This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
216 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 216
  1. K. A. (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
    Russell's objections to object-theory have been refuted by the proofs of the consistency of Meinong's system given by various writers. These proofs exploit technical distinctions that Meinong apparently uses very little if at all. Instead, Meinong introduces a theoretical postulate called the modal moment. I describe this postulate and its place in Meinong's system, and I argue that it has been much under-rated by Meinong's logician expositors.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. Adamson (1883). A. Meinong, Ueber Die Bedeutung des Weberschen Gesetzes. Mind 8:251.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Liliana Albertazzi (2000). Evelyn Dölling, 'Wahrheit Suchen Und Wahrheit Bekennen ,' Alexius Meinong: Skizze Seines Lebens Rodopi, Amsterdam 1999, Pp. 266. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 11 (1-3):137-141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Liliana Albertazzi (1996). A Cubist State of Mind: Meinong's Ontology. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 7 (1-2):5-16.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Liliana Albertazzi (1996). The Philosophy of Alexius Meinong. Axiomathes 7 (1-2).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Liliana Albertazzi (1995). Forms of Completion. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:321-340.
    The essay underlines the complementarity between theory and experimentation as a characteristic feature of the Meinong-school. In particular, it deals with the nucleus of a theory of presentation implicit in the theory of production. In fact, on the basis of Benussi's experimental results, I distinguish between presentation and representation, relatively to the various phases of the moment-now as the qualitative primitive of cognition. This result has various consequences which shed light on the act-side: it shows that the production relation relates (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Liliana Albertazzi (1993). Brentano, Meinong and Husserl on Internal Time. Brentano Studien 3:89-110.
    Brentano's Descriptive Psychology marks a breakthrough into clarification of internal time, made possible by using his doctrine of intentionality (and modality) of consciousness. Husserl's version of descriptive psychology, a pure phenomenological psychology, according to its author tries to overcome Brentano's (naturalistic) description of internal experience by explicitly considering the intentional content of mental events, and the different categories of objects as objects of a possible consciousness. Husserl's investigations on internal time are an example of a quite specific sort of genetic (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Liliana Albertazzi, Dale Jacquette & Roberto Poli (2001). The School of Alexius Meinong. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Antonio Allegra (2010). Meinong prima di meinong. Alcune note per Una storia degli oggetti impossibili. Giornale di Metafisica 32 (3):595-609.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mauro Antonelli & Marian David (eds.) (2014). Logical, Ontological, and Historical Contributions on the Philosophy of Alexius Meinong. De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. István Aranyosi (2012). Talking About Nothing. Numbers, Hallucinations, and Fictions. Philosophy 87 (1):145-150.
    If everything exists, then it looks, prima facie, as if talking about nothing is equivalent to not talking about anything. However, we appear as talking or thinking about particular nothings, that is, about particular items that are not among the existents. How to explain this phenomenon? One way is to deny that everything exists, and consequently to be ontologically committed to nonexistent “objects”. Another way is to deny that the process of thinking about such nonexistents is a genuine singular thought. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David M. Armstrong (1995). Reacting to Meinong. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:615-627.
    1. Some reasons are given for rejecting the view that there are entities that do not exist. 2. It is suggested, nevertheless, that this view has some plausibility when we consider unrealized empirical possibilities. 3. Even if non-existent entities are rejected, there remains Meinong's distinction between object and objectives, roughly: things and facts. The author would analyze objects in terms of objectives, yielding a world of facts.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. G. Auletta (2004). Alexius Meinong. Teoria dell'oggetto. [REVIEW] Epistemologia 27 (1):167-169.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Giuliano Bacigalupo (2010). Une balistique de l'intentionnalité. Compte rendu de Arkadiusz Chrudzimski, Gegenstandstheorie und Theorie der Intentionalität bei Alexius Meinong, Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, 386 pages. [REVIEW] Methodos 10.
    Comme le titre l’indique (« Théorie de l’objet et intentionnalité chez Alexius Meining »), ce volume d’Arkadiusz Chrudzimski récemment publié chez Springer a pour but d´étudier les multiples connexions entre la théorie de l’intentionnalité et la théorie de l’objet au sein du développement de la pensée d’Alexius Meinong (1853-1920). Plus précisément, selon l’auteur, la théorie de l’objet formulée par Meinong en 1904 – dans ses traits fondamentaux mais pas définitifs – serait l’aboutissement in..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Kenneth Barber (1971). Meinong's Hume Studies: Part II. Meinong's Analysis of Relations. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 31 (4):564-584.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Kenneth Barber (1970). Meinong's Hume Studies: Part I: Meinong's Nominalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (4):550-567.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Wilhelm Baumgartner & Wojciech Zełaniec (1996). Meinong Values. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):233-239.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jc Beall (2006). Review of G. Priest, Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David R. Bell (1964). Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values. Philosophical Books 5 (1):8-9.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ermanno Bencivenga (1986). Meinong: A Critique From the Left. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:461-483.
    Meinong justifies the need of his Gegenstandstheorie by presenting it as a generalization of (existing) metaphysics, in that the former deals with both existent and non-existent objects, whereas the latter used to deal with existent objects only. But this justification is disingenuous, since the notion of a non-existent object is virtually a contradiction in terms for the traditional paradigm. What Meinong is really proposing is a conceptual revolution of a Kantian variety, and we need to get clearer about the full (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gustav Bergmann (1967). Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong. University of Wisconsin Press.
  22. V. Warren Bourgeois (1981). Beyond Russell and Meinong. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):653 - 666.
    This paper adjudicates the debate between russell and meinong on the tenability of meinong's theory of objects. The conclusion is that while russell did not adequately reply to meinong's defence of the theory, The defence is nonetheless, Unsuccessful. The contemporary interest in meinong's theory, The controversial features of the theory, Russell's objections, And meinong's replies are discussed.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Franz Brentano (1965). Sechs Briefe an A. Meinong. In R. Kindinger (ed.), Philosophenbriefe: Aus der wissenschaftlichen Korrespondenz von A. Meinong. Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.
  24. C. D. Broad (1913). MEINONG, A. - Über Annahmen. [REVIEW] Mind 22:90.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. C. D. Broad, Critical Notice of A. Meinong, Über Annahmen (Leipzig, 1910).
    Everyone is or ought to be acquainted with the thesis of Meinong's extraordinarily able and important work. It is that beside acts of judgment and ideas there is an intermediate kind of psychical state -- the act of supposing -- which resembles judgment in that its content can be affirmative or negative, but differs from it and resembles ideas in that it is unaccompanied by conviction. Meinong tries to show that it is necessary to assume such acts for a variety (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Berit Brogaard (2009). Review of Nicholas Griffin, Dale Jacquette (Eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
  27. Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.) (1991). Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Philosophia Verlag.
    The Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology reflects the conviction that the history of metaphysics and current work in metaphysics and ontology can each throw valuable light on the other. Thus it is designed to serve both äs a means of making more widely accessible the results of recent scholarship in the history of philosophy, and also äs a unique work of reference in reladon to the metaphysical themes at the centre of much current debate in analyüc philosophy. The work contains (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Campbell (1972). Did Meinong Plant a Jungle? Philosophical Papers 1 (2):89-102.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Lawrence R. Carleton (1987). On Assumptions. By Alexius Meinong. Modern Schoolman 64 (2):136-138.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Serena Cattaruzza (1996). Meinong and Bühler. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):103-110.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Roderick M. Chisholm (1982). Brentano and Meinong Studies. Rodopi.
  32. Roderick M. Chisholm (1973). Homeless Objects. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 22 (2/3=104/105):207.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. A. Chrudzimski (2001). Meinong's Theory of Intentionality. Dialectica 55 (2):119-143.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2004). Meinong Und Supervaluation. In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Wolfgang Huemer (eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy. Ontos. 105-130.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2002). Brentano und Meinong. Zur Ontologie der Denkobjekte. In Winfried Löffler (ed.), Substanz und Identität. Beiträge zur Ontologie. Mentis.
    1. Die Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (1874) Brentanos gilt als das Werk der Theorie der Intentionalität. Brentano macht dort die „intentionale Inexistenz” des Denkobjekts zum Definitionsmerkmal des Psychischen und zugleich zum zentralen Begriff eines einflußreichen Forschungsprogramms. Die Idee der intentionalen Beziehung, die in der Psychologie diese zentrale Stellung genießt, hat jedoch ganz bestimmte Aristotelisch-scholastische Wurzeln und wurde bereits in Brentanos Dissertation (1862) sowie in seiner Habilita¬tions¬schrift (1867) als ein unproblematisches Werzeug der Analyse verwendet. 2. Die Rede von der „objektiven Existenz (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2001). Die Theorie der Intentionalität Meinongs. Dialectica 55 (2):119–143.
    The most striking feature of Meinong's theory of intentionality is his thesis that every mental act has its reference‐object “beyond being and non being”. This theory seems, at first, to be a clear example of the so called object‐theory of intentionality, as it introduces special “postulated” entities in the target‐position of the mental act. Closer examination, however, reveals in Meinong's works important elements of the mediator‐theory. Meinong speaks of auxiliary incomplete objects situated “between” the subject and the object of reference (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (1999). Brentano i Meinong. Między obiektywistyczną a epistemiczną teorią prawdy. Principia:0-0.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. James Van Cleve (1996). If Meinong Is Wrong, Is McTaggart Right? Philosophical Topics 24 (1):231-254.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Nino Cocchiarella (1982). Meinong Reconstructed Versus Early Russell Reconstructed. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (2):183 - 214.
  40. Raul Corazzon, Alexius Meinong's Theory of Objects.
    "Nowadays, a need for formal tools is strongly felt in the treatment of two special areas of ontological inquiry. One area is concerned with intentional objects, an area which seems to contain difficulties on the level of things, but also on the level of states of affairs, facts and other "propositional" entities. An intentional relation holds between either persons (more generally experiencing subjects) or acts of consciousness on the one hand, and the intentional objects on the other. The latter are (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nadine de Courtenay (2010). The Epistemological Virtues of Assumptions: Towards a Coming of Age of Boltzmann and Meinong's Objections to 'the Prejudice in Favour of the Actual'? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):41-57.
    Two complementary debates of the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth century are examined here: the debate on the legitimacy of hypotheses in the natural sciences and the debate on intentionality and ‘representations without object’ in philosophy. Both are shown to rest on two core issues: the attitude of the subject and the mode of presentation chosen to display a domain of phenomena. An orientation other than the one which contributed to shape twentieth-century philosophy of science is explored through the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. N. C. A. da Costa, F. Doria & N. Papavero (1991). Meinong's Theory Of Objects And Hilbert's $\Epsilon$-Symbol. Reports on Mathematical Logic.
    We propose a formalization of Meinong's theory of objects with the help of Hilbert's $\epsilon$-symbol and a paraconsistent logical system, with an eye towards its application in an axiomatization of the natural sciences.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Luigi Dappiano (1994). L'idealismo di Oxbridge Tra Lotze E Meinong. A Proposito Delle Origini Della Filosofia Analitica. Axiomathes 5 (2-3):279-304.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Richard Dyche (1980). Alexius Meinong Gesamtausgabe. Grazer Philosophische Studien 10:181-191.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Editor Editor (1878). Meinong's Hume-Studien, I. [REVIEW] Mind 3:386.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. J. N. Findlay (1977). The Constitution of Human Values. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 11:189-207.
    The present paper is an attempt to study the acts and intentions which set up for the subject, and for the community of subjects, a set of values and disvalues which impose themselves as valid upon everyone, and which everyone must tend to prescribe, or to warn against, for everyone. The acts which set up a formal apophantic and ontology have been studied by Husserl in his Formal and Transcendental Logic , but he has not set out a comparable theory (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. N. Findlay (1977). GROSSMANN, R. "Meinong". [REVIEW] Mind 86:138.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. N. Findlay (1975). Meinong the Phenomenologist. In Don Ihde & Richard M. Zaner (eds.), Revue Internationale de Philosophie. Martinus Nijhoff. 117--135.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. N. Findlay (1963). Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. J. N. Findlay (1933). Meinong's Theory of Objects. Oxford, H. Milford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 216