Year:

Forthcoming articles
  1. David James Barnett (forthcoming). Is Memory Merely Testimony From One's Former Self? Philosophical Review 124 (3).
    A natural view of testimony holds that a source’s statements provide one with evidence about what the source believes, which in turn provides one with evidence about what is true. But some theorists have gone further, and developed a broadly analogous view of memory. According to this view, which I call the ‘diary model’, one’s memory ordinarily serves as a means for one’s present self to gain evidence about one’s past judgments, and in turn about the truth. I reject the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Bacon (forthcoming). Can The Classical Logician Avoid The Revenge Paradoxes? Philosophical Review.
    Most work on the semantic paradoxes within classical logic has centred around what I call `linguistic' accounts of the paradoxes: they attribute to sentences or utterances of sentences some property that is supposed to explain their paradoxical or non-paradoxical status. `No proposition' views are paradigm examples of linguistic theories, although practically all accounts of the paradoxes subscribe to some kind of linguistic theory. This paper shows that linguistic accounts of the paradoxes endorsing classical logic are subject to a particularly acute (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Tim Henning (forthcoming). From Choice to Chance? Saving People, Fairness, and Lotteries. Philosophical Review.
    Many authors in ethics, economics and political science endorse the Lottery Requirement, i.e. the following thesis: Where different parties have equal moral claims to one indivisible good, it is morally obligatory to let a fair lottery decide which party is to receive the good. This article defends skepticism about the Lottery Requirement. Three broad strategies of defending such a requirement are distinguished: the surrogate satisfaction account, the procedural account and the ideal consent account. It is argued that none of these (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ned Markosian (forthcoming). Are You Special? A Review of Caspar Hare's *On Myself, and Other, Less Important Subjects*. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (forthcoming). Review of Samuel Fleischacker, Divine Teaching and the Way of the World (Oxford University Press, 2011), Philosophical Review. Forthcoming. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kati Balog (forthcoming). New Conceivability Arguments or Revenge of the Zombies. Philosophical Review.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. Lippitt (forthcoming). Reading Cavell: Alice Crary and Sandford Shieh, Eds., Reading Cavell. New York: Routledge, 2006 [Book Review]. Philosophical Review.