- Noga Arikha (2007). Opaque Humours, Enlightened Emotions, and the Transparent Mind. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 51:175-182.
- Anthony Robert Booth (2008). Deontology in Ethics and Epistemology. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):530-545.
- Anthony Brueckner (1996). Deontologism and Internalism in Epistemology. Noûs 30 (4):527-536.
- Krister Bykvist & Anandi Hattiangadi (2007). Does Thought Imply Ought? Analysis 67 (296):277–285.
- H. G. Callaway (1999). Intelligence, Community and Cartesian Doubt. Humanism Today 13:31-48.
- H. G. Callaway (1993). Open Transcendentalism and the Normative Character of Methodology. Grazer Philosophische Studien 43 (July):1-24.
- J. Adam Carter & Guy Axtell (2008). Just The Right Thickness: A Defense of Second-Wave Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Papers 37 (3):413-434.
- Joseph Adam Carter, &Quot;The Epistemic Point of View".
- Matthew Chrisman (2008). Ought to Believe. Journal of Philosophy 105 (7).
- Josep E. Corbí (1993). In Defense of a Normative Scientific Epistemology. Philosophical Issues 3:287-307.
- Richard Feldman (2008). Modest Deontologism in Epistemology. Synthese 161 (3).
- Sally Haslanger (1999). What Knowledge is and What It Ought to Be: Feminist Values and Normative Epistemology. Philosophical Perspectives 13.
- Deborah L. Kasman (2003). Knowledge as Power: The Impact of Normativity on Epistemology. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):20 – 22.
- Jeff Kasser & Nishi Shah (2006). The Metaethics of Belief: An Expressivist Reading of "the Will to Believe". Social Epistemology 20 (1):1 – 17.
- Thomas Kelly (2003). Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
- Søren Harnow Klausen (2009). Two Notions of Epistemic Normativity. Theoria 75 (3):161-178.
- Hilary Kornblith (1993). Epistemic Normativity. Synthese 94 (3).
- Barry Lam, The Dynamic Foundations of Epistemic Rationality.
- Markus Lammenranta (1998). The Normativity of Naturalistic Epistemology. Philosophia 26 (3-4).
- Carole J. Lee (2008). Applied Cognitive Psychology and the "Strong Replacement" of Epistemology by Normative Psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1).
- Albert Lefevre (1902). Epistemology and Ethical Method. Philosophical Review 11 (6):557-564.
- Adam Leite (2005). Epistemological Externalism and the Project of Traditional Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):505–533.
- James Lenman (2007). Expressivism and Epistemology: What is Moral Inquiry? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):63–81.
- Jarrett Leplin (1990). Renormalizing Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 57 (1):20-33.
- Arnold Levison (1981). 'Epistemology Today: A Perspective in Retrospect' by Ernest Sosa. Philosophical Studies 40 (3).
- Clayton Littlejohn (2009). On Treating Something as a Reason for Action. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy.
- James Maffie (1990). Naturalism and the Normativity of Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 59 (3).
- Eugene Mills (2002). Review: Reason Without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity. Mind 111 (442).
- David Owens (2000). Reason Without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity. Routledge.
- David J. Owens (2003). Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
- Adam C. Podlaskowski & Joshua A. Smith (forthcoming). Infinitism and Epistemic Normativity. Synthese.
- David Pugmire (1972). A Doubt About the Normative Theory of Belief. Mind 81 (324):584-586.
- Andrew Reisner, Is There Reason to Be Theoretically Rational?
- Andrew Reisner (2009). The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem. Philosophical Studies 145 (2).
- Andrew Reisner (2008). Weighing Pragmatic and Evidential Reasons for Belief. Philosophical Studies 138 (1).
- Michael Ridge (2007). Expressivism and Epistemology: Epistemology for Ecumenical Expressivists. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):83–108.
- Nishi Shah (2006). A New Argument for Evidentialism. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):481–498.
- Nishi Shah (2003). How Truth Governs Belief. Philosophical Review 112 (4):447-482.
- Nishi Shah & J. David Velleman (2005). Doxastic Deliberation. Philosophical Review 114 (4):497-534.
- Nishi Shah & Jeffrey Kasser, The Metaethics of Belief: An Expressivist Reading of “the Will to Believe”.
- Daniel Star (forthcoming). Review of Terence Cuneo, The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism (OUP, 2007). Mind.
- Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen, How to Be a Teleologist About Epistemic Reasons.
- Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2009). Weighing the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Studies 145 (3).
- Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (2006). No Norm Needed: On the Aim of Belief. Philosophical Quarterly 56 (225):499–516.
- Bart Streumer (2007). Reasons and Entailment. Erkenntnis 66 (3).
- James E. Taylor (1998). Richard Foley, Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 214 + X Pp, USD $35.00. Noûs 32 (2):265–275.
- John Turri (forthcoming). Epistemic Supervenience. In Matthias Steup (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Epistemology, 2 ed. Blackwell.
- David Velleman (2000). On the Aim of Belief. In David Velleman (ed.), The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press.
- Jonathan M. Weinberg (2007). Moderate Epistemic Relativism and Our Epistemic Goals. Episteme 4 (1).
- Daniel Whiting, Should I Believe the Truth?
 | 1 — 50 / 52 |  |
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|