This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
33 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Francis Ellingwood Abbot (1890). The Way Out of Agnosticism: Or, the Philosophy of Free Religion. Ams Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Piers Benn (1999). Some Uncertainties About Agnosticism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 46 (3):171-188.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Sean Creaven (2001). Materialism, Agnosticism and God. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 31 (4):419–448.
    The longstanding philosophical debate between idealism and materialism has recently entered the ontological terrain of critical realism and dialectical critical realism . This has been initiated by Roy Bhaskar’s most recent book, From East to West, which attempts an ambitious synthesis of philosophy, social theory and theology. On the one hand, Bhaskar’s attempt to root his philosophy and social theory in a ‘realist theory of God’ has found an echo within the CR and DCR research camp, some of whose members (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. J. E. Creighton (1904). Dr. Perry's References to Ward's `Naturalism and Agnosticism'. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (10):266-269.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Sylvie Delacroix, Ethical Objectivity Without the Trappings: A Pragmatist Answer to Hart's Agnosticism.
    In his review of Williams' Ethics and the limits of philosophy, Hart eloquently formulated an apprehension that still haunts much of contemporary jurisprudence: if the moral 'I must' has to be 'seen as coming not from outside, but from what is most deeply inside us [...] the fear is that this will not be enough.' I argue that this fear is the byproduct of the dualist outlook within which Hart - and a significant part of contemporary legal theory - is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Theodore M. Drange, Atheism, Agnosticism, Noncognitivism (1998).
    This online essay puts forth and defends precise definitions of the terms "atheism," "agnosticism." and "[theological] noncognitivism.".
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. James Elliott (forthcoming). The Power of Humility in Sceptical Religion: Why Ietsism is Preferable to J. L. Schellenberg's Ultimism. Religious Studies:1-20.
    J. L. Schellenberg’s Philosophy of Religion argues for a specific brand of sceptical religion that takes ‘Ultimism’ – the proposition that there is a metaphysically, axiologically, and soteriologically ultimate reality – to be the object to which the sceptical religionist should assent. In this article I shall argue that Ietsism – the proposition that there is merely something transcendental worth committing ourselves to religiously – is a preferable object of assent. This is for two primary reasons. First, Ietsism is far (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Robert M. Ellis (2011). The Trouble with Buddhism. Lulu.Com.
    This book is a philosophical critique of the Buddhist tradition (not a scholarly work about the Buddhist tradition), applying the standards of judgement developed in 'A Theory of Moral Objectivity'. It is argued that although the Buddhist tradition provides access to the insights of the Middle Way, many other aspects of Buddhist tradition are inconsistent with this central insight. The sources of justified belief in Buddhism, karma, conditionality, concepts of reality, monasticism and Buddhist ethics are all subjected to the same (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Alan Hájek (1998). Agnosticism Meets Bayesianism. Analysis 58 (3):199–206.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  10. Aaron Holland (2001). Consistency in Presuming Agnosticism. Philo 4 (1):82-89.
    According to the presumption of atheism, we are to presume disbelief unless agnosticism or theism can be adequately defended. In this paper I will defend the presumption of atheism against a popular objection made by Thomas Morris and elucidate an insuperable difficulty for any attempt to argue for a presumption of agnosticism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Friedrich Hügel (1931). The Reality of God, and Religion & Agnosticism. New York, E.P. Dutton.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Thomas Henry Huxley (1931). Agnosticism and Christianity, and Other Essays. Prometheus Books.
    Lectures on evolution -- On the physical basis of life -- Naturalism and supernaturalism -- The value of witness to the miraculous -- Agnosticism -- The Christian tradition in relation to Judaic Christianity -- Agnosticism and Christianity.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Tomis Kapitan (1985). Lucey's Agnosticism: The Believer's Reply. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 18 (1/2):87 - 90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. George Karnoutsos (1970). Agnosticism. Journal of Critical Analysis 2 (2):1-13.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Anthony Kenny (2009). Agnosticism and Atheism. In John Cornwell & Michael McGhee (eds.), Philosophers and God: At the Frontiers of Faith and Reason. Continuum
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Kevin Kinghorn (2005). The Decision of Faith: Can Christian Beliefs Be Freely Chosen? T & T Clark.
    Christian theologians have historically described a 'saving faith in God' as containing a fundamental element of 'belief'. However, philosophers present strong arguments exist that we are not capable of freely deciding which beliefs we will hold. Rather, we simply find ourselves believing things as the evidence before us seems to dictate. So, if belief is indeed involuntary, and if certain beliefs are requisite for Christian faith, then how can the matter of one's salvation rest on whether one has freely put (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Sterling P. Lamprecht (1933). Naturalism and Agnosticism in Santayana. Journal of Philosophy 30 (21):561-574.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Antonio Llano (1897). Agnosticism and Disguised Materialism. Philosophical Review 6 (2):170-175.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Alfred H. Lloyd (1908). Radical Empiricism and Agnosticism. Mind 17 (66):175-192.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. William Maccall (1893). Agnosticism. A Posthumous Essay. The Monist 4 (1):31-43.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Moti Mizrahi (forthcoming). Skeptheism: Is Knowledge of God’s Existence Possible? European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
    In this paper, I sketch an argument for the view that we cannot know (or have good reasons to believe) that God exists. Some call this view “strong agnosticism” but I prefer the term “skeptheism” in order to clearly distinguish between two distinct epistemic attitudes with respect to the existence of God, namely, agnosticism and skepticism. For the skeptheist, we cannot know (or have good reasons to believe) that God exists, since there can be neither conceptual (a priori) nor empirical (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. James Noxon (1976). In Defence of "Hume's Agnosticism". Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (4):469-473.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. James Noxon (1964). Hume's Agnosticism. Philosophical Review 73 (2):248-261.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. Graham Oppy (1994). Weak Agnosticism Defended. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 36 (3):147 - 167.
    Agnosticism has had some bad press in recent years. Nonetheless, I hope to show that agnosticism can be so formulated that it is no less philosophically respectable than theism and atheism. This is not a mere philosophical exercise; for, as it happens, the formulated position is--I think--the one to which I subscribe. I include a qualification here since it may be that the position to which I subscribe is better characterised as fallibilist atheism--but more of that anon.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Gerald B. Phelan (1929). Beyond Agnosticism. New Scholasticism 3 (4):478-479.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Douglas V. Porpora (2006). Methodological Atheism, Methodological Agnosticism and Religious Experience. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (1):57–75.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27. Thomas McHugh Reed (2002). Christianity and Agnosticism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):81-95.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Josiah Royce (1890). Dr. Abbot's "Way Out of Agnosticism":The "Way Out of Agnosticism; or, the Philosophy of Free Religion,". Francis Ellingwood Abbot. Ethics 1 (1):98-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. J. G. Schurman (1895). Agnosticism. Philosophical Review 4 (3):241-263.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Piotr Sikora (2010). Ateism, Agnosticism, and Apothatic Theism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):65-80.
    In this paper, I propose a specific version of theism which I would call apophatic theism. In the first part of the paper, I argue that this in the only tenableversion of theism. Due to the fact that it may seem indistinguishable from a very strong form of agnosticism (or atheism understood in the etymological sense of the word: as a-theism where ‘a’ means ‘without’), in the second part of my paper, I try to distinguish apophatic theism from agnosticism (or (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Roy Sorensen (2004). Agnosticism and Tolerance: A Reply to Mills. Philosophical Books 45 (1):12-16.
  32. James Ward (1915). Naturalism and Agnosticism. New York,Kraus Reprint Co..
    This book contains Volumes 1 and 2 of the original works.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33. E. I. Watkin (1936). Theism, Agnosticism and Atheism. J. Heritage, the Unicorn Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography