This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
160 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 160
  1. John F. Ahearne (1984). Nuclear Deterrence. Thought 59 (1):78-90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. By Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98–101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Susan B. Anthony (1984). Spiritual Deterrence in the Nuclear Age. Thought 59 (1):64-77.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Ardagh (1990). The Immorality of Nuclear Deterrence. International Philosophical Quarterly 30 (3):343-358.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. D. Attwood (1991). Threats and Nuclear Deterrence: Paul Ramsey's Account of the Morality of Nuclear Threats. Studies in Christian Ethics 4 (1):40-57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Brenda M. Baker (1985). Duress, Responsibility, and Deterrence. Dialogue 24 (04):605-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. S. I. Benn (1984). Deterrence or Appeasement? Or, On Trying to Be Rational About Nuclear War[1]. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Glacomo Bonanno, Deterrence, Observability and Awareness.
    ,d simple example is used to analyze the issue ofimperfcsct obseruabilitt of commitmerit and to highlight the follotving phenor»enon: u'hen a player h«s tlie option of taking — at a cost — a (potentiality' deterring action, she is less lil.ely to do so cigainst an opponent rgho is aware of' tlie aoailabilitt' of tliis opticrn thaii against an opponent it her is not..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Steven J. Brams & D. Marc Kilgour (1985). Optimal Deterrence. Social Philosophy and Policy 3 (01):118-.
    1. Introduction The policy of deterrence, at least to avert nuclear war between the superpowers, has been a controversial one. The main controversy arises from the threat of each side to visit destruction on the other in response to an initial attack. This threat would seem irrational if carrying it out would lead to a nuclear holocaust – the worst outcome for both sides. Instead, it would seem better for the side attacked to suffer some destruction rather than to retaliate (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Conrad G. Brunk (1988). John Finnis, Joseph Boyle, Jr., and Germain Grisez, Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (10):393-395.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sue Rabbitt Bulmer (2001). Nuclear Revisionism. Minerva 39 (2):259-264.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. B. Sharon Byrd (1989). Kant's Theory of Punishment: Deterrence in its Threat, Retribution in its Execution. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 8 (2):151 - 200.
    Kant's theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Perhaps the problem lies not in Kant's inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the Metaphysic of Morals, but rather in a superimposed, modern yet monistic view of punishment. Historical considerations tend to show that Kant was discussing not one, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Duane L. Cady & Richard Werner (eds.) (1991). Just War, Nonviolence, and Nuclear Deterrence: Philosophers on War and Peace. Longwood Academic.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Theodore Caplow (2010). Armageddon Postponed: A Different View of Nuclear Weapons. Hamilton Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lisa J. Carlson & Raymond Dacey (2010). Social Norms and the Traditional Deterrence Game. Synthese 176 (1):105 - 123.
    Bicchieri (The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of norms, 2006, xi) presents a formal analysis of norms that answers the questions of "when, how, and to what degree" norms affect human behavior in the play of games. The purpose of this paper is to apply a variation of the Bicchieri norms analysis to generate a model of norms-based play of the traditional deterrence game (Zagare and Kilgour, Int Stud Q 37: 1-27, 1993; Morrow, Game theory for political scientists, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. R. Paul Churchill (1989). Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Paternalism. Social Philosophy Today 2:191-204.
  17. Stephen J. Cimbala (1987). "Launch Under Attack": The War Nobody Wanted. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):26-32.
  18. Avner Cohen (1987). Lackey on Nuclear Deterrence: A Public Policy Critique or Applied Ethics Analysis?:Moral Principles and Nuclear Weapons. Douglas P. Lackey. Ethics 97 (2):457-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David A. Conway (1974). Capital Punishment and Deterrence: Some Considerations in Dialogue Form. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3 (4):431-443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Paul W. Diener (1988). Nuclear Deterrence. Journal for Peace and Justice Studies 1 (1):47-70.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Thomas Donaldson (1987). Nonstrategic Nuclear Thinking:The Logic of Deterrence. Anthony Kenny; Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Avner Cohen, Steven Lee. Ethics 97 (3):638-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas Donaldson (1985). Nuclear Deterrence and Self-Defense. Ethics 95 (3):537-548.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Kai Draper (1992). Book Review:Nuclear Deterrence and Moral Restraint. Henry Shue. [REVIEW] Ethics 103 (1):170-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Anthony Duggan (2009). Gain-Based Remedies and the Place of Deterrence in the Law of Fiduciary Obligations. In Andrew Robertson & Hang Wu Tang (eds.), The Goals of Private Law. Hart Pub..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Dummett (2013). The Morality of Deterrence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):111-127.
    (1986). The Morality of Deterrence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 16, Supplementary Volume 12: Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence and Disarmament, pp. 111-127.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. G. R. Dunstan (1982). Theological Method in the Deterrence Debate. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Anthony Ellis (2005). Punishment as Deterrence: Reply to Sprague. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):98 - 101.
    In my 'A Deterrence Theory of Punishment', I argued that a deterrence system of punishment can avoid the charge that it illegitimately uses offenders if its punishments are carried out 'quasiautomatically': threats are issued by a legislature for deterrent purposes, but those who carry out the punishments have no authority to take deterrent considerations into account. Sprague has objected that under such a system, those who carry out punishments will be unable to justify their actions. I reply that if it (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Anthony Ellis (2003). A Deterrence Theory of Punishment. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):337–351.
    I start from the presupposition that the use of force against another is justified only in self-defence or in defence of others against aggression. If so, the main work of justifying punishment must rely on its deterrent effect, since most punishments have no other significant self-defensive effect. It has often been objected to the deterrent justification of punishment that it commits us to using offenders unacceptably, and that it is unable to deliver acceptable limits on punishment. I describe a sort (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Gertrude Ezorsky (1978). Ii. On Retributivism and Deterrence. Inquiry 21 (1-4):103 – 104.
    Alan Wertheimer claims the class of criminals who deserve punishment is identical with the class of criminals who are deferrable (Inquiry, Vol. 20 [1977]). According to Wertheimer this premise implies the conclusion that on ?the retributive account . . . the guilty are punished because we expect to alter (at least some) criminal behavior?. It is argued that this premise does not imply the conclusion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Daniel M. Farrell (1985). The Justification of General Deterrence. Philosophical Review 94 (3):367-394.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Dm Farrell (1992). On Some Alleged Paradoxes of Deterrence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (2):114-136.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert K. Fullinwider (1988). Nuclear War: The Moral Dimension. Philosophical Books 29 (2):102-103.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jonathan F. Galloway (1987). The Logics, Meta-Logic and Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (2):33-41.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Gauthier (1984). Deterrence, Maximization, and Rationality. Ethics 94 (3):474-495.
  35. Timothy J. Van Gelder (1989). Credible Threats and Usable Weapons: Some Dilemmas of Deterrence. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (2):158 - 183.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Alan Gewirth (2013). Reason and Nuclear Deterrence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):129-159.
    (1986). Reason and Nuclear Deterrence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 16, Supplementary Volume 12: Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence and Disarmament, pp. 129-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Geoffrey Goodwin (1982). Deterrence and Détente. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) (1982). Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Trudy Govier (1986). Robert Dahl, Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy Versus Guardianship Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 6 (6):265-268.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Colin Gray (1985). Strategic Defense, Deterrence, and the Prospects for Peace. Ethics 95 (3):659-672.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ernest Den Haavang (1968). On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. Ethics 78 (4):280-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John J. Haldane (1985). Notes and Comments. The Morality of Deterrence. Heythrop Journal 26 (1):41–46.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. G. H. Hampsch (1984). George H. Hampsch -- Nuclear Deterrence and World Peace. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (3-4):123-131.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Russell Hardin (2013). Deterrence and Moral Theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (sup1):161-193.
    (1986). Deterrence and Moral Theory. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 16, Supplementary Volume 12: Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence and Disarmament, pp. 161-193.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Russell Hardin (1985). Book Review:Nuclear Pacifism: "Just War" Thinking Today. Edward J. Laarman; The Ethics of War and Nuclear Deterrence. James P. Sterba; When War Is Unjust: Being Honest in Just-War Thinking. John Howard Yoder. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (3):763-.
  46. Russell Hardin (1983). Unilateral Versus Mutual Disarmament. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3):236-254.
  47. Stanley Hauerwas (1992). On Surviving Justly. Ethics and Nuclear Disarmament. In Jean Bethke Elshtain (ed.), Just War Theory. New York University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Russell Hittinger (1989). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):229-233.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Arthur Hockaday (1988). Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism By John Finnis, Joseph M. Boyle Jr and Germain Grisez Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, Xv + 429 Pp., £30.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 63 (244):277-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Arthur Hockaday (1982). In Defence of Deterrence. In Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.), Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence. St. Martin's Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 160