This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
122 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 122
  1. K. A. (2002). Meinong's Much Maligned Modal Moment. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):95-118.
    Russell's objections to object-theory have been refuted by the proofs of the consistency of Meinong's system given by various writers. These proofs exploit technical distinctions that Meinong apparently uses very little if at all. Instead, Meinong introduces a theoretical postulate called the modal moment. I describe this postulate and its place in Meinong's system, and I argue that it has been much under-rated by Meinong's logician expositors.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Liliana Albertazzi (2000). Evelyn Dölling, 'Wahrheit Suchen Und Wahrheit Bekennen ,' Alexius Meinong: Skizze Seines Lebens Rodopi, Amsterdam 1999, Pp. 266. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 11 (1-3):137-141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Liliana Albertazzi (1993). Brentano, Meinong and Husserl on Internal Time. Brentano Studien 3:89-110.
    Brentano's Descriptive Psychology marks a breakthrough into clarification of internal time, made possible by using his doctrine of intentionality (and modality) of consciousness. Husserl's version of descriptive psychology, a pure phenomenological psychology, according to its author tries to overcome Brentano's (naturalistic) description of internal experience by explicitly considering the intentional content of mental events, and the different categories of objects as objects of a possible consciousness. Husserl's investigations on internal time are an example of a quite specific sort of genetic (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. István Aranyosi (2012). Talking About Nothing. Numbers, Hallucinations, and Fictions. Philosophy 87 (1):145-150.
    If everything exists, then it looks, prima facie, as if talking about nothing is equivalent to not talking about anything. However, we appear as talking or thinking about particular nothings, that is, about particular items that are not among the existents. How to explain this phenomenon? One way is to deny that everything exists, and consequently to be ontologically committed to nonexistent “objects”. Another way is to deny that the process of thinking about such nonexistents is a genuine singular thought. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Wilhelm Baumgartner & Wojciech Zełaniec (1996). Meinong Values. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):233-239.
  6. Jc Beall (2006). Review of G. Priest, Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (9).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ermanno Bencivenga (1986). Meinong: A Critique From the Left. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:461-483.
    Meinong justifies the need of his Gegenstandstheorie by presenting it as a generalization of (existing) metaphysics, in that the former deals with both existent and non-existent objects, whereas the latter used to deal with existent objects only. But this justification is disingenuous, since the notion of a non-existent object is virtually a contradiction in terms for the traditional paradigm. What Meinong is really proposing is a conceptual revolution of a Kantian variety, and we need to get clearer about the full (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gustav Bergmann (1967). Realism: A Critique of Brentano and Meinong. University of Wisconsin Press.
  9. Franz Brentano (1965). Sechs Briefe an A. Meinong. In R. Kindinger (ed.), Philosophenbriefe: Aus der wissenschaftlichen Korrespondenz von A. Meinong. Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.
  10. C. D. Broad, Critical Notice of A. Meinong, Über Annahmen (Leipzig, 1910).
    Everyone is or ought to be acquainted with the thesis of Meinong's extraordinarily able and important work. It is that beside acts of judgment and ideas there is an intermediate kind of psychical state -- the act of supposing -- which resembles judgment in that its content can be affirmative or negative, but differs from it and resembles ideas in that it is unaccompanied by conviction. Meinong tries to show that it is necessary to assume such acts for a variety (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Berit Brogaard (2009). Review of Nicholas Griffin, Dale Jacquette (Eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (4).
  12. Hans Burkhardt & Barry Smith (eds.) (1991). Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology. Philosophia Verlag.
    The Handbook of Metaphysics and Ontology reflects the conviction that the history of metaphysics and current work in metaphysics and ontology can each throw valuable light on the other. Thus it is designed to serve both äs a means of making more widely accessible the results of recent scholarship in the history of philosophy, and also äs a unique work of reference in reladon to the metaphysical themes at the centre of much current debate in analyüc philosophy. The work contains (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Richard Campbell (1972). Did Meinong Plant a Jungle? Philosophical Papers 1 (2):89-102.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Serena Cattaruzza (1996). Meinong and Bühler. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):103-110.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Roderick M. Chisholm (1982). Brentano and Meinong Studies. Rodopi.
  16. Roderick M. Chisholm (1973). Homeless Objects. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 22.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2004). Meinong Und Supervaluation. In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Wolfgang Huemer (eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy. Ontos.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2002). Brentano und Meinong. Zur Ontologie der Denkobjekte. In Winfried Löffler (ed.), Substanz und Identität. Beiträge zur Ontologie. Mentis.
    1. Die Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt (1874) Brentanos gilt als das Werk der Theorie der Intentionalität. Brentano macht dort die „intentionale Inexistenz” des Denkobjekts zum Definitionsmerkmal des Psychischen und zugleich zum zentralen Begriff eines einflußreichen Forschungsprogramms. Die Idee der intentionalen Beziehung, die in der Psychologie diese zentrale Stellung genießt, hat jedoch ganz bestimmte Aristotelisch-scholastische Wurzeln und wurde bereits in Brentanos Dissertation (1862) sowie in seiner Habilita¬tions¬schrift (1867) als ein unproblematisches Werzeug der Analyse verwendet. 2. Die Rede von der „objektiven Existenz (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2001). Die Theorie der Intentionalität Meinongs. Dialectica 55 (2):119–143.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (1999). Brentano i Meinong. Między obiektywistyczną a epistemiczną teorią prawdy. Principia:0-0.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James Van Cleve (1996). If Meinong Is Wrong, Is McTaggart Right? Philosophical Topics 24 (1):231-254.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Nino Cocchiarella (1982). Meinong Reconstructed Versus Early Russell Reconstructed. Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (2):183 - 214.
  23. Raul Corazzon, Alexius Meinong's Theory of Objects.
    "Nowadays, a need for formal tools is strongly felt in the treatment of two special areas of ontological inquiry. One area is concerned with intentional objects, an area which seems to contain difficulties on the level of things, but also on the level of states of affairs, facts and other "propositional" entities. An intentional relation holds between either persons (more generally experiencing subjects) or acts of consciousness on the one hand, and the intentional objects on the other. The latter are (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Nadine de Courtenay (2010). The Epistemological Virtues of Assumptions: Towards a Coming of Age of Boltzmann and Meinong's Objections to 'the Prejudice in Favour of the Actual'? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):41-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Luigi Dappiano (1994). L'idealismo di Oxbridge Tra Lotze E Meinong. A Proposito Delle Origini Della Filosofia Analitica. Axiomathes 5 (2-3):279-304.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. J. N. Findlay (1963). Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. N. Findlay (1933). Meinong's Theory of Objects. Oxford, H. Milford.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jerome I. Gellman (1969). Suter on Russell on Meinong. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 29 (3):441-445.
  29. Nicholas Griffin (1986). Russell's Critique of Meinong's Theory of Objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25:375-401.
    Russell brought three arguments forward against Meinong's theory of objects. None of them depend upon a misinterpretation of the theory as is often claimed. In particular, only one is based upon a clash between Meinong's theory and Russell's theory of descriptions, and that did not involve Russell's attributing to Meinong his own ontological assumption. The other two arguments were attempts to find internal inconsistencies in Meinong's theory. But neither was sufficient to refute the theory, though they do require some revisions, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nicholas Griffin (1985). On Assumptions Alexius Meinong Edited and Translated, with an Introduction, by James Heanue Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983. Pp. Xlviii, 331. $29.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 24 (04):726-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Nicholas Griffin (1982). Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items Richard Routley Philosophy Department Monograph Series Canberra, Australia: Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, 1980. Pp. 1035. $18.35. [REVIEW] Dialogue 21 (04):764-769.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.) (2009). Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
    Meinong The Legacy of "On Denoting" Edited by Nicholas Griffin and Dale Jacquette Routledge TaylorkFrancisGroup New York London ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Reinhardt Grossmann (1974/1999). Meinong. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Reinhardt Grossmann (1974). Meinong's Doctrine of the Aussersein of the Pure Object. Noûs 8 (1):67-82.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Reinhardt Grossmann (1969). Non-Existent Objects: Recent Work on Brentano and Meinong. American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (1):17 - 32.
  36. Michel ter Hark (2007). Popper, Otto Selz and Meinong's Gegenstandstheorie. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (1):60-78.
    In this article it is argued that Popper's well-known deductive and falsificationistic epistemology is historically rooted in German psychology, notably the work of Otto Selz. Drawing on Popper's early and still unpublished psychological manuscripts it is shown how Otto Selz's psychology of thinking with its emphasis on the guiding role of schematic anticipations gave the impetus to Popper's theory of problem solving, his theory of the Searchlight, and its attendant rejection of empiricism, the so-called Bucket theory of knowledge. In the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. G. Dawes Hicks (1922). The Philosophical Researchers of Meinong (I.). Mind 31 (121):1-30.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jaakko Hintikka (1995). Meinong in a Long Perspective. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:29-45.
    Meinong's thought is considered in relation to several major conceptual problems, including the Frege-Russell thesis that words like is are multiply ambiguos and Aristotle's treatment of existence. This treatment leads to a problem of how to interpret quantifiers. The three main possible interpretations are: (i) quantifiers as ranging over actual individuals (or individuals existing in some one world); (ii) quantifiers as ranging over a set of possible individuals; (iii) quantifiers merely as a way of specifying the interdependencies of the concepts (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Wolfgang Huemer (2002). The School of Alexius Meinong. Albertazzi, Liliana, Dale Jacquette, and Roberto Poli (Eds.). Axiomathes 13 (2):217-224.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Carlo Ierna (2009). Relations in the Early Works of Meinong and Husserl. Meinong Studies 3:7-36.
    Both Alexius Meinong and Edmund Husserl wrote about relations in their early works, in periods in which they were still influenced by Franz Brentano. However, besides the split between Brentano and Meinong, the latter also accused Husserl of plagiarism with respect to the theory of relations. Examining Meinong’s and Husserl’s early works and the Brentanist framework they were written in, we will try to assess their similarities and differences. As they shared other sources besides Brentano, we will consider very carefully (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Carlo Ierna (2006). The Beginnings of Husserl's Philosophy. Part 2: Mathematical and Philosophical Background. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 6 (1):23-71.
    The article examines the development of Husserl’s early philosophy from his Habilitationsschrift (1887) to the Philosophie der Arithmetik (1891). -/- An attempt will be made at reconstructing the lost Habilitationsschrift (of which only the first chapter survives, which we know as Über den Begriff der Zahl). The examined sources show that the original version of the Habilitationsschrift was by far broader than the printed version, and included most topics of the PA. -/- The article contains an extensive and detailed comparison (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Dale Jacquette (2009). Meditations on Meinong's Golden Mountain. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Dale Jacquette (2003). Meinong on the Phenomenology of Assumption. Studia Phaenomenologica 3 (1-2):155-177.
  44. Dale Jacquette (1999). Alexius Meinong's Elements of Ethics, with Translation of the Fragment Ethische Bausteine. Review of Metaphysics 52 (3):727-730.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Dale Jacquette (1996). Meinongian Logic: The Semantics of Existence and Nonexistence. W. De Gruyter.
    Introduction Alexius Meinong and his circle of students and collaborators at the Phi- losophisches Institut der Universitat Graz formulated the basic ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Dale Jacquette (1996). On Defoliating Meinong's Jungle. Axiomathes 7 (1-2):17-42.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Dale Jacquette (1995). Meinong's Concept of Implexive Being and Nonbeing. Grazer Philosophische Studien 50:233-271.
    Meinong introduces the concept of implexive being and nonbeing to explain the metaphysics of universals, and as a contribution to the theory of reference and perception. Meinong accounts for Aristotle's doctrine of the inherence of secondary substances in primary substances in object theory terms as the implection of incomplete universals in complete existent or subsistent objects. The derivative notion of implexive so-being is developed by Meinong to advance an intuitive modal semantics that admits degrees of possibility. A set theoretical interpretation (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Dale Jacquette (1991). The Origins of Gegenstandstheorie: Immanent and Transcendent Intentional Objects in Brentano, Twardowski, and Meinong. Brentano Studien 3:177-202.
    The origins of object theory in the philosophical psychology and semantics of Alexius Meinong and the Graz school can be traced both to the insight and failure of Franz Brentano's immanent objectivity or intentional in-existence thesis. The immanence thesis is documented, together with its critical reception in Alois Höfler's Logik, Twardowski's Zur Lehre vom Inhalt und Gegenstand der Vorstellungen, and Meinong's mature Gegenstandstheorie, in which immanent thought content and transcendent intentional object are distinguished, and Brentano's thesis of immanent intentionality as (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Dale Jacquette (1989). Mally's Heresy and the Logic of Meinong's Object Theory. History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):1-14.
    The consistent formalization of Meinong's object theory in recent mathematical logic requires either plural modes of predication, or distinct categories of nuclear or constitutive and extranuclear or nonconstitutive properties. The plural modes of predication approach is rejected because it is reducible to the nuclear extranuclear property distinction, but not conversely, and because the nuclear extranuclear property distinction offers a more satisfactory solution to object theory paradoxes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Dale Jacquette & Nicholas Griffin (2009). Introduction: Russell and Meinong in Retrospect. In Nicholas Griffin & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Russell Vs. Meinong: The Legacy of "on Denoting". Routledge.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 122