the virtues of visual argumentation. What makes visual argumentation distinct from verbal argumentation? What aspects of visual argumentation may be considered especially beneficial?
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Martin Kusch & H. Schroder (forthcoming). Text, Interpretation. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Fabrizio Macagno & Alessandro Capone (forthcoming). Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning. Argumentation:1-24.
    The problem of establishing the best interpretation of a speech act is of fundamental importance in argumentation and communication in general. A party in a dialogue can interpret another’s or his own speech acts in the most convenient ways to achieve his dialogical goals. In defamation law this phenomenon becomes particularly important, as the dialogical effects of a communicative move may result in legal consequences. The purpose of this paper is to combine the instruments provided by argumentation theory with the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Fernando López Pan (forthcoming). The Newspaper as an Epideictic Meeting Point. Argumentation:1-19.
    This article shows how epideictic rhetoric and argumentation may be interrelated in a general-interest newspaper framed as a single discourse produced by a collective author. In more specific terms, the view advanced here is that newspaper as whole has an epideictic dimension which, in terms of argumentation, is the fundamental or predominant one. The usefulness of this approach is twofold. In terms of rhetoric, to explore the applicability of epideictic rhetoric to journalistic discourse; and in the field of journalism studies, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Christian Plantin (forthcoming). Laissez dire: La norme du discours de l'un est dans le discours de l'autre Christian Plantin (Lyon). Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Georges Roque (forthcoming). Should Visual Arguments Be Propositional in Order to Be Arguments? Argumentation:1-19.
    An important issue for visual argumentation is its relationship to propositions, since it has been argued that, in order to be arguments, images should be propositional. The first part of the paper will approach this debate from a theoretical perspective. After quickly surveying the field on the issue, I will address the relationship between images and propositions. Three specific questions will be examined: can propositions accurately account for the way images express arguments?; are verbal propositions necessary to reconstruct arguments that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Anika Schiemann (forthcoming). Adverbial indizierte Implikationen: eine argumentationsbasierte Analyse von persinolperfino. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Laura Sergo (forthcoming). La funzione argomentativa del connettore infatti in testi scientifici e divulgativi. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. E. Sigler (forthcoming). The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived. Argumentation:1-25.
    This paper explores The New Rhetoric’s concept of universal audience in the contexts of philosophical and traditional rhetorical discourse. It argues that, since Perelman’s final English-language article, published in 1984 to clarify misunderstandings among rhetorical scholars about his theory, rhetorical scholars have persisted in three primary misconceptions of the concept of universal audience: appeals to the real are made only to universal audiences, only universal audiences are qualified to establish the reasonableness of arguments, and only universal audiences prevent The New (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Justine Simon (forthcoming). Stratégies de Négociation Politique Et de Représentation du Discours d'Autrui Dans la Presse Adressée aux Jeunes. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Takeshi Suzuki (forthcoming). The 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Paul Van den Hoven (forthcoming). Cognitive Semiotics in Argumentation: A Theoretical Exploration. Argumentation:1-20.
    Argumentation is a cognitive category. Texts cannot be said to be argumentation, nor can argumentation be said to lie in texts. This is an almost trivial semiotic point of departure, but it is quite relevant nevertheless. In this contribution, three reasons are developed to emphasize and to articulate the semiotic component of argumentation to show that it is a crucial element that cannot be disregarded. Two of these reasons are mentioned only in passing as other contributions in this volume deal (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Judith Visser (forthcoming). Formation de mots et persuasion: Le discours de l'extrême droite française. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John Woods (forthcoming). John Locke. Argumentation.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. A. D. Wright & C. P. Butterfield (forthcoming). The NREL Teetering Hub Rotor Code: Final Results and Conclusions. Argumentation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation