Alcubierre Space-Time Bubbles

How about the Alcubierre Space-Time bubble? Here we find ourselves riding a ‘shock wave’ of space-time. My research into absolute rest suggests that the interior of Alcubierre’s bubble is not immune to the effects of quantum-entropy if the quantum field geometrics theory I’ve proposed is correct. The universe, being a history of interactions, can be theoretically mapped as a series of relativistic Feynman exchanges, so if his bubble moves through space, it interacts via field geometrics. Conversely, if his bubble is stationary, it has to be asked, “Can you speed up entropy by finding absolute rest?” It poses a possible solution to the Moses on Mount Sinai/accelerated aging that was alleged to occur. *    NOTE:  “The radiant face of Moses”…  Admittedly, I’ve found no reference to this ‘advanced aging’ in the bible so it seems to be more of a Hollywood addition in the Charlton Heston classic, ‘The Ten Commandments’. Closest biblical reference is Exodus 34:29-30. 29“It came about when Moses was coming down from Mount Sinai (and the two tablets of the testimony were in Moses' hand as he was coming down from the mountain), that Moses did not know that the skin of his face shone because of his speaking with Him.  30 So when Aaron and all the sons of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone, and they were afraid to come near him.…”

Even so, the stationary bubble might work in a different way. A dualistic concept that utilizes diffeomorphistic approaches to background independency normally found in quantum gravity theories can be applied to Alcubierre’s bubble. Remember, in QGD, gravity is a form of acceleration because any and all motion through the vacuum must consist of interaction with the vacuum. In this way, absolute space finds itself foundationally rooted in relativity. Einstein’s great invention survives the greatest challenges to it but finds itself to be the ever evolving doctrine in universality. 

Globalization on planet Earth has led to the use of shipping lanes at sea, traveling lanes in air, and orbiting lanes in outer space. The Alcubierre theory would need to harness space-traveling lanes as well that essentially become a conveyor belt. But instead of the bubble moving down the conveyor system, the bubble needs to remain stationary and the intended destination would come toward it. The analogy of a surfer in the Pacific Ocean is that she travels through the water but what if she just stands on a stationary surfboard and the ocean is what moves past her? In laymen’s terms, it moves not you but brings space to you. A reworking in simultaneity of relativity concepts, nonetheless, but we could say this is a form of stationary quantum teleportation that brings the universe to you and not the other way around. This of course is a radical re-interpretation of Alcubierre’s theory, but truth in nature requires that if a theory must be saved it then it should be saved.

A quick critique of the Alcubierre theory requires asking the super luminal question. If the bubble works by contracting the space ‘units’ in front of the bubble and expanding them behind it, the so-called rest frame mechanics within the bubble must still only interact within the framework of special relativity. The near luminal uniform acceleration “flat rest frame” can be described as solutions to the Rindler coordinates, however they are converted in the front section of the bubble into a Cauchy horizon.

A Cauchy horizon is a light like interval, or “null” line described through graphing light cones. For the purposes of this discussion, matter moving at near SoL can be graphed by the same method. Though different laws of physics apply to this subsystem, it is negligible in the context of graphing. Visualizing how this works in the forward direction, the bubble space’s flat Minkowski space interior in the front of the ship runs into the contracted space units in the front of the ship. One side of the horizon contains closed space-like geodesics and the other side contains closed time-like geodesics. In the back of the bubble, the same thing is happening but in reverse. The expanded space ‘units’ behind the bubble become the flat space within it. All these simultaneous transformations describe quantum field geometrics. It all sounds fine and dandy, but we run into a problem here. Alcubierre’s bubble is not dynamical as the description I just afforded. It is static and fits the description of a Reissner–Nordström metric. That is, the interior is singular so Alcubierre’s bubble is the internal horizon of a Reissner–Nordström black hole. 

Quantum Field Geometrics requires the utilization of planckian dynamics to correctly describe quantum relativity. The theory describes the event surface of a black hole’s horizon to be static as far as interaction parameters are concerned within the interior and exterior regions of space are concerned. Matter can cross over the threshold but the spaces themselves do not interact. This at first glance seems a little contrived but the whole quantum theory has that feel. The point is, the theory is grounded on solid observation, and mathematics. We see frame dragging caused by black holes but that happens relatively further away from them but the area near the horizon is the calm before the storm. Alcubierre’s space bubble is a black hole rocket and a separately derived region of space-time. Even a conveyor like system that brings the destination to it can only become a part of its singular collapse. The fact is, our universe fits a white hole Kerr solution and not a black hole solution. This is another example of the appearance of design in the laws of physics. A failsafe that prevents a runaway universe from hyper-singular collapse or expansion.