This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
110 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 110
  1. John F. Ahearne (1984). Nuclear Deterrence. Thought 59 (1):78-90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. By Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98–101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. David Ardagh (1990). The Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence. International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):343-358.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. D. Attwood (1991). Threats and Nuclear Deterrence: Paul Ramsey's Account of the Morality of Nuclear Threats. Studies in Christian Ethics 4 (1):40-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Brenda M. Baker (1985). Duress, Responsibility, and Deterrence. Dialogue 24 (04):605-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. S. I. Benn (1984). Deterrence or Appeasement? Or, On Trying to Be Rational About Nuclear War[1]. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Glacomo Bonanno, Deterrence, Observability and Awareness.
    ,d simple example is used to analyze the issue ofimperfcsct obseruabilitt of commitmerit and to highlight the follotving phenor»enon: u'hen a player h«s tlie option of taking — at a cost — a (potentiality' deterring action, she is less lil.ely to do so cigainst an opponent rgho is aware of' tlie aoailabilitt' of tliis opticrn thaii against an opponent it her is not..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour (1985). Optimal Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):118-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Duane L. Cady & Richard Werner (eds.) (1991). Just War, Nonviolence, and Nuclear Deterrence: Philosophers on War and Peace. Longwood Academic.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105 - 123.
    Bicchieri (The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of norms, 2006, xi) presents a formal analysis of norms that answers the questions of "when, how, and to what degree" norms affect human behavior in the play of games. The purpose of this paper is to apply a variation of the Bicchieri norms analysis to generate a model of norms-based play of the traditional deterrence game (Zagare and Kilgour, Int Stud Q 37: 1-27, 1993; Morrow, Game theory for political scientists, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. R. Paul Churchill (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Paternalism. Social Philosophy Today 2:191-204.
  13. Stephen J. Cimbala (1987). "Launch Under Attack": The War Nobody Wanted. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):26-32.
  14. Avner Cohen (1987). Lackey on Nuclear Deterrence: A Public Policy Critique or Applied Ethics Analysis?:Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons. Douglas P. Lackey. Ethics 97 (2):457-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David A. Conway (1974). Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Some Considerations in Dialogue Form. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (4):431-443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Paul W. Diener (1988). Nuclear Deterrence. Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 1 (1):47-70.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas Donaldson (1987). Nonstrategic Nuclear Thinking:The Logic of Deterrence. Anthony Kenny; Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Avner Cohen, Steven Lee. Ethics 97 (3):638-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Thomas Donaldson (1985). Nuclear Deterrence and Self-Defense. Ethics 95 (3):537-548.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Kai Draper (1992). Book Review:Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Henry Shue. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (1):170-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Anthony Duggan (2009). Gain-Based Remedies and the Place of Deterrence in the Law of Fiduciary Obligations. In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The Goals of Private Law. Hart Pub..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. G. R. Dunstan (1982). Theological Method in the Deterrence Debate. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98 - 101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Anthony Ellis (2003). A Deterrence Theory of Punishment. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
    I start from the presupposition that the use of force against another is justified only in self-defence or in defence of others against aggression. If so, the main work of justifying punishment must rely on its deterrent effect, since most punishments have no other significant self-defensive effect. It has often been objected to the deterrent justification of punishment that it commits us to using offenders unacceptably, and that it is unable to deliver acceptable limits on punishment. I describe a sort (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Gertrude Ezorsky (1978). Ii. On Retributivism and Deterrence. Inquiry 21 (1-4):103 – 104.
    Alan Wertheimer claims the class of criminals who deserve punishment is identical with the class of criminals who are deferrable (Inquiry, Vol. 20 [1977]). According to Wertheimer this premise implies the conclusion that on ?the retributive account . . . the guilty are punished because we expect to alter (at least some) criminal behavior?. It is argued that this premise does not imply the conclusion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Daniel M. Farrell (1985). The Justification of General Deterrence. Philosophical Review 94 (3):367-394.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jonathan F. Galloway (1987). The Logics, Meta-Logic and Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):33-41.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David Gauthier (1984). Deterrence, Maximization, and Rationality. Ethics 94 (3):474-495.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Timothy J. Van Gelder (1989). Credible Threats and Usable Weapons: Some Dilemmas of Deterrence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (2):158 - 183.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Geoffrey Goodwin (1982). Deterrence and Détente. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) (1982). Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Colin Gray (1985). Strategic Defense, Deterrence, and the Prospects for Peace. Ethics 95 (3):659-672.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ernest Den Haavang (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John J. Haldane (1985). Notes and Comments. The Morality of Deterrence. Heythrop Journal 26 (1):41–46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. G. H. Hampsch (1984). George H. Hampsch -- Nuclear Deterrence and World Peace. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):123-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Russell Hardin (1985). Book Review:Nuclear Pacifism: "Just War" Thinking Today. Edward J. Laarman; The Ethics of War and Nuclear Deterrence. James P. Sterba; When War Is Unjust: Being Honest in Just-War Thinking. John Howard Yoder. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (3):763-.
  36. Russell Hardin (1983). Unilateral Versus Mutual Disarmament. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):236-254.
  37. Russell Hittinger (1989). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):229-233.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Arthur Hockaday (1988). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism By John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle Jr and Germain Grisez Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, Xv + 429 Pp., £30.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 63 (244):277-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Arthur Hockaday (1982). In Defence of Deterrence. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. M. W. Howard (1984). Michael W. Howard -- Utopianism and Nuclear Deterrence. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):53-65.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Susan Hunter (1990). Nuclear Rights / Nuclear Wrongs. Social Philosophy Today 3:454-455.
  42. Thomas J. Jeannot (1988). Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. The Personalist Forum 4 (1):39-42.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gregory S. Kavka (1983). Doubts About Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):255-260.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gregory S. Kavka (1978). Some Paradoxes of Deterrence. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):285-302.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Kenneth W. Kemp (1987). Nuclear Deterrence and the Morality of Intentions. The Monist 70 (3):276-297.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. D. M. Kilgour & F. C. Zagare (1994). Uncertainty and the Role of the Pawn in Extended Deterrence. Synthese 100 (3):379 - 412.
    This paper develops an incomplete information model of extended deterrence relationships. It postulates players who are fully informed about the costs of war and all other relevant variables, save for the values their opponents place on the issues at stake, i.e., the pawn. We provide consistent and intuitively satisfying parallel definitions for two types of players, Hard and Soft, in terms of the parameters of our model. We also answer several particular questions about the strategy choices of players in an (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Frederick Kroon (1996). Deterrence and the Fragility of Rationality. Ethics 106 (2):350-377.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Kultgen (1991). Nuclear Deterrence and the Morality of Intentions. Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (1):105-117.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. C. Kunkel (1984). Joseph C. Kunkel -- Right Intention, Deterrence, and Nuclear Alternatives. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):143-155.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Douglas P. Lackey (1985). Immoral Risks: A Deontological Critique of Nuclear Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):154-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 110