Tara H. Abraham (2003). From theory to data: Representing neurons in the 1940s. Biology and Philosophy 18 (3).
Colin Allen, Macaque mirror neurons.
A. J. Amos & C. D. L. Wynne (2000). The organization of organization: Neuronal scaffold or cognitive straitjacket? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):533-534.
Michael A. Arbib (1989). Modularity, schemas and neurons: A critique of Fodor. In Peter Slezak (ed.), Computers, Brains and Minds. Kluwer.
Jerrold L. Aronson (1976). Some dubious neurological assumptions of radical behaviourism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (1):49–60.
Harald Atmanspacher, Interpreting neurodynamics: Concepts and facts.
William P. Bechtel (2005). The challenge of characterizing operations in the mechanisms underlying behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 84:313-325.
William P. Bechtel, Mental mechanisms: What are the operations?
William P. Bechtel (2002). Aligning multiple research techniques in cognitive neuroscience: Why is it important? Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):548-558.
William P. Bechtel (2001). Cognitive neuroscienec: Relating neural mechanisms and cognition. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press.
William P. Bechtel (1983). A bridge between cognitive science and neuroscience: The functional architecture of mind. Philosophical Studies 44 (November):319-30.
William P. Bechtel & Jennifer Mundale (1996). Integrating neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology through a teleological conception of function. Minds And Machines 6 (4):481-505.
Terry Blumenthal & James Schirillo (1999). Biological neuroscience is only as radical as the evolution of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):831-831.
Noel Boyle (2008). Neurobiology and phenomenology: Towards a three-tiered intertheoretic model of explanation. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (3):34-58.
Leslie Brothers (1999). The logic of interests in neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):831-832.
Carlos & Campis René (2008). DID I DO IT? -YEAH, YOU DID! Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences:34- 37.
D. Cliff (1990). Computational Neuroethology: A Provisional Manifesto. In Jean-Arcady Meyer & Stewart W. Wilson (eds.), From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of The First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Complex Adaptive Systems). Cambridge University Press.
Max Coltheart & Martin Davies (2003). Inference and explanation in cognitive neuropsychology. Cortex 39 (1):188-191.
Jeff Coulter (1995). The informed neuron: Issues in the use of information theory in the behavioral sciences. Minds and Machines 5 (4):583-96.
Carl Craver, Why the Hodgkin and huxely model does not explain the action potential.
Carl F. Craver (2008). Physical law and mechanistic explanation in the Hodgkin and Huxley model of the action potential. Philosophy of Science 75 (5).
Carl F. Craver (2007). Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press ;.
Carl F. Craver (2003). The making of a memory mechanism. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (1):153-95.
Carl F. Craver (2002). Interlevel experiments and multilevel mechanisms in the neuroscience of memory. Philosophy of Science Supplemental Volume 69 (3):S83-S97.
Carl F. Craver (2001). Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68 (1):53-74.
Carl F. Craver & William Bechtel (2007). Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy 22 (4).
Carl F. Craver & Lindley Darden (2001). Discovering mechanisms in neurobiology: The case of spatial memory. In P.K. Machamer, Rick Grush & Peter McLaughlin (eds.), Theory and Method in Neuroscience. Pittsburgh: University of Pitt Press.
H. Cruse (2001). The explanatory power and limits of simulation models in the neurosciences. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Fred Delcomyn (2001). Biorobotic models can contribute to neurobiology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1056-1057.
den Bosch & M. P. (2005). Structures in neuropharmacology. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):343-359.
T. Elliott & N. R. Shadbolt (1997). Neurotrophic factors, neuronal selectionism, and neuronal proliferation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):561-562.
Walter J. Freeman (1997). Nonlinear neurodynamics of intentionality. Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (2-3):291-304.
Philip Gerrans & Valerie E. Stone (2008). Generous or parsimonious cognitive architecture? Cognitive neuroscience and theory of mind. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2).
Philip Gerrans (2003). Nativism and neuroconstructivism in the explanation of Williams syndrome. Biology and Philosophy 18 (1):41-52.
Philip Gerrans (2002). Nativism, neuroconstructivism, and developmental disorder. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):757-758.
Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar (1999). Interpreting neuroscience and explaining the mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Valerie Gray Hardcastle (2008). Review of Carl F. Craver, Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (1).
Valerie Gray Hardcastle & C. Matthew Stewart (2001). Theory structure in neuroscience. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Stephan Hartmann (2001). Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pitt Press.
Stephan Hartmann (2001). Mechanisms, coherence, and the place of psychology. In Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pitt Press.
D. Heinke (2000). A dynamical system theory approach to cognitive neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):543-543.
Susan L. Hurley, The shared circuits model. How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation and mind reading.
Frank Keil, The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.
Peter R. Krebs, Models of cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
Arnon Levy (2009). Explaining what? Review of explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience by Carl F. Craver. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1).
Jack C. Lyons (2003). Lesion studies, spared performance, and cognitive systems. Cortex 39 (1):145-7.
Peter K. Machamer , Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy Of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Peter K. Machamer , Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (2001). Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Jean-Arcady Meyer & Stewart W. Wilson (1990). From Animals to Animats: Proceedings of The First International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Complex Adaptive Systems). Cambridge University Press.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2006). Computational explanation in neuroscience. Synthese 153 (3):343-353.
Jeffrey S. Poland & Barbara Von Eckardt (2004). Mechanism and explanation in cognitive neuroscience. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):972-984.
Antti Revonsuo (2001). On the nature of explanation in the neurosciences. In Peter K. Machamer, Peter McLaughlin & Rick Grush (eds.), Theory and Method in the Neurosciences. University of Pittsburgh wPress.
S. Skarda (1986). Explaining behavior: Bringing the brain back in. Inquiry 29 (June):187-201.
Peter Slezak (1989). Computers, Brains and Minds. Kluwer.
Catherine Stinson (2009). Searching for the Source of Executive Attention. PSYCHE 15 (1):137-154.
Paul Thagard (2007). Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science. North-Holland.
Lorraine K. Tyler & Helen E. Moss (2001). Concepts and categories: What is the evidence for neural specialisation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):495-496.
Cory D. Wright & William P. Bechtel (2007). Mechanisms and psychological explanation. In Paul Thagard (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science. Elsevier.