About this topic
Summary "Action Theory" as it is used here is the sub-area in the philosophy of action/agency that is concerned chiefly with the foundations of the broader sub-discipline. Central problems include the nature and scope of intentional action and agency, the explanation of action, and our knowledge of our actions. Most of the other problems that fall within the scope of this category at PhilPapers are closely related to such foundational questions.
Key works [BROKEN REFERENCE: DORRAC-2w]#DORRAC-2Perhaps the two most influential works that have shaped the current state of action theory are Anscombe 1957 and Davidson 1963. Davidson's essay is the locus classicus for the causal theory of action and for causalism about reason-explanations of actions. Anscombe's book has been influential among proponents of non-causal theories of action and reason-explanation. For a classic defense of the agent-causal perspective, see Chisholm 1966. And for a volitionist perspective, see McCann 1974. Some collections of essays that may help readers get a sense of the major debates in action theory today include Mele 1997, Aguilar & Buckareff 2010, Aguilar & Buckareff 2009, and D'Oro & Sandis 2013.
Introductions The following are good places to start to for those looking for guides to the current state of the art in action theory. Mele 2005 Mele 1992 Wilson 2008
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:See also:
6010 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 6010
Material to categorize
  1. Avery Archer (forthcoming). Do Desires Provide Reasons? An Argument Against the Cognitivist Strategy. Philosophical Studies:1-17.
    According to the cognitivist strategy, the desire to bring about P provides reasons for intending to bring about P in a way analogous to how perceiving that P provides reasons for believing that P. However, while perceiving P provides reasons for believing P by representing P as true, desiring to bring about P provides reasons for intending to bring about P by representing P as good. This paper offers an argument against this view. My argument proceeds via an appeal to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Forrest E. Baird (1992). Human Thought and Action. Upa.
    A book of readings in Western intellectual history focusing on the role of reason in human action. Contents:^ Plato: Myth of the Cave; Plato: ^IThe Four Virtues; Aristotle: Knowledge of Causes; Aristotle: The Types of Governments; Epicurus: Epicureanism; Epictetus: Stoicism; St. Augustine: The Platonist; St. Augustine: The Nature of Sources of Evil; St. Thomas Aquinas: The Four Laws; St. Thomas Aquinas: The Nature of the Soul; Pico: The Oration on the Dignity of Man; John Calvin: Reason, Sin and Illumination; St. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. S. J. Boey (2013). De dubbele oorspronkelijkheid Van blondels “action”. Bijdragen 24 (2):130-153.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Richard Kuhns (1960). Criticism and the Problem of Intention. Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):5-23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Daniel González Lagier (2003). The Paradoxes of Action Human Action, Law and Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. P. E. Langford (1988). Autonomy. Review of Metaphysics 41 (3):622-624.
  7. Roy Frederick Lawrence (1966). Motives, Intentions, and Actions. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Vladimir Lifschitz, Actions as Special Cases.
    This paper is motivated by the idea of interaction between two directions of research in knowledge representation: the design of action description languages and the development of libraries of reusable, general-purpose knowledge components. Writing an action description that characterizes actions in terms of their effects, as common today, can be compared to writing a program that does not use standard subroutines. We conjecture that a library of standard descriptions for a number of “basic” actions can facilitate writing, understanding and modifying (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Robert Joseph Michael Lithown (1976). Actions: Their Identification and Explanation. An Essay in the Philosophy of Action and the Epistemology of the Social Sciences. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Alfred Louch (1981). Actions. International Studies in Philosophy 13 (2):93-95.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Christoph Lumer, Practical Arguments for Prudential Justifications of Actions.
    Practical arguments for actions are arguments which, besides their epistemic function, shall motivate an addressee to execute the justified action. First, a strategy is developed how this motivational and other requirements can be met. Part of this strategy is to identify a thesis for which holds that believing it motivates in the required manner. Second, relying on empirical decision theory, such a thesis is identified. Finally, precise validity criteria for the respective arguments are developed.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Andres Luure (2009). Action in Signs. Sign Systems Studies 37 (1-2):270-280.
    The present article discusses sign typology from the perspective of action which is conceived as having a sextet structure. The relation between means and purpose in action is analogous to the relation between sign and meaning. The greater the degree in which the action has purpose, the less tool-like the action is.Peirce’s trichotomies correspond to a fragment of the sextet structure.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. B. M. M. (1969). The Logic of Decision and Action. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 23 (1):143-144.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. M. M. (1982). Theory of Action. Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):864-865.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. S. Maasen, W. Prinz & G. Roth (2003). The Explanatory Role of Consciousness in Action. In Sabine Maasen, Wolfgang Prinz & Gerhard Roth (eds.), Voluntary Action: Brains, Minds, and Sociality. Oxford University Press 188--201.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Matthew D. MacKenzie (2001). The Five Factors of Action and the Decentring of Agency in the Bhagavad Gtā. Asian Philosophy 11 (3):141 – 150.
    I will here analyse the five factors of action given in the Bhagavad Gtā, paying specific attention to the implications of this account for the Gtā's moral and soteriological psychologies. I argue that the Gtā's account of action constitutes a decentring of agency which paves the way for liberation. Further, while the ethics and moral psychology of the Gtā are often seen as similar to Kant's, I will argue that the decentring of agency in the Gtā places the liberated person (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Ruth Chimacoff Macklin (1968). Theory of Action. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. J. Macmurray, A. C. Ewing & O. S. Franks (1938). What Is Action? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 17:69-120.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Graeme MacQueen (2008). WhatValues Underlie Our Actions? In Neil Arya & Joanna Santa Barbara (eds.), Peace Through Health: How Health Professionals Can Work for a Less Violent World. Kumarian Press 1075.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. V. Mangalvedkar (1919). The Philosophy of Action of Lok. B.G. Tilak's Githarahasya. Indian Literature Publishers.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. S. Mann, Pasco Daphne & Bernard Bosanquet (1889). Symposium: What Takes Place in Voluntary Action? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1 (2):61 - 76.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. André Marc (1951). Being and Action. Modern Schoolman 28 (3):175-190.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Eric Marcus (2010). Life and Action. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):749-751.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Chirstopher Martin (1994). Libertad y Revocabilidad. Anuario Filosófico 27 (3):991-1006.
    The article treat with the voluntary action (in which we can include the free human action) and non voluntary causality. The author wants give some aclarations over the actual controversy, from Aquinas thought.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jane R. Martin (1972). Basic Actions and Simple Actions. American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1):59 - 68.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. Michael Martin (1978). Volitions and Actions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):187 - 190.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Francesca Masi (2007). Swerves and Voluntary Actions. Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science 2:311-328.
    Critical notice of Tim O’ Keefe, <span class='Hi'>Epicurus</span> on Freedom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Hugh J. McCann (2013). Action. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Mary A. Mccloskey (1979). THALBERG, IRVING "Perception, Emotion and Action". [REVIEW] Philosophy 54:264.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. John Mcdowell (2013). Zum Verhältnis von Rezeptivem Und Praktischem Wissen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 61 (3):387-401.
    According to G. E. M. Anscombe, practical knowledge, an agent’s knowledge of what she is intentionally doing, is not contemplative or speculative; it does not owe its being knowledge to its being derived from what it knows. She argues for this on the ground that practical knowledge can be one of “two knowledges of the same thing”, where the other of the two is speculative. If we try to conceive practical knowledge as speculative, we fall into a hopeless picture in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. John McDowell (2011). Pragmatism and Intention-in-Action. In Rosa M. Calcaterra (ed.), New Perspectives on Pragmatism and Analytic Philosophy. Editions Rodopi
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. John Mcdowell (2011). “Some Remarks On Intention In Action”. Studies in Social Justice:1-18.
    I suggest that intentions for the future become intentions in action when the time for acting comes. The image of intentions as a kind of continuant helpfully accommodates progress in an action; a persisting intention in action changes its shape in respect of how much of what is intended lies behind it and how much is still in prospect. Specific motor intentions in the course of, for instance, crossing a street are shapes successively taken by a persisting intention in action. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  33. R. Mcinerny (1991). The Structure of Human Action. Daimon: Revista de Filosofia 3:15.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Alison G. Mcintyre (1985). Omissions and Other Acts. Dissertation, Princeton University
    Philosophical discussion of the topic of intentional agency has often focused on questions about the nature of the events which are intentional actions. This event-oriented approach cannot yield an adequate account of human agency because it cannot accommodate negative acts, or acts of omission. Agents may act intentionally by omitting to act, but many such acts of omission cannot be identified with any event consisting of a bodily movement. This dissertation is an attempt to develop an account of agency which (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Andrew Joseph McKinlay, Creative Agency.
    This thesis is about the agency involved with creativity. I am concerned particularly with the process of Insight Based Problem Solving (IBPS). IBPS is a problem solving process that is associated with a particular phenomenal experience, of sudden enlightenment, where new content arrives when the individual problem solver is not intentionally considering the problem at hand. The moment of insight is intuitively involuntary and as I argue for in chapter 1, is not successfully incorporated into any current account of creative (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. R. N. McLaughlin (1967). Human Action. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (2):141 – 158.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Robert N. McLaughlin (2000). Intentions and Causes, Actions and Right Actions. Ratio 13 (1):54–68.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Jeff McMahon (2008). Collective Crime and Collective Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):4-12.
    George Fletcher emerges in his writing, as in his life, as a colorful and highly individual figure. The last thing one expects of him is the surrender of individual identity to an anonymous submersion in the collective. Yet doctrinally he is a collectivist. In his recent writings, he has been seeking to collectivize just about everything: action, responsibility, guilt, liability, self-defense, criminal punishment, international criminal law, action in war, war crimes, and so on.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alfred R. Mele (1984). Michael A. Simon: "Understanding Human Action". [REVIEW] The Thomist 48 (1):121.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Wendy Messenger (2009). Managing Multi-Agency Working. In Michael Reed & Natalie Canning (eds.), Reflective Practice in the Early Years. Sage 126.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Denise Meyerson (1994). When Are My Actions Due to Me? Analysis 54 (3):171 - 174.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42. Patricia G. Milanich (1984). Allowing, Refraining, and Failing: The Structure of Omissions. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 45 (1):57 - 67.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. Fred D. Miller Jr (1975). Actions and Results. Philosophical Quarterly 25 (101):350-354.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Arthur R. Miller (1981). Ii. Intentions and Conditions of Satisfaction. Inquiry 24 (1):115 – 121.
    This paper discusses a problem arising from the way in which John Searle marks the distinction between intentional and unintentional action (Inquiry, Vol. 22, pp. 253?80), namely, that of adequately distinguishing those events which we regard as unintentional actions on the part of an agent from those other events occasioned by or brought about as a result of his action which we (correctly) do not countenance as actions of any sort ? unintentional or otherwise. Searle's attempt to distinguish them in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Christian Miller (2009). Divine Will Theory: Intentions or Desires? In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. OUP Oxford
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Theodore Mischel (1971). Human Action. Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):606-608.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Walter Mischel (1996). From Good Intentions to Willpower. In P. Gollwitzer & John A. Bargh (eds.), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior. Guilford 9--197.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  48. Dieter Misgeld (1980). Ultimate Self-Responsibility, Practical Reasoning, and Practical Action: Habermas, Husserl, and Ethnomethodology on Discourse and Action. [REVIEW] Human Studies 3 (1):255 - 278.
    A particular notion of reason has pervaded studies of practical action throughout the whole tradition of western philosophy up to Wittgenstein and Heidegger. This notion has been centrally located in contexts other than the specific study of practical action itself.This essay examines the relation of reason and practical action by reviewing Habermas' and Husserl's theories of the relation between discourse and action (I), and then proposing Garfinkel's ethnomethodological studies of practical action as an alternative to Husserl's and Habermas' preoccupation with (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49. James S. Morgan (1982). Actions. Philosophical Studies 29:345-348.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Adam Morton (2015). Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260):582-585.
    I praise Bratman's minimal account of shared agency, while expressing some doubts about the explanatory force of his central concepts and some puzzlement about what he means by norms.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 6010