This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
106 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 100 / 106
  1. By Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98–101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Ardagh (1990). The Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence. International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):343-358.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. D. Attwood (1991). Threats and Nuclear Deterrence: Paul Ramsey's Account of the Morality of Nuclear Threats. Studies in Christian Ethics 4 (1):40-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Brenda M. Baker (1985). Duress, Responsibility, and Deterrence. Dialogue 24 (04):605-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. S. I. Benn (1984). Deterrence or Appeasement? Or, On Trying to Be Rational About Nuclear War[1]. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Glacomo Bonanno, Deterrence, Observability and Awareness.
    ,d simple example is used to analyze the issue ofimperfcsct obseruabilitt of commitmerit and to highlight the follotving phenor»enon: u'hen a player h«s tlie option of taking — at a cost — a (potentiality' deterring action, she is less lil.ely to do so cigainst an opponent rgho is aware of' tlie aoailabilitt' of tliis opticrn thaii against an opponent it her is not..
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour (1985). Optimal Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):118-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Duane L. Cady & Richard Werner (eds.) (1991). Just War, Nonviolence, and Nuclear Deterrence: Philosophers on War and Peace. Longwood Academic.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (forthcoming). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese.
    Bicchieri (The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of norms, 2006, xi) presents a formal analysis of norms that answers the questions of “when, how, and to what degree” norms affect human behavior in the play of games. The purpose of this paper is to apply a variation of the Bicchieri norms analysis to generate a model of norms-based play of the traditional deterrence game (Zagare and Kilgour, Int Stud Q 37:1–27, 1993; Morrow, Game theory for political scientists, 1994), (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. R. Paul Churchill (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Paternalism. Social Philosophy Today 2:191-204.
  12. Stephen J. Cimbala (1987). "Launch Under Attack": The War Nobody Wanted. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):26-32.
  13. Avner Cohen (1987). Lackey on Nuclear Deterrence: A Public Policy Critique or Applied Ethics Analysis?:Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons. Douglas P. Lackey. Ethics 97 (2):457-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David A. Conway (1974). Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Some Considerations in Dialogue Form. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (4):431-443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Thomas Donaldson (1987). Nonstrategic Nuclear Thinking:The Logic of Deterrence. Anthony Kenny; Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Avner Cohen, Steven Lee. Ethics 97 (3):638-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Thomas Donaldson (1985). Nuclear Deterrence and Self-Defense. Ethics 95 (3):537-548.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kai Draper (1992). Book Review:Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Henry Shue. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (1):170-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anthony Duggan (2009). Gain-Based Remedies and the Place of Deterrence in the Law of Fiduciary Obligations. In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The Goals of Private Law. Hart Pub..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. G. R. Dunstan (1982). Theological Method in the Deterrence Debate. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98 - 101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anthony Ellis (2003). A Deterrence Theory of Punishment. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
    I start from the presupposition that the use of force against another is justified only in self-defence or in defence of others against aggression. If so, the main work of justifying punishment must rely on its deterrent effect, since most punishments have no other significant self-defensive effect. It has often been objected to the deterrent justification of punishment that it commits us to using offenders unacceptably, and that it is unable to deliver acceptable limits on punishment. I describe a sort (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gertrude Ezorsky (1978). Ii. On Retributivism and Deterrence. Inquiry 21 (1-4):103 – 104.
    Alan Wertheimer claims the class of criminals who deserve punishment is identical with the class of criminals who are deferrable (Inquiry, Vol. 20 [1977]). According to Wertheimer this premise implies the conclusion that on ?the retributive account . . . the guilty are punished because we expect to alter (at least some) criminal behavior?. It is argued that this premise does not imply the conclusion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Daniel M. Farrell (1985). The Justification of General Deterrence. Philosophical Review 94 (3):367-394.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jonathan F. Galloway (1987). The Logics, Meta-Logic and Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):33-41.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David Gauthier (1984). Deterrence, Maximization, and Rationality. Ethics 94 (3):474-495.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Geoffrey Goodwin (1982). Deterrence and Détente. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) (1982). Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Colin Gray (1985). Strategic Defense, Deterrence, and the Prospects for Peace. Ethics 95 (3):659-672.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ernest Den Haavang (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John J. Haldane (1985). Notes and Comments. The Morality of Deterrence. Heythrop Journal 26 (1):41–46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. G. H. Hampsch (1984). George H. Hampsch -- Nuclear Deterrence and World Peace. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):123-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Russell Hardin (1985). Book Review:Nuclear Pacifism: "Just War" Thinking Today. Edward J. Laarman; The Ethics of War and Nuclear Deterrence. James P. Sterba; When War Is Unjust: Being Honest in Just-War Thinking. John Howard Yoder. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (3):763-.
  33. Russell Hittinger (1989). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):229-233.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Arthur Hockaday (1988). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism By John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle Jr and Germain Grisez Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, Xv + 429 Pp., £30.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 63 (244):277-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Arthur Hockaday (1982). In Defence of Deterrence. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. M. W. Howard (1984). Michael W. Howard -- Utopianism and Nuclear Deterrence. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):53-65.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Susan Hunter (1990). Nuclear Rights / Nuclear Wrongs. Social Philosophy Today 3:454-455.
  38. Thomas J. Jeannot (1988). Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. The Personalist Forum 4 (1):39-42.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Gregory S. Kavka (1983). Doubts About Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):255-260.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gregory S. Kavka (1978). Some Paradoxes of Deterrence. Journal of Philosophy 75 (6):285-302.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Kenneth W. Kemp (1987). Nuclear Deterrence and the Morality of Intentions. The Monist 70 (3):276-297.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. D. M. Kilgour & F. C. Zagare (1994). Uncertainty and the Role of the Pawn in Extended Deterrence. Synthese 100 (3):379 - 412.
    This paper develops an incomplete information model of extended deterrence relationships. It postulates players who are fully informed about the costs of war and all other relevant variables, save for the values their opponents place on the issues at stake, i.e., the pawn. We provide consistent and intuitively satisfying parallel definitions for two types of players, Hard and Soft, in terms of the parameters of our model. We also answer several particular questions about the strategy choices of players in an (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Frederick Kroon (1996). Deterrence and the Fragility of Rationality. Ethics 106 (2):350-377.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John Kultgen (1991). Nuclear Deterrence and the Morality of Intentions. Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (1):105-117.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. C. Kunkel (1984). Joseph C. Kunkel -- Right Intention, Deterrence, and Nuclear Alternatives. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):143-155.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Douglas P. Lackey (1985). Immoral Risks: A Deontological Critique of Nuclear Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):154-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Douglas P. Lackey (1982). Missiles and Morals: A Utilitarian Look at Nuclear Deterrence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (3):189-231.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. John Langan (1984). Struggling for Moral Clarity About Nuclear Deterrence. Thought 59 (1):91-98.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Steven Lee (1985). Morality and Paradoxical Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):136-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Steven Lee (1985). The Morality of Nuclear Deterrence: Hostage Holding and Consequences. Ethics 95 (3):549-566.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Louis G. Lombardi (1991). Intentions, Uncertainty and Deterrence. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (1):51-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. David Luban (1986). The Paradox of Deterrence Revived. Philosophical Studies 50 (1):129 - 141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Timothy W. Luke (1991). The Discourse of Deterrence: National Security as Communicative Interaction. Journal of Social Philosophy 22 (1):30-44.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Duncan MacIntosh (1991). Retaliation Rationalized: Gauthier's Solution to the Deterrence Dilemma. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1):9-32.
    Gauthier claims: (1) a non-maximizing action is rational if it maximized to intend it. If one intended to retaliate in order to deter an attack, (2) retaliation is rational, for it maximized to intend it. I argue that even on sympathetic theories of intentions, actions and choices, (1) is incoherent. But I defend (2) by arguing that an action is rational if it maximizes on preferences it maximized to adopt given one's antecedent preferences. (2) is true because it maximized to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Douglas Maclean (ed.) (1984). The Security Gamble: Deterrence in the Nuclear Age. Rowman and Allenheld.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Jeff McMahan (1989). Review: Is Nuclear Deterrence Paradoxical? [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (2):407 - 422.
    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Jeff McMahan (1989). Is Nuclear Deterrence Paradoxical?:Nuclear Deterrence, Morality, and Realism. John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle, Jr., Germain Grisez; Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Gregory Kavka. [REVIEW] Ethics 99 (2):407-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Jeff McMahan (1988). Book Review:Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Disarmament. David Copp. [REVIEW] Ethics 98 (3):610-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Jeff McMahan (1985). Book Review:Conventional Deterrence. John J. Mearsheimer. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (2):376-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Jeff McMahan (1985). Deterrence and Deontology. Ethics 95 (3):517-536.
    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Christopher W. Morris (1985). A Contractarian Defense of Nuclear Deterrence. Ethics 95 (3):479-496.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. David B. Myers (1987). Beyond Nuclear Deterrence: The Concept of a Retributive Policy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (2):135-153.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. Richard Norman (1990). Absolutism and Nuclear Deterrence. Cogito 4 (1):14-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. William V. O.’Brien (1984). Proportion and Discrimination in Nuclear Deterrence and Defense. Thought 59 (1):41-52.
  65. B. Paskins (1990). Book Review : Peace and Certainty: A Theological Essay on Deterrence, by Oliver O'Donovan. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989. Ix + 125 Pp. 4.95. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 3 (1):103-106.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Steven C. Patten (1985). Dangers of Deterrence: Philosophers on Nuclear Strategy Nigel Blake and Kay Pole, Editors London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983. Pp. Viii, 184. Dialogue 24 (04):713-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Eduard Pestel (1989). From Deterrence to Peace Without Fear. World Futures 27 (1):17-23.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Robert L. Pfaltzgraff (1985). Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control: Ethical Issues for the 1980s. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):74-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Michael Quinlan (1983). The Meaning of Deterrence. In Francis Bridger (ed.), The Cross and the Bomb: Christian Ethics and the Nuclear Debate. Mowbray.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. Michael J. Quirk (1988). Consequences, Moral Rules, and Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (1):26-29.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. Michael J. Quirk (1986). Just War Theory, Nuclear Deterrence, and “Reason of State”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (2):51-59.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. Jeffrey Reiman (1990). The Death Penalty, Deterrence, and Horribleness. Social Theory and Practice 16 (2):261-272.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. Eric Reitan (1993). Why the Deterrence Argument for Capital Punishment Fails. Criminal Justice Ethics 12 (1):26-33.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Theodore Roszak (1963). A Just War Analysis of Two Types of Deterrence. Ethics 73 (2):100-109.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Kathryn Russell (1985). Dangers of Deterrence. Teaching Philosophy 8 (3):269-273.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. Cheyney Ryan (1988). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. The Personalist Forum 4 (1):44-46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Jonathan Schonsheck (1991). Nuclear Stalemate: A Superior Escape From the Dilemmas of Deterrence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (1):35-51.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Maimon Schwarzschild (2002). Retribution, Deterrence, and the Death Penalty: A Response to Hugo Bedau. Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):9-11.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. J. Peter Scoblic (2001). Alive and Kicking: The Greatly Exaggerated Death of Nuclear Deterrence. A Response to Nina Tannenwald. Ethics and International Affairs 15 (1):71–77.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. W. E. Seager (1984). Is Nuclear Deterrence Paradoxical? Dialogue 23 (02):187-198.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. F. C. Sharp & M. C. Otto (1910). Retribution and Deterrence in the Moral Judgments of Common Sense. International Journal of Ethics 20 (4):438-453.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Gene Sharp (1987). Civilian-Based Defense: A New Deterrence and Defense Policy. World Futures 24 (1):227-262.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. William H. Shaw (1985). On the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (1):41-52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. William H. Shaw (1984). Nuclear Deterrence and Deontology. Ethics 94 (2):248-260.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Henry Shue (ed.) (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Cambridge University Press.
    An examination and assessment of arguments for two central tendencies in current nuclear strategy--mutual assured destruction and nuclear utilization target ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Henry Shue (1985). Conflicting Conceptions of Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):43-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. R. Song (1989). Book Review : Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism, by John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle, Jr, and Germain Grisez. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987. Xvi + 429pp. 30.00 & 12.50. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 2 (1):124-133.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. Otto Spear (1976). Deterrence and Peace. Philosophy and History 9 (1):47-49.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. By Michael Sprague (2004). Who May Carry Out Protective Deterrence? Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):445–447.
    Anthony Ellis argues that institutional punishment occurs automatically in a way analogous to mechanical deterrents, and given that issuing real threats is justified for self-defence, institutional punishment, intended to protect society via deterrence, can be justified without violating the Kantian constraint against using persons as means only. But institutional punishments are not in fact executed automatically: they must be carried out by moral agents. Ellis fails to provide a basis for those agents to justify the performance of their legal duties.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Lance Stell (2010). Avoiding Over-Deterrence in Managing Physicians' Relationships With Industry. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (1):27-29.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Leslie Stevenson (1986). Is Nuclear Deterrence Ethical? Philosophy 61 (236):193-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. Mark Strasser (1988). Schell on the Internal Inconsistency of Deterrence Theory. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (1):30-36.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Yock Lin Tan (2009). Deterrence in Private Law. In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The Goals of Private Law. Hart Pub..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. Robin Taylor (1990). Absolutism and Nuclear Deterrence. Cogito 4 (1):8-14.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Marek Thee (1987). The Doctrine of Nuclear Deterrence: Impact on Contemporary International Relations. World Futures 24 (1):65-85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Robert W. Tucker (1985). Morality and Deterrence. Ethics 95 (3):461-478.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Ernest van den Haag (1970). Deterrence and the Death Penalty: A Rejoinder. Ethics 81 (1):74-75.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Ernest Van Den Haag (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-288.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. Timothy J. Van Gelder (1989). Credible Threats and Usable Weapons: Some Dilemmas of Deterrence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (2):158-183.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  100. Leslie Vinjamuri (2010). Deterrence, Democracy, and the Pursuit of International Justice. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (2):191-211.
    In recent years the efforts to hold the perpetrators of mass atrocities accountable have become increasingly normalized, and building capacity in this area has become central to the strategies of numerous advocacy groups, international organizations, and governments engaged in rebuilding and reconstructing states. The indictment of sitting heads of state and rebel leaders engaged in ongoing conflicts, however, has been more exceptional than normal, but is nonetheless radically altering how we think about, debate, and practice justice. While a principled commitment (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 106