This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
705 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 705
Material to categorize
  1. Robert John Ackermann (1970). Philosophy of Science an Introduction. Pegasus.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Russell L. Ackoff (1949). An Educational Program for the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 16 (2):154-157.
  3. John Stokes Adams Jr (1951). Contemporary Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 18 (3):218-222.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Evandro Agazzi (1972). Recent Developments of the Philosophy of Science in Italy. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 3 (2):359-371.
    Summary Philosophy of science is, in Italy, a relatively young field of research. The foreword of the paper gives some explanation of this fact, which is the consequence of a particular situation of Italian culture between the two world wars. When problems in this field began to be studied after the war, they were practically imported matter, and a rather long time was necessary before an original research started in this country. The beginning of it was marked by a profound (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Douglas Allchin (2004). Pseudohistory and Pseudoscience. Science and Education 13 (3):179-195.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.) (2013). New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag.
    This fourth volume of the Programme “The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective” deals with new challenges in this field. In this regard, it seeks to broaden the scope of the philosophy of science in two directions. On the one hand, ...
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Theodore Arabatzis & Jutta Schickore (2012). Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 20 (4):395-408.
  8. Peter D. Asquith & Henry Ely Kyburg (eds.) (1979). Current Research in Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the P.S.A. Critical Research Problems Conference. Philosophy of Science Association.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. J. B. (1963). Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science. Review of Metaphysics 16 (4):809-809.
  10. Marino Badiale (2008). Difficili Mediazioni: Fra Scienza, Cultura E Filosofia. Aracne.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Barker (1969). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Philosophical Studies 18:228-231.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gillian Barker & Philip Kitcher (2013). Philosophy of Science: A New Introduction. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Bernhard Bavink & H. Stafford Hatfield (1932). The Anatomy of Modern Science an Introduction to the Scientific Philosophy of to-Day. Bell.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Antonio Bereijo (2012). The Category of "Applied Science": An Analysis of Its Justification From "Information Science" As Design Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):327-350.
    This paper addresses the problem of the distinction between basic science and applied science. It also explores their differences with regard to technology. For this analysis, as well as a general epistemological and methodological approach, we study a particular case: information science. As the emphasis of the paper is on the category of applied science, it includes a critical analysis of Philip Kitcher's proposal. First, there is an examination of Ph. Kitcher's thought, because he has addressed this issue without offering (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lukas Bielik (2012). The Possibilities and Limits of the Demarcation of Science. Filozofia 67 (7):530-544.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Richard J. Blackwell (1977). "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6: Induction, Probability, and Confirmation," Ed. Grover Maxwell and Robert M. Anderson, Jr.; and "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge," Ed. Keith Gunderson. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 54 (3):307-308.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard J. Blackwell (1970). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. V: Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966-68. Ed. R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 47 (3):354-355.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Blair (2012). Science Works Better Than That. Australian Humanist, The 108 (108):12.
    Blair, David David Tribe, in his article, 'On science, good, bad and ugly' (AH, No. 107, Spring 2012), criticises an earlier article by Victor Bien. Bien - rightly in my view - defends present-day science in respect of three areas where science is under attack; the most prominent of these three is anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Tribe claims that, Victor Bien appears to have inflated views on the sagacity, objectivity and probity of scientists, who can be called our new priests. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Walter J. Bock (2000). Towards a New Metaphysics: The Need for an Enlarged Philosophy Ofscience. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):603-621.
  20. János Boros (2010). A Tudomány, a Tudás És Az Egyetem: Filozófiai És Felsőoktatási-Elméleti Vázlatok. Gondolat.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. R. B. Braithwaite & D. H. Mellor (eds.) (1980). Science, Belief, and Behaviour: Essays in Honour of R. B. Braithwaite. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is a collection of original essays by eminent philosophers written for R. B. Braithwaite's eightieth birthday to celebrate his work and teaching. In one way or another, all the essays reflect his central concern with the impact of science on our beliefs about the world and the responses appropriate to that. Together they testify to the signal importance of his contributions in areas of philosophy bearing on this concern: the philosophy of science, especially of the statistical sciences, theories (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jan Bransen (1996). The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction. Philosophical Books 37 (1):78-80.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Baruch A. Brody (1970). Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Harold I. Brown (2006). Conceptual Systems. London.
    New concepts are constantly being introduced into our thinking. Conceptual Systems explores how these new concepts are entered into our systems along with sufficient continuity with older ideas to ensure understanding. The encyclopaedic breadth of this text highlights the many different aspects and disciplines that together present an insightful view into the various theories of concepts. Harold Brown, a reputable author in the philosophy of science examines several historically influential theories of concepts as well as providing a clear view on (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Harold I. Brown (1988). Rationality. Routledge.
  26. Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):7-8.
    This paper is obituary of Leszek Nowak, one of the greatest Polish philosophers of the XX century.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. P. C. Burcham (2014). Science in Two Minds: Reflections on the Missional Disunity Within Contemporary Medicine. Christian Bioethics 20 (3):359-375.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Hua Cai (2009). Ren Si Zhi Ren: Wen Hua Ke Xue He Zi Ran Ke Xue de Tong Yi Xing. Yunnan Ren Min Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich & Michael Siegal (2002). Introduction: What Makes Science Possible. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Constança Marcondes César (2012). Conhecimento E verdadeKnowledge and Truth: The Philosophy of Science in Milton Vargas. Cultura:99-105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. A. F. Chalmers (1999). What is This Thing Called Science? Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Alan Chalmers (1990). Science and its Fabrication. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    While acknowledging its theory-ladeness, Chalmers (history and philosophy, U. of Sydney) defends the objectivity of scientific knowledge against those critics for whom such knowledge is both subjective and ideological.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. D. P. Chattopadhyaya & Philosophy Culture Project of History of Indian Science (1996). Interdisciplinary Studies in Science, Technology, Philosophy and Culture. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. C. W. Churchman (2004). Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):214-216.
    Eview This Encyclopedia would be a useful guide to this growing area of philosophy. - Library Journal Thoughtful, concise essays that are both well structured and ordered... Larger schools with advanced courses of study in philosophy and/or bioethics will find this an extremely valuable addition to their collection. Highly recommended. -Choice Contributors from many countries provide a reference to developments in the philosophy of science since the beginning of the 20th century, that is, themes that have emerged starting with the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Raffaele Cirino & Alfredo Givigliano (eds.) (2010). Filosofia E Scienza: Percorsi di Ricerca E Spazi di Discussione. Aracne.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Tad S. Clements (1968). Science and Man the Philosophy of Scientific Humanism. Thomas.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Brian Coffey (1949). The Philosophy of Science and the Scientific Attitude, II. Modern Schoolman 26 (4):331-336.
  38. Brian Coffey (1948). The Philosophy of Science and the Scientific Outlook. Modern Schoolman 26 (1):23-35.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. L. Jonathan Cohen & Israel Scheffler (1965). The Anatomy of Enquiry: Philosophical Studies in the Theory of Science. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (61):374.
    First published in 1963, this title considers the philosophical problems encountered when attempting to provide a clear and general explanation of scientific principles, and the basic confrontation between such principles and experience. Beginning with a detailed introduction that considers various approaches to the philosophy and theory of science, Israel Scheffler then divides his study into three key sections – Explanation, Significance and Confirmation – that explore how these complex issues involved have been dealt with in contemporary research. This title, by (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert G. Colodny (ed.) (1971). The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Auguste Comte (1998). Book Notices-Philosophie Des Sciences. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 20 (3):377.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. M. Curd & J. A. Cover (1998). Science and Pseudoscience: Introduction. In Martin Curd & Jan Cover (eds.), Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. Norton. 1--2.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Peter A. Daempfle (2012). Good Science, Bad Science, Pseudoscience, and Just Plain Bunk: How to Tell the Difference. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Filled with provocative real-life examples from coffee to cancer, the book helps readers build their tools of scientific literacy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Willem R. de Jong (2001). Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity and the Aristotelian Model of Science. Kant-Studien 92 (3):328-349.
    Quine's well-known ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’ (1951) plays a key role in the debate about the analytic-synthetic distinction. Taking to task the ideas of Carnap in particular, Quine shows that logical positivism works with a concept of scientific rationality that is based dogmatically on, among other things, the opposition analytic-synthetic.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Georg J. W. Dorn & Gerhard Schurz (1994). Addendum: Die Entwicklung der Wissenschaftstheorie in Österreich 1971-1990. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (1):177 - 178.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Federigo Enriques & Katharine Royce (1914). Problems of Science. The Open Court Publishing Company.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Simon Evnine, Old Evidence Again.
    A critique of Mark Kaplan's attempt to solve the problem of old evidence by restricting the principle of when something is evidence explicitly to cases in which we are less than certain of it.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Anne Fagot-Largeault, The Legend of Philosophy's Striptease: Trends in Philoosphy of Science.
    The title is meant to tease the reader and attract his/her curiosity, but the question behind the teasing is serious. The reader will gently excuse the unconventional gait of a chapter that originated as an invited lecture given in Paris, at the HOPOS 2006 June conference. Doing philosophy of science requires having been trained both in philosophy and in (at least some) science. That is already a challenge. Studying the history of philosophy of science (which is what "hopos" means) might (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Břetislav Fajkus (2005). Filosofie a Metodologie Vědy: Vývoj, Současnost a Perspektivy. Academia.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David Favrholdt (2008). Erkendelse: Grundlag Og Gyldighed. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 705