Related categories
Siblings:
158 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 158
  1. J. L. Ackrill (1970). FURLEY, D. J. - "Two Studies in the Greek Atomists". [REVIEW] Mind 79:307.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gregory Andrew (2013). Leucippus and Democritus on Like to Like and Ou Mallon. Apeiron 46 (4):1-23.
    Journal Name: Apeiron Issue: Ahead of print.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Annas (2002). Democritus and Eudaimonism. In Alexander P. D. Mourelatos, Victor Miles Caston & Daniel W. Graham (eds.), Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Ashgate.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ivars Avotins (1980). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists. Classical Quarterly 30 (02):429-.
    In discussing the atomists' theory of vision modern accounts have quite neglected to take into account two sections of Alexander of Aphrodisias on this topic. Nearly identical in length and content, they contain objections to the atomist theory of vision by means of the . In form they consist of a series of questions purporting to contain atomist doctrine. Each question is followed by objections to its subject-matter. Most of the questions contain doctrine known to us already from other sources.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. D. T. J. Bailey (2006). Review: Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle and Democritus. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1151-1153.
  6. O. Balaban (1989). The Hermeneutics of the Young Marx: According To Marx's Approach To the Philosophy of Democritus and Epicurus. Diogenes 37 (148):28-41.
    In the History of Philosophy, the atomistic physics of Epicurus and of Democritus have been considered as very similar.1 Con trary to the more conventional view, Marx considers this similarity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard W. Baldes (1978). 'Divisibility' and 'Division' in Democritus. Apeiron 12 (1):1 - 12.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard W. Baldes (1978). Democritus on the Nature and Perception of 'Black' and 'White'. Phronesis 23 (2):87 - 100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard W. Baldes (1978). Democritus on the Nature and Perception of `Black' and `White. Phronesis 23 (2):87-100.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Richard W. Baldes (1976). Theophrastus' Witness to Democritus on Perception. Apeiron 10 (1):42 - 48.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard W. Baldes (1975). Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One? Phronesis 20 (2):93-105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard W. Baldes (1975). Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One? Phronesis 20 (2):93 - 105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. D. M. Balme (1941). Greek Science and Mechanism II. The Atomists. Classical Quarterly 35 (1-2):23-.
    The principle that a moving body must continue to move unless something stops it was not known to Aristotle nor even unconsciously assumed by him. The effect of this ignorance upon his philosophy was discussed in C.Q. 1939, p. 129 f. It forbade him to conceive of a mechanist theory in the nineteenth-century sense. It enabled him to hold, what must seem self-contradictory to us, that all events have definable causes without there being a universal nexus of causes and effects (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Lewis White Beck (1984). Plurality of Worlds. The Origins of the Extra-Terrestrial Life Debate From Democritus to Kant. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):365-366.
  15. Sylvia Berryman, Democritus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Sylvia Berryman, Leucippus. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. P. J. Bicknell (1970). Coins and the Presocratics III; Abdera. Apeiron 4 (1):1 - 3.
  18. Peter Bicknell (1981). "Kosmos"-Sized Atoms in Demokritos. Apeiron 15 (2):138-139.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter J. Bicknell (1975). Two Notes on Demokritos. Apeiron 9 (2):40 - 41.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Aldo Brancacci & Pierre-Marie Morel (eds.) (2007). Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus, Paris, 18-20 September 2003. [REVIEW] Brill.
    Printbegrænsninger: Der kan printes 10 sider ad gangen og max. 40 sider pr. session.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Aldo Brancacci & Pierre-Marie Morel (eds.) (2006). Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Democritus. [REVIEW] Brill.
    This volume gathers specific investigations dealing with some of the main topics of the research on Democritus: the catalogue of works, music, literary criticism, technics, zoology and the relation to medicine, physics, epistemology, posterity.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Tad Brennan (2003). Book Review. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. J Warren. [REVIEW] Ethics 1 (1):205-12.
  23. Victor Brochard (1889). Protagoras et Démocrite. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 2 (3):368-378.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. W. H. Brock (1969). The Atomists. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 4 (3):291-292.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. R. G. Bury (1916). The Origin of Atomism. The Classical Review 30 (01):1-4.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Paul Cartledge (1998). Democritus: Democritus and Atomistic Politics. Phoenix.
    The Renaissance's 'Laughing Philosopher': ourown age's 'prophet of quark' : throughout modern philosophical traditions, Democritushas been a man little known beyond his labels. Yet if the image of the cheerful ironist understates his true seriousness, that of father of modern nuclear physics - though by no means entirely unfounded - loses sight of the man in the hyperbole. Flattering as it is, it fails to do justice either to the full range of Democritus' interests or to the astonishing originality of (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Luca Castagnoli (2010). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; Part I. Truth, <span class='Hi'>Falsehood</span> and Self-Refutation: 1. Preliminaries; 2. A modern approach: Mackie on the absolute self-refutation of 'nothing is true'; 3. Setting the ancient stage: Dissoi Logoi 4.6; 4. Self-refutation and dialectic: Plato; 5. Speaking to Antiphasis: Aristotle; 6. Introducing peritroph: Sextus Empiricus; 7. Augustine's turn; 8. Interim conclusions; Part II. Pragmatic, Ad Hominem and Operational Self-Refutation: 9. Epicurus against the determinist: blame and reversal; 10. Anti-sceptical dilemmas: pragmatic or ad hominem self-refutations?; 11. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Luca Castagnoli (2007). Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus, by Mi-Kyoung Lee. Ancient Philosophy 27 (2):405-418.
  29. Alan Chalmers (1997). Did Democritus Ascribe Weight to Atoms? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):279 – 287.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Timothy Chappell (2010). Mi-Kyoung Lee's Epistemology After Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Philosophical Books 51 (2):117-125.
  31. Chris Christensen (2014). Democritus: Empirical Rationalist. Philosophy Now 104:10-12.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Vincenzo Cioffari (1935). Fortune and Fate From Democritus to St. Thomas Aquinas. New York.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Michael Gregory Colvin (1974). A New Look at the Ethics of Democritus. Dissertation, Indiana University
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Patricia Curd (2008). Review of Aldo Brancacci, Pierre-Marie Morel (Eds.), Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (12).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. Danchin (ed.) (1987). Order and Necessity. Elsevier Sciences Publishers.
    Because this lecture was a tribute to the contribution of Monod to science it focused on his views, without discussing the work of others who contributed to his achievements. In particular, because Monod was implicitly a platonician/pythagorean (with his emphasis on the importance of beauty in things), he thought that symmetry had to be introduced in the concept of allostery. In fact this was an extra feature that was absent from the original work of Jean-Pierre Changeux on the enzyme threonine (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. J. A. Davison (1953). Protagoras, Democritus, and Anaxagoras. Classical Quarterly 3 (1-2):33-.
    Recent accounts of the life of Protagoras differ widely from one another in their treatment of the ancient sources, and in the conclusions which they draw from them. A re-examination of the evidence, undertaken in 1949–50 as part of a study of the Prometheus trilogy, has convinced me that a new discussion is urgently needed if we are to place the earlier stages of the sophistic movement in the right context historically; and the purpose of this paper is to lay (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Herman De Ley (1969). Δοξισ Επιρϒσμιη, A Critical Note On Democritus Fr. 7. Hermes 97 (4):497-498.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andreas Degen (2012). Concepts of Fascination, From Democritus to Kant. Journal of the History of Ideas 73 (3):371-393.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. G. DeMorsier, G. Deny, E. Y. Deykin, Ch Dickens, H. Diels, W. Dilthey, Don Juan, G. Diirer & A. Einstein (1982). Da Vinci, L., 37 DeKoning, AJJ, seeKoning, AJJ de Delgado, H., 135 Democritus, 11. In A. J. J. de Koning & F. A. Jenner (eds.), Phenomenology and Psychiatry. Grune & Stratton.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David A. Dilworth (1989). Santayana and Democritus. Overheard in Seville 7 (7):9-19.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Tiziano Dorandi (2000). C. C. W. Taylor: The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus Fragments (the Phoenix Presocratics Series). Pp. XII + 308. Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 1999. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):421-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Louis Dudek (1994). The Birth of Reason. Dc Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jean-François Duvernoy (2005). Epicure: La Construction de la Félicité. Ousia.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Adolf Dyroff (1899). Demokritstudien.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Alfred Einstein (1937). Democritus and Heraclitus: A Duet in Major and Minor. Journal of the Warburg Institute 1 (2):177-179.
  46. Walter Englert (2004). Epicurus and Democritean Ethics. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 24 (2):496-500.
  47. B. Farrington (1965). Atomism in a Void George K. Strodach: The Philosophy of Epicurus. Pp.X + 262. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1963. Cloth, $5. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 15 (03):290-291.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Ferguson (1971). Δinoς. Phronesis 16 (1):97-115.
  49. Rein Ferwerda (1997). Démocrite. Ancient Philosophy 17 (2):529-532.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. K. Friis Johansen (1986). The Concept of Nature in Democritus. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 23:148-167.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 158