Bookmark and Share

Academic Skeptics

Edited by Diego E. Machuca (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas)
Related categories
Siblings:
75 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Francesca Alesse (2007). Academici E Platonici. Il Dibattito Antico Sullo Scetticismo di Platone, by Mauro Bonazzi. Ancient Philosophy 27 (2):425-429.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. D. J. Allan (1951). Philosophical Surveys I: A Survey of Work Dealing with Greek Philosophy From Thales to the Age of Cicero, 1945-1949, Part II. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 1 (2):165-170.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. D. J. Allan (1950). Philosophical Surveys, I: A Survey of Work Dealing with Greek Philosophy From Thales to the Age of Cicero, 1945-49. Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1):61-72.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James Allen, Antiochus of Ascalon. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James Allen, Carneades. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. Annas (1996). R.J. Hankinson: The Sceptics, (The Arguments of the Philosophers). London, New York: Routledge, 1995. The Classical Review 46 (1):75-76.
  7. Julia Annas (1988). The Heirs of Socrates. Phronesis 33 (1):100-112.
  8. Julia Annas & Jacques Brunschwig (1990). Platon le Sceptique. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 95 (2):267 - 291.
    The article discusses the sceptical New Academy's interpretation of Plato as a sceptic. The first part discusses Arcesilaus' reintroduction of Socratic method, and the reading of the Socratic dialogues and the Theaetetus implied by this. The second part discusses arguments probably used by the later, more moderate Academy for a reading of Plato's more dogmatic dialogues in a way consistent with scepticism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. E. Vernon Arnold (1914). Stoics and Sceptics Stoics and Sceptics: Four Lectures Delivered in Oxford During Hilary Term, 1913, for the Common University Fund. By Edwyn Bevan, Sometime Scholar of the New College, Oxford. . Pp. 152. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1913. 4s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 28 (02):62-63.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jonathan Barnes (2001). Against the Sceptics A. Haltenhoff: Kritik der Akademischen Skepsis. Ein Kommentar Zu Cicero , Lucullus 1–62 . (Studien Zur Klassischen Philologie 113.) Pp. 226. Berlin, Etc.: Peter Lang, 1998. Paper, DM 29. ISBN: 3-631-33440-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (01):46-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jonathan Barnes (1991). Leo Groarke: Greek Scepticism: Anti-Realist Trends in Ancient Thought. (McGill-Queen's Studies in the History of Ideas.) Pp. Xv + 176. Montreal & Kingston, London and Buffalo: McGill–Queen's University Press, 1990. £33.20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):500-501.
  12. Jonathan Barnes (1989). Antiochus of Ascalon. In Miriam T. Griffin & Jonathan Barnes (eds.), Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jonathan Barnes (1986). The Fourth Academy Harold Tarrant: Scepticism or Platonism? The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. (Cambridge Classical Studies.) Pp. Ix+182. Cambridge University Press, 1985. £19.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):75-77.
  14. Sylvia Berryman (1999). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. Philosophical Review 108 (3):447-449.
  15. Richard Bett (2010). Scepticism and Ethics. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Richard Bett (1993). Greek Scepticism. Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):243-252.
  17. Richard Bett (1990). Carneades' Distinction Between Assent and Approval. The Monist 73 (1):3-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. E. R. Bevan (1931). The Greek Sceptics. By Mary Mills Patrick, Ph.D., LL.D., Litt.D. Pp. Xxi + 339. New York: Columbia University Press, 1929. Cloth, $4.50, or 22s. 6d. (London: Milford). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):45-46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Charles Brittain, Arcesilaus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Charles Brittain, Philo of Larissa. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Charles Brittain (2001). Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Sceptics. OUP Oxford.
    This is the first book-length study of Philo of Larissa. Philo (159-84 BC) was the leader of the Platonic Academy in its final period as an Athenian institution, and also the principal philosophical teacher of Cicero. Dr Brittain charts Philo's gradual rejection of the radical scepticism of Carneades (concluding with his notorious 'Roman Books' of 89 BC), and offers philosophical justifications for his initial position of modified scepticism and final advocacy of a fallibilist empiricism. Philo's controversial epistemological views are constructed (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Charles Brittain & John Palmer (2001). The New Academy's Appeals to the Presocratics. Phronesis 46 (1):38-72.
    Members of the New Academy presented their sceptical position as the culmination of a progressive development in the history of philosophy, which began when certain Presocratics started to reflect on the epistemic status of their theoretical claims concerning the natures of things. The Academics' dogmatic opponents accused them of misrepresenting the early philosophers in an illegitimate attempt to claim respectable precedents for their dangerous position. The ensuing debate over the extent to which some form of scepticism might properly be attributed (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael J. Buckley (1970). Philosophic Method in Cicero. Journal of the History of Philosophy 8 (2):143-154.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Lewis Campbell (1888). Les Sceptiques Grees Les Sceptiques Grees, Beochaed Par Victor. Paris, F. Alcan. 1887. 8 Frs. The Classical Review 2 (04):111-113.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Cicero, Academica.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Cicero (1997). The Nature of the Gods. Clarendon Press.
    Cicero's philosophical works are now exciting renewed interest and more generous appreciation, in part because he provides vital evidence of the views of the (largely lost) Greek philosophers of the Hellenistic age, and partly because of the light he casts on the intellectual life of first-century Rome. Hellenistic philosophy has in recent years atrracted growing interest from academic philosophers in Europe and North America. The Nature of the Gods is a document of central significance in this area, for it presents (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. M. L. Clarke (1960). Cicero's De Natura Deorum. The Classical Review 10 (02):130-.
  28. John M. Cooper (2006). Arcesilaus: Socratic and Sceptic. In Lindsay Judson & V. Karasmanēs (eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
  29. J. I. Daniel (1999). Hellenistic Philosophy R. W. Sharples: Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy . Pp. Xiv + 154. London and New York: Routledge, 1996. Cased, £30 (Paper, £10.99). ISBN: 0-415-11034-3 (0-415-11035-1 Pbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):127-.
  30. Joseph G. DeFilippo (2000). Cicero Vs. Cotta in De Natura Deorum. Ancient Philosophy 20 (1):169-187.
  31. John Dillon (1981). Antiochus and the Late Academy John Glucker: Antiochus and the Late Academy. (Hypomnemata, 56.) Pp. 510. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 31 (01):60-62.
  32. Lloyd P. Gerson (2009). Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
    Ancient and modern perspectives -- The origin of epistemology -- Plato -- Republic -- Theaetetus -- Knowledge versus belief -- Aristotle -- Posterior analytics -- De anima -- Epicureanism and stoicism -- Epicurean epistemology -- Stoic epistemology -- Skepticism -- Pyrrho and the beginning of skepticism -- Academic skepticism -- The pyrrhonist revival -- Plotinus and the neoplatonic synthesis -- The platonist's response to the pyrrhonist -- Knowledge and consciousness -- Imagination -- Varieties of naturalism -- Naturalism redivivus -- Epistemology (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Glucker (1978). Antiochus and the Late Academy. Vandenhoeck Und Ruprecht.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Estelle Haan (1995). Carlos Lévy (Ed.): Cicero Academicus. Recherches Sur les Académiques Et Sur la Philosophie Cicéronienne. (Collection de ľÉcole Française de Rome, 162.) Pp. X+697. École Françhise de Rome, 1992. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):168-.
  35. David E. Hahm (1999). Plato, Carneades, and Cicero's Philus (Cicero, Rep. 3.8–31). The Classical Quarterly 49 (01):167-183.
  36. R. J. Hankinson (1995/1999). The Sceptics. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection. This title available in eBook format. Click here for more information . Visit our eBookstore at: www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Anna Maria Ioppolo (1993). The Academic Position of Favorinus of Arelate. Phronesis 38 (2):183-213.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. David Johnson (2008). What Does Academic Skepticism Presuppose? Lyceum 10 (1):44-54.
  39. G. B. Kerferd (1972). Bohdan Wiśniewski: Karneades, Fragmente, Text Und Kommentar. (Archiwum Filologiczne, Xxiv.) Pp. 130. Wroclaw: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, 1970. Paper, Zł.30. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (03):410-411.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Konstan (1992). Opinione E Scienza: II Dibattito Tra Stoici E Accademici Nel III E Nel II Secolo A.C. Ancient Philosophy 12 (1):219-222.
  41. Carlos Lévy (1990). Platon, Arcésilas, Carnéade Réponse à J. Annas. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 95 (2):293 - 306.
    Cet article propose une interprétation de la philosophie de la Nouvelle Académie différente de celle qui a été défendue par J. Annas. Il nous semble que la prise en compte de l'ensemble des témoignages concernant cette école suggère une réalité plus complexe que celle que recouvre le concept de scepticisme, au moins dans sa version néopyrrhonienne. Nous croyons qu'Arcésilas et Carnéade n'ont pas délimité un Platon sceptique, mais qu'ils ont accepté à leur manière l'ensemble de l'héritage platonicien. La force de (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. A. A. Long (2003). Philo the Academic C. Brittain: Philo of Larissa. The Last of the Academic Sceptics . Pp. XII + 406. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001. Cased, £40. Isbn: 0-19-815298-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (02):314-.
  43. A. A. Long (1967). Carneades and the Stoic Telos1. Phronesis 12 (1):59-90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Diego E. Machuca (2011). Ancient Skepticism: The Skeptical Academy. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):259-266.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Diego E. Machuca (2011). Review of R. Bett (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism (CUP, 2010). [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):573 - 579.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 3, Page 573-579, May 2011.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Diego E. Machuca (2011). Ancient Skepticism: Overview. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):234-245.
  47. Diego E. Machuca (2010). Review of A. M. Ioppolo, La Testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull'Accademia Scettica. [REVIEW] Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2010.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Diego E. Machuca (2009). Review of C. Lévy, Les Scepticismes. [REVIEW] Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.
  49. Diego E. Machuca (2009). Review of H. Thorsrud, Ancient Scepticism. [REVIEW] Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.
  50. Diego E. Machuca (2008). Review of A.M. Ioppolo and D. Sedley (Eds.), Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155-86 BC. [REVIEW] Bryn Mawr Classcial Review.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Diego E. Machuca (2006). Review of Charles Brittain, Cicero: On Academic Scepticism. [REVIEW] Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2006.
    Particularly during the past twenty five years, there has been an outstanding advance in the study of ancient skepticism, both in its Pyrrhonian and Academic varieties. This is reflected in the publication of a considerable number of works about the nature and consistency of those philosophical outlooks, as well as about their influence on the development of early modern philosophy and their relevance to present day epistemological discussions. Most of these works concern Pyrrhonian skepticism. This predominance of interest in Pyrrhonism (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Paul MacKendrick (1994). Cicero on Stoic Good and Evil: De Finibus 3 and Paradoxa a Stoicorum. Ancient Philosophy 14 (2):463-465.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Paul Lachlan MacKendrick (1989). The Philosophical Books of Cicero. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Ethan Mills (2011). Ancient Scepticism. Ancient Philosophy 31 (2):446-450.
  55. Suzanne Obdrzalek (2012). From Skepticism to Paralysis. Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):369-392.
  56. Casey Perin (2010). Scepticism and Belief. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
  57. Casey Perin (2006). Review of Cicero, Charles Brittain (Trans.), Cicero, on Academic Scepticism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (10).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. J. G. F. Powell (ed.) (1995). Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. Clarendon Press.
    Cicero may be best known as a politician, but he was also one of the few significant Roman writers of philosophy. Powell presents a new and exciting selection of current scholarly work on this neglected side of him, establishing Cicero firmly as a serious philosophical writer of continuing importance and relevance.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Robert J. Rabel (1998). Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics. Ancient Philosophy 18 (1):199-201.
  60. Malcolm Schofield (2006). (R.) Polito The Sceptical Road. Aenesidemus' Appropriation of Heraclitus. (Philosophia Antiqua 96). Leiden: Brill, 2004. Pp, Ix + 202. €95. 9004137424. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 126:215-216.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. David Sedley (1981). The End of the A Cademy. Phronesis 26 (1):67-75.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Gisela Striker (1981). Über den Unterschied Zwischen den Pyrrhoneern Und den Akademikern. Phronesis 26 (2):153-171.
  63. Gisela Striker (1981). Über den Unterschied Zwischen den Pyrrhoneern Und den Akademikern. Phronesis 26 (2):153-171.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Harold Tarrant (1985). Scepticism or Platonism?: The Philosophy of the Fourth Academy. Cambridge University Press.
    In the first half of the first century BC the Academy of Athens broke up in disarray. From the wreckage of the semi-sceptical school there arose the new dogmatic philosophy of Antiochus, synthesised from Stoicism and Platonism, and the hardline Pyrrhonist scepticism of Aenesidemus. With his extensive knowledge of the ways in which Plato was read and invoked as an authority in late antiquity Dr Tarrant builds a most impressive reconstruction of Philo of Larissa's brand of Platonism and of its (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Harald Thorsrud (2010). Arcesilaus and Carneades. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Harald Thorsrud (2009). Ancient Scepticism. University of California Press.
    Introduction -- Pyrrho and Timon: the origin of Pyrrhonian scepticism -- Arcesilaus: the origin of academic scepticism -- Carneades -- Cicero: the end of the sceptical academy -- Aenesidemus: the Pyrrhonian revival -- Sextus empiricus: the consistency of Pyrrhonian -- Scepticism -- Pyrrhonian arguments -- The (ordinary) life of a Pyrrhonist.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Harald Thorsrud, Cicero’s Academic Skepticism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Harald Thorsrud (2002). Cicero on His Academic Predecessors: The Fallibilism of Arcesilaus and Carneades. Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (1):1-18.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Harold Thorsrud, Ancient Greek Skepticism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  70. Author unknown, Carneades. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. Author unknown, Arcesilaus. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. Katja Maria Vogt (2010). Scepticism and Action. In Richard Arnot Home Bett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge University Press.
  73. Douglas Walton, The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof.
    with Thomas F. Gordon and Henry Prakken. Artificial Intelligence, forthcoming. [Preprint posted.].
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Douglas Walton (1999). Can an Ancient Argument of Carneades on Cardinal Virtues and Divine Attributes Be Used to Disprove the Existence of God? Philo 2 (2):5-13.
    An ancient argument attributed to the philosopher Carneades is presented that raises critical questions about the concept of an all-virtuous Divine being. The argument is based on the premises that virtue involves overcoming pains and dangers, and that only a being that can suffer or be destroyed is one for whom there are pains and dangers. The conclusion is that an all-virtuous Divine (perfect) being cannot exist. After presenting this argument, reconstructed from sources in Sextus Empiricus and Cicero, this paper (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. J. Zetzel (1997). Review. Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers. JFG Powell. The Classical Review 47 (1):81-82.