About this topic
Summary The epistemology of religion covers the varied epistemological questions that may be posed concerning religious belief; it thus lies at the intersection of epistemology and philosophy of religion. Traditional issues include the rationality of religious belief/disbelief, the nature of evidence for and against theism, whether and under what circumstances knowledge of God (if there is one) is possible, the roles of religious experience or revelation or testimony in supporting religious belief, whether arguments or evidence are needed to ground religious belief (see 'reformed epistemology'), the nature of 'faith' (in both religious and non-religious contexts), and the epistemological consequences of disagreement on religious questions.
Key works A handful of philosophers have been most important in shaping the recent literature on the rationality of religious belief: see especially the collection edited by Alvin Plantinga and Nicholas Wolterstorff (Plantinga & Wolterstorff 1983), and book-length treatments Plantinga 1967, Swinburne 1993, Swinburne 1996, Plantinga 2000, Alston 1991, plus the collections Wolterstorff 2010 and VanArragon & Clark 2011. For criticism see Mackie 1982Sobel 2004Schellenberg 2007. For recent work on faith, see  Buchak 2012Howard-Snyder 2013, and Buchak 2014; and for discussions of disagreement and religious belief, see Oppy 2010Thurow 2012, and Frances 2015. For important historical considerations, see Coakley 2009 and Coakley 2013.
Introductions Clark 2004, Forrest 2008Dastmalchian 2013, Smith 2014, and Dunaway & Hawthorne forthcoming
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:
2012 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 2012
Material to categorize
  1. Leonard Angel (2005). Compositional Science and Religious Philosophy. Religious Studies 41 (2):125-143.
    Religious thought often assumes that the principle of physical causal completeness (PCC) is false. But those who explicitly deny or doubt PCC, including William Alston, W. D. Hart, Tim Crane, Paul Moser and David Yandell, Charles Taliaferro, Keith Yandell, Dallas Willard, William Vallicella, Frank Dilley, and, recently, David Chalmers, have ignored not only the explicit but also the implicit grounds for acceptance of PCC. I review the explicit grounds, and extend the hitherto implicit grounds, which together constitute a greater challenge (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. F. E. B. (1959). Calvin's Doctrine of the Knowledge of God. Review of Metaphysics 13 (2):359-359.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Luciano Baccari (2005). Miracolo E Legge Naturale. Urbaniana University Press.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Matthew Christian Bagger (1994). Religious Experience and Justified Belief. Dissertation, Columbia University
    Recently, a cohort of philosophers of religion have sought, through recourse to the extraordinary experiences of mystics, to defend the rationality of religious belief. My dissertation critically assesses this project. First, I portray experience as a response to stimuli, one which draws on an individual's background beliefs, expectations and values. Experience represents an individual's best explanation of an event. Secondly, I explicate the technical term, 'justification', in terms of reasons. Rather than linking justification solely to the relations among an individual's (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. John Baillie (1922). The True Ground of Theistic Belief. Hibbert Journal 21:44.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Arthur James Balfour Balfour (1879). A Defence of Philosophic Doubt Being an Essay on the Foundations of Belief. --. Macmillan.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ramsden Balmforth (1939). " A Challenge to Novelists." A Reply to Dr Lyttelton. Hibbert Journal 38:115.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Earl E. Barrett (1965). A Christian Perspective of Knowing. Kansas City, Mo.,Beacon Hill Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Anthony Baxter (1993). Knowledge, and Our Position Regarding God. Heythrop Journal 34 (2):137–159.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Frederick Beiser (2005). Schleiermacher's Ethics. In Jacqueline Mariña (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher. Cambridge University Press 53--71.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Patricia Anne Benefiel (1975). Religious Experience as Justification for Belief in God. Dissertation, Stanford University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. John Bishop (2007). How a Modest Fideism May Constrain Theistic Commitments: Exploring an Alternative to Classical Theism. Philosophia 35 (3-4):387-402.
    On the assumption that theistic religious commitment takes place in the face of evidential ambiguity, the question arises under what conditions it is permissible to make a doxastic venture beyond one’s evidence in favour of a religious proposition. In this paper I explore the implications for orthodox theistic commitment of adopting, in answer to that question, a modest, moral coherentist, fideism. This extended Jamesian fideism crucially requires positive ethical evaluation of both the motivation and content of religious doxastic ventures. I (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13. Julius Seelye Bixler (1942). The Problem of Religious Knowledge. Philosophical Review 51 (6):574-586.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. William T. Blackstone (1963). The Problem of Religious Knowledge. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Tomas Bogardus (2013). Erratum To: Disagreeing with the (Religious) Skeptic. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):19-19.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. John Boli & David V. Brewington (2007). Religious Organizations1. In Peter Beyer & Lori G. Beaman (eds.), Religion, Globalization and Culture. Brill 6--203.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Harold Augustus Bosley (1939). The Quest of Religious Certainty. New York, Willett, Clark & Company.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Robert Brecher (1976). Knowledge, Belief, and the Sophisticated Theodicist. Heythrop Journal 17 (2):178–183.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. G. Briintrup & R. Tacelli (1999). Many Kinds of Rational Theistic Belief. In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer 19--21.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. G. Briintrup & R. Tacelli (1999). The Rationality of Theistic Belief and the Concept of Truth. In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer 19--39.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Alan Brown (1998). Belief and Unbelief a Christian Response to the Challenge of Scepticism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Godehard Brüntrup (2013). Reformierte Epistemologie (Plantinga). In Thomas Bonk (ed.), Lexikon der Erkenntnistheorie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 226-229.
    Encyclopedia article about "reformed epistemology".
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. C. Delisle Burns (1914). What is Religious Knowledge? International Journal of Ethics 24 (3):253-265.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. J. Oliver Buswell (1960). A Christian View of Being and Knowing. Grand Rapids, Zondervan Pub. House.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Dino Buzzetti (2010). Per una lettura laica della teologia medievale. Doctor Virtualis 9:199-231.
    Is some form of epoché possible on theological concepts? In which way? Is it possible consider their importance leaving their religious scope aside? Can the theological concepts tell us something unless we consider their essential reference to our relationship with a divine being? The answer to these questions let us to understand what means to be a secular scholar of medieval philosophy. It's impossible conversely to discuss this problem without dealing with medieval theology. And this concerns not only the nature (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Paul E. Capetz (1998). Christian Faith as Religion a Study in the Theologies of Calvin and Schleiermacher.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Peter A. Carmichael (1949). Limits of Religious Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10 (1):53-64.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. C. Cesa (1986). The Historical Role of Schleiermacher. Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 6 (3):462-464.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. M. J. Charlesworth (1975). The Problem of Religious Language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (4):591-593.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Jb Chethimattam (1984). Religious Monograms and Mantras. Journal of Dharma 9 (2):142-149.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Joseph T. Clark (1952). Epilogue to the Evidence. Philosophical Studies of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 3:60-60.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Stephen R. L. Clark (2013). Dougherty Evidentialism and its Discontents_ . Pp. Xii + 335. £45.00 . ISBN 978 0 19 956350 0. Clark & VanArragon _Evidence and Religious Belief . Pp. X + 214. £35.00 , £24.94 . ISBN 9780 19 960371 8. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 49 (1):134-139.
    Book Reviews STEPHEN R. L. CLARK, Religious Studies, FirstView Article.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. John B. Cobb Jr (2009). Truth, "Faith", and 9/11. In Matthew J. Morgan (ed.), The Impact of 9/11 on Religion and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Arthur B. Cody (1969). On the Difference It Makes. Inquiry 12 (1-4):394 – 405.
    Man's belief in God is often contrasted with man's disbelief, Atheism; but the nature of human belief is contrastable with the nature of the belief of demons. A point of contrast lies in the consequences of the different sort of reasons men and demons must be understood to have. One consequence has to do with the vision of the world, seeing the world as God's creation, which men are expected to achieve and demons are not. The logic of the ?seeing (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Quentin Colgan (1991). On Reasoning About That Than Which Only One Being Can Be Thought Greater. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 65:99-105.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. James Collins (1973). God Knowable and Unknowable. International Philosophical Quarterly 13 (3):452-454.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Daniel Cory (1954). God or the External World. Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):57-61.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. M. B. Crowe (1953). Religious Faith, Language and Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 3:164-165.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. H. A. D. (1973). Religion and Rationality. Review of Metaphysics 26 (4):761-762.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Charles T. Davis (2001). Hallett, Garth L. A Middle Way to God. Review of Metaphysics 55 (1):136-137.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Michael William Denty (1975). Reminders of God: On the Uses of Argument in Religious Discourse. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. E. S. Drown (1905). Does Christian Belief Require Metaphysics? Hibbert Journal 4:527.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Daniel Eaton & Timothy Pickavance (forthcoming). Wagering on Pragmatic Encroachment. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford
    Lately, there has been an explosion of literature exploring the the relationship between one’s practical situation and one’s knowledge. Some involved in this discussion have suggested that facts about a person’s practical situation might affect whether or not a person knows in that situation, holding fixed all the things standardly associated with knowledge (like evidence, the reliability of one’s cognitive faculties, and so on). According to these “pragmatic encroachment” views, then, one’s practical situation encroaches on one’s knowledge. Though we won’t (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Christopher J. Eberle (1998). The Autonomy and Explanation of Mystical Perception. Religious Studies 34 (3):299-316.
    William Alston has articulated a powerful defence of the claim that mystical perception generates prima facie justified beliefs about God. At the heart of his defence is the claim that mystical perception is 'innocent until proven guilty'; that is, Alston claims that the practice of forming beliefs on the basis of putative perceptions of God should be accorded the same presumptive innocence we accord to other standard ways of forming beliefs like sense perception, memory and introspection. But Alston employs a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Rem B. Edwards (1983). Matters of Faith and Matters of Principle. Review of Metaphysics 36 (4):956-958.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Leonard J. Eslick (1950). Nature, Knowledge, and God. New Scholasticism 24 (2):229-233.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. N. Everitt (1998). Gellman, JI-Experience of God and the Rationality of Theistic Belief. Philosophical Books 39:215-216.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. A. C. Ewing (1957). Religious Assertions In The Light Of Contemporary Philosophy. Philosophy 32 (122):206 - 218.
    The author discusses the claim that owing to the lack of reference to ordinary experience by which religious assertions could be tested, there is nothing in the mind of the person who makes such religious assertions which could conceivably be objectively true. the author maintains that such a view of religious assertions is groundless, and that, if true, it would leave little of value in religion. (staff).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. K. P. F. (1962). On Religious Maturity. Review of Metaphysics 16 (1):163-164.
  50. M. Jamie Ferreira (1995). Religion and 'Really Believing'. In Timothy Tessin & Mario Von der Ruhr (eds.), Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief. St. Martin's Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 2012