This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
332 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 332
Material to categorize
  1. Henry Blumenthal & Julia Annas (eds.) (1991). Aristotle and the Later Tradition: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 1991. Clarendon Press.
    This volume contains papers by a group of leading experts on Aristotle and the later Aristotelian tradition of Neoplatonism. The discussion ranges from Aristotle's treatment of Parmenides, the most important pre-Socratic Greek philosopher, to Neoplatonic and medieval use of Aristotle, for which Aristotle himself set guidelines in his discussions of his predecessors. Traces of these guidelines can be seen in the work of Plotinus, and that of the later Greek commentators on Aristotle. The study of these commentators, and the recognition (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Susanne Bobzien (1998). The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem. Phronesis 43 (2):133-175.
    ABSTRACT: In this paper I argue that the ‘discovery’ of the problem of causal determinism and freedom of decision in Greek philosophy is the result of a combination and mix-up of Aristotelian and Stoic thought in later antiquity; more precisely, a (mis-)interpretation of Aristotle’s philosophy of deliberate choice and action in the light of Stoic theory of determinism and moral responsibility. The (con-)fusion originates with the beginnings of Aristotle scholarship, at the latest in the early 2nd century AD. It undergoes (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3. István Bodnár (1997). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Celestial Motions. Phronesis 42 (2):190 - 205.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Marcelo D. Boeri (2009). Alexander of Aphrodisias as an Interpreter of the Aristotelian Noetics. Estudios de Filosofía 40:79-107.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. William F. Boggess (1970). Alfarabi and the Rhetoric: The Cave Revisited. Phronesis 15 (1):86-90.
  6. Cecilia Martini Bonadeo (2007). The Arabic Aristotle in the 10th Century Bagdad: The Case of Yaiya Ibn 'Adi's Commentary on Metaph. Alpha Elatton. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 52 (3):7-20.
    In this study, we want to show, through the analysis of a Christian author of the 10th. century, how commentaries on the works of Aristotle were continuously made, from the Greek commentators until Averroes. Taking as an example some texts of the Metaphysics, we can see that, even without direct contact with the original Greek version, several translations, both from the Greek and the Syriac, were compared by the author. In those cases, it was not only a translation, but also (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Marta Borgo (2011). Themistius on Aristotle's Physics, B, 3. Notes on the Presence of Alexander of Aphrodisias in Themistius' Paraphrase. Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 22:97-152.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Barbara Botter (2009). The Aristotelism of Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Culture of Commentary. Estudios de Filosofía 40:109-133.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. M. J. Boyd (1937). H. F. Bouchery: Themistius in Libanius' Brieven. Critische uitgave van 52 brieven, voorzien van een historisch commentaar en tekstverklarende nota's. Met een voorrede van J. Bidez. Pp. 295. Antwerp: 'De Sikkel', 1936. Paper, 24s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (06):240-.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Michael Boylan (1984). The Galenic and Hippocratic Challenges to Aristotle's Conception Theory. Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):83 - 112.
    As a result of this case study, additional questions arise. These can be cast into at least three groups. The first concerns the development of critical empiricism in the ancient world: a topic of much interest in our own century, expecially with regard to the work of the logical empiricists. Many of the same arguments are present in the ancient world and were hotly debated from the Hippocratic writers through and beyond Galen. Some of the ways in which Galen reacts (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11. Peter Brown, Andrew Smith & Karin Alt (eds.) (2005). The Philosopher and Society in Late Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Brown. Distributor in the U.S., David Brown Bk. Co..
  12. Georgina G. Buckler (1926). Étude de la Langue Et du Style de Michel Psellos. Lexique Choisi de Psellos. By Emile Renauld. Two Vols. Vol. I., Pp. Xxix + 614; Vol. II., Pp. Xxvii + 160. Paris: Auguste Picard, 1920. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (05):172-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Charles Burnett (ed.) (1993). Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts: The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. Warburg Institute, University of London.
  14. W. E. Charlton (1974). Giancarlo Movia: Alessandro di Afrodisia: Tra Naturalismo E Misticismo. Pp. 94. Padua: Antenore, 1970. Paper, L. 1,400. The Classical Review 24 (01):134-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. W. E. Charlton (1968). L. G. Westerink: Pseudo-Elias (Pseudo-David), Lectures on Porphyry's Isagoge. Pp. Xviii+160. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 1967. Cloth, 70s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 18 (03):353-354.
  16. Michael Chase (2012). Damascius, Problems Solutions Concerning First Principles. Translated with Introduction and Notes by Sara Ahbel-Rappe. New York: Oxford University Press (Religion in Translation Series), 2010, Xxviii-529 Pp. 2 Index. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (1):139-145.
    This article is currently available as a free download on ingentaconnect.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Riccardo Chiaradonna (2013). Platonist Approaches to Aristotle: From Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and Beyond). In Malcolm Schofield (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century Bc: New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 28.
  18. Jean Christensen De Groot (1983). Philoponus on De A Nima II. 5, Physics III. 3, and the Propagation of Light. Phronesis 28 (2):177-196.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. S. Marc Cohen & Gareth B. Matthews (1991). On Aristotle's Categories. Cornell University Press.
    Translation with notes of Ammonius' Commentary on Aristotle's Categories.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Alejandro Coroleu (1996). The Fortuna of Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda's Translations of Aristotle and of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 59:325-332.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Antoine Côté (2009). Simplicius and James of Viterbo on Propensities. Vivarium 47 (1):24-53.
    The paper examines Simplicius's doctrine of propensities in his commentary on Aristotle's Categories and follows its application by the late thirteenth century theologian and philosopher James of Viterbo to problems relating to the causes of volition, intellection and natural change. Although he uses Aristotelian terminology and means his doctrine to conflict minimally with those of Aristotle, James's doctrine of propensities really constitutes an attempt to provide a technically rigorous dressing to his Augustinian and Boethian convictions. Central to James's procedure is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Antoine Côté (2003). Note on Syrianus' Use of the Divided Line in His Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. Modern Schoolman 81 (1):57-66.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. William J. Courtenay (2012). Latin Aristotle Commentaries, V: Bibliography of Secondary Literature_, And: _Latin Aristotle Commentaries, I.2: Medieval Authors M–Z (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (1):141-142.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. A. H. Coxon (1968). The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius' Commentary on Aristotle's Physics I-Iv. Classical Quarterly 18 (01):70-.
    The following discussion' of the manuscript tradition of Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle's Physics i-iv originated in an examination of the tradition of the fragments of Parmenides. It is therefore illustrated not only from Simplicius but particularly from the texts of Parmenides quoted by him. This will not be misleading, since, though many of these texts are quoted by Simplicius more than once, there is little or no sign in any manuscript of interpolation from one passage to another and it is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. I. C. Cunningham (1986). Lloyd W. Daly: John Philoponus: De Vocabulis Quae Diversum Signification Exhibent Secundum Differentiam Accentus. (American Philosophical Society, Memoirs.) Pp. Xxx + 250. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1983. $20. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 36 (01):150-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. O. D. (1978). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics. A Study of the De Mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Review of Metaphysics 32 (2):372-373.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Jean Christensen de Groot (1983). Philoponus on De A Nima II. 5, Physics III. 3, and the Propagation of Light. Phronesis 28 (2):177-196.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. F. De Haas (1996). C. Lohr: Johannis Philoponi Commentariae Annotationes in Libros Priorum Resolutivorum Aristotelis. Ubersetzt von Guillelmus Dorotheus. Neudruch der Ausgabe Venedig 1541 mit einer Einleitung von K. Verrycken und C. Lohr. (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Versiones Latinae Resuscitatarum Litterarum, 4). Stuttgart, Bad Canstatt:Frommann-Holzboog, 1994. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (1):172-172.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. F. A. J. de Haas (2001). Genesis Elucidated L. Fladerer: Johannes Philoponos . De Opificio Mundi. Spätantikes Sprachdenken Und Christliche Exegese . Pp. 419. Stuttgart and Leipzig: B. G. Teubner, 1999. Cased, DM 158. ISBN: 3-519-07684-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (02):300-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. H. Diels (ed.) (1882). Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca. Reimer.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. W. E. Dooley (1993). Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle's Metaphysics I. Philosophical Review 102 (4):584-586.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. L. J. Elders (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias. Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):919-920.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. L. J. Elders (2005). Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement to “On the Soul.”. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):919-920.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. B. Farrington (1963). From Aristotle to Philoponus. The Classical Review 13 (02):195-.
  35. Kevin Lawrence Flannery (1992). The Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Luciano Floridi (1997). Scepticism and Animal Rationality: The Fortune of Chrysippus' Dog in the History of Western Thought. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79 (1):27-57.
  37. D. Frank (1996). Review. Alexander of Aphrodisias. Alexander of Aphrodisias, Quaestiones 2.16-3.15. R W Sharples (Tr). The Classical Review 46 (2):235-236.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Daniel Frank (1996). Alexander of Aphrodisias. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 46 (2):235-236.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Dorothea Frede (1982). The Dramatization of Determinism: Alexander of Aphrodisias' "De Fato". Phronesis 27 (3):276 - 298.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Dorothea Frede (1982). The Dramatization of Determinism: Alexander of Aphrodisias' De Fato. Phronesis 27 (3):276-298.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. Gad Freudenthal (2009). The Astrologization of the Aristotelian Cosmos: Celestial Influences on the Sublunary World in Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias, and Averroes. In A. C. Bowen & C. Wildberg (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s de Caelo. Brill 117--239.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Myrna Gabbe (2010). Themistius on Concept Acquisition and Knowledge of Essences. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (3):215-235.
    Themistius's (ca. 317–ca. 388 C.E.) paraphrase of the De Anima is an influential and important work; however, it is not now regarded as profound or original and thereby suffers from neglect. I argue that Themistius is misunderstood on the matter of Aristotle's productive and potential intellects. It is commonly held that Themistius gives to the productive intellect the role of illuminating images in order to produce universal thoughts in the potential intellect with epistemic certainty. I argue that Themistius's productive intellect (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Robert Gallagher (1996). Alexander of Aphrodisias. Review of Metaphysics 49 (4):946-947.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Robert Gallagher (1996). Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16-3.15. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 49 (4):946-947.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Aaron Vladeck Garrett (1994). The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle I. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 17 (1-2):377-391.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. R. Gaskin (1998). Simplicius on the Meaning of Sentences: A Commentary on "In Cat." 396,30-397,28. Phronesis 43 (1):42 - 62.
    At "Categories" 12b5-16 Aristotle appears to regard the referents of declarative sentences, such as "Socrates is sitting," as what later writers were to call "complexe significabilia," i.e., items such as that Socrates is sitting. Simplicius' discussion of this passage in his commentary on the "Categories" clearly shows the influence of Stoic philosophy of language; but, if we follow the text printed by Kalbfleisch, Simplicius' commentary is seen to be a muddle of Stoic and Aristotelian elements, neither properly understood. It is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Richard Gaskin (1993). Alexander's Sea Battle: A Discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias De Fato 10. Phronesis 38 (1):75-94.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Richard Gaskin (1993). Alexander's Sea Battle: A Discussion of Alexander of Aphrodisias "De Fato" 10. Phronesis 38 (1):75 - 94.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Marc-Antoine Gavray (2011). Archytas Lu Par Simplicius. Un Art de la Conciliation. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):85-158.
    Intent upon harmonizing doctrines of their predecessors, some Neoplatonic commentators are faced with a problem of resolving doctrinal discrepancies so as to restore the συµφωνία in the history of philosophy. This article considers a particular example of this attempt ats harmonization: how Simplicius reconciles Aristotle's Categories with the Neopythagorean doctrine of the Pseudo-Archytas. The chronological inversion introduced by the counterfeiter produces remarkable effects on the late Platonic doctrine about general terms, to the extent that a commentator such as Simplicius works (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Lloyd P. Gerson (1998). Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of the "De Anima" (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (2):315-316.
1 — 50 / 332