This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
25 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Evandro Agazzi (1987). A Systems-Theoretic Approach to the Problem of the Responsibility of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 18 (1-2):30-49.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Clarice Alho & Ricardo Timm de Souza (eds.) (2006). Ciência E Ética: Os Grandes Desafios. Edipucrs.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Bernard Baumrin (1991). The Conflict Between Science and Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):31-34.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Riccardo Campa (2007). Etica Della Scienza Pura: Un Percorso Storico E Critico. Sestante.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Raymond B. Cattell (1987). Beyondism: Religion From Science. Praeger.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Fen Chen (2004). Ke Ji Li Xing de Jia Zhi Shen Shi =. Beijingzhongguo She Hui Ke Xue Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Joseph L. Daleiden (1998). The Science of Morality: The Individual, Community, and Future Generations. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Aant Elzinga & Sven Andersson (1988). Ideals of Science in the Humanities and Their Ethical and Political Implications. Social Epistemology 2 (1):67 – 77.
  9. Ivan Timofeevich Frolov (1986/1990). Man, Science, Humanism: A New Synthesis. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rudolf Haller (ed.) (1981). Science and Ethics. Distributed by Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Charles Hatfield (ed.) (1973). The Scientist and Ethical Decision. Downers Grove, Ill.,Intervarsity Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Darryl R. J. Macer (ed.) (2008). Asia - Pacific Perspectives on Ethics of Science and Technology. UNESCO Bangkok.
    This collection of papers were originally presented during conferences on ethics in science and technology that UNESCO’s Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences (RUSHSAP) has been convening since 2005. Since intercultural communication and information-sharing are essential components of these deliberations, the books also provide theme-related discourse from the conferences.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Henry Margenau (1979). Ethics & Science. R. E. Krieger Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gregorio Moreno-Rueda (2013). How Frequently Do Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Occur in Ecology and Evolution, and What Happens Afterwards? Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):93-96.
    Scientific misconduct obstructs the advance of knowledge in science. Its impact in some disciplines is still poorly known, as is the frequency in which it is detected. Here, I examine how frequently editors of ecology and evolution journals detect scientist misconduct. On average, editors managed 0.114 allegations of misconduct per year. Editors considered 6 of 14 allegations (42.9%) to be true, but only in 2 cases were the authors declared guilty, the remaining being dropped for lack of proof. The annual (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David Morley (1978). The Sensitive Scientist: Report of a British Association Study Group. Scm Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. D. R. Oldroyd (ed.) (1982). Science and Ethics: Papers Presented at a Symposium Held Under the Aegis of the Australian Academy of Science, University of New South Wales, November 7, 1980. New South Wales University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Charles E. Reagan (1971). Ethics for Scientific Researchers. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. D. Resnik (1996). Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4):565-586.
  19. Dane Scott & Blake Francis (eds.) (2011). Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. Prometheus Books.
  20. William R. Shea & Beat Sitter-Liver (eds.) (1989). Scientists and Their Responsibility. Watson Pub. International.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Tamler Sommers (2009). A Very Bad Wizard: Morality Behind the Curtain. McSweeney's Press.
    A collection of long, detailed interviews with philosophers and scientists who work on issues in ethics and moral psychology. The researchers interviewed include Galen Strawson, Philiip Zimbardo, Stephen Stich, Jonathan Haidt, Frans De Waal, Michael Ruse, Joshua Greene, Liane Young, Joe Henrich, and William Ian Miller.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Albert Szent-Györgyi (1970). The Crazy Ape. New York,Philosophical Library.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Nicole A. Vincent (2011). Legal Responsibility Adjudication and the Normative Authority of the Mind Sciences. Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):315-331.
    In the field of ?neurolaw?, reformists claim that recent scientific discoveries from the mind sciences have serious ramifications for how legal responsibility should be adjudicated, but conservatives deny that this is so. In contrast, I criticise both of these polar opposite positions by arguing that although scientific findings can have often-weighty normative significance, they lack the normative authority with which reformists often imbue them. After explaining why conservatives and reformists are both wrong, I then offer my own moderate suggestions about (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Xuechuan Wang (2009). Xian Dai Ke Ji Lun Li Xue =. Qing Hua da Xue Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Mariusz M. Żydowo (ed.) (2005). Ethical Problems in the Rapid Advancement of Science. Polish Academy of Sciences.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation