Tip: Search results and category listings are restricted by the filters on the right hand side of the page. Not all entries are shown by default. (Okay, got it)

1. Samantha Brennan, Families, Efficiency, Gender, and Justice.
   I'm going to focus my comments on a relatively small part of Joe Heath's book, the section on the household division of labour. Although it's a small piece of a much larger picture, I've chosen this area for two reasons: First, it connects with my own interests in issues of family justice. Second, I think for me it highlights a potentially larger problem concerning the relationship between justice and efficiency. When Heath puts the contrast between those who place rights before (...) efficiency in terms of a contrast between the US and Canadian health care systems, I find that I'm in agreement with the argument for efficiency. But when I think about the contrast in terms of the question of the gendered division of domestic labour, I'm less certain that I want to accord efficiency the kind of status it has according to Heath. (I must confess that I've always thought of Canada as the just society, rather than the efficient society. If it turns out.. (shrink)

   Justice in Social and Political Philosophy

   Philosophy of Gender in Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | Share & More ...
2. Samantha Brennan (2009). Feminist Ethics and Everyday Inequalities. Hypatia 24 (141):159.
   How should feminist philosophers regard the inequalities that structure the lives of women? Some of these inequalities are trivial and others are not; together they form a framework of unequal treatment that shapes women’s lives. This paper asks what priority we should give inequalities that affect women; it critically analyzes Claudia Card’s view that feminists ought to give evils priority. Sometimes ending gender-based inequalities is the best route to eliminating gender-based evil.

   Feminist Ethics in Normative Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
3. Samantha Brennan (2009). Moderate Deontology and Moral Gaps. Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):23-43.
   No categories

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
4. Samantha Brennan (2006). Moral Lumps. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (3).
   Can all goods or bads be broken down into smaller and smaller pieces? Can all goods or bads be added together with some other good or bad to get a larger amount? Further, how does moral significance track the disaggregation and the aggregation of moral goods and bads? In Part 1, I examine the limits placed on aggregation by moderate deontological moral theories. This paper focuses in particular on the work of Judith Thomson and T.M. Scanlon as well as (...) on some of my own past work on the question of aggregation in the context of overriding rights. In Part 2, I examine consequentialist criticism that harms and benefits can be broken down into smaller pieces than the deontological theory allows and the argument that the moderate deontological view is too permissive since it allows aggregation of benefits within a single person's life. In Part 3 I suggest how a moderate deontological moral theory might respond to the criticisms. I cast my answer in terms of the existence of lumpy goods and bads. I argue that consequentialist critics of deontology are wrong to insist that all goods and bads can be disaggregated and aggregated at will. Instead, I offer the suggestion that most, or many, goods and bads come in morally significant lumps. That said, it will not always be obvious what those lumps are. Determining the texture of moral value is a substantive project in normative ethics. All I have hoped to do in this paper is suggest that two standard positions on how to group moral value are mistaken and give hope that we need not adopt one of the two. Part 4 of the paper responds to an objection and sets the stage for further work in value theory. (shrink)

   Value Theory

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
5. Samantha Brennan & Todd Calder (2003). Report on the 18th International Social Philosophy Conference. Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (1).
   Value Theory

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
6. Samantha Brennan (1999). Reconciling Feminist Politics and Feminist Ethics on the Issue of Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275.
   Should feminist ethical theories include rights as a component? There is a tension between feminist politics and the endorsement of the language of “women’s rights,” and feminist ethics and its critique of rights.1 In this paper I begin the project of reconciling moral theories that include rights as a component with feminist criticisms of rights. There are two parts to this project. First, I must respond to the criticisms feminists have made against rights theories in order to show that it (...) is possible for a moral theory that includes rights to be a feminist moral theory. Answering these criticisms is necessary if I am to establish that moral theories that include rights are among the candidate theories from which feminists might choose. Second, I must develop a feminist moral theory that encompasses rights, and argue for its superiority to other sorts of moral theories in order to show that a moral theory that encompasses rights is a plausible feminist moral theory. Going beyond responding to criticisms and developing a positive feminist rights theory is necessary if feminists are to find rights theories to be attractive candidate moral theories.2 In this paper I am concerned mostly with the first part of the project, responding to some feminist arguments against theorizing about morality in terms of rights, although in the course of responding to the objections I make remarks that might suggest ways in which some rights theories might be developed as feminist moral theories. (shrink)

   Feminist Ethics in Normative Ethics

   Rights in Social and Political Philosophy

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: blackwell-synergy.com   | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...
7. Samantha Brennan (1999). Recent Work in Feminist Ethics. Ethics 109 (4).
   Feminist Ethics in Normative Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | Share & More ...