This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
10 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Skelton Anthony (2002). Review of Robert Myers Self-Governance and Cooperation. [REVIEW] Utilitas 14 (1):128-130.
  2. Giovanni De Grandis (2003). La Giustizia E Il Bene. Teoria Politica (2-3):341-369.
    In this article an attempt is made of presenting the deontological feature of A Theory of Justice under a new light. Through an exploration of the meaning of the priority of the good over the right and of the significance and function of the argument of the congruence between justice and individual good, the differences between teleology and deontology are displayed. Deontology seems to have several advantages: a) it allows for pluralism of values and a richer and deeper understanding of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jasper Doomen (2010). Review of C. Korsgaard, Self-Constitution. [REVIEW] Dialogue 49 (2):317-322.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Piotr T. Makowski (2007). Nowa filozofia moralności. Hybris 5.
  5. Tamar Schapiro (2006). Kantian Rigorism and Mitigating Circumstances. Ethics 117 (1):32–57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Tamar Schapiro (2003). Compliance, Complicity, and the Nature of Nonideal Conditions. Journal of Philosophy 100 (7):329-355.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Anthony Skelton (2002). Review of Robert Myers Self-Governance and Cooperation. [REVIEW] Utilitas 14 (1):128-130.
    A critical review of Robert Myers Self-Governance and Cooperation.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rob van Someren Greve (2011). Wishful Thinking in Moral Theorizing: Comment on Enoch. Utilitas 23 (04):447-450.
    David Enoch recently defended the idea that there are valid inferences of the form ‘it would be good if p, therefore, p’. I argue that Enoch's proposal allows us to infer the absurd conclusion that ours is the best of all possible worlds.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). ‘Practical Reason: Categorical Imperative, Maxims, Laws’. In W. Dudley & K. Engelhard (eds.), Kant: Key Concepts. Acumen.
    This chapter considers the centrality of principles in Kant’s moral philosophy, their distinctively ‘Kantian’ character, why Kant presents a ‘metaphysical’ system of moral principles and how these ‘formal’ principles are to be used in practice. These points are central to how Kant thinks pure reason can be practical. These features have often puzzled Anglophone readers, in part due to focusing on Kant’s Groundwork, to the neglect of his later works in moral philosophy, in which the theoretical preliminaries of that first (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kenneth R. Westphal (1997). ‘Do Kant’s Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?’. Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5:141-194.
    Kant’s justification of possession appears to beg the question (petitio principii) by assuming rather than proving the legitimacy of possession. The apparent question-begging in Kant’s argument has been recapitulated or exacerbated but not resolved in the secondary literature. A detailed terminological, textual, and logical analysis of Kant’s argument reveals that he provides a sound justification of limited rights to possess and use things (qualified choses in possession), not of private property rights. Kant’s argument is not purely a priori; it is (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation