Related categories
Siblings:
131 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 131
  1. Jochen Althoff (2012). Presocratic Discourse in Poetry and Prose: The Case of Empedocles and Anaxagoras. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (2):293-299.
  2. M. R. Arundel (1962). Empedocles, Fr. 35. 12–15. The Classical Review 12 (02):109-111.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jonathan Barnes (1993). Giorgio Imbraguglia, Giuseppe S. Badolati, Renzo Morchio, Antonio M. Battegazzore, Gaetano Messina (edd.): Index Empedocleus. (Le opere i giorni, 1, 2.) 2 vols. Pp. 515 (numbered continuously). Genoa: Erga edizioni, 1991. Paper, L. 25,000 + L. 28,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):165-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jonathan Barnes (1988). Review: The Presocratics in Context. [REVIEW] Phronesis 33 (3):327 - 344.
  5. Jonathan Barnes (1982). Empedocles. The Classical Review 32 (02):191-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jonathan Barnes (1982). Empedocles M. R. Wright: Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. Edited with an Introduction, Commentary and Concordance. Pp. Vii + 364. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981. £28. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 32 (02):191-196.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Rachel Barney (2009). Simplicius: Commentary, Harmony, and Authority. Antiquorum Philosophia 3:101-120.
    Simplicius’ project of harmonizing previous philosophers deserves to be taken seriously as both a philosophical and an interpretive project. Simplicius follows Aristotle himself in developing charitable interpretations of his predecessors: his distinctive project, in the Neoplatonic context, is the rehabilitation of the Presocratics (especially Parmenides, Anaxagoras and Empedocles) from a Platonic-Aristotelian perspective. Simplicius’ harmonizations involve hermeneutic techniques which are recognisably those of the serious historian of philosophy; and harmonization itself has a distinguished history as a constructive philosophical method.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Vincent Blok (2009). Communication or Confrontation – Heidegger and Philosophical Method. Empedocles 1 (1):43-57.
  9. Dominique Bouchet (2010). The Paradox of Culture. Empedocles 1 (2):203-213.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Geoffrey Brown (1984). The Cosmological Theory of Empedocles. Apeiron 18 (2):97 - 101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James Eric Butler (2005). Effluvia. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):215-231.
    Taking as a guiding theme his claim that “there are effluvia from all things that have come to be,” (DK B89), the author presents a reading of Empedocles that stresses the central role of effluvia in his natural philosophy. In presentations of Empedocles, the tradition has usually emphasized the importance of the elements—earth, air, water, fire, Love, and Strife. But as an alternative to that tradition, the author here argues that one must bring to the forefront the role of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gordon Campbell (2005). Empedocles Divided J. Bollack: Empédocle : Les purifications. Un projet de paix universelle . Édité, traduit et commenté. (Collection Points, Série Essais, 498.) Pp. 144. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2003. Paper. ISBN: 2-02-056915-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):12-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gordon Campbell, Empedocles. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Robert Cathey (2011). From Empedocles to Wittgenstein. Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):642-644.
  15. Felix M. Cleve (1979). Empedocles: A Philosophical Investigation (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (4):455-457.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. H. Coxon (1934). Joseph Souilhé: L'énigme d'Emptédocle. Pp. 23. (Archives de Philosophic, Vol. IX, Cahier III.) Paris: Beauchesne, 1934. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (04):146-147.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Timothy J. Crowley (2005). On the Use of Stoicheion in the Sense of 'Element'. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:367-394.
  18. O. D. (1978). Empedocles with a Prefatory Essay 'Empedocles and T. S. Eliot' by Marshall Mcluhan. Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):488-489.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Shirley M. Darcus (1977). Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles. Phronesis 22 (3):175 - 190.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Shirley M. Darcus (1977). Daimon Parallels the Holy Phren in Empedocles. Phronesis 22 (2):175-190.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Eduardo de La Fuente (2010). Paradoxes of Communication: The Case of Modern Classical Music. Empedocles 1 (2):237-250.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Eli Dresner (2009). Radical Interpretation, the Primacy of Communication, and the Bounds of Language. Empedocles 1 (1):123-134.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Empedocles, Empedocles Fragments and Commentary.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Empedocles (1975). The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios: Towards a New Edition of All the Fragments: Thirty-One Fragments. B. R. Grüner.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Empedocles (1908/1973). The Fragments of Empedocles. Lasalle, Ill.,Open Court Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Arthur Fairbanks (1898). Repetitions in Empedokles. The Classical Review 12 (01):16-17.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Elena Fell (2009). Beyond Bergson: The Ontology of Togetherness. Empedocles 1 (1):9-25.
  28. John Ferguson (1971). Δinoς. Phronesis 16 (1):97-115.
  29. John Ferguson (1964). Two Notes on the Preplatonics. Phronesis 9 (2):98-106.
    (I) EMPEDOCLES DK 31 A 30: on the sun as reflected light (II) ANAXAGORAS DK 59 B 11: on stuff turning into other stuff in Anaxagoras.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Hallvard J. Fossheim (2011). From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: Historical Essays in Philosophy – Anthony Kenny. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (242):187-189.
  31. Daniel W. Graham (1988). Symmetry in the Empedoclean Cycle. Classical Quarterly 38 (02):297-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Daniel W. Graham (1985). Empedocles. International Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):119-121.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Philip Hardie (1995). The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos. Classical Quarterly 45 (01):204-.
  34. J. Hause (2010). From Empedocles to Wittgenstein: Historical Essays in Philosophy, by Anthony Kenny. [REVIEW] Mind 119 (474):494-497.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Devin Henry (forthcoming). The Failure of Evolution in Antiquity. In Georgia Irby (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Ancient Science, Medicine and Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
    The intellectual history of evolutionary theory really does not begin in earnest until the late seventeenth/early eighteenth century. Prior to that, the idea that species might have evolved over time was not a serious possibility for most naturalists and philosophers. There is certainly no substantive debate in antiquity about evolution in the modern sense. There were really only two competing explanations for how living things came to have the parts they do: design or blind chance. Ancient Greek Atomism, for example, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jackson P. Hershbell (1973). Hippolytus' "Elenchos" as a Source for Empedocles Re-Examined. II. Phronesis 18 (3):187 - 203.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jackson P. Hershbell (1973). Hippolytus' Elenchos as a Source for Empedocles Re-Examined II. Phronesis 18 (3):187-203.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jackson P. Hershbell (1973). Hippolytus' "Elenchos" as a Source for Empedocles Re-Examined, I. Phronesis 18 (2):97 - 114.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Brad Inwood (2000). EMPEDOCLES A. Martin, O. Primavesi: L'empédocle de Strasbourg (P. Strasb. Gr. Inv. 1665–1666). Introduction, Édition Et Commentaire. Pp. Xi + 396, 6 Pls. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1998. Cased, DM 78. ISBN: 3-11-015129-4. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (01):5-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Brad Inwood (1984). Pour Interpréter Empédocle. Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):99-101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Richard Janko (2010). Empedokles Physika I. Eine Rekonstruktion des Zentralen Gedankengangs. Ancient Philosophy 30 (2):407-411.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Charles H. Kahn (1960). Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles' Doctrine of the Soul. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42 (1):3-35.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Rachana Kamtekar (2009). Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles. Phronesis 54 (3):215-238.
    Contrary to the Aristotelian interpretation of Empedocles' views about cognition, according to which all cognition, like perception, is due to the compositional likeness between subject and object of cognition, this paper argues that when Empedocles says that we know one thing 'by' another (e.g. earth by earth or love by love), he is characterizing analogical reasoning, an intellectual activity quite different from perception (which is explained by the fit between effluences and pores). The paper also explores the idea that strife (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. G. B. Kerferd (1978). Empedocles the Rationalist. The Classical Review 28 (01):80-.
  45. G. B. Kerferd (1978). Empedocles the Rationalist Carlo Gallavotti: Empedocle, Poema Fisico E Lustrale. (Scritti Greci E Latini.) Pp. Xxv + 360; 4 Plates. Verona: Mondadori, 1975. Cloth L. 5,000. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 28 (01):80-81.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. G. B. Kerferd (1978). N. Van der Ben: The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios. Towards a New Edition of All the Fragments. Thirty-One Fragments Edited. Pp. 230. Amsterdam: Grüner, 1975. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 28 (01):167-168.
  47. G. B. Kerferd (1972). Empedocles Jean Bollack: Empédocle. Ii: Les Origines, Édition Et Traduction des Fragments Et des Témoignages; Iii: Commentaire I–Ii. 2 Vols. (In 3). Pp. Xxiv+304, 683; 6 Plates, 10 Text-Figs. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1969. Cloth, 225fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 22 (03):325-327.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. G. B. Kerferd (1972). Empedocles. The Classical Review 22 (03):325-.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. G. B. Kerferd (1971). Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle D. O'Brien: Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle. A Reconstruction From the Fragments and Secondary Sources. Pp. X+459. Cambridge: University Press, 1969. Cloth, £5·00. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (02):176-178.
  50. G. B. Kerferd (1967). A New Approach to Empedogles Jean Bollack: Empédocle. I: Introduction à l'Ancienne Physique. Pp. 411; 4 Text-Diagrams. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1965. Cloth, 45 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (02):147-149.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 131