This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
382 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 382
  1. What Is Really Unethical About Insider Trading? 150 (2003). Jennifer Moore. In William H. Shaw (ed.), Ethics at Work: Basic Readings in Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Laird Addis & Douglas Lewis (eds.) (1965). Ayer and Moore: Two Ontologists. University of Iowa Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jacob Adler (1991). Book Review:Pardons: Justice, Mercy, and the Public Interest. Kathleen Dean Moore. [REVIEW] Ethics 101 (3):659-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jonathan E. Adler & Bradley Armour-Garb (2007). Moore's Paradox and the Transparency of Belief. In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ian W. Alexander (1971). The Psychology of Maine de Biran. By F. C. T. Moore. (Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press, 1970. Pp. 228. Price £2.25.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 46 (177):269-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Fritz Allhoff (2003). Evolutionary Ethics From Darwin to Moore. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25 (1):51 - 79.
    Evolutionary ethics has a long history, dating all the way back to Charles Darwin.1 Almost immediately after the publication of the Origin, an immense interest arose in the moral implications of Darwinism and whether the truth of Darwinism would undermine traditional ethics. Though the biological thesis was certainly exciting, nobody suspected that the impact of the Origin would be confined to the scientific arena. As one historian wrote, 'whether or not ancient populations of armadillos were transformed into the species that (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Claudio Almeida (2001). What Moore's Paradox Is About. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):33 - 58.
    On the basis of arguments showing that none of the most influential analyses of Moore's paradox yields a successful resolution of the problem, a new analysis of it is offered. It is argued that, in attempting to render verdicts of either inconsistency or self-contradiction or self-refutation, those analyses have all failed to satisfactorily explain why a Moore-paradoxical proposition is such that it cannot be rationally believed. According to the proposed solution put forward here, a Moore-paradoxical proposition is one for which (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Andrew Altman (2004). Breathing Life Into a Dead Argument: G.E. Moore and the Open Question. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 117 (3):395-408.
    A century after its publication, G.E. Moore''sPrincipia Ethica stands as one of theclassic statements of anti-naturalism inethics. Moore claimed that the most basic ethicalproperties were denoted by `good'' and `bad'' andthat all naturalist accounts of thoseproperties were inadequate. His open-questionargument aimed to refute any proposedidentification of good with some naturalproperty, and Moore concluded from theargument that good must be a nonnaturalproperty.The received view is that the open-questionargument is a failure. In this paper,my aim is to breathe some life back intoMoore''s (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard J. Arneson (1982). Book Review:Marx on the Choice Between Socialism and Communism. Stanley Moore. [REVIEW] Ethics 93 (1):180-.
  10. Rudolf Arnheim (1948). The Holes of Henry Moore: On the Function of Space in Sculpture. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 7 (1):29-38.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jamin Asay (2013). The Primitivist Theory of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
    Jamin Asay's book offers a fresh and daring perspective on the age-old question 'What is truth?', with a comprehensive articulation and defence of primitivism, the view that truth is a fundamental and indefinable concept. Often associated with Frege and the early Russell and Moore, primitivism has been largely absent from the larger conversation surrounding the nature of truth. Asay defends primitivism by drawing on a range of arguments from metaphysics, philosophy of language and philosophy of logic, and navigates between correspondence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jay David Atlas (2007). What Reflexive Pronouns Tell Us About Belief : A New Moore's Paradox de Se, Rationality, and Privileged Access. In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. A. J. Ayer (1971). Russell and Moore. Cambridge,Harvard University Press.
  14. M. Baldwin (ed.) (1998). Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Westview.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Thomas Baldwin (2006). Keynes and Ethics. In R. E. Backhouse & B. W. Bateman (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Keynes. CUP.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Thomas Baldwin (1999). La valeur intrinsèque chez Brentano et Moore. Philosophiques 26 (231):243.
    In Principia Ethica Moore expresses his great admiration for Brentano's ethical writings, and a comparison between Moore and Brentano reveals that their ethical theories have much in common. But they disagree fundamentally on the metaphysics of intrinsic value. Moore adopts an abstract realist position, whereas Brentano interprets intrinsic value by reference to “correct love” : that which is good is that which merits correct love. Brentano's position has many advantages over that of Moore ; but it raises the question as (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas Baldwin (1997). Frege, Moore, Davidson: The Indefinability of Truth. Philosophical Topics 25 (2):1-18.
  18. Thomas Baldwin (1990/1999). G.E. Moore. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Thomas Baldwin & Consuelo Preti (eds.) (2011). G. E. Moore: Early Philosophical Writings. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Editors' introduction; 2. Moore's 1897 dissertation; 3. Reports by Sidgwick and Caird; 4. Moore's 1898 dissertation; 5. Report by Bosanquet.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Tom Baldwin, George Edward Moore. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen Ball (2003). G. E. Moore's Ethical Theory. Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):415-419.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Winston H. F. Barnes (1956). Some Main Problems of Philosophy. By George Edward Moore. London: George Allen ' Unwin Ltd. 1953. Pp. Xii + 380. Philosophy 31 (119):362-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David Barnett (2008). Ramsey + Moore ≠ God. Analysis 68 (2):168 - 174.
    Frank Ramsey writes: If two people are arguing ‘if p will q?’ and both are in doubt as to p, they are adding p hypothetically to their stock of knowledge and arguing on that basis about q. We can say that they are fixing their degrees of belief in q given p. (1931) Chalmers and Hájek write: Let us take the first sentence [of Ramsey] the way it is often taken, as proposing the following test for the acceptability of an (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. S. R. Barrett (1990). Book Reviews : Kenneth Moore, Ed., Waymarks. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1987. Pp. X, 157, $15.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (2):256-257.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Peter Baumann (2009). Was Moore a Moorean? On Moore and Scepticism. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):181-200.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Craig Beam (1997). Foundations of Liberalism Margaret Moore Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, 222 Pp., $59.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 36 (03):668-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Hasna Begum (1979). Moore on Goodness and the Naturalistic Fallacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (3):251 – 265.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Hasna Begum (1979). Moore on Goodness and the Naturalistic Fallacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (3):251-265.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ronald Beiner (2003). Margaret Moore, The Ethics of Nationalism:The Ethics of Nationalism. Ethics 113 (2):440-443.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Aaron Ben-Zeev (1981). G.E. Moore and the Relation Between Intrinsic Value and Human Activity. Journal of Value Inquiry 15 (1):69-78.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Arnold Berleant (2009). Making Theory, Making Sense: Comments on Ronald Moore'sNatural Beauty. Ethics, Place and Environment 12 (3):337-341.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Archie Blake (1946). A Boolean Derivation of the Moore-Osgood Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):65-70.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Boardman (1988). M.B. Moore, M. Z. Pease-Philippides: The Athenian Agora, Vol. XXIII: Attic Black-Figured Pottery. Pp. Xvi + 382; 22 Figures, 124 Plates, 1 Plan. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 1986. $60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 38 (01):177-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. William Boardman, Some Comments on Moore's "Envelope" Argument.
    In the sketch of his (discontinuous) envelope argument in his Some Main Problems of Philosophy (Macmillan: 1953), Moore treats the various phrases, "appears to be," "appears like a thing would appear if it were presented in a certain way," as though they were synonymous. Austin, in the fourth chapter of his Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: 1962), tries to call to our attention the fact that these philosophically favorite phrases are not interchangeable; as a result, if an argument is begun by (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Cristina Borgoni (2008). Interpretando la Paradoja de Moore (Interpreting Moore's Paradox). Theoria 23 (2):145-161.
    RESUMEN: Este trabajo ofrece una lectura de la Paradoja de Moore que pone énfasis en su relevancia para nuestra comprensión de la racionalidad y de la interpretación lingüística. Mantiene que las oraciones que dan origen a la paradoja no necesitan entenderse en términos de ausencia de una contradicción, sino más bien en términos de ausencia de racionalidad, entendida esta como un término más amplio que el de coherencia y consistencia lógica. Se defenderá tal posición por medio de tres tesis, dos (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. R. B. Braithwaite (1945). The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp. (Library of Living Philosophers: Vol. IV.) Northwestern University: Evanston and Chicago: 1942. Pp. Xvi + 717. (In Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. 30s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 20 (77):256-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Paul Brazier (2010). English Hypothetical Universalism: John Preston the Softening of Reformed Theology. By Jonathon D. Moore and John Owen: Reformed Catholic, Renaissance Man (Great Theologians Series). By Carl R. Trueman. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 51 (1):140-142.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John Briscoe (1977). J. M. Moore: Aristotle and Xenophon on Democracy and Oligarchy. Pp. 320; 3 Maps. London: Chatto & Windus, 1975. Cloth, £4·25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (01):134-.
  39. Anthony Brueckner (2009). Moore-Paradoxicality and the Principle of Charity. Theoria 75 (3):245-247.
    In a recent article in Theoria , Hamid Vahid offered an explanation of the phenomenon of Moore-paradoxicality which employed Davidson's Principle of Charity regarding radical interpretation. I argue here that Vahid's explanation fails.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Anthony Brueckner (2009). More on Justification and Moore's Paradox. Analysis 69 (3):497-499.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anthony Brueckner (1998). Moore Inferences. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):366-369.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William H. Bruening (1971). Moore and "is-Ought". Ethics 81 (2):143-149.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Teddy Brunius (1965/1964). G. E. Moore's Analyses of Beauty. Uppsala[Printed by Almqvist & Wiksells].
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Nicholas Bunnin (1999). Points of View by A. W. Moore. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997, Pp. XIII + 313, £35. Philosophy 74 (2):282-295.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. C. Delisle Burns (1926). Book Review:Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements by James Ward, E. B. Bax, D. Fawcett, G. Dawes Hicks, R. F. A. Hoenle, C. E. M. Joad, G. E. Moore, J. A. Smith, W. R. Sorley, A. E. Taylor, J. Arthur Thompson, Clement C. J. Webb. J. H. Muirhead. [REVIEW] Ethics 36 (3):314-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. M. F. Burnyeat (1977). Examples in Epistemology: Socrates, Theaetetus and G. E. Moore. Philosophy 52 (202):381 - 398.
  47. Mary Whiton Calkinss (1912). Book Review:Pragmatism and Its Critics. Addison W. Moore. [REVIEW] Ethics 22 (2):222-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. James Cargile (1972). Moore's Proposition $W$. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13 (1):105-117.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Erik Carlson (2001). Organic Unities, Non-Trade-Off, and the Additivity of Intrinsic Value. Journal of Ethics 5 (4):335-360.
    Whether or not intrinsic value is additively measurable is often thought to depend on the truth or falsity of G. E. Moore's principle of organic unities. I argue that the truth of this principle is, contrary to received opinion, compatible with additive measurement. However, there are other very plausible evaluative claims that are more difficult to combine with the additivity of intrinsic value. A plausible theory of the good should allow that there are certain kinds of states of affairs whose (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. George R. Carlson (1987). Moore and the New Realism. Philosophical Papers 16 (1):41-52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 382