Related categories
Siblings:
70 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 70
  1. Jon Altschul, Epistemic Entitlement. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    In the early 1990s there emerged a growing interest with the concept of epistemic entitlement. Philosophers who acknowledge the existence of entitlements maintain that there are beliefs or judgments unsupported by evidence available to the subject, but which the subject nonetheless has the epistemic right to hold. Some of these may include beliefs non-inferentially sourced in perception, memory, introspection, testimony, and the a priori. Unlike the traditional notion of justification, entitlement is often characterized as an externalist type of epistemic warrant, (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Anna-Karin M. Andersson (2007). An Alleged Contradiction in Nozick's Entitlement Theory. Journal of Libertarian Studies 21 (3):43-63.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Nancy Aries (2003). Smith:Entitlement Politics: Medicare and Medicaid 1995–2001. Inquiry 40 (4):416-417.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Yuval Avnur (2011). An Old Problem for the New Rationalism. Synthese 183 (2):175-185.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Agnes Bäker, Werner Güth, Kerstin Pull & Manfred Stadler (2014). Entitlement and the Efficiency-Equality Trade-Off: An Experimental Study. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 76 (2):225-240.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul A. Boghossian (2003). Epistemic Analyticity: A Defense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):15-35.
    The paper is a defense of the project of explaining the a priori via the notion of meaning or concept possession. It responds to certain objections that have been made to this project—in particular, that there can be no epistemically analytic sentences that are not also metaphysically analytic, and that the notion of implicit definition cannot explain a priori entitlement. The paper goes on to distinguish between two different ways in which facts about meaning might generate facts about entitlement—inferential and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Anthony Brueckner (2007). Content Externalism, Entitlement, and Reasons. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 160.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-548.
    The paper develops a conception of epistemic warrant as applied to perceptual belief, called entitlement, that does not require the warranted individual to be capable of understanding the warrant. The conception is situated within an account of animal perception and unsophisticated perceptual belief. It characterizes entitlement as fulfillment of an epistemic norm that is apriori associated with a certain representational function that can be known apriori to be a function of perception. The paper connects anti-individualism, a thesis about the nature (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Tyler Burge (2003). Perceptual Entitlement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):503-48.
    The paper develops a conception of epistemic warrant as applied to perceptual belief, called "entitlement", that does not require the warranted individual to be capable of understanding the warrant. The conception is situated within an account of animal perception and unsophisticated perceptual belief. It characterizes entitlement as fulfillment of an epistemic norm that is apriori associated with a certain representational function that can be known apriori to be a function of perception. The paper connects anti-individualism, a thesis about the nature (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Tyler Burge (1996). Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:91-116.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Tyler Burge (1993). Content Preservation. Philosophical Review 102 (4):457-488.
    The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tyler Burge & Christopher Peacocke (1996). Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge: II. Christopher Peacocke: Entitlement, Self-Knowledge and Conceptual Redeployment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:117 - 158.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Albert Casullo, B o O K R E V I E W S.
    At any given time, an individual has certain beliefs and certain procedures or methods for modifying those beliefs. In The Realm of Reason, as in his previous book, Being Known (1999), Christopher Peacocke is concerned with the elusive question of what it is for someone to be “entitled” to a given belief or procedure.1..
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Albert Casullo (2007). What is Entitlement? Acta Analytica 22 (4):267 - 279.
    In his seminal paper, Content Preservation, Tyler Burge defends an original account of testimonial knowledge. The originality of the account is due, in part, to the fact that it is cast within a novel epistemic framework. The central feature of that framework is the introduction of the concept of entitlement, which is alleged to be a distinctive type of positive epistemic support or warrant. Entitlement and justification, according to Burge, are sub-species of warrant. Justification is the internalist form of warrant, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Martin Davies (2004). Epistemic Entitlement, Warrant Transmission and Easy Knowledge. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):213–245.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Fred Dretske (2000). Entitlement: Epistemic Rights Without Epistemic Duties? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):591-606.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mikkel Gerken (2013). Internalism and Externalism in the Epistemology of Testimony. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):532-557.
    Is the nature of testimonial warrant epistemically internalist or externalist? I will argue that the question should be answered ‘yes!’ The disjunction is not exclusive. Rather, a testimonial belief may possess epistemically internalist warrant—justification—as well as epistemically externalist warrant—entitlement. I use the label ‘pluralism’ to denote the view that there are both internalist and externalist species of genuinely epistemic warrant and argue for pluralism in the epistemology of testimony.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Peter J. Graham (2012). Epistemic Entitlement. Noûs 46 (3):449-482.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Peter J. Graham (2011). Perceptual Entitlement and Basic Beliefs. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 153 (3):467-475.
    Perceptual entitlement and basic beliefs Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11098-010-9603-3 Authors Peter J. Graham, University of California, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA USA Journal Philosophical Studies Online ISSN 1573-0883 Print ISSN 0031-8116.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Peter J. Graham (2010). Testimonial Entitlement and the Function of Comprehension. In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 148--174.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gilbert Harman, Review of Christopher Peacocke, the Realm of Reason. [REVIEW]
    Peacocke argues that all epistemic entitlements depend at bottom on a priori entitlements, determined by "constitutive conditions" for the application of concepts. He does not address familiar doubts about the distinction between constitutive and nonconstitutive conditions of application. (These doubts are based on the widely accepted idea that justification begins with all of one's current beliefs and methods and seeks to modify these only to improve their overall coherence with each other, hoping ultimately for "reflective equilibrium.") In addition, Peacocke conflates (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. David Henderson (2013). Entitlement in Gutting's Epistemology of Philosophy: Comments on What Philosophers Know. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):121-132.
    In What Philosophers Know, Gary Gutting provides an epistemology of philosophical reflection. This paper focuses on the roles that various intuitive inputs are said to play in philosophical thought. Gutting argues that philosophers are defeasibly entitled to believe some of these, prior to the outcome of the philosophical reflection, and that they then rightly serve as significant (again defeasible) anchors on reflection. This paper develops a view of epistemic entitlement and applies it to argue that many prephilosophical convictions of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Robert C. Hughes (2013). Law and the Entitlement to Coerce. In Wilfrid J. Waluchow & Stefan Sciaraffa (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford University Press. 183.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Mikael Janvid (2009). The Value of Lesser Goods: The Epistemic Value of Entitlement. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 24 (4):263-274.
    The notion of entitlement plays an important role in some influential epistemologies. Often the epistemological motive for introducing the concept is to accommodate certain externalist intuitions within an internalist framework or, conversely, to incorporate internalist traits into an otherwise externalist position. In this paper two prominent philosophers will be used as examples: Tyler Burge as a representative of the first option and Fred Dretske as one of the second. However, even on the assumption that the concept of entitlement is sufficiently (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. C. S. Jenkins (2007). Entitlement and Rationality. Synthese 157 (1):25 - 45.
    This paper takes the form of a critical discussion of Crispin Wright’s notion of entitlement of cognitive project. I examine various strategies for defending the claim that entitlement can make acceptance of a proposition epistemically rational, including one which appeals to epistemic consequentialism. Ultimately, I argue, none of these strategies is successful, but the attempt to isolate points of disagreement with Wright issues in some positive proposals as to how an epistemic consequentialist should characterize epistemic rationality.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anthony Brueckner Jon Altschul (2014). Vahid, Burge, and Perceptual Entitlement. Metaphilosophy 45 (3):325-330.
    Hamid Vahid criticizes Tyler Burge's account of perceptual entitlement. Vahid argues that Burge's account fails to satisfy a criterion of adequacy that any correct account of perceptual warrant must satisfy. According to Vahid, a correct account of perceptual warrant must allow for perceptual beliefs which are produced by a properly functioning perceptual system yet which lack warrant. The present article argues that Vahid's critique of Burge fails. It presents numerous examples of such beliefs that are consistent with Burge's account of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. David M. Lederkramer (1979). Quest on the Entitlement Theory. Analysis 39 (4):219 - 222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Cynthia Macdonald (1998). Externalism and Authoritative Self-Knowledge. In C. Wright, B. Smith & C. Macdonald (eds.), Knowing Our Own Minds. Oxford University Press. 123-155.
    Externalism in the philosophy of mind has been thought by many to pose a serious threat to the claim that subjects are in general authoritative with regard to certain of their own intentional states.<sup>1</sup> In a series of papers, Tyler Burge (1985_a_, 1985_b_, 1988, 1996) has argued that the distinctive entitlement or right that subjects have to self- knowledge in certain cases is compatible with externalism, since that entitlement is environmentally neutral, neutral with respect to the issue of the individuation (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Brad Majors (forthcoming). What Entitlement Is. Acta Analytica:1-25.
    The paper is an examination of Tyler Burge’s notion of epistemic entitlement. It begins with consideration of a recent attempt to understand entitlement, including the ways in which it differs from the more traditional notion of justification . The paper argues that each of Casullo’s central contentions rests upon confusion. More generally, the paper shows that Casullo’s interpretation tries to force Burge’s work into a framework that is not suited for it; and that the interpretation also suffers from not being (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Brad Majors & Sarah Sawyer (2007). Entitlement, Opacity, and Connection. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 131.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Aidan McGlynn (2014). On Epistemic Alchemy. In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. 173-189.
    Crispin Wright has proposed that one has entitlements to accept certain propositions that play a foundational role within one’s body of belief. Such an entitlement is a kind of warrant that does not require the possessor to have acquired evidence speaking in favor of the proposition in question. The proposal allows Wright to concede much of the force of the most powerful arguments for scepticism, while avoiding the truly sceptical conclusion that one lacks warrant for most of one’s beliefs. Here (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter E. Millspaugh (1989). Severance Pay: Moving From Managerial Prerogative to Worker Entitlement. Business and Society 28 (1):6-11.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Luca Moretti, Problems of Wright's Entitlement Theory.
    I am concerned with Crispin Wright (2004, 2008, 2012 and 2014)’s entitlement theory, according to which (1) we have non-evidential justification for accepting propositions of a general type, which Wright calls cornerstones, and (2) this non-evidential justification for cornerstones can secure evidential justification for believing many other propositions––those we take to be true on the grounds of ordinary evidence. I initially focus on Wright’s strategic entitlement, which is one of the types of entitlement that Wright has described in more detail. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ram Neta (2010). Can a Priori Entitlement Be Preserved by Testimony. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. Oxford University Press, Usa. 194--215.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Robert Nozick (forthcoming). 6 The Entitlement Theory of Justice. Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Susana Nuccetelli (2001). Is Self-Knowledge an Entitlement? And Why Should We Care? Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):143-155.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Alexander C. R. Oldemeier (2013). Entitlement and Epistemic Upgrading. Analytic Philosophy 54 (4):436-446.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. D. Pare (1984). On Nozick: A Critique of Entitlement. Gnosis. A Journal of Philosophic Interest Montréal 2 (3):39-63.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jeffrey Paul (1990). Property, Entitlement, and Remedy. The Monist 73 (4):564-577.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Christopher Peacocke (2006). Entitlement, Reasons and Externalism. Philosophical Books 47 (2):120-128.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Christopher Peacocke (2004). The Realm of Reason. Oxford University Press.
    The Realm of Reason develops a new, general theory of what it is for a thinker to be entitled to form a given belief. The theory locates entitlement in the nexus of relations between truth, content, and understanding. Peacocke formulates three principles of rationalism that articulate this conception. The principles imply that all entitlement has a component that is justificationally independent of experience. The resulting position is thus a form of rationalism, generalized to all kinds of content. To show how (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Christopher Peacocke (2004). Explaining Perceptual Entitlement. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter. 441--80.
    material that was later incorporated into The Realm of Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), and into a paper of the same title in The Challenge of Externalism, ed. R. Schantz (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2004).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Christopher Peacocke (2001). The Past, Necessity, Externalism and Entitlement. Philosophical Books 42:106--117.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Christopher Peacocke (1996). Entitlement, Self-Knowledge, and Conceptual Redeployment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Sociey 96:117-58.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Christopher Peacocke (1996). Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge: Entitlement, Self-Knowledge, and Conceptual Redeployment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96:117-58.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen, Entitlement in Mathematics.
    Crispin Wright has recently introduced a non-evidential notion of warrant – entitlement of cognitive project – as a promising response to certain sceptical arguments, which have been subject to extensive discussion within mainstream epistemology. The central idea is that, for a given class of cognitive projects, there are certain basic propositions – entitlements – which one is warranted in trusting provided there is no sufficient reason to think them false. (See Wrigh [2].) The aim of this paper is to provide (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (forthcoming). Hume's Principle and Entitlement: On the Epistemology of the Neo-Fregean Programme. In Philip Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen (2009). Entitlement, Value and Rationality. Synthese 171 (3):443-457.
    In this paper I discuss two fundamental challenges concerning Crispin Wright's notion of entitlement of cognitive project: firstly, whether entitlement is an epistemic kind of warrant since, seemingly, it is not underwritten by epistemic reasons, and, secondly, whether, in the absence of such reasons, the kind of rationality associated with entitlement is epistemic in nature. The paper investigates three possible lines of response to these challenges. According to the first line of response, entitlement of cognitive project is underwritten by epistemic (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Patrice Philie (2009). Entitlement as a Response to I–Ii–III Scepticism. Synthese 171 (3):459 - 466.
    In this paper, Crispin Wright’s unified strategy against scepticism is put under pressure through an examination of the concept of entitlement. Wright’s characterisation of a generalised form of scepticism is first described, followed by an examination of the concept of entitlement and of the role played by presuppositions in his strategy. This will make manifest the transcendental structure of this response to scepticism. The paper ends with a discussion of the effectiveness of this transcendental strategy in providing a satisfying response (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Stathis Psillos, The a Priori: Between Conventions and Implicit Definitions.
    A thumbnail sketch of the philosophical thinking about the a priori would surely include that it has been dominated by two major approaches: the Kantian absolute conception of it and the Millian-Quinean absolute rejection of it (section 2). Yet, one can find in the literature claims about the existence of a ›functional a priori‹, a ›relative a priori‹, a ›relativised a priori‹ and suchlike. They are all meant to carve a space between the two extremes. An important thought behind the (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 70