Philosophy of Computing and Information


Search forums
Subscribe to this forum      feed for this page

 1 - 6 / 6 
Your article is very interesting.

In the same spirit I propose a more modal formalism to speak about "true announcements" and "learning" :

This representation allow to make the difference between a world before and after the learning act. Then it becomes easier to deal with expression about knowledge and learning.


Does anyone think that the subcategories for this category need to be refined? It seems that many entries can be shoved into Concepts of Information, though I am not sure if this is optimal.

For example, there are many articles focusing on Logic and Information. Should these be lumped together with general articles concerning conceptions of information? Or is it possible to have a cross-reference to another section under the logic category.

Another example: there are many articles concerning Information and Epistemology. Should there be a subcategory for this? There is another related section for this, namely:

Philosophy of Mind > Intentionality > Naturalizing Mental Content > Information-Based Accounts of Mental Content.

- Simon
Latest replies: Permanent link: Reply

The Philosophical Registry is a very interesting project on its own, independantly of any use other than observing and participating in the systemic life of a philosophical community. However, it could lead to various uses and raise ethical questions : suppose that in few years it has grown enough to serve as a basis for the implementation of a philosophical version of the Turing Test, then, even a vote would not suffice to dissipate the ethical issue if it had not been addressed in the beggining.

There may be also issues related to preliminary theories on the nature of philosophy - specially in the last paragraph of the article - that could make this initial forumulation unsuited for an independant method of assessment. What if the new Lao Tzu gets the poorest evaluation?

This exciting project diserves that its ethical aspects receive thorough attention and prospective.



A link to an article going in the same direction:
This guy apparently has some theories about socio-technical systems and on academic publishing as a special case of such a system - see for example:

Just browsing First Monday for the link I've also encountered

Latest replies: Permanent link: Reply

Hello.  I would like to know what people think of this paper.  It is primarily a defense of computationalism against Bishop's use of the Fading Qualia argument to back his claim that "Counterfactuals Cannot Count".  It also constitutes an attack on the Fading Qualia argument in general, and can be taken to support an elimitivist view about qualia.

This short paper grew out of an email exchange which was really about mathematical platonism, in which I argued against the claim that partial brains (which can tend towards nonexistent brains) would have to have the same consciousness as a full brain.  I wrote it up as an entry for the Consciousness Online web conference, but it was not chosen.

I would also appreciate any suggestions regarding whether and where to submit it for publication. Thanks.
Latest replies: Permanent link: Reply

 1 - 6 / 6