This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
25 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
Material to categorize
  1. H. G. Callaway (1994). Review of Hans Joas, Pragmatismus Und Gesellschaftstheorie. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society (1):203-212.
    This is my critical review of Hans Joas' book on Pragmatism and social theory which concerns, in part the early 20th-century German reception of American philosophy and the relationship of this to contemporary German thought.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Phillip Deen (2010). Dialectical Vs. Experimental Method: Marcuse's Review of Dewey's Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (2):242-257.
    Hans Joas has called the German reception of pragmatism “a history of misunderstandings.” This is certainly true of the Frankfurt School’s reception of John Dewey’s work. Even as early as Lukács’ History and Class Consciousness, which exercised such an influence on the western Marxism of the Frankfurt School, pragmatism is taken as a willful abandonment of reason’s highest purpose. Pragmatism is equated with relativism and is only able to conceive of freedom within the gaps of a reified society (1971: 194– (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carl-Göran Heidegren (2002). Anthropology, Social Theory, and Politics: Axel Honneth's Theory of Recognition. Inquiry 45 (4):433 – 446.
    This article presents and discusses Axel Honneth's theory of recognition as a specific constellation, i.e. as a theoretical endeavour spanning over and interrelating positions in the fields of anthropology, social theory, and politics. As essential components in this constellation I discern an anthropology of recognition, a social philosophy of different forms of recognition, a morality of recognition, a theory of democratic ethical life as a social ideal, and a notion of political democracy as an ambitious reflexive form of social cooperation. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Renato Pettoello & Nadia Moro (2014). Dizionarietto di tedesco per filosofi. La Scuola.
    German-Italian Dictionary of Philosophical Terms.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Barry Smith (1997). Realistic Phenomenology. In Lester Embree (ed.), Encyclopedia of Phenomenology. Kluwer.
    The tradition of realist phenomenology was founded in around 1902 by a group of students in Munich interested in the newly published Logical Investigations of Edmund Husserl. Initial members of the group included Johannes Daubert, Alexander Pfänder, Adolf Reinach and Max Scheler. With Reinach’s move to Göttingen the group acquired two new prominent members – Edith Stein and Roman Ingarden. The group’s method turned on Husserl’s idea that we are in possession a priori (which is to say: non-inductive) knowledge of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
20th Century German Philosophy, Misc
  1. Richard Bodéüs (1984). The Problem of Freedom According to Nicolai Hartmann. International Philosophical Quarterly 24 (1):55-60.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nicolai Hartmann (1953/1975). New Ways of Ontology. Regnery.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dale Jacquette (2011). Hartmann's Philosophy of Mathematics. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. 269.
  4. Eugene Kelly (2011). Hartmann on the Unity of Moral Value. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. 177--93.
  5. Eugene Kelly (2011). Material Ethics of Value: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann. Springer.
    This volume demonstrates that their contributions to a material ethics of value are complementary: by supplementing the work of one with that of the other, we obtain a comprehensive and defensible axiological and moral theory.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Eugene Kelly (2008). Material Value-Ethics: Max Scheler and Nicolai Hartmann. Philosophy Compass 3 (1):1-16.
  7. Eugene Kelly (1997). Revisiting Max Scheler's Formalism in Ethics: Virtue-Based Ethics and Moral Rules in the Non-Formal Ethics of Value. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (3):381-397.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ian James Kidd (2013). Oswald Spengler. In Gregory Claey (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Modern Political Thought. CQ Press.
    I provide an account of the political and philosophical thought of Oswald Spengler.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Helmut Kuhn (1951). Nicolai Hartmann's Ontology. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (4):289-318.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thomas Mormann (2010). Zwischen Weisheit Und Wissenschaft - Schlicks Weites Philosophisches Spektrum. Grazer Philosophische Studien 80:263 - 285.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Thomas Mormann (2005). Mathematical Metaphors in Natorp’s Neo-Kantian Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. In Falk Seeger, Johannes Lenard & Michael H. G. Hoffmann (eds.), Activity and Sign. Grounding Mathematical Education. Springer.
    A basic thesis of Neokantian epistemology and philosophy of science contends that the knowing subject and the object to be known are only abstractions. What really exists, is the relation between both. For the elucidation of this “knowledge relation ("Erkenntnisrelation") the Neokantians of the Marburg school used a variety of mathematical metaphors. In this con-tribution I reconsider some of these metaphors proposed by Paul Natorp, who was one of the leading members of the Marburg school. It is shown that Natorp's (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. H. D. Oakeley (1935). Professor Nicolai Hartmann's Concept of Objective Spirit. Mind 44 (173):39-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Lydia Patton (2010). Review: Makkreel and Luft (Eds), Neo-Kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 30 (4):280-282.
    A volume dealing seriously with the influence of the major schools of Neo-Kantian thought on contemporary philosophy has been needed sorely for some time. But this volume of essays aims higher: it 'is published in the hopes that it will secure Neo-Kantianism a significant place in contemporary philosophical discussions' (Introduction, 1). The aim of the book, then, is partly to provide a history of major Neo-Kantian thinkers and their influence, and partly to argue for their importance in contemporary (continental) philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Keith R. Peterson (2012). An Introduction to Nicolai Hartmann's Critical Ontology. Axiomathes 22 (3):291–314.
    Nicolai Hartmann contributed significantly to the revitalization of the discipline of ontology in the early twentieth century. Developing a systematic, post-Kantian critical ontology ‘this side’ of idealism and realism, he subverted the widespread impression that philosophy must either exhaust itself in foundationalist epistemology or engage in system-building metaphysical excess. This essay provides an introduction to Hartmann’s approach in light of the recent translation of his early essay ‘How is Critical Ontology Possible?’ ( 1923 ) In it Hartmann criticizes both the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Roberto Poli (2011). Hartmann's Theory of Categories. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.) (2011). The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter.
    Nicolai Hartmann was one of the most prolific and original, yet sober, clear and rigorous, 20th century German philosophers. Hartmann was brought up as a Neo-Kantian, but soon turned his back on Kantianism to become one of the most important proponents of ontological realism. He developed what he calls the “new ontology”, on which relies a systematic opus dealing with all the main areas of philosophy. His work had major influences both in philosophy and in various scientific disciplines. The contributions (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nicholas Rescher (2011). Aporetics in Nicolai Hartmann and Beyond. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. 53.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Frederic Tremblay (2013). Nicolai Hartmann and the Metaphysical Foundation of Phylogenetic Systematics. Biological Theory 7 (1):56-68.
    When developing phylogenetic systematics, the entomologist Willi Hennig adopted elements from Nicolai Hartmann’s ontology. In this historical essay I take on the task of documenting this adoption. I argue that in order to build a metaphysical foundation for phylogenetic systematics, Hennig adopted from Hartmann four main metaphysical theses. These are (1) that what is real is what is temporal; (2) that the criterion of individuality is to have duration; (3) that species are supra-individuals; and (4) that there are levels of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Frederic Tremblay, Roberto Poli & Carlo Scognamiglio (2011). Foreword. In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. 157-158.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gerd Wolandt (1970). On the Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. The Problem of Categorial Strata and Real Determination. Philosophy and History 3 (1):20-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation