This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
7 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2007). Putnams Semi-Fideismus. Theologische Quartalschrift 185 (3):215-234.
    In this paper I argue that Hilary Putnam is a semi-fideist.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Graham Oppy (2013). Arguments for Atheism. In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press 53.
    This paper consider three families of arguments for atheism. First, there are direct arguments for atheism: arguments that theism is meaningless, or incoherent, or logically inconsistent, or impossible, or inconsistent with known fact, of improbable given known fact, or morally repugnant, or the like. Second, there are indirect arguments for atheism: direct arguments for something that entails atheism. Third, there are comparative arguments for atheism: e.g., arguments for the view that (atheistic) naturalism is more theoretically virtuous than theism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Marek Pepliński (2012). Balet Dawkinsa w ogrodzie teologii. Uwagi krytyczne w sprawie racjonalności głównych twierdzeń dotyczących wymiaru poznawczego twierdzeń o Bogu, zawartych w książce Richarda Dawkinsa Bóg urojony. Część I. Filo-Sofija 12 (18):293-322.
    DAWKINS’ BALLET IN THE GARDEN OF THEOLOGY. A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF RICHARD DAWKINS’ EPISTEMOLOGICAL THESES ON THEISTIC BELIEFS FROM THE GOD DELUSION. PART I My paper presents a detailed analysis and assessment of Richard Dawkins’ epistemological theses from The God Delusion concerning the nature of religious belief, the existence of God and treating belief in God as a scientific hypothesis. In the first part of the article, I am interpreting Dawkins’ statement that atheism deserves respect as an epistemic achievement. I (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Michael Tooley (2009). Helping People to Think Critically About Their Religious Beliefs. In 50 Voices of Disbelief: Why We Are Atheists. Wiley-Blackwell
    In the debate volume, ’Knowledge of God’, co-authored with Alvin Plantinga, I argued that there is an inductively sound version of the argument from evil, and recently, several popular books criticizing religious belief have appeared, often focusing on that issue of the existence of God. In the present essay I argue, however, that to help ordinary people think more critically about religious beliefs, it is better to focus on beliefs associated with specific religions, such as Christianity. I then go on (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. David Webster (2012). Dispirited: Dispirited: How Contemporary Spirituality Makes Us Stupid, Selfish and Unhappy. John Hunt.
  6. Raymond Aaron Younis (2009). Climbing Mount Unintellgible? Science Religion and the Question of Meaning and Explanation. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):2009.
  7. Linda Zagzebski (2007). Philosophy of Religion: An Historical Introduction. Blackwell Pub..
    An accessible and engaging introduction to the philosophy of religion. Written with verve and clarity by a leading philosopher and contributor to the field Places key issues and debates in the philosophy of religion in their historical contexts, highlighting the conditions that led to the development of the field Addresses the core topics, among them the the existence of God, the problem of evil, death and the afterlife, and the problem of religious diversity Rich with argument, yet never obtrusive Forms (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations