This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
403 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 403
Material to categorize
  1. John Dennis Aach (1987). Behaviorism and Normativity: The Prospect of a Skinnerian Psychologism. Dissertation, Boston University
    The thesis attempts to formulate a behavioristc definition of normativity based on proposals by B. F. Skinner in the context of a general analysis of the problem of reconciling psychology with normative science, especially logic. An introduction states the problem and briefly traces its historical roots. Chapter 1 traces modern acceptance of the view that psychology is irrelevant to normative science to Husserl's and Frege's victorious arguments against nineteenth century psychologism, and aims to show them inconclusive against modern psychologies through (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. R. Abelson, L. Addis, K. D. Allen, W. P. Alston, J. T. Andresen, D. M. Armstrong, W. J. Arnold, K. J. Arrow, B. J. Baars & A. Bandura (1999). Comte, X Coombs, CH, 31, 36 Cox. LE, 205,207 Darwin, C., 29, 36. In Bruce A. Thyer (ed.), The Philosophical Legacy of Behaviorism. Kluwer Academic Publishers 257.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Laird Addis (1982). Behaviorism and the Philosophy of the Act. Noûs 16 (3):399-420.
    Behaviorism and the philosophy of the act are widely believed to be inconsistent with one another. I argue that both are true, Fulfilling the requirements of scientific psychology and the phenomenology of mind, Respectively. The key to understanding their mutual consistency lies in the idea of parallelism and its corresponding requirement that all descriptive features of mental states be analyzed as properties, None as relations (to anything physical). So the intentional link itself must be a 'logical' and not a descriptive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Harold J. Allen (1980). P.W. Bridgman and B.F. Skinner on Private Experience. Behaviorism 8 (1):15-29.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. William P. Alston (1972). Can Psychology Do Without Private Data? Behaviorism 1 (1):71-102.
  6. Stuart A. Altmann (1984). Skinner's Circus. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):678.
  7. Majid Amini (2004). Behaviourism Is Back! Minerva 8:257-275.
    It was not long ago that behaviourism was almost a contemptuous epithet, if not a contretemps career epitaph,and few theorists wished to be mistaken for behaviourists. However, there has been a recent shift of allianceswith the emergence of a new breed of researchers that openly advocate the incorporation of behaviourism intothe study of consciousness. This critical essay is therefore devoted to the examination of Rodney Cotterill’s workwhose theoretical orientation in the field of consciousness positions him among the eminent members of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Abram Amsel (1988). Behaviorism, Neobehaviorism, and Cognitivism in Learning Theory Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9. Claudia Arrighi (2006). Suppes From Stimulus-Response to Brain Waves Analysis: A Tale on the White Knight of Behaviorism. Epistemologia 29 (2):267-290.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Andrew Backe (2000). Book Review:The Philosophical Legacy of Behaviorism Bruce A. Thyer. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 67 (3):546-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Donald M. Baer & Stephanie B. Stolz (1978). A Description of the Erhard Seminars Training in the Terms of Behavior Analysis. Behaviorism 6 (1):45-70.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. F. C. Bartlett (1927). WATSON, J B. - Behaviorism. [REVIEW] Mind 36:77.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Claude G. Beardslee (1924). Personalism and Behaviorism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 5 (1):12.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.) (2005). Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon.
    This volume will be the starting point for future discussion and research.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  15. Gustav Bergmann (1940). On Some Methodological Problems of Psychology. Philosophy of Science 7 (April):205-219.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Alberto Binazzi (2009). The Philosophical Legacy of Behaviorism - Bruce A. Thyer. [REVIEW] Humana.Mente 11.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Brand Blanshard (1928). Behaviorism and the Theory of Knowledge. Philosophical Review 37 (4):328-352.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Robert A. Boakes (1985). From Darwin to Behaviorism. Behaviorism 13 (2):183-186.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19. Peter Boghossian (2006). Behaviorism, Constructivism, and Socratic Pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 38 (6):713–722.
    This paper examines the relationship among behaviorism, constructivism and Socratic pedagogy. Specifically, it asks if a Socratic educator can be a constructivist or a behaviorist. In the first part of the paper, each learning theory, as it relates to the Socratic project, is explained. In the last section, the question of whether or not a Socratic teacher can subscribe to a constructivist or a behaviorist learning theory is addressed. The paper concludes by stating that while Socratic pedagogy shares some similarities (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20. Stefano Borgo, Noemi Spagnoletti, Laure Vieu & Elisabetta Visalberghi (2013). Artifact and Artifact Categorization: Comparing Humans and Capuchin Monkeys. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (3):375-389.
    We aim to show that far-related primates like humans and the capuchin monkeys show interesting correspondences in terms of artifact characterization and categorization. We investigate this issue by using a philosophically-inspired definition of physical artifact which, developed for human artifacts, turns out to be applicable for cross-species comparison. In this approach an artifact is created when an entity is intentionally selected and some capacities attributed to it (often characterizing a purpose). Behavioral studies suggest that this notion of artifact is not (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Paul J. Bruckner (1932). Behaviorism and Common Sense. Modern Schoolman 9 (4):80-82.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. José E. Burgos (2009). Against Parsimonious Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 37:59 - 85.
    This paper is a rejection of parsimonious behaviorism (PB). PB was proposed by Stemmer (2003) to avoid certain problems with radical behaviorism's (RB) appeal to covert behavior to account for mental phenomena. According to Stemmer, covert behavior was not clearly defined and its existence was not supported by empirical evidence. However, overt behavior is not as undefined, nor its existence as empirically unsupported as Stemmer claimed. Nor does PB avoid the problems, as it does not encourage us to seek a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. José E. Burgos (2007). About Aboutness: Thoughts on Intentional Behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy 35:65 - 76.
    The rationale, scientific necessity, and character of intentionality ascriptions (assertions that attribute beliefs, expectations, wishes and such to certain systems) remain unresolved issues in the philosophy of mind and psychology. Foxall's proposed resolution (2007), which he calls "Intentional Behaviorism" (IB), is that intentionality ascriptions should be tied to the experimental analysis of behavior, nervous systems, and evolutionary considerations. Foxall's tone of scientific pluralism and attention to academic philosophy and psychology are steps in the right direction. However, I remain skeptical about (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. José E. Burgos (2007). The Theory Debate in Psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 35:149 - 183.
    This paper is a conceptual analysis of the theory debate in psychology, as carried out by cognitivists and radical behaviorists. The debate has focused on the necessity of theories in psychology. However, the logically primary issue is the nature of theories, or what theories are. This claim stems from the fact that cognitivists and radical behaviorists adopt disparate accounts of the nature of theories. The cognitivists' account is closely akin to the received view from logical positivism, where theories are collections (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Alex Byrne (1994). Behaviorism. In Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell
    Introductory texts in the philosophy of mind often begin with a discussion of behaviourism, presented as one of the few theories of mind that have been conclusively refuted. But matters are not that simple: behaviourism, in one form or another, is still alive and kicking.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Randall K. Campbell (1991). Nonnomic Properties of Stimuli and Psychological Explanation. Behavior and Philosophy 19 (1):77 - 92.
    Recently there has been a great deal of argument about what justifies references to representational states in explanations of behavior. I discuss Jerry Fodor's claim that it is necessary to ascribe representational states to organisms that respond to "nonnomic properties" of stimuli. Zenon Pylyshyn's (apparently equivalent) claim that it is necessary to ascribe representational states to organisms that respond to "nonprojectable properties" of stimuli and Fodor's claim that an organism's ability to respond to nonnomic properties of stimuli is a criterion (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Cristiano Castelfranchi (2014). Minds as Social Institutions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (1):121-143.
    I will first discuss how social interactions organize, coordinate, and specialize as “artifacts,” tools; how these tools are not only for coordination but for achieving something, for some outcome (goal/function), for a collective work. In particular, I will argue that these artifacts specify (predict and prescribe) the mental contents of the participants, both in terms of beliefs and acceptances and in terms of motives and plans. We have to revise the behavioristic view of “scripts” and “roles”; when we play a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. A. Charles Catania (1976). Self-Reinforcement Revisited. Behaviorism 4 (2):157-162.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Paul Champagne (1976). Alternative Perspectives in Education: The Radical School or Reinforcement Theory? Behaviorism 4 (2):231-243.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. H. Wallis Chapman (1928). Behaviourism: A Logical Study. Philosophy 3 (9):65.
    The object of this article is not to criticize Professor Watson's psychology, still less his physiology; neither do I wish to attempt a fundamental metaphysical criticism, such as that contained in Professor Lloyd Morgan's article in the April number of the Journal, but it appears to me that a purely logical criticism, admitting Professor Watson's facts and observations, and assuming his mechanistic point of view, may be a useful preliminary to such wider and more fundamental inquiry.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Charles Henry Chase (1927). Trundle-Bed Philosophy; Being a Critique Upon the Modern Cafeteria Method of Education and Pseudo-Scientific Behaviorism. East Lansing, Mich.,The Author.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. M. C. Chernoff, B. J. Baars, A. Bandura, V. M. Bekhterev, J. Bentham, A. Berger, G. Bergmann, A. Biglan, H. Bischof & A. H. Black (1999). Cavalli-Sforza, LL, 36, 16 Cezanne, Xii Chase, PN, Xv Chen, 16, 36. In Bruce A. Thyer (ed.), The Philosophical Legacy of Behaviorism. Kluwer Academic Publishers
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. N. H. Colburn (1954). Logic and Professor Ryle. Philosophy of Science 21 (2):132-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. S. Coleman (1987). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism. A Reassessment of the Alliance. [REVIEW] Journal of Mind and Behavior 8 (1).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Arthur W. Collins (1999). Behaviorism and Belief. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96 (1-3):75-88.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Alan Costall (1980). The Limits of Language: Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy and Skinner's Radical Behaviorism. Behaviorism 8 (2):123-131.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Robert F. Creegan (1948). Laying the Ghost of Behaviorism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1):43.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Richard E. Creel (1974). Radical Behaviorism, Feelings, and Beliefs. Behaviorism 2 (2):190-193.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. William Davis (1978). Behaviorism as a Test Case. Journal of Social Philosophy 9 (1):1-5.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Frank Diehl (1934). An Historical and Critical Study of Radical Behaviorism as a Philosophical Doctrine. Baltimore.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. William H. Dray (1954). Professor Ryle on Arguments and Inference Licenses. Mind 63 (251):384-387.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Louis Dupré (1967). Behaviorism and Phenomenology, Contrasting Bases for Modern Psychology. New Scholasticism 41 (3):418-421.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Charles A. Ellwood (forthcoming). The Uses and Limitations of Behaviorism in the Social Sciences. Behaviorism. A Battle Line, Ed., Wp King (Nashville, Tennessee: Cokesbury Press, 1930).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. George Englebretsen (1974). Behaviorism and Perception. Man and World 7 (2):149-157.
  45. Robert Epstein (1997). B.F. Skinner And Behaviorism In American Culture. [REVIEW] Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (1):99-102.
    B.F. Skinner and Behaviorism in American Culture is one of a small but growing library of volumes that focus on the life and contributions of the eminent behavioral psychologist. During Skinner’s lifetime, these volumes included B.F. Skinner: The Man and His Ideas , Festschrift for B.F. Skinner , The Skinner Primer: Behind Freedom and Dignity , What Is B.F. Skinner Really Saying? , Skinner’s Philosophy , Skinner for the Classroom , a special issue of Behavioral and Brain Sciences , and (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Robert Epstein (1977). A Listing of the Published Works of B.F. Skinner, with Notes and Comments. Behaviorism 5 (1):99-110.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Owen J. Flanagan (1980). Skinnerian Metaphysics and the Problem of Operationism. Behaviorism 8 (1):1-13.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Owen Joseph Flanagan (1978). B. F. Skinner's Radical Behaviorism: The Adequacy Question. Dissertation, Boston University Graduate School
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Jerry A. Fodor (2006). Logical Behaviorism [Selection From Language of Thought]. In Maureen Eckert (ed.), Theories of Mind: An Introductory Reader. Rowman and Littlefield 27.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Dagfinn Follesdal (2011). Developments in Quine's Behaviorism. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):273-282.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 403