Related categories
Siblings:
122 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 122
  1. Gregory Andrew (2013). Leucippus and Democritus on Like to Like and Ou Mallon. Apeiron 46 (4):1-23.
    Journal Name: Apeiron Issue: Ahead of print.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ivars Avotins (1980). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists. Classical Quarterly 30 (02):429-.
  3. D. T. J. Bailey (2006). Review: Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle and Democritus. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1151-1153.
  4. O. Balaban (1989). The Hermeneutics of the Young Marx: According To Marx's Approach To the Philosophy of Democritus and Epicurus. Diogenes 37 (148):28-41.
    In the History of Philosophy, the atomistic physics of Epicurus and of Democritus have been considered as very similar.1 Con trary to the more conventional view, Marx considers this similarity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard W. Baldes (1978). Democritus on the Nature and Perception of 'Black' and 'White'. Phronesis 23 (2):87 - 100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard W. Baldes (1978). Democritus on the Nature and Perception of `Black' and `White. Phronesis 23 (2):87-100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard W. Baldes (1975). Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One? Phronesis 20 (2):93 - 105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard W. Baldes (1975). Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One? Phronesis 20 (2):93-105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. M. Balme (1941). Greek Science and Mechanism II. The Atomists. Classical Quarterly 35 (1-2):23-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lewis White Beck (1984). Plurality of Worlds. The Origins of the Extra-Terrestrial Life Debate From Democritus to Kant. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):365-366.
  11. Sylvia Berryman, Democritus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sylvia Berryman, Leucippus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. P. J. Bicknell (1970). Coins and the Presocratics III; Abdera. Apeiron 4 (1):1 - 3.
  14. Aldo Brancacci & Pierre-Marie Morel (eds.) (2007). Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus, Paris, 18-20 September 2003. [REVIEW] Brill.
    Printbegrænsninger: Der kan printes 10 sider ad gangen og max. 40 sider pr. session.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Tad Brennan (2003). Book Review. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. J Warren. [REVIEW] Ethics 1 (1):205-12.
  16. Victor Brochard (1889). Protagoras et Démocrite. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 2 (3):368-378.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. R. G. Bury (1916). The Origin of Atomism. The Classical Review 30 (01):1-4.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Paul Cartledge (1998). Democritus: Democritus and Atomistic Politics. Phoenix.
    The Renaissance's 'Laughing Philosopher': ourown age's 'prophet of quark' : throughout modern philosophical traditions, Democritushas been a man little known beyond his labels. Yet if the image of the cheerful ironist understates his true seriousness, that of father of modern nuclear physics - though by no means entirely unfounded - loses sight of the man in the hyperbole. Flattering as it is, it fails to do justice either to the full range of Democritus' interests or to the astonishing originality of (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Luca Castagnoli (2010). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; Part I. Truth, <span class='Hi'>Falsehood</span> and Self-Refutation: 1. Preliminaries; 2. A modern approach: Mackie on the absolute self-refutation of 'nothing is true'; 3. Setting the ancient stage: Dissoi Logoi 4.6; 4. Self-refutation and dialectic: Plato; 5. Speaking to Antiphasis: Aristotle; 6. Introducing peritroph: Sextus Empiricus; 7. Augustine's turn; 8. Interim conclusions; Part II. Pragmatic, Ad Hominem and Operational Self-Refutation: 9. Epicurus against the determinist: blame and reversal; 10. Anti-sceptical dilemmas: pragmatic or ad hominem self-refutations?; 11. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Luca Castagnoli (2007). Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus, by Mi-Kyoung Lee. Ancient Philosophy 27 (2):405-418.
  21. Alan Chalmers (1997). Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Timothy Chappell (2010). Mi-Kyoung Lee's Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Philosophical Books 51 (2):117-125.
  23. Vincenzo Cioffari (1935). Fortune and Fate From Democritus to St. Thomas Aquinas. New York.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. J. A. Davison (1953). Protagoras, Democritus, and Anaxagoras. Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):33-.
  25. Andreas Degen (2012). Concepts of Fascination, From Democritus to Kant. Journal of the History of Ideas 73 (3):371-393.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David A. Dilworth (1989). Santayana and Democritus. Overheard in Seville 7 (7):9-19.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Tiziano Dorandi (2000). C. C. W. Taylor: The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus Fragments (the Phoenix Presocratics Series). Pp. XII + 308. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 1999. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):421-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Louis Dudek (1994). The Birth of Reason. Dc Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jean-François Duvernoy (2005). Epicure: La Construction de la Félicité. Ousia.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Alfred Einstein (1937). Democritus and Heraclitus: A Duet in Major and Minor. Journal of the Warburg Institute 1 (2):177-179.
  31. Walter Englert (2004). Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):496-500.
  32. B. Farrington (1965). Atomism in a Void George K. Strodach: The Philosophy of Epicurus. Pp.X + 262. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1963. Cloth, $5. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 15 (03):290-291.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Ferguson (1971). Δinoς. Phronesis 16 (1):97-115.
  34. Rein Ferwerda (1997). Démocrite. Ancient Philosophy 17 (2):529-532.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. D. Furley (1983). Weight and Motion in Democritus' Theory. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1:193-209.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. David J. Furley (1970). Studies in Presocratic Philosophy. New York,Humanities Press.
  37. Todd Ganson (1999). Democritus Against Reducing Sensible Qualities. Ancient Philosophy 19 (2):201-215.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jens Gerlach (2008). Gnomica Democritea: Studien Zur Gnomologischen Überlieferung der Ethik Demokrits Und Zum Corpus Parisinum Mit Einer Edition der Democritea des Corpus Parisinum. L. Reichert.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Raymond Godfrey (1990). Democritus and the Impossibility of Collision. Philosophy 65 (252):212 - 217.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. García Gómez & M. Angel (1984). The Legend of the Laughing Philosopher and its Presence in Spanish Literature, 1500-1700. Servicio De Publicaciones, Universidad De Córdoba.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. H. B. Gottschalk (1986). Democritus FV 68 B 1: An Amputation. Phronesis 31 (1):90-91.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Daniel W. Graham (2008). Leucippus's Atomism. In Patricia Curd & Daniel W. Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. A. A. Guseinov (1987). The Ethics of Democritus. Russian Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):53-65.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. W. Hamilton (1936). The Atomists V. E. Alfieri: Gli Atomisti. Frammenti e testimonianze. Traduzione e note. Pp. xx + 410. Bari: Laterza, 1936. Paper, L. 40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (04):124-125.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. W. Hamilton (1935). A New view of Democritus Hermann Langerbeck : ΔΟΞΙΣ ΕΙΙΙΡΣΜΙΗ, Studien zu Demokrits Ethik und Erkenntnislehre. Pp. 132. (Neue Philologische Untersuchungen, Heft 10.) Berlin: Weidmann, 1935. Paper, RM. 9. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (04):132-133.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Dirk tD Held (2004). Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. Review of Metaphysics 58 (1):199-200.
  47. Ulrike Hirsch (1990). War Demokrits Weltbild mechanistisch und antiteleologisch? Phronesis 35 (1):225-244.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Pamela M. Huby (1978). Epicurus' Attitude to Democritus. Phronesis 23 (1):80-86.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Edward Hussey (1980). Rudolf Löbl: Demokrits AtomeL: Eine Untersuchung zur Überlieferung und zu einigen wichtigen Lehrstücken in Demokrits Physik. Pp. 253. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 1976. Paper, DM 36. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 30 (02):284-285.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Milena Ivanova (2013). Did Perrin's Experiments Convert Poincare to Scientific Realism. HoPoS 3 (1):1-19.
    In this paper I argue that Poincaré’s acceptance of the atom does not indicate a shift from instrumentalism to scientific realism. I examine the implications of Poincaré’s acceptance of the existence of the atom for our current understanding of his philosophy of science. Specifically, how can we understand Poincaré’s acceptance of the atom in structural realist terms? I examine his 1912 paper carefully and suggest that it does not entail scientific realism in the sense of acceptance of the fundamental existence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 122