Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. Loren King, Brandon Morgan-Olsen & James Wong (forthcoming). Identifying Difference, Engaging Dissent: What is at Stake in Democratizing Knowledge? Foundations of Science.
    Several prominent voices have called for a democratization of science through deliberative processes that include a diverse range of perspectives and values. We bring these scholars into conversation with extant research on democratic deliberation in political theory and the social sciences. In doing so, we identify systematic barriers to the effectiveness of inclusive deliberation in both scientific and political settings. We are particularly interested in what we call misidentified dissent, where deliberations are starkly framed at the outset in terms of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Boaz Miller (forthcoming). Scientific Consensus and Expert Testimony in Courts Lessons From the Bendectin Litigation. Foundations of Science.
    A consensus in a scientific community is often used as a resource for making informed ‎public-policy decisions and deciding between rival expert testimonies in legal trials. This ‎paper contains a social-epistemic analysis of the high-profile Bendectin drug controversy, ‎which was decided in the courtroom inter alia by deference to an emerging scientific ‎consensus about the safety of Bendectin. Drawing on Miller’s theory of knowledge based ‎consensus, I argue that the consensus in this case was not knowledge based, hence courts’ ‎deference (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gustavo E. Romero (forthcoming). Present Time. Foundations of Science:1-11.
    The idea of a moving present or ‘now’ seems to form part of our most basic beliefs about reality. Such a present, however, is not reflected in any of our theories of the physical world. I show in this article that presentism, the doctrine that only what is present exists, is in conflict with modern relativistic cosmology and recent advances in neurosciences. I argue for a tenseless view of time, where what we call ‘the present’ is just an emergent secondary (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Áurea Anguera de Sojo, Juan Ares, María Aurora Martínez, Juan Pazos, Santiago Rodríguez & José Gabriel Zato (forthcoming). Serendipity and the Discovery of DNA. Foundations of Science:1-15.
    This paper presents the manner in which the DNA, the molecule of life, was discovered. Unlike what many people, even biologists, believe, it was Johannes Friedrich Miescher who originally discovered and isolated nuclein, currently known as DNA, in 1869, 75 years before Watson and Crick unveiled its structure. Also, in this paper we show, and above all demonstrate, the serendipity of this major discovery. Like many of his contemporaries, Miescher set out to discover how cells worked by means of studying (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Woosuk Park (forthcoming). Misrepresentation in Context. Foundations of Science:1-12.
    We can witness the recent surge of interest in the interaction between cognitive science, philosophy of science, and aesthetics on the problem of representation. This naturally leads us to rethinking the achievements of Goodman’s monumental book Languages of Art. For, there is no doubt that no one else contributed more than Goodman to throw a light on the cognitive function of art. Ironically, it could be also Goodman who has been the stumbling block for a unified theory of representation. In (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi (forthcoming). God May Not Play Dice, But Human Observers Surely Do. Foundations of Science:1-29.
    We investigate indeterminism in physical observations. For this, we introduce a distinction between genuinely indeterministic (creation-1 and discovery-1) observational processes, and fully deterministic (creation-2 and discovery-2) observational processes, which we analyze by drawing a parallel between the localization properties of microscopic entities, like electrons, and the lateralization properties of macroscopic entities, like simple elastic bands. We show that by removing the randomness incorporated in certain of our observational processes, acquiring over them a better control, we also alter these processes in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven E. Wallis (forthcoming). Abstraction and Insight: Building Better Conceptual Systems to Support More Effective Social Change. Foundations of Science:1-10.
    When creating theory to understand or implement change at the social and/or organizational level, it is generally accepted that part of the theory building process includes a process of abstraction. While the process of abstraction is well understood, it is not so well understood how abstractions “fit” together to enable the creation of better theory. Starting with a few simple ideas, this paper explores one way we work with abstractions. This exploration challenges the traditionally held importance of abstracting concepts from (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. D. Aerts, J. Broekaert & L. Gabora (forthcoming). The Quantum Nature of Common Processes. Foundations of Science.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. Aerts & L. Gabora (forthcoming). Towards a General Theory of Evolution. Foundations of Science.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay, John G. Bennett & Megan D. Higgs (forthcoming). How to Undermine Underdetermination? Foundations of Science:1-21.
    The underdetermination thesis poses a threat to rational choice of scientific theories. We discuss two arguments for the thesis. One draws its strength from deductivism together with the existence thesis, and the other is defended on the basis of the failure of a reliable inductive method. We adopt a partially subjective/objective pragmatic Bayesian epistemology of science framework, and reject both arguments for the thesis. Thus, in science we are able to reinstate rational choice called into question by the underdetermination thesis.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. David L. Bergman (forthcoming). Conflict of Atomism and Creation-Science in History. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David L. Bergman (forthcoming). Modeling the Real Structure of an Electron. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. David L. Bergman (forthcoming). Commentary on Sub-Quantum Physics. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David L. Bergman (forthcoming). Science of Origins. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David L. Bergman (forthcoming). Nuclear Binding and Half-Lives. Foundations of Science.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David L. Bergman & Dennis P. Allen Jr (forthcoming). Electron in the Ground Energy State—Part. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mario Bunge (forthcoming). Does the Aharonov–Bohm Effect Occur? Foundations of Science:1-5.
    Aharonov and Bohm (Phys Rev 115:485–491, 1959) showed that, far from being merely a mathematical tool, the vector potential \(A\) can have a microphysical effect even when irrotational, in which case the magnetic field is null. Still, at first sight there is something weird about this situation. Do we have to admit a new force? I argue that there is no paradox in the potentials-formulation of electrodynamics, for it shows that, while “ \(\nabla \times A = 0\) ” represents a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Taner Edis & Maarten Boudry (forthcoming). Beyond Physics? On the Prospects of Finding a Meaningful Oracle. Foundations of Science:1-20.
    Certain enterprises at the fringes of science, such as intelligent design creationism, claim to identify phenomena that go beyond not just our present physics but any possible physical explanation. Asking what it would take for such a claim to succeed, we introduce a version of physicalism that formulates the proposition that all available data sets are best explained by combinations of “chance and necessity”—algorithmic rules and randomness. Physicalism would then be violated by the existence of oracles that produce certain kinds (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Börje Ekstig (forthcoming). Complexity, Natural Selection and the Evolution of Life and Humans. Foundations of Science:1-13.
    In this paper, I discuss the concept of complexity. I show that the principle of natural selection as acting on complexity gives a solution to the problem of reconciling the seemingly contradictory notion of generally increasing complexity and the observation that most species don’t follow such a trend. I suggest the process of evolution to be illustrated by means of a schematic diagram of complexity versus time, interpreted as a form of the Tree of Life. The suggested model implies that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Miguel Ferrero & J. L. Sánchez-Gómez (forthcoming). Coming From Material Reality. Foundations of Science:1-14.
    In a previous essay we demonstrated that quantum mechanical formalism is incompatible with some necessary principles of the mechanism conception still dominant in the physicist’s community. In this paper we show, based on recent empirical evidence in quantum physics, the inevitability of abandoning the old mechanism conception and to construct a new one in which physical reality is seen as a representation which refers to relations established through operations made by us in a world that we are determining. This change (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. András Kertész (forthcoming). The Puzzle of Thought Experiments in Conceptual Metaphor Research. Foundations of Science:1-28.
    How can thought experiments lead to new empirical knowledge if they do not make use of empirical information? This puzzle has been widely discussed in the philosophy of science. It arises in conceptual metaphor research as well and is especially important for the clarification of its empirical foundations. The aim of the paper is to suggest a possible solution to the puzzle of thought experiments in conceptual metaphor research. The solution rests on the application of a novel metatheoretical framework that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Wojciech Krysztofiak (forthcoming). Hyper-Slingshot. Is Fact-Arithmetic Possible? Foundations of Science:1-18.
    The paper presents a new argument supporting the ontological standpoint according to which there are no mathematical facts in any set theoretic model (world) of arithmetical theories. It may be interpreted as showing that it is impossible to construct fact-arithmetic. The importance of this conclusion arises in the context of cognitive science. In the paper, a new type of slingshot argument is presented, which is called hyper-slingshot. The difference between meta-theoretical hyper-slingshots and conventional slingshots consists in the fact that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). Creationists Should Not Accept Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). Union of Euclid's Axiomatic Method with Newton's Empirical Scientific Method Leads to an Improved Electrodynamic Force. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). The Symmetry and Beauty of the Universe. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Charles W. Lucas Jr (forthcoming). A Physical Model for Atoms and Nuclei—Part 4. Foundations of Science.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Charles William Bill Lucas Jr & Joseph J. Smulsky (forthcoming). New Solar System Force, Decay of Gravity, and Expansion of the Solar System. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. B. A. Mamedov & M. Y. Esmer (forthcoming). On the Philosophical Nature of Einstein's Mass-Energy Equivalence Formula E=Mc^{2}. Foundations of Science:1-11.
    The historical development of the famous Einstein formula $E=mc^{2}$ is briefly discussed. In this paper, on the basis of the Einstein viewpoint a new general approach is proposed for demonstrating the correctness of the formula $E=mc^{2}$ . It is can be seen that the generalized approach leads to Einstein’s famous formula, too. During recent years, various papers have been published concerning the incompleteness of this famous formula. It is demonstrated that the presented claims in these articles are not mathematically legitimate. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Alan Montgomery (forthcoming). The God Particle. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. Nescolarde-Selva, J. L. Usó-Doménech & M. J. Sabán (forthcoming). Linguistic Knowledge of Reality: A Metaphysical Impossibility? Foundations of Science:1-32.
    Reality contains information (significant) that becomes significances in the mind of the observer. Language is the human instrument to understand reality. But is it possible to attain this reality? Is there an absolute reality, as certain philosophical schools tell us? The reality that we perceive, is it just a fragmented reality of which we are part? The work that the authors present is an attempt to address this question from an epistemological, linguistic and logical-mathematical point of view.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ilkka Niiniluoto (forthcoming). Representation and Truthlikeness. Foundations of Science:1-5.
    Woosuk Park’s paper “Misrepresentation in Context” is a useful plea for a theory of representation with promising interaction between cognitive science, philosophy of science, and aesthetics. In this paper, I argue that such a unified account is provided by Charles S. Peirce’s semiotics. This theory puts Park’s criticism of Nelson Goodman and Jerry Fodor in context. Some of Park’s pertinent remarks on the problem of misrepresentation can be illuminated by the account of truthlikeness and idealization developed by philosophers of science.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Henri Poincaré (forthcoming). Space and Geometry. Foundations of Science.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Greg Volk (forthcoming). 39 Questionable Assumptions in Modern Physics. Foundations of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Steven E. Wallis (forthcoming). Structures of Logic in Policy and Theory: Identifying Sub-Systemic Bricks for Investigating, Building, and Understanding Conceptual Systems. Foundations of Science:1-19.
    A rapidly growing body of scholarship shows that we can gain new insights into theories and policies by understanding and increasing their systemic structure. This paper will present an overview of this expanding field and discuss how concepts of structure are being applied in a variety of contexts to support collaboration, decision making, learning, prediction, and results. Next, it will delve into the underlying structures of logic that may be found within those theories and policies. Here, we will go beyond (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Friedel Weinert (forthcoming). Lines of Descent: Kuhn and Beyond. Foundations of Science:1-22.
    Thomas S. Kuhn is famous both for his work on the Copernican Revolution and his ‘paradigm’ view of scientific revolutions. But Kuhn later abandoned the notion of paradigm (and related notions) in favour of a more ‘evolutionary’ view of the history of science. Kuhn’s position therefore moved closer to ‘continuity’ models of scientific progress, for instance ‘chain-of-reasoning’ models, originally championed by D. Shapere. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the debate around Kuhn’s new ‘developmental’ view and to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation