| 2010-04-19 |
Phil. of Lang. vs. Phil of Mind
|
|
There's been some interest in whether the phil. of lang has been replaced the phil. of mind as the center of philosophical discussion. Searle and Williamson I believe both think that the phil. of mind is in the driver's seat. I believe that the phil. of lang. is still important due the Putnam's and Kripke's work.
Permanent link: http://philpapers.org/post/3608
Reply
|
|
 |
|
|
Hosted by The Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Study, University of London |
Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by David Bourget and David Chalmers
Page generated Fri May 24 21:32:45 2013 - Hash code: TWueYRh28b+p70hq33jP7g
