This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
3630 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 3630
Material to categorize
  1. Ao Adams (1968). Reliability Goes in Long Before the Wrapper Goes On. In Peter Koestenbaum (ed.), Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif. 16.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Jonathan E. Adler (1996). An Overlooked Argument for Epistemic Conservatism. Analysis 56 (2):80–84.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Modesto Manuel Gómez Alonso (2011). The Rehabilitation of Global Scenarios in Epistemological Reliabilism. Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 38:329-350.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Robert Audi (1988). Justification, Truth, and Reliability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (1):1-29.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5. Ralph Neil Baergen (1990). A Reliability Theory of Epistemic Justification. Dissertation, Syracuse University
    The claim that the epistemic status of a belief corresponds to the reliability of the process by which it was formed is developed and defended. In the course of this, a variety of conceptual and methodological matters are addressed. Notably, the role of the sciences, particularly experimental psychology and cognitive science, in epistemology is explored, and the claim that factual disciplines can have no bearing upon a normative project is considered and rejected. Also, the suggestion that psychology should entirely replace (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Michael Bergmann (2006). Review: Bonjour's Dilemma. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 131 (3):679 - 693.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Christian Beyer (2007). Contextualism and the Background of (Philosophical) Justification. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):291-305.
    I propose to apply a version of contextualism about knowledge to the special case that represents the topic of this volume. I begin by motivating my preferred version of contextualism, which may be labelled as conventionalist contextualism; here I start from a well-known problem that besets epistemic internalism (section I). Following this, I pose a problem for conventionalist contextualism and argue that it can be solved by invoking, first, the idea of what I shall call the lifewordly background of epistemic (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. B. Bir (1968). The Scatter of the Reliability Factor of Roller Bearing Dimensioning, and its Practical Aspects. In Peter Koestenbaum (ed.), Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif. 39.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Richard Macartney Blackstone (1968). An Examination of the Philosophical Methods of G.E. Moore. Dissertation, Brown University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Laura Blažetić (2003). Laurence BonJour I Ernest Sosa, Epistemic Justification. Prolegomena 2 (2):251-256.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Patrick Bondy, Against Epistemic Circularity.
    One finds a surprising number of defenses of the legitimacy of some kinds of question-begging arguments or beliefs in the literature. Without wanting to deny the importance of dialectical analyses of begging the question, what I do here is explore the epistemic side of the issue. In particular, I want to explore the legitimacy of “epistemically circular” arguments and beliefs. My tentative conclusion is that epistemically circular arguments and beliefs are never legitimate. *Note: this is an unpublished manuscript presented at (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. L. Bonjour (1990). Apriority and Metajustification in BonJour Structure of Empirical Knowledge-Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):779-782.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Laurence BonJour (1985). Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (9):410-412.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Giacomo Borbone (2014). Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij , Epistemic Paternalism: A Defence . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 34 (6):282-283.
  15. Kenny Boyce & Andrew Moon (forthcoming). In Defense of Proper Functionalism: Cognitive Science Takes on Swampman. Synthese:1-15.
    According to proper functionalist theories of warrant, a belief is warranted only if it is formed by cognitive faculties that are properly functioning according to a good, truth-aimed design plan, one that is often thought to be specified either by intentional design or by natural selection. A formidable challenge to proper functionalist theories is the Swampman objection, according to which there are scenarios involving creatures who have warranted beliefs but whose cognitive faculties are not properly functioning, or are poorly designed, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Johannes Bronkhorst (2005). The Reliability of Tradition. In Federico Squarcini (ed.), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Firenze University Press and Munshiram Manoharlal 63--76.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Georg Brun (2009). Wer hat ein Problem mit irrationalen Präferenzen? Entscheidungstheorie und Überlegungsgleichgewicht. Studia Philosophica 68:11-41.
    Decision theory explicates norms of rationality for deriving preferences from preferences and beliefs. Empirical studies have found that actual preferences regularly violate these norms, launching a debate on whether this shows that subjects are prone to certain forms of irrationality or that decision theory needs to be revised. It has been claimed that such a revision is necessitated by the fact that normative uses of decision theory must be justified by a reflective equilibrium. The paper discusses three points. First, the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Brian Bruya (2003). Review of Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. [REVIEW] China Review International 10 (1):157-164.
    This is a full length review in which I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Jane Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Geaney's strengths lie in her refusal to import Western epistemological presuppositions into depictions of Early Chinese philosophy, her meticulous canvassing of key Warring States texts, and her insightful reconstruction of Early Chinese epistemology as based on perception rather than abstract concepts. Her weaknesses are the limited range of her representative texts and her occasional (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Lawrence Cahoone (2004). Postmodern Conservatism: A Definition. Studies in Practical Philosophy 4 (1):23-53.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Mauro Ceruti & Alfonso Montuori (1994). Constraints and Possibilities the Evolution of Knowledge and Knowledge of Evolution. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21. A. Chalmers (1980). ZIMAN, J., "Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science". [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58:73.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Eloisa Cianci (2012). The Role of Context in the Construction of Biotechnological Knowledge. World Futures 68 (3):178 - 187.
    The aim of this article is to show how context, in its multiple forms, as well as having influence in localization, organization, government, and business of firms, is also fundamental on an epistemological level because it acts directly on the dynamics of scientific knowledge construction. It will be shown how context takes on the role of a constraint that strongly influences the growth of the endless possibilities from which a scientific knowledge emerges, and how epistemology has to rethink the definition (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Lorraine Code (1991). What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press.
    CHAPTER ONE Is the Sex of the Knower Epistemologically Significant? The Question A question that focuses on the knower, as the title of this chapter does, ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   99 citations  
  24. Stewart Cohen (1985). Reliability and Justification. The Monist 68:149-158.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. James W. Cornman (1977). Foundational Versus Nonfoundational Theories of Empirical Justification. American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (4):287 - 297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. Tim Crane (2003). Review of "In Defence of Pure Reason" by Laurence BonJour. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (447):502-506.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Zvonimir Čuljak (2012). Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology. Prolegomena 11 (2):259-282.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. John Dewey (1905). The Realism of Pragmatism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (12):324-327.
    Dewy argues for the realist stance of his pragmatism as regards epistemology--as contrasted with moral idealism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. Margherita Di Stasio (2008). Plantinga's Reliabilism Between Teleology and Epistemic Naturalization. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):13-24.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Jörg Disse (2013). The Two Process Model of Cognition and Kierkegaard's Stages of Life. E-Journal Philosophie der Psychologie 19 (2013):9 p..
    My aim is to relate Søren A. Kierkegaard’s early theory of stages as described basically in “Either-Or” to the theory of interest underlying the two process model of cognition of the Canadian psychologist Keith E. Stanovich with regard to the question of the highest formal goal we can pursue in our life. On the basis of Stanovich’s distinction between type 1 and type 2 processing and Kierkegaard’s distinction between an esthetical and an ethical stage of life, I argue for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Richard Eldridge (2006). History Vs. (Epistemological) Theory. History and Theory 45 (3):448–454.
    Interpretive Reasoning. By Laurent Stern.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. M. Engel (2000). Laurence BonJour, in Defense of Pure Reason. Dialogue 39:163-166.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Olsson Erik (ed.) (2003). The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. William Douglas Evans (1992). The Contextual Basis of Rationality. Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
    Among recent naturalistic epistemologies, one class of theories, 'rough psychologistic' theories, is the most promising. These claim that for our belief-formation processes to yield knowledge is for them to be sufficiently reliable. The study of cognition, then, is best conducted by dividing labor between two groups: psychologists, who should describe what, and how reliable, the processes we use to form beliefs are; and philosophers, who should formulate normative standards of reliability. ;One promising version of rough psychologism is Alvin Goldman's nativistic (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. James Fieser, David Hume: Metaphysical and Epistemological Theories. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  36. Luciano Floridi (2005). Telepresence: From Epistemic Failure to Successful Observability. In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. 4--37.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Richard Foley (1983). Epistemic Conservatism. Philosophical Studies 43 (2):165 - 182.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  38. Hermann Frankel (1994). 4. Xenophanes' Empiricism and His Critique of Knowledge. In Alexander P. D. Mourelatos (ed.), The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays. Princeton University Press 118-132.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39. Danny Frederick, Theoretical and Practical Reason: A Critical Rationalist View.
    If the task of theoretical reason is to discover truth, or reasons for belief, then theoretical reason is impossible. Attempts to circumvent that by appeal to probabilities are self-defeating. If the task of practical reason is to discover what we ought to do or what actions are desirable or valuable, then practical reason is impossible. Appeals to the subjective ought or to subjective probabilities are self-defeating. Adapting Karl Popper, I argue that the task of theoretical reason is to obtain theories (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Nagarjuna G. (2009). Tracing the Biological Roots of Knowledge. In Rangaswamy N. S. (ed.), Life and Organicism. Centre for Studies in Civilizations
    The essay is a critical review of three possible approaches in the theory of knowledge while tracing the biological roots of knowledge: empiricist, rationalist and developmentalist approaches. Piaget's genetic epistemology, a developmentalist approach, is one of the first comprehensive treatments on the question of tracing biological roots of knowledge. This developmental approach is currently opposed, without questioning the biological roots of knowledge, by the more popular rationalist approach, championed by Chomsky. Developmental approaches are generally coherent with cybernetic models, of which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. P. Garavaso (2001). Recensioni-La naturalizzazione dell'epistemologia. Contro una soluzione quineana by Nicla Vassallo. Epistemologia 24 (2):367-370.
    Quine, criticism of Quine's Naturalized Epistemology.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Alvin I. Goldman (2012). Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology: Essays. OUP Usa.
    This is the most up-to-date collection of essays by the leading proponent of process reliabilism, refining and clarifying that theory and critiquing its rivals. The volume features important essays on the internalism/externalism debate, epistemic value, the intuitional methodology of philosophy, and social epistemology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  43. Alvin I. Goldman (1967). A Causal Theory of Knowing. Journal of Philosophy 64 (12):357-372.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   83 citations  
  44. D. Goldstick (1976). More on Methodological Conservatism. Philosophical Studies 30 (3):193 - 195.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. D. Goldstick (1971). Methodological Conservatism. American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (2):186 - 191.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  46. Liran Shia Gordon (2015). Reconstructing Aquinas's Process of Abstraction. Heythrop Journal 57 (3).
    Aquinas’s process of abstraction of the particular thing into a universal concept is of pivotal importance for grounding his philosophy and theology in a natural framework. Much has been said and written regarding Aquinas’s doctrine of abstraction, yet recent studies still consider it to be ‘nothing more than a kind of magic.’ This problematic claim is not without foundation, for in trying to understand exactly how this process works, we are constantly faced with an unbridgeable abyss and the repeated vague (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Peter J. Graham (2014). Against Transglobal Reliabilism. Philosophical Studies 169 (3):525-535.
    David Henderson and Terry Horgan argue that doxastic epistemic justification requires the transglobal reliability of the belief-forming process. Transglobal reliability is reliability across a wide range of experientially possible global environments. Focusing on perception, I argue that justification does not require transglobal reliability, for perception is non-accidentally reliable and confers justification but not always transglobally reliable. Transglobal reliability is an epistemically desirable property of belief-forming processes, but not necessary for justification.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. John Greco (2003). Why Not Reliabilism? In Olsson Erik (ed.), The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer. Kluwer 31--41.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Leo Groarke (1993). Paul Kurtz, The New Skepticism: Inquiry and Reliable Knowledge Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 13 (2):101-103.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Thomas Grundmann (2015). How Reliabilism Saves the Apriori/Aposteriori Distinction. Synthese 192 (9):2747-2768.
    Contemporary epistemologists typically define a priori justification as justification that is independent of sense experience. However, sense experience plays at least some role in the production of many paradigm cases of a priori justified belief. This raises the question of when experience is epistemically relevant to the justificatory status of the belief that is based on it. In this paper, I will outline the answers that can be given by the two currently dominant accounts of justification, i.e. evidentialism and reliabilism. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 3630