Online research in philosophy

This bibliography focus on the moral/ethical conception of corporate responsibility (including but not limited to corporate social responsibility and corporate environmental responsibility).

1. Yves Fassin (2009). Inconsistencies in Activists' Behaviours and the Ethics of Ngos. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):503 - 521.
   Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and pressure groups have taken up the mission of counterbalancing the huge power of the multinational corporations. Curiously, while most NGOs have a sincere ethical background and a genuine ethical motivation, the way some activist groups and NGOs themselves act does not always live up to the principles they advocate. Research using a multiple case study methodology is used to provide an illustration of various questionable practices followed by pressure groups revealing a range of tactics. The concerns, (...) the objectives and the legitimacy of NGOs and activist groups will be discussed, along with their strategies and tactics. A framework will be developed as a basis for analysing the ethical aspects of the various NGO actions. The analysis of the cases will reveal some worrisome inconsistencies between the demands and the practices of NGOs and activist groups. Should not the means employed by activists and NGOs be consistent with their own espoused or implied values? As power gives responsibility, NGOs should be seen as having corporate stakeholder responsibility. (shrink)

   Business Ethics in Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
2. Stephen M. Gardiner (2004). Ethics and Global Climate Change. Ethics 114 (3):555-600.
   Climate Change in Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: journals.uchicago.edu dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
3. Paul G. Harris (2003). Fairness, Responsibility, and Climate Change. Ethics and International Affairs 17 (1):149–156.
   Climate Change in Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: interscience.wiley.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
4. Jan Inglis (2008). Evolving to Address Global Climate Change and the Scale of Public Interactions. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):498 – 502.
   Global climate change is complex to address. It will require people to interact publicly as well as set policy, as a crucial part of addressing it. To date, skills for effective public interaction—where such interactions even exist—do not measure up to the demands of such global complexity. Hierarchical complexity is used to analyze common forms of public talk and interaction. Its premises are applied to approaches to conduct public discourse, including postformal approaches. The Scale of Public Interactions is introduced and (...) indicates that Metasystematic stage approaches to climate change hold the most potential for addressing it. (shrink)

   Climate Change in Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
5. Karsten Klint Jensen (2007). Corporate Responsibility: The Stakeholder Paradox Reconsidered. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (6).
   Is it legitimate for a business to concentrate on profits under respect for the law and ethical custom? On the one hand, there seems to be good reasons for claiming that a corporation has a duty to act for the benefit of all its stakeholders. On the other hand, this seems to dissolve the notion of a private business; but then again, a private business would appear to be exempted from ethical responsibility. This is what Kenneth Goodpaster has called the (...) stakeholder paradox: either we have ethics without business or we have business without ethics. Through a different route, I reach the same solution to this paradox as Goodpaster, namely that a corporation is the instrument of the shareholders only, but that shareholders still have an obligation to act ethically responsibly. To this, I add discussion of Friedman’s claim that this responsibility consists in increasing profits. I show that most of his arguments fail. Only pragmatic considerations allow to a certain extent that some of the ethical responsibility is left over to democratic regulation. (shrink)

   Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
6. John R. Sparks & Yue Pan (2010). Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (3):405 - 418.
   Decades of empirical and theoretical research has produced an extensive literature on the ethical judgments construct. Given its importance to understanding people’s ethical choices, future research should explore the psychological processes that produce ethical judgments. In this paper, the authors discuss two steps needed to advance this effort. First, they note that the business ethics literature lacks a single, generally accepted definition of ethical judgments. After reviewing several extant definitions, the authors offer a definition of the construct and discuss its (...) advantages. Second, future ethical judgment research would benefit from greater integration between theories of ethical decision making and theories of social cognition. Drawing upon the Hunt–Vitell ( Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring), 5–15, 1986 ; In: N. C. Smith and J. A. Quelch (eds.), Ethics in Marketing . Irwin, Homewood, IL, pp. 775–784, 1992 ) model and the heuristic-systematic model (Chaiken, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (November), 752–766, 1980 ), the authors present a brief research agenda intended to stimulate research on the psychological processes behind ethical judgments. (shrink)

   Business Ethics in Applied Ethics

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: jstor.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...
7. Marcus Willaschek (2009). Right and Coercion: Can Kant's Conception of Right Be Derived From His Moral Theory? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):49 – 70.
   Recently, there has been some discussion about the relationship between Kant's conception of right (the sphere of juridical rights and duties) and his moral theory (with the Categorical Imperative as its fundamental norm). In section 1, I briefly survey some recent contributions to this debate and distinguish between two different questions. First, does Kant's moral theory (as developed in the Groundwork and the Critique of Practical Reason ) imply , or validate, a Kantian conception of right (as developed in the (...) first part of the Metaphysics of Morals , the Doctrine of Right)? In other words, is the Categorical Imperative sufficient to show that the fundamental principles of right are normatively valid? Second, does Kant's conception of right presuppose his moral theory? In other words, is the Categorical Imperative necessary to show that the basic principles of right are normatively valid? In this paper, I will be primarily concerned with defending a negative answer to the first of these questions. In section 2, I will discuss Paul Guyer's attempt to vindicate a positive answer to the same question. In section 3, reasons will be given why any attempt to derive Kant's conception of right from the Categorical Imperative must fail because of the analytic connection between right and coercion. (shrink)

   Kant's Works in Practical Philosophy, Misc in 17th/18th Century Philosophy

   Reading list   |  Discuss  |  Edit  |  Categorize  |  

    

   My bibliography  |

    

   Export citation  | Other links: informaworld.com dx.doi.org   | Scholar | At my library | More options ...