This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
18 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Alain Badiou (2013). Badiou and the Philosophers: Interrogating 1960s French Philosophy. Bloomsbury Academic.
    Philosophy and history (with Jean Hyppolite) -- Philosophy and science (with Georges Canguilhem) -- Philosophy and sociology (with Raymond Aron) -- Philosophy and psychology (with Michel Foucault) -- Philosophy and language (with Paul Ricœur) -- Philosophy and truth (with Jean Hyppolite, Georges Canguilhem, Raymond Aron, Michel Foucault, Paul Ricœur, Alain Badiou and Dina Dreyfus) -- Philosophy and ethics (with Michel Henry) -- Model and structure (with Michel Serres) -- Teaching philosophy through television (with excerpts from Jean Hyppolite, Georges Canguilhem, Raymond (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Patrick L. Bourgeois (1971). Phenomenology and the Sciences of Language. Research in Phenomenology 1 (1):119-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Patrizia Calefato (2009). Language in Social Reproduction. Sign Systems Studies 37 (1-2):43-80.
    This paper focuses on the semiotic foundations of sociolinguistics. Starting from the definition of “sociolinguistics” given by the philosopher Adam Schaff, the paper examines in particular the notion of “critical sociolinguistics” as theorized by the Italian semiotician Ferruccio Rossi-Landi. The basis of the social dimension of language are to be found in what Rossi-Landi calls “social reproduction” which regards both verbal and non-verbal signs. Saussure’s notionof langue can be considered in this way, with reference not only to his Course of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ian Downey (2013). The Origin of Certainty in Lacan's Seminar XI. International Journal of Žižek Studies 7.
    Slavoj Zizek is operating from a position of certainty, a position discovered by Jacques Lacan in Seminar XI. In this essay, I examine this position of certainty ("Gewissheit") and the ways this position is distinct from both existential phenomenology and post-structuralism, ultimately arguing that for structuralist psychoanalysis to function requires an intentional forgetting of being.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Wayne Froman (1989). Toward a Theory of Textuality. Research in Phenomenology 19 (1):298-303.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Debashis Guha (2008). Is Structuralism Unavoidable in the Application of Ethics? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 3:31-38.
    Serious thinking about the models of application of ethics has enabled us to move away from ethical engineering and adopting a social-scientific vocation that is an aid to moral-engineering. Time is ripe to rethink about the charge of “structuralism” on the non-engineering model of applied ethics. If we fail to resolve this issue, a structuralist application of ethics will be unavoidable, leading way to the old engineering. The paper argues why “structuralism” is undesirable and how it is avoided in a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mitchell P. Jones (2000). Transcendental Intersubjectivity and the Objects of the Human Sciences. Symposium 4 (2):209-219.
    In this essay I show that Structuralism, in order to combat the impression that it is “untenable and outmoded,” needs to be attached to a phenomenology of transcendental intersubjectivity. My argument for this conclusion is: 1) that Peter Caws is right in arguing that Structuralism needs a notion of the transcendental subject because its objects, qua intentional, presuppose such a subject; 2) the objects withwhich Structuralism is concemed are objects in the sense that Husserl speaks of objects ofthe spiritual world; (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Paul M. Livingston (2011). The Politics of Logic: Badiou, Wittgenstein, and the Consequences of Formalism. Routledge.
    In this book, Livingston develops the political implications of formal results obtained over the course of the twentieth century in set theory, metalogic, and computational theory. He argues that the results achieved by thinkers such as Cantor, Russell, Gödel, Turing, and Cohen, even when they suggest inherent paradoxes and limitations to the structuring capacities of language or symbolic thought, have far-reaching implications for understanding the nature of political communities and their development and transformation. Alain Badiou's analysis of logical-mathematical structures forms (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Bruno Osimo (2008). Jakobson. Sign Systems Studies 36 (2):315-338.
    Jakobson, in his essays, has tried to insert Peirce’s typology of signs (icon, index, symbol) in his own binary logic, in which every feature of a text may be considered or dismissed either with a 0 or with a 1 (absent, present). In so doing, he used the features “similarity versus contiguity” and “imputed versus factual”, and discovered that the notion of “imputed similarity” was not covered by Peirce’s triad. Hence the search for it. In this article, whose ideological basis (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Keith Percival (2011). Roman Jakobson and the Birth of Linguistic Structuralism. Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):236-260.
    The term “structuralism” was introduced into linguistics by Roman Jakobson in the early days of the Linguistic Circle of Prague, founded in 1926. The cluster of ideas defended by Jakobson and his colleagues can be specified but differ considerably from the concept of structuralism as it has come to be understood more recently. That took place because from the 1930s on it became customary to equate structuralism with the ideas of Ferdinand de Saussure, as expounded in his posthumous Cours de (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jaroslav Peregrin, Structural Linguistics And Formal Semantics.
    The beginning of this century hailed a new paradigm in linguistics, the paradigm brought about by de Saussure's Cours de Linguistique Genérále and subsequently elaborated by Jakobson, Hjelmslev and other linguists. It seemed that the linguistics of this century was destined to be structuralistic. However, half of the century later a brand new paradigm was introduced by Chomsky's Syntactic Structures followed by Montague's formalization of semantics. This new turn has brought linguistics surprisingly close to mathematics and logic, and has facilitated (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jaroslav Peregrin, The Philosophers’ Magazine/Autumn 2002.
    What is structuralism? The stock To explain why we should see Quine can translate the natives’ gavagai either as answer is that it is the brainas a structuralist, I would like to revive rabbit or as undetached rabbit’s part, so he child of Ferdinand de his widely discussed thought experican translate his peers’ rabbit either as Saussure, later fostered by Levi-Strauss, ment, featuring a field linguist decipherrabbit or as undetached rabbit’s part. Hence Foucault, Derrida and their allies. But I ing (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jaroslav Peregrin (1997). Structure and Meaning. Semiotica 113 (1-2):71-88.
    It seems that the theories of language of the present century can be classified into two basic groups. The approaches of the first group perceive language as a mathematical structure and understand any theory of language as a kind of application of mathematics or logic. Their ideological background is furnished by logical positivism and analytical philosophy (esp. by Russell, Carnap, Wittgenstein and their followers); and their practical output is Chomskian formal syntax and subsequent formal semantics. The approaches of the other (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Bruce M. Psaty & Thomas S. Inui (1991). The Place of Human Values in the Language of Science: Kuhn, Saussure, and Structuralism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
    The current paradigm in medicine generally distinguishes between genetic and environmental causes of disease. Although the word paradigm has become a commonplace, the theories of Thomas Kuhn have not received much attention in the journals of medicine. Kuhn's structuralist method differs radically from the daily activities of the scientific method itself. Using linguistic theory, this essay offers a structuralist reading of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Our purpose is to highlight the similarities between these structuralist models of science (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Anti Randviir (2001). Sociosemiotic Perspectives on Studying Culture and Society. Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):607-625.
    The article analyses the position of sociosemiotics in the paradigm of contemporary semiotics. Principles of studying sociocultural phenomena are discussed so as they have been set for analysing the inner mechanisms of sign systems in the semiology of F. de Saussure on the one hand, and for studying sign systems and semiotic units as related to referential reality in the semiotics of C. S. Peirce on the other hand. Three main issues are touched upon to define the scope of sociosemiotics: (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Pol Vandevelde (1992). The Notions of “Discourse” and “Text” in Postmodernism. Philosophy and Theology 6 (3):181-200.
    I address a simple question: How are the notions or “discourse” and “text” to be understood, and what does it mean that they “create” their own object? A historical reconstruction seems to be required, if we are to make some sense of the provocative postmodern statements. In order to understand how a discourse can create its own object, three features need to be examined: (1) the inheritance of F. de Saussures’s structuralism, (2) the influence of the Freneh NouvelIe Critique, and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thérèse Vedet (2005). Parry in Paris: Structuralism, Historical Linguistics, and the Oral Theory. Classical Antiquity 24 (2):257-284.
  18. Samuel Ysseling (1970). Structuralism and Psychoanalysis in the Work of Jacques Lacan. International Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1):102-117.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation