This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
332 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 332
  1. D. M. Armstrong (2002). David Lewis, 1941-2001. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):134-135.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Nathan Ballantyne (2013). Knockdown Arguments. Erkenntnis:1-19.
    David Lewis and Peter van Inwagen have claimed that there are no “knockdown” arguments in philosophy. Their claim appears to be at odds with common philosophical practice: philosophers often write as though their conclusions are established or proven and that the considerations offered for these conclusions are decisive. In this paper, I examine some questions raised by Lewis’s and van Inwagen’s contention. What are knockdown arguments? Are there any in philosophy? If not, why not? These questions concern the nature of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ned Block (ed.) (1978). Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology. , Vol.
  4. Andrea Borghini & Giorgio Lando (2011). Natural Properties, Supervenience, and Composition. Humana.Mente 19:79-104.
    The interpretation of Lewis?s doctrine of natural properties is difficult and controversial, especially when it comes to the bearers of natural properties. According to the prevailing reading ? the minimalist view ? perfectly natural properties pertain to the micro-physical realm and are instantiated by entities without proper parts or point-like. This paper argues that there are reasons internal to a broadly Lewisian kind of metaphysics to think that the minimalist view is fundamentally flawed and that a liberal view, according to (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Braddon-Mitchell & Robert Nola (eds.) (2001). The Canberra Plan. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard Bradley & Christian List (2009). Desire-as-Belief Revisited. Analysis 69 (1):31-37.
    On Hume’s account of motivation, beliefs and desires are very different kinds of propositional attitudes. Beliefs are cognitive attitudes, desires emotive ones. An agent’s belief in a proposition captures the weight he or she assigns to this proposition in his or her cognitive representation of the world. An agent’s desire for a proposition captures the degree to which he or she prefers its truth, motivating him or her to act accordingly. Although beliefs and desires are sometimes entangled, they play very (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing.
    David Lewis's book 'On the Plurality of Worlds' mounts an extended defense of the thesis of modal realism, that the world we inhabit the entire cosmos of which we are a part is but one of a vast plurality of worlds, or cosmoi, all causally and spatiotemporally isolated from one another. The purpose of this article is to provide an accessible summary of the main positions and arguments in Lewis's book.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Broome (2001). Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy. David Lewis. Mind 110 (439):781-783.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James Robert Brown (1987). On the Plurality of Worlds David Lewis Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Pp. 276. $58.00, $27.00 Paper. Dialogue 26 (02):399-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeremy Butterfield (2004). David Lewis Meets Hamilton and Jacobi. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1095-1106.
    I commemorate David Lewis by discussing an aspect of modality within analytical mechanics, which is closely related to his work on counterfactuals. This concerns the way Hamilton‐Jacobi theory uses ensembles, i.e. sets of possible initial conditions. (A companion paper discusses other aspects of modality in analytical mechanics that are equally related to Lewis's work.).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jeremy Butterfield (1992). David Lewis Meets John Bell. Philosophy of Science 59 (1):26-43.
    The violation of the Bell inequality means that measurement-results in the two wings of the experiment cannot be screened off from one another, in the sense of Reichenbach. But does this mean that there is causation between the results? I argue that it does, according to Lewis's counterfactual analysis of causation and his associated views. The reason lies in his doctrine that chances evolve by conditionalization on intervening history. This doctrine collapses the distinction between the conditional probabilities that are used (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Alex Byrne & Alan Hájek (1997). David Hume, David Lewis, and Decision Theory. Mind 106 (423):411-728.
    David Lewis claims that a simple sort of anti-Humeanism-that the rational agent desires something to the extent he believes it to be good-can be given a decision-theoretic formulation, which Lewis calls 'Desire as Belief' (DAB). Given the (widely held) assumption that Jeffrey conditionalising is a rationally permissible way to change one's mind in the face of new evidence, Lewis proves that DAB leads to absurdity. Thus, according to Lewis, the simple form of anti-Humeanism stands refuted. In this paper we investigate (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Keith Cambell, John Bacon & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.) (1993). Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays on the Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Massimiliano Carrara & Enrico Martino (2011). On the Infinite in Mereology with Plural Quantification. Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):54-62.
    In Lewis reconstructs set theory using mereology and plural quantification (MPQ). In his recontruction he assumes from the beginning that there is an infinite plurality of atoms, whose size is equivalent to that of the set theoretical universe. Since this assumption is far beyond the basic axioms of mereology, it might seem that MPQ do not play any role in order to guarantee the existence of a large infinity of objects. However, we intend to demonstrate that mereology and plural quantification (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lewis G. Creary & Christopher S. Hill (1975). Book Review:Counterfactuals David Lewis. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Robin P. Cubitt & Robert Sugden (2003). Common Knowledge, Salience and Convention: A Reconstruction of David Lewis' Game Theory. Economics and Philosophy 19 (2):175-210.
    David Lewis is widely credited with the first formulation of common knowledge and the first rigorous analysis of convention. However, common knowledge and convention entered mainstream game theory only when they were formulated, later and independently, by other theorists. As a result, some of the most distinctive and valuable features of Lewis' game theory have been overlooked. We re-examine this theory by reconstructing key parts in a more formal way, extending it, and showing how it differs from more recent game (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. George Darby (2009). Lewis's Worldmate Relation and the Apparent Failure of Humean Supervenience. Dialectica 63 (2):195-204.
    This paper considers two aspects of Lewis's metaphysics to which spatiotemporal relations appear central, with the aim of showing them to be less so. First, Lewis reluctantly characterises what it is for two things to be part of the same possible world in terms of an analogically spatiotemporal category of relations, rather than a wider natural external category. But Lewis's reason for restricting himself to the narrower category is unpersuasive. Second, Humean supervenience is formulated with spatiotemporal relations (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. George Darby & Duncan Watson (2010). Lewis's Principle of Recombination: Reply to Efird and Stoneham. Dialectica 64 (3):435-445.
    According to Lewis's modal realism, all ways the world could be are represented by possible worlds, and all possible worlds represent some way the world could be. That there are just the right possible worlds to represent all and only the ways the world could be is to be guaranteed by the principle of recombination. Lewis sketches the principle (put roughly: anything can co-exist with anything else), but does not spell out a precise version that generates just the right possibilities. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Donald Davidson (1974). Replies to David Lewis and W.V. Quine. Synthese 27 (3-4):345 - 349.
  20. John Divers (2007). Quinean Scepticism About de Re Modality After David Lewis. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):40–62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Andy Egan (2004). Second-Order Predication and the Metaphysics of Properties. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):48 – 66.
    Problems about the accidental properties of properties motivate us--force us, I think--not to identify properties with the sets of their instances. If we identify them instead with functions from worlds to extensions, we get a theory of properties that is neutral with respect to disputes over counterpart theory, and we avoid a problem for Lewis's theory of events. Similar problems about the temporary properties of properties motivate us--though this time they probably don't force us--to give up this theory as well, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert J. Fogelin (1998). David Lewis on Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals. Analysis 58 (4):286–289.
    David Lewis has argued that there must be a difference between indicative and counterfactual conditionals beyond an indication of truth-value commitments. He cites the following contrast to show this: If Oswald did not shoot Kennedy, then someone else did. If Oswald had not shot Kennedy, then someone else would have. In response, it is shown that this difference is better explained by shifts in context. Keep context fixed, the contrast disappears. EG: If Oswald was not the one who shot Kennedy, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Peter Forrest (1991). Book Review: David Lewis. Parts of Classes. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (3):494-497.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter Forrest & D. M. Armstrong (1984). An Argument Against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (2):164 – 168.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Laurel Fujimagari (1982). Justice or Tyranny?: A Critique of John Rawls's “Theory of Justice” David Lewis Schaefer Port Washington: Kennikat Press Corp, 1979. Pp. 137. $12.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 21 (02):356-360.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Samuel D. Guttenplan (ed.) (1994). A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  27. Alan Hájek (2010). David Lewis. In The New Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Scribners.
    David Lewis was one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century working in the Anglo-American analytic tradition. His corpus is extraordinary for its breadth of subject matter and for its systematicity. For both these reasons, it is difficult to do justice to his work in a short space—there are rich interconnections among his myriad writings, and numerous possible entry points. This article approaches Lewis and his work in three passes: first, a biographical tracing of his intellectual influences; second, (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ned Hall, David Lewis's Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ned Hall (2002). David Lewis. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 10 (1):81-84.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Joel David Hamkins & Andy Lewis (2000). Infinite Time Turing Machines. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):567-604.
    Infinite time Turing machines extend the operation of ordinary Turing machines into transfinite ordinal time. By doing so, they provide a natural model of infinitary computability, a theoretical setting for the analysis of the power and limitations of supertask algorithms.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (21 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Sven Ove Hansson (2003). David Lewis on Rights Introduction. Theoria 69 (3):157-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jussi Haukioja (2003). Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis Gerhard Preyer and Frank Siebelt, Editors Studies in Epistemology and Cognitive Theory Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001, Xii + 243 Pp., $27.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 42 (02):389-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Hawthorne (2006). Quantity in Lewisian Metaphysics. In , Metaphysical Essays. Oxford University Press. 229-237.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Wilfrid Hodges & David Lewis (1968). Finitude and Infinitude in the Atomic Calculus of Individuals. Noûs 2 (4):405-410.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Holdcroft & Harry A. Lewis (2000). Memes, Minds and Evolution. Philosophy 75 (2):161-182.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Richard Holton (forthcoming). Primitive Self-Ascription: Lewis on the De Se. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to David Lewis. Blackwell.
    There are two parts to Lewis's account of the de se. First there is the idea that the objects of de se thought (and, by extension of de dicto thought too) are properties, not propositions. This is the idea that is center-stage in Lewis's discussion. Second there is the idea that the relation that thinkers bear to these properties is that of self-ascription. It is crucial to LewisÕs account that this is understood as a fundamental, unanalyzable, notion: self-ascription of a (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Richard Holton (2003). David Lewis's Philosophy of Language. Mind and Language 18 (3):286–295.
    Lewis never saw philosophy of language as foundational in the way that many have. One of the most distinctive features of his work is the robust confidence that questions in metaphysics or mind can be addressed head on, and not through the lens of language.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Terence E. Horgan (2001). Reality and Humean Supervenience: Essays on the Philosophy of David Lewis. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Frank Jackson (2003). David Kellogg Lewis Philosopher and Philosopher of Mind. Mind and Language 18 (3):281–285.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Frank Jackson & Graham Priest (eds.) (2004). Lewisian Themes: The Philosophy of David K. Lewis. Oxford University Press.
    David Lewis's untimely death on 14 October 2001 deprived the philosophical community of one of the outstanding philosophers of the 20th century. As many obituaries remarked, Lewis has an undeniable place in the history of analytical philosophy. His work defines much of the current agenda in metaphysics, philosophical logic, and the philosophy of mind and language. This volume, an expanded edition of a special issue of the Australasian Journal of Philosophy, covers many of the topics for which Lewis was well (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Edward L. Keenan (ed.) (1975). Formal Semantics of Natural Language: Papers From a Colloquium Sponsored by the King's College Research Centre, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
  42. Jonathan L. Kvanvig (1999). Lewis on Finkish Dispositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (3):703 - 710.
    Finkish dispositions, those dispositions that are lost when their conditions of realization occur, pose deep problems for counterfactual accounts of dispositions. David Lewis has argued that the counterfactual approach can be rescued, offering such an account that purports to handle finkish as well as other dispositions. The paper argues that Lewis's account fails to account for several kinds of dispositions, one of which involves failure to distinguish parallel processes from unitary processes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Bruce Le Catt (1982). Censored Vision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 60 (June):158-162.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephan Leuenberger (2010). Humility and Constraints on O -Language. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):327 - 354.
    In "Ramseyan Humility," David Lewis argues that we cannot know what the fundamental properties in our world are. His arguments invoke the possibility of permutations and replacements of fundamental properties. Most responses focus on Lewis's view on the relationship between properties and roles, and on the assumptions about knowledge that he makes. I argue that no matter how the debates about knowledge and about the metaphysics of properties turn out, Lewis's arguments are unconvincing since they rely on a highly implausible (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. D. M. Lewis (1993). Ian Worthington (Ed.): Acta of the University of New England (Armidale, Australia): International Seminar on Greek and Latin Epigraphy (12–14 July, 1989). Pp. Iv + 214; 8 Plates. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt, 1990. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):460-461.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. D. M. Lewis (1993). Jean-Marie Bertrand: Inscriptions Historiques Grecques. (La Roue à Livres, 17.) Pp. 273. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1992. Paper, 135 FF. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):460-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. D. M. Lewis (1993). Jean Bingen: Pages d'Épigraphie Grecque: Attique-Égypte (1952–1982). (Epigraphica Bruxellensia, 1.) Pp. Xx+188; 2 Plates, 1 Map. Brussels: Epigraphica Bruxellensia, 1991. Paper, B. Frs. 1,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):208-209.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. D. M. Lewis (1993). H. W. Pleket, R. S. Stroud (edd.): Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum, Vol. XXXVIII (1988). Pp. xxxi + 699. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1991. fl. 195. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):208-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. D. M. Lewis (1993). Keeping Roads Clean in Thasos Hervé Duchêne: La Stèle du Port. Fouilles du Port 1. Recherches Sur Une Nouvelle Inscription Thasienne. (Études Thasiennes, XIV.) Pp. 157; 1 Plan, 20 Plates. Athens: École Francaise d'Athenes and Paris: Diffusion de Boccard, 1992. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (02):402-403.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. D. M. Lewis (1992). H. W. Pleket, R. S. Stroud (edd.): Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum, XXXVII (1987). Pp. xxix + 672. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben, 1990. fl. 160. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):482-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 332