This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:History/traditions: Atheism
229 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 229
  1. Rolf Ahlers (1984). Hegel's Theological Atheism. Heythrop Journal 25 (2):158–177.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Scott F. Aikin (2011). Reasonable Atheism: A Moral Case for Respectful Disbelief. Prometheus Books.
    Arguing in mixed company -- What atheism is -- On the new atheism -- Ethics without God -- A moral case for atheism -- Religion in politics.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Shabbir Akhtar (1991). A History of Atheism in Britain. International Studies in Philosophy 23 (1):100-101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael J. Almeida (2006). On Stone's Evidential Atheism. Theoria 72 (1):5-22.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel E. Anderson (1980). Descartes and Atheism. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 29:11-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas Anderson (1995). Technics and Atheism in Gabriel Marcel. Bulletin de la Société Américaine de Philosophie de Langue Française 7 (1/2):59-68.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Louise Antony (ed.) (2007). Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular. Oup.
    In this revealing volume, 19 leading philosophers open a window on the inner life of atheism, shattering common stereotypes as they reveal how they came to turn ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Michael Antony (2011). All Due Respect - “Reasonable Atheism” by Aikin and Talisse Reviewed. [REVIEW] The Philosophers' Magazine (55):108-109.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael V. Antony (2010). Where's the Evidence? Philosophy Now 78:18-21.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Derek Attridge (2009). Martin Hägglund, Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008), 255pp, Hb $65.00 (USD), ISBN-10: 080470077X, ISBN-13: 978-0804700771; Pb $24.95 (USD), ISBN-10: 0804700788, ISBN-13: 978-0804700788. [REVIEW] Derrida Today 2 (2):271-281.
    Review of _Radical Atheism_, focusing on the question of hospitality.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Dennis Vanden Auweele (2010). Atheism, Radical Evil, and Kant. Philosophy and Theology 22 (1/2):155-176.
    This paper investigates the link between (radical) evil and the existence of God. Arguing with contemporary atheist thinkers, such as Richard Dawkins and Victor Stenger, I hold that one can take the existence of evil as a sign of the existence of God rather than its opposite. The work of Immanuel Kant, especially his thought on evil, is a fertile source to enliven this intuition. Kant implicitly seems to argue that because man is unable to overcome evil by himself, there (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Julian Baggini (2008). Michael Martin (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Religious Studies 44 (3):367-371.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christine Battersby (1978). Atheism and the Rejection of God: Contemporary Philosophy and 'The Brothers Karamazov' By Stewart R. Sutherland Oxford: Blackwell, 1977, 152 + Viii Pp., £6.75. [REVIEW] Philosophy 53 (206):566-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. L. Bel'tser & V. Gaida (1973). First Ussr-Wide Seminar on Atheism. Russian Studies in Philosophy 12 (3):87-98.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Benatar (2006). What's God Got to Do with It? Atheism and Religious Practice. Ratio 19 (4):383–400.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Boran Berčić (2005). Rey's Meta-Atheism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):417-422.
    The author argues that the atheist does not commit the so called “philosophy fallacy” but rather simply answers the theist’s arguments. The principle that the absence of evidence is the evidence of absence, although very sound, is nevertheless context-dependent and cannot be accepted without further qualifications. Also, any systematic study of religiousness should explore its links to emotions (prophets often invite people to open their hearts, not their minds or reasons) and its role in the constitution of identity (people often (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. David Berman (1983). David Hume and the Suppression of 'Atheism'. Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (3):375-387.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Bishop (2001). Book Review. Arguing for Atheism. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion Robin le Poidevin. [REVIEW] Mind 110 (438):497-501.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Bishop (1997). On J.J.C. Smart and J.J. Haldane's Atheism and Theism. Sophia 36 (1):38-52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thomas J. Blakeley (1977). Scientific Atheism: Some Soviet Books, 1974–1975. Studies in East European Thought 17 (1):91-92.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Thomas J. Blakeley (1966). Marxist-Leninist Scientific Atheism. Inquiry 9 (1-4):30 – 46.
    The main object of Marxist-Leninist 'scientific atheism' consists in the discovery and assimilation of 'scientific' data and its use in the 'atheistic' destruction of religion and all its appurtenances. The first task is to show — using the data mainly of the natural sciences — the non-existence of the object of religion, i.e. God. Second, it is necessary to explain how a theory without an object came to be and continues to show signs of vitality, i.e. to find the causes (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas J. Blakeley (1965). Soviet Writings on Atheism and Religion: Supplement. Studies in East European Thought 5 (1-2):106-113.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas J. Blakeley (1964). Soviet Writings on Atheism and Religion. Studies in East European Thought 4 (4):319-338.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas J. Blakeley (1964). Scientific Atheism: An Introduction. Studies in East European Thought 4 (4):277-295.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Bradie (2009). What's Wrong with Methodological Naturalism? Human Affairs 19 (2):126 - 137.
    The compatibility of Darwinism with religious beliefs has been the subject of vigorous debate from 1859 to the present day. Darwin himself did not think that there was any incompatibility between his theory of natural selection and the existence of God. However, he did not think that appeals to the direct or indirect activity of a Creator substantially increased our understanding of any natural phenomenon. In effect, Darwin endorsed what we would today label as ’methodological naturalism,’ roughly the view that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Raymond D. Bradley, A Moral Argument for Atheism.
    First: there is ample precedent for what I am doing. Socrates, for example, examined the religious beliefs of his contemporaries-- especially the belief that we ought to do what the gods command--and showed them to be both ill-founded and conceptually confused. I wish to follow in his footsteps though not to share in his fate. A glass of wine, not of poison, would be my preferred reward.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Raymond D. Bradley, God, Design, and Evolution: A Teleological Argument for Atheism.
    Many things in the natural world work so well that they seem to have been designed. But by what? Could nature itself, by processes including those of evolution, be the designer? Or must their complex structure and function be attributed to some intelligent designer or God? Is natural design compatible with intelligent design? How good is the argument from the presence of design to an intelligent designer? And if we could legitimately infer the probable existence of an intelligent designer from (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Neil Broom (1998). How Blind is the Watchmaker?: Theism or Atheism: Should Science Decide? Ashgate Pub..
  29. Robin Burgess (2001). The Case for Atheism. Heythrop Journal 42 (1):66–70.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Reviewed Rosalind Carey (2005). Atheism, Morality and Meaning. Philosophical Investigations 28 (1):87–90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Rosalind Carey (2005). Atheism, Morality and Meaning. Philosophical Investigations 28 (1):87-90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Anthony J. Carroll (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Edited by Michael Martin. Heythrop Journal 50 (3):539-540.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Timothy Chappell (2001). Atheism and Theism. J. J. C. Smart J. J. Haldane. Mind 110 (439):836-839.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Lorenzo Chiesa & Alberto Toscano (2007). Agape and the Anonymous Religion of Atheism. Angelaki 12 (1):113 – 126.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Keith Chrzan (1991). Plantinga and Probabilistic Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (1):21 - 27.
    Plantinga underestimates the prospects for probabilistic atheism. He employs a flawed mathematical rendition of the atheist's crucial claim, (1) and he misunderstands the utility (1) would have for the atheist.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John Churchill (2000). Merold Westphal, Suspicion and Faith: The Religious Uses of Modern Atheism. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (3):183-185.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Chapman Cohen (1943). Materialism Restated. London, Issued for the Secular Society, Limited, by the Pioneer Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Benjamin Cordry (2011). A More Dangerous Enemy? Philo's “Confession” and Hume's Soft Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (1):61-83.
    While Hume has often been held to have been an agnostic or atheist, several contemporary scholars have argued that Hume was a theist. These interpretations depend chiefly on several passages in which Hume allegedly confesses to theism. In this paper, I argue against this position by giving a threshold characterization of theism and using it to show that Hume does not confess. His most important confession does not cross this threshold and the ones that do are often expressive rather than (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. William Lane Craig (1993). Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford University Press.
    Contemporary science presents us with the remarkable theory that the universe began to exist about fifteen billion years ago with a cataclysmic explosion called "the Big Bang." The question of whether Big Bang cosmology supports theism or atheism has long been a matter of discussion among the general public and in popular science books, but has received scant attention from philosophers. This book sets out to fill this gap by means of a sustained debate between two philosophers, William Lane Craig (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. James E. Crimmins (1993). D. Berman, A History of Atheism in Britain, From Hobbes to Russell, London and New York, Routledge, 1990, Pp. X + 253. Utilitas 5 (02):337-.
  41. Mary-Ann Crumplin (2012). Emmanuel Levinas on Onto-Theo-Logy: Parricide and Atheism. Heythrop Journal 53 (1):100-110.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Helmut Dahm (1991). The Problem of Atheism in Recent Soviet Publications. Studies in East European Thought 41 (2):85-126.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John Danaher (2014). Skeptical Theism and Divine Permission - A Reply to Anderson. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):101-118.
    Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC) value of natural events and states of affairs. And if we lose that ability, a whole slew of undesirable consequences follow. So goes a common consequential critique of ST. In a recent article, Anderson has argued that this consequential critique is flawed. Anderson claims (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephen T. Davis (2005). Is Nonbelief a Proof of Atheism? Philo 8 (2):151-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Lara Denis (2003). Kant's Criticism of Atheism. Kant-Studien 94 (2):198-219.
    Although Kant argues that morality is prior to and independent of religion, Kant nevertheless claims that religion of a certain sort (“moral theism”) follows from morality, and that atheism poses threats to morality. Kant criticizes atheism as morally problematic in four ways: atheism robs the atheist of springs for moral action, leads the atheist to moral despair, corrupts the atheist’s moral character, and has a pernicious influence on the atheist’s community. I argue that Kant is right to say that moral (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Daniel C. Dennett (2007). Atheism and Evolution. In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 135--148.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. George Di Giovanni (1989). From Jacobi's Philosophical Novel to Fichte's Idealism: Some Comments on the 1798-99 "Atheism Dispute". Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1):75-100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. T. Dixon (2002). Scientific Atheism as a Faith Tradition - the Genetic Gods: Evolution and Belief in Human Affairs John C. Avise; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA & London, 1998, Pp. VIII+279, Price £20.50 Hardback, ISBN 0-674-34625-4, £12.50 Paperback, ISBN 0-674-0033-. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (2):337-359.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jude P. Dougherty (1989). The Religious Significance of Atheism. Idealistic Studies 19 (1):85-86.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Trent Dougherty & Logan Paul Gage (forthcoming). New Atheist Approaches to Religion. In Graham Oppy (ed.), Acumen Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Acumen.
    In this article, we examine in detail the New Atheists' most serious argument for the conclusion that God does not exist, namely, Richard Dawkins's Ultimate 747 Gambit. Dawkins relies upon a strong explanatory principle involving simplicity. We systematically inspect the various kinds of simplicity that Dawkins may invoke. Finding his crucial premises false on any common conception of simplicity, we conclude that Dawkins has not given good reason to think God does not exist.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 229