This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
30 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Evandro Agazzi (1987). A Systems-Theoretic Approach to the Problem of the Responsibility of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18 (1-2):30-49.
    Man kann die wissenschaftliche Tätigkeit so betrachten, daß sie von einem "wissenschaftlichen System" ausgeführt wird, welches zugleich offen und adaptiv ist und dessen allgemeines Ziel darin besteht, objektives Wissen zu produzieren und zu verbreiten. WS nimmt aus seiner Umgebung Eingaben von "Nachfrage", "Unterstützung", "Ablehnung" entgegen und reagiert auf kreative Art und Weise darauf. Sein Funktionieren ist bedingt durch die Verträglichkeit seines Ziels mit denjenigen aller andern sozialen Subsysteme, die eine Maximierung der internen Variablen von WS ausschließen mögen, um das gesamte (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Clarice Alho & Ricardo Timm de Souza (eds.) (2006). Ciência E Ética: Os Grandes Desafios. Edipucrs.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. L. K. B. (1959). Coloquio Sobre El Problema Etico Del Cientifico. Review of Metaphysics 12 (3):486-486.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Bernard Baumrin (1991). The Conflict Between Science and Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):31-34.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Donato Bergandi (2013). L’Impartialité Engagée : Objectivité Scientifique Et Engagement Moral. In Byk (ed.), Les scientifiques doivent-ils être responsables ? Fondements, enjeux et évolution normative. Les Études Hospitalières 137-154.
    L’humanité est devenue facteur d’évolution au niveau planétaire. En complexifiant toujours plus les modalités de ses relations avec l’environnement, elle pense trouver dans la science l’outil principal de son développement et en définitive de sa survie. La science, en effet, est un système d’acquisition de connaissances qui génère une interprétation systématique et rationnelle du monde naturel ethumain, jamais définitive et en renouvellement continu. En tant qu’explication rationnelle des phénomènes naturels et sociaux, elle nous permet de raffiner sans cesse la compréhension (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Riccardo Campa (2007). Etica Della Scienza Pura: Un Percorso Storico E Critico. Sestante.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Raymond B. Cattell (1987). Beyondism: Religion From Science. Praeger.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Fen Chen (2004). Ke Ji Li Xing de Jia Zhi Shen Shi =. Beijingzhongguo She Hui Ke Xue Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Joseph L. Daleiden (1998). The Science of Morality: The Individual, Community, and Future Generations. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Aant Elzinga & Sven Andersson (1988). Ideals of Science in the Humanities and Their Ethical and Political Implications. Social Epistemology 2 (1):67 – 77.
  11. Ivan Timofeevich Frolov (1986). Man, Science, Humanism: A New Synthesis. Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Rudolf Haller (ed.) (1981). Science and Ethics. Distributed by Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Charles Hatfield (ed.) (1973). The Scientist and Ethical Decision. Downers Grove, Ill.,Intervarsity Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Marian Hillar (2013). Philosophy and its Reinterpretation: A Quintessential Humanistic Doctrine. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 17 (1):71-90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Darryl R. J. Macer (ed.) (2008). Asia - Pacific Perspectives on Ethics of Science and Technology. UNESCO Bangkok.
    This collection of papers were originally presented during conferences on ethics in science and technology that UNESCO’s Regional Unit for Social and Human Sciences (RUSHSAP) has been convening since 2005. Since intercultural communication and information-sharing are essential components of these deliberations, the books also provide theme-related discourse from the conferences.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Henry Margenau (1979). Ethics & Science. R. E. Krieger Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Gregorio Moreno-Rueda (2013). How Frequently Do Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Occur in Ecology and Evolution, and What Happens Afterwards? Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):93-96.
    Scientific misconduct obstructs the advance of knowledge in science. Its impact in some disciplines is still poorly known, as is the frequency in which it is detected. Here, I examine how frequently editors of ecology and evolution journals detect scientist misconduct. On average, editors managed 0.114 allegations of misconduct per year. Editors considered 6 of 14 allegations (42.9%) to be true, but only in 2 cases were the authors declared guilty, the remaining being dropped for lack of proof. The annual (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. David Morley (1978). The Sensitive Scientist: Report of a British Association Study Group. Scm Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. D. R. Oldroyd (ed.) (1982). Science and Ethics: Papers Presented at a Symposium Held Under the Aegis of the Australian Academy of Science, University of New South Wales, November 7, 1980. New South Wales University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Ruel F. Pepa, The Information Age Needs Knowledge and Morality.
    In situations of information overload, where cases of garbage-in-garbage-out are commonplace, it is necessary to sort out important and appropriate data for one’s specific purposes. A deluge of seemingly interrelated or interconnected data may lead us from one analytic moment to another without consideration for the credibility of our sources. Since people generally tend to be on one side of an issue rather than the other, information exploration and gathering can become a quantitative rather than qualitative exercise, as we are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Charles E. Reagan (1971). Ethics for Scientific Researchers. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Gregory S. Reed & Nicholaos Jones (2013). Toward Modeling and Automating Ethical Decision Making: Design, Implementation, Limitations, and Responsibilities. Topoi 32 (2):237-250.
    One recent priority of the U.S. government is developing autonomous robotic systems. The U.S. Army has funded research to design a metric of evil to support military commanders with ethical decision-making and, in the future, allow robotic military systems to make autonomous ethical judgments. We use this particular project as a case study for efforts that seek to frame morality in quantitative terms. We report preliminary results from this research, describing the assumptions and limitations of a program that assesses the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. D. Resnik (1996). Social Epistemology and the Ethics of Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4):565-586.
  24. Dane Scott & Blake Francis (eds.) (2011). Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. Prometheus Books.
  25. William R. Shea & Beat Sitter-Liver (eds.) (1989). Scientists and Their Responsibility. Watson Pub. International.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Tamler Sommers (2009). A Very Bad Wizard: Morality Behind the Curtain. McSweeney's Press.
    A collection of long, detailed interviews with philosophers and scientists who work on issues in ethics and moral psychology. The researchers interviewed include Galen Strawson, Philiip Zimbardo, Stephen Stich, Jonathan Haidt, Frans De Waal, Michael Ruse, Joshua Greene, Liane Young, Joe Henrich, and William Ian Miller.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Albert Szent-Györgyi (1970). The Crazy Ape. New York,Philosophical Library.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Nicole A. Vincent (2011). Legal Responsibility Adjudication and the Normative Authority of the Mind Sciences. Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):315-331.
    In the field of ?neurolaw?, reformists claim that recent scientific discoveries from the mind sciences have serious ramifications for how legal responsibility should be adjudicated, but conservatives deny that this is so. In contrast, I criticise both of these polar opposite positions by arguing that although scientific findings can have often-weighty normative significance, they lack the normative authority with which reformists often imbue them. After explaining why conservatives and reformists are both wrong, I then offer my own moderate suggestions about (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Xuechuan Wang (2009). Xian Dai Ke Ji Lun Li Xue =. Qing Hua da Xue Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Mariusz M. Żydowo (ed.) (2005). Ethical Problems in the Rapid Advancement of Science. Polish Academy of Sciences.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography