About this topic
Summary

Assertion is a kind of speech act which plays a central role in both philosophy of language and epistemology. The main philosophical issues concerning assertion include: How to characterize which utterances of (declarative) sentences count as assertions? What, if any, are the norms governing assertion?  What effects do assertions have on the dynamics of conversation? What is the connection between assertion and the semantic content, meaning, or truth of sentences? What is the connection between what one asserts and what one believes or knows? How can we separate between what is asserted by an utterance and what is conveyed by it in more indirect means – such as presupposition or implicature? Are utterances of conditional sentences a kind of assertion, or a different type of speech act (a conditional assertion)?

These questions help to see why assertion plays such a central role in philosophy: for example, assertion plays a central role in the philosophy of language for anyone who thinks that there is a close connection between what is asserted by an utterance and what its semantic content or meaning is, and plays a central role in epistemology for anyone who thinks that assertions are governed by a norm involving knowledge or belief (e.g. assert only what you know or only what you believe). 

Key works

The classic text on speech acts in general is Austin 1962. For a central discussion on the norms of assertion, and a defence of the knowledge norm of assertion see Williamson 2000. The classic text on the distinction between assertion and presupposition is Strawson 1950, and between assertion and implicature Grice 1967Stalnaker 1978 is the key work on the effects that assertion has on the dynamics of conversation, and how assertion, context, and semantic content interact with each other. For a defence of the claim that utterances of conditionals are not assertions, but rather involve a special kind of speech act see Edgington 1995.

Introductions For general introductions see Pagin 2015 and also the introduction in Brown & Cappelen 2011. For an introduction on the issue of norms of assertion in particular see Weiner 2007.
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
581 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 581
Material to categorize
  1. Juan José Acero (2007). Intención y aserción. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):19-39.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Nuel D. Belnap Jr (1966). Questions, Answers, and Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophy 63 (20):609-611.
  3. F. Robert Bohl (1978). Saying and believing. Logique Et Analyse 21 (82):293.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Kenneth Boyd & Diana Heney (forthcoming). Rascals, Triflers, and Pragmatists: Developing a Peircean Account of Assertion. British Journal for the History of Philosophy.
    While the topic of assertion has recently received a fresh wave of interest from Peirce scholars, to this point no systematic account of Peirce’s view of assertion has been attempted. We think that this is a lacuna that ought to be filled. Doing so will help make better sense of Peirce’s pragmatism; further, what is hidden amongst various fragments is a robust pragmatist theory of assertion with unique characteristics that may have significant contemporary value. Here we aim to uncover this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Richard B. Brandt (1952). The Status of Empirical Assertion Theories in Ethics. Mind 61 (244):458-479.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Rudolf Carnap (1934). Meaning, Assertion and Proposal. Philosophy of Science 1 (3):359-360.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Manuel García Carpintero (2011). Assertion. New Philosophical Essays, de Jessica Brown. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):167-175.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Peter Cave (2011). With and Without Absurdity: Moore, Magic and McTaggart's Cat. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68 (68):125-149.
    Here is a tribute to humanity. When under dictatorial rule, with free speech much constrained, a young intellectual mimed; he mimed in a public square. He mimed a protest speech, a speech without words. People drew round to watch and listen; to watch the expressive gestures, the flicker of tongue, the mouthing lips; to listen to – silence. The authorities also watched and listened, but did nothing.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. L. J. Cohen & Alonso Church (1954). Assertion-Statements. Analysis 15:66.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. L. J. Cohen & A. C. Lloyd (1955). Assertion-Statements. Analysis 15 (3):66 - 70.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Michael Cohen (1976). Assertion: A Reply to Brooks. Analysis 37 (1):44 - 45.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Malgorzata Czarnocka (1996). Truth and Assertion. Dialogue and Universalism 6 (1-6):125.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. J. Delbœuf (1883). Note rectificative d'une assertion de Fechner. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 16:229 - 231.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. John Dewey (1934). Meaning, Assertion and Proposal. Philosophy of Science 1 (2):237-238.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. V. H. Dudman (1992). Probability and Assertion. Analysis 52 (4):204 - 211.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  16. Dorothy Edgington (2009). And Assertion. In Ian Ravenscroft (ed.), Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes From the Philosophy of Frank Jackson. Oxford University Press 283.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. George Englebretsen (1975). Trivalence and Absurdity. Philosophical Papers 4 (2):121-128.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Don Fallis (2011). What Liars Can Tell Us About the Knowledge Norm of Practical Reasoning. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):347-367.
    If knowledge is the norm of practical reasoning, then we should be able to alter people's behavior by affecting their knowledge as well as by affecting their beliefs. Thus, as Roy Sorensen (2010) suggests, we should expect to find people telling lies that target knowledge rather than just lies that target beliefs. In this paper, however, I argue that Sorensen's discovery of “knowledge-lies” does not support the claim that knowledge is the norm of practical reasoning. First, I use a Bayesian (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (2009). L'asserzione e la contingenza delle convenzioni. Rivista di Estetica 49 (41):161-170.
    The paper offers a model for the conventionality of illocutionary forces. It focuses on the argument that accounts of assertion in terms of constitutive norms are incompatible with conventionalist claims about assertion. The argument appeals to an alleged modal asymmetry, and is in that respect related to well-known arguments that the notion of truth by convention is misguided: while constitutive rules are essential to the acts they characterize, and therefore the obligations they impose necessarily apply to every instance, conventions are (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. André Gombay (1988). Some Paradoxes of Counterprivacy. Philosophy 63 (244):191 - 210.
    For many years G. E. Moore asked himself what was wrong with sentences like ‘I went to the pictures last Tuesday, but I don't believe that I did’, or ‘I believe that he has gone out, but he has not’. He discussed the problem in 1912 in his Ethics , and was still discussing it in 1944 in a paper to the Moral Sciences Club at Cambridge—an event we know about from a letter of Wittgenstein that I shall quote in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21. Joshua C. Gregory (1940). A Note on Statement and Assertion. Analysis 7 (3):75 - 76.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Ingemund Gullvåg (1978). The Logic of Assertion. Theoria 44 (2):75-116.
    The aim is to fashion intuitive conditions of pragmatic consistency for the speech act of assertion into a formal theory, so as to exclude "pragmatically absurd" utterances (contradictory statements, versions of the liar, moore's paradox, etc.). a core theory i for a concept of pragmatic implication (tentatively identified with overt or covert assertion) and an added theory ib for implied belief are constructed on the pattern of a weak modal system, whose specific axiom is taken to explicate what it means (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. N. G. E. Harris (1967). Geach on Frege's Assertion Sign. Analysis 27 (6):186 - 189.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. David Holdcroft (1969). Asserting and Referring. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (75):111-122.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Gary Kemp (2007). 6 Assertion as a Practice. In Geo Siegwart & Dirk Griemann (eds.), Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Routledge 5--106.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Mikhail Kissine (forthcoming). J. Brown & H. Cappelen (Eds.) Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. W. Kluxen (1983). Humane Self-Assertion in the Technological World. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 90 (2):335-344.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Max Kölbel (2013). The Conversational Role of Centered Contents. Inquiry 56 (2-3):97-121.
    Some philosophers, for example David Lewis, have argued for the need to introduce de se contents or centered contents, i.e. contents of thought and speech the correctness of believing which depends not only on the possible world one inhabits, but also on the location one occupies. Independently, philosophers like Robert Stalnaker (and also David Lewis) have developed the conversational score model of linguistic communication. This conversational model usually relies on a more standard conception of content according to which the correctness (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. Carolyn Korsmeyer (1985). Pictorial Assertion. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43 (3):257-265.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Sue Howard Larson (1962). Practical Implication: Some Problems in the Logic of Assertion. Dissertation, Stanford University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Steven Luper (1992). The Absurdity of Life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52:1-17.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Steven Luper-Foy (1992). The Absurdity of Life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (1):85-101.
  33. Cynthia Macdonald & Anthony Appiah (1987). Mind, Meaning, and Assertion. Philosophical Books 28 (4):193-205.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. J. S. Mackenzie (1895). Self-Assertion and Self-Denial. International Journal of Ethics 5 (3):273-295.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Tecla Mazzarese (1991). Norm-Proposition: Epistemic and Semantic Queries. Rechtstheorie 22:39-70.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Marco Mazzone (2013). Attention to the Speaker. The Conscious Assessment of Utterance Interpretations in Working Memory. Language and Communication 33:106-114.
    The role of conscious attention in language processing has been scarcely considered, despite the wide-spread assumption that verbal utterances manage to attract and manipulate the addressee’s attention. Here I claim that this assumption is to be understood not as a figure of speech but instead in terms of attentional processes proper. This hypothesis can explain a fact that has been noticed by supporters of Relevance Theory in pragmatics: the special role played by speaker-related information in utterance interpretation. I argue that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37. Thomas McPherson (1959). Assertion and Analogy. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 60:155 - 170.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Joe Mintoff (2008). Transcending Absurdity. Ratio 21 (1):64–84.
    Many of us experience the activities which fill our everyday lives as meaningful, and to do so we must (and do) hold them to be important. However, reflection undercuts this confidence: our activities are aimed at ends which are arbitrary, in that we have reason to regard our taking them so seriously as lacking justification; they are comparatively insignificant; and they leave little of any real permanence. Even though we take our activities seriously, and our everyday lives to be important, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39. Stuart Moore (1933). Rational Absurdity in Primitives. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):204 – 221.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Noël Mouloud (1991). L'Assertion dans les contextes épistémiques garants objectaux et bases d'évaluation. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 96 (2):197 - 206.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Noël Mouloud (1978). La connaissance et les modalités de l'assertion sous le jour de l'analyse sémantique. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 83 (2):145 - 170.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Sarah E. Murray (2011). A Hamblin Semantics for Evidentials. In Ed Cormany, Satoshi Ito & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings From Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XIX (2009). CLC Publications 324--341.
    In this paper, I propose that the distinction between what is at-issue and what is not can be modeled as a distinction between two components of assertion. These two components affect the common ground in different ways. The at-issue component of an assertion, which is negotiable, is treated as a proposal to update the common ground. The not-at-issue component of an assertion, which is not negotiable, is added directly to the common ground. Evidence for this proposal comes from evidentials, which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Sarah E. Murray (2010). Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts. Dissertation, Rutgers University
    Many languages grammatically mark evidentiality, i.e., the source of information. In assertions, evidentials indicate the source of information of the speaker while in questions they indicate the expected source of information of the addressee. This dissertation examines the semantics and pragmatics of evidentiality and illocutionary mood, set within formal theories of meaning and discourse. The empirical focus is the evidential system of Cheyenne (Algonquian: Montana), which is analyzed based on several years of fieldwork by the author.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44. Kai Nielsen (1958). Is "Why Should I Be Moral?" An Absurdity? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):25 – 32.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45. Edward Nieznański (2011). On Notions of Assertion, Knowledge and Opinion in Epistemic Logic. Studia Philosophiae Christianae 4:73-83.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. William Ernest Oberst (1976). Sentential Assertion. Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Douglas Odegard (1966). Absurdity and Types. Mind 75 (297):97-113.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48. Peter Pagin (forthcoming). Review of Mark Jary: Assertion. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. H. Palmer (1964). Affirmation and Assertion. Philosophy 39 (148):120 - 136.
    Positivists have always objected to people talking about God. Their objection rests on quite general logical grounds. They have discovered a simple, formal test by which to tell significant remarks from nonsensical collections of words. There must, they say, be some minimal conditions of intelligibility. From these we can construct a Principle of Meaning. Now religiousremarks, on any positivist Principle, are demonstrable nonsense. What are these conditions of intelligibility ? Speaker and hearer, we suppose, must use the same language; must (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Eva Picardi (1994). Convention and Assertion. In Brian McGuiness & Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.), The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. Kluwer 59--77.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 581