This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Subcategories:
965 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 965
Material to categorize
  1. Robert John Ackermann (1970). Philosophy of Science an Introduction. Pegasus.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Russell L. Ackoff (1949). An Educational Program for the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 16 (2):154-157.
  3. John Stokes Adams Jr (1951). Contemporary Philosophy and Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 18 (3):218-222.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Charles Adelard, Italo Burnett, Pedro Ronca, Baudouin van den Mantas Espa~na & Abeele (1998). Adelard of Bath Conversations with His Nephew : On the Same and the Different, Questions on Natural Science, and on Birds. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Evandro Agazzi (1972). Recent Developments of the Philosophy of Science in Italy. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 3 (2):359-371.
    Summary Philosophy of science is, in Italy, a relatively young field of research. The foreword of the paper gives some explanation of this fact, which is the consequence of a particular situation of Italian culture between the two world wars. When problems in this field began to be studied after the war, they were practically imported matter, and a rather long time was necessary before an original research started in this country. The beginning of it was marked by a profound (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Douglas Allchin (2004). Pseudohistory and Pseudoscience. Science and Education 13 (3):179-195.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Emmanuel Alloa (2015). Produktiver Schein. Phänomenotechnik zwischen Wissenschaft und Ästhetik. Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 60 (2):169-182.
    The notion of ‘phenomenotechnique’ which Gaston Bachelard introduced in the 1930’s has enjoyed popularity among historians of science who used it in order to insist upon the technical and social mediateness of scientific facts. In the wake of the current triumphal return to epistemological ‘realism,’ the idea of phenomenotechnique has been dismissed as an alleged relic of ‘constructivism.’ The article advocates for a different reading of ‘phenomenotechnique,’ which, rather than insisting on the fabrication of the scientific fact, highlights the intrinsic (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.) (2013). New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag.
    This fourth volume of the Programme “The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective” deals with new challenges in this field. In this regard, it seeks to broaden the scope of the philosophy of science in two directions. On the one hand, ...
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Theodore Arabatzis & Jutta Schickore (2012). Ways of Integrating History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 20 (4):395-408.
  10. Stanley Aronowitz (1988). Science as Power. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  11. Jan Arreman (2011). ONCE UPON A TIME ... A Fictionalist Account of Scientific Models & Scientific Representation. Dissertation, Antwerp University
    (MA Thesis Antwerp University) -/- In this thesis I want to investigate the notion of regarding scientific models as works of fiction and to examin the consequences of this view on scientific representation and scientific realism. I will do this by first of all giving an extensive overview of what literature in philosophy of science tells us about scientific theories, scientific models, and scientific representation. I will then turn back to look at scientific representation in more detail followed by an (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Jacques Arsac (1993). La Science Et le Sens de la Vie.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Benedict M. Ashley (1961). A Social Science Founded on a Unified Natural Science. The Thomist 24 (2):605.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Peter D. Asquith & Henry Ely Kyburg (eds.) (1979). Current Research in Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the P.S.A. Critical Research Problems Conference. Philosophy of Science Association.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Don Armin Philosophy of Science Association & Howard (1997). Psa 98 Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part 1 Contributed Papers. Philosophy of Science Association.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. R. J. B. (1963). Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science. Review of Metaphysics 16 (4):809-809.
  17. Marino Badiale (2008). Difficili Mediazioni: Fra Scienza, Cultura E Filosofia. Aracne.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Gerald Bakker & Len Clark (1988). Explanation an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Wolfgang Balzer, Carles Ulises Moulines & Joseph D. Sneed (1987). An Architectonic for Science the Structuralist Program. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  20. Andrew Barker (1969). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Philosophical Studies 18:228-231.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Gillian Barker & Philip Kitcher (2013). Philosophy of Science: A New Introduction. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22. Bernhard Bavink & H. Stafford Hatfield (1932). The Anatomy of Modern Science an Introduction to the Scientific Philosophy of to-Day. Bell.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Antonio Bereijo (2012). The Category of "Applied Science": An Analysis of Its Justification From "Information Science" As Design Science. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101 (1):327-350.
    This paper addresses the problem of the distinction between basic science and applied science. It also explores their differences with regard to technology. For this analysis, as well as a general epistemological and methodological approach, we study a particular case: information science. As the emphasis of the paper is on the category of applied science, it includes a critical analysis of Philip Kitcher's proposal. First, there is an examination of Ph. Kitcher's thought, because he has addressed this issue without offering (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Lukas Bielik (2012). The Possibilities and Limits of the Demarcation of Science. Filozofia 67 (7):530-544.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Richard J. Blackwell (1977). "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6: Induction, Probability, and Confirmation," Ed. Grover Maxwell and Robert M. Anderson, Jr.; and "Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7: Language, Mind, and Knowledge," Ed. Keith Gunderson. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 54 (3):307-308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Richard J. Blackwell (1970). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. V: Proceedings of the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science 1966-68. Ed. R. S. Cohen and M. W. Wartofsky. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 47 (3):354-355.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. David Blair (2012). Science Works Better Than That. The Australian Humanist 108 (108):12.
    Blair, David David Tribe, in his article, 'On science, good, bad and ugly' (AH, No. 107, Spring 2012), criticises an earlier article by Victor Bien. Bien - rightly in my view - defends present-day science in respect of three areas where science is under attack; the most prominent of these three is anthropogenic global warming (AGW). Tribe claims that, Victor Bien appears to have inflated views on the sagacity, objectivity and probity of scientists, who can be called our new priests. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Walter J. Bock (2000). Towards a New Metaphysics: The Need for an Enlarged Philosophy Ofscience. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 15 (4):603-621.
  29. Herman Bondy (1988). Los Grandes Avances Del Conocimiento. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. János Boros (2010). A Tudomány, a Tudás És Az Egyetem: Filozófiai És Felsőoktatási-Elméleti Vázlatok. Gondolat.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. R. B. Braithwaite & D. H. Mellor (eds.) (1980). Science, Belief, and Behaviour: Essays in Honour of R. B. Braithwaite. Cambridge University Press.
    This volume is a collection of original essays by eminent philosophers written for R. B. Braithwaite's eightieth birthday to celebrate his work and teaching. In one way or another, all the essays reflect his central concern with the impact of science on our beliefs about the world and the responses appropriate to that. Together they testify to the signal importance of his contributions in areas of philosophy bearing on this concern: the philosophy of science, especially of the statistical sciences, theories (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Jan Bransen (1996). The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction. Philosophical Books 37 (1):78-80.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Baruch A. Brody (1970). Readings in the Philosophy of Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34. Jacob Bronowski (1978). Magic, Science, and Civilization. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Jacob Bronowski (1969). Nature and Knowledge the Philosophy of Contemporary Science. Oregon State System of Higher Education.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Harold I. Brown (2006). Conceptual Systems. London.
    New concepts are constantly being introduced into our thinking. Conceptual Systems explores how these new concepts are entered into our systems along with sufficient continuity with older ideas to ensure understanding. The encyclopaedic breadth of this text highlights the many different aspects and disciplines that together present an insightful view into the various theories of concepts. Harold Brown, a reputable author in the philosophy of science examines several historically influential theories of concepts as well as providing a clear view on (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Harold I. Brown (1988). Rationality. Routledge.
  38. Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2009). Leszek Nowak (1943-2009). Polish Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):7-8.
    This paper is obituary of Leszek Nowak, one of the greatest Polish philosophers of the XX century.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. P. C. Burcham (2014). Science in Two Minds: Reflections on the Missional Disunity Within Contemporary Medicine. Christian Bioethics 20 (3):359-375.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Leslie Burkholder (2001). Fred Wilson, The Logic and Methodology of Science and Pseudoscience. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 21:300-302.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Robert E. Butts, Jaakko Hintikka & Methodology Philosophy of Science International Congress of Logic (1977). Basic Problems in Methodology and Linguistics Part Three of the Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, London, Ontario, Canada, 1975.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Hua Cai (2009). Ren Si Zhi Ren: Wen Hua Ke Xue He Zi Ran Ke Xue de Tong Yi Xing. Yunnan Ren Min Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich & Michael Siegal (2002). Introduction: What Makes Science Possible. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44. J. L. Casti (1996). The Outer Limits in Search of the "Unknowable" in Science. Santa Fe Institute.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. J. L. Casti & Anders Karlqvist (1996). Boundaries and Barriers on the Limits to Scientific Knowledge. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. Constança Marcondes César (2012). Conhecimento E verdadeKnowledge and Truth: The Philosophy of Science in Milton Vargas. Cultura:99-105.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. A. F. Chalmers (1999). What is This Thing Called Science? Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   51 citations  
  48. Alan Chalmers (1990). Science and its Fabrication. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    While acknowledging its theory-ladeness, Chalmers (history and philosophy, U. of Sydney) defends the objectivity of scientific knowledge against those critics for whom such knowledge is both subjective and ideological.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  49. D. P. Chattopadhyaya & Philosophy Culture Project of History of Indian Science (1996). Interdisciplinary Studies in Science, Technology, Philosophy and Culture. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Valentin Cheshko, Valery Glazko, Gleb Yu Kosovsky & Anna S. Peredyadenko (eds.) (2015). STABLE ADAPTIVE STRATEGY of HOMO SAPIENS and EVOLUTIONARY RISK of HIGH TECH. Transdisciplinary Essay. New Publ.Tech..
    The co-evolutionary concept of Three-modal stable evolutionary strategy of Homo sapiens is developed. The concept based on the principle of evolutionary complementarity of anthropogenesis: value of evolutionary risk and evolutionary path of human evolution are defined by descriptive (evolutionary efficiency) and creative-teleological (evolutionary correctly) parameters simultaneously, that cannot be instrumental reduced to others ones. Resulting volume of both parameters define the trends of biological, social, cultural and techno-rationalistic human evolution by two gear mechanism ˗ gene-cultural co-evolution and techno- humanitarian balance. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 965