This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:See also:
128 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 128
  1. Rudolf Arnheim (1981). Style as a Gestalt Problem. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 39 (3):281-289.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rudolf Arnheim (1943). Gestalt and Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2 (8):71-75.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Mitchell G. Ash & Jonathan Harwood (1998). Essay Review-Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890-1967: Holism and the Quest for Objectivity. History of Science 36 (4):485-497.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gloria Ayob (2009). The Aspect-Perception Passages: A Critical Investigation of Köhler's Isomorphism Principle. Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):264-280.
    In this paper I argue that Wittgenstein's aim in the aspect-perception passages is to critically evaluate a specific hypothesis. The target hypothesis in these passages is the Gestalt psychologist Köhler's "isomorphism principle." According to this principle, there are neural correlates of conscious perceptual experience, and these neural correlates determine the content of our perceptual experiences. Wittgenstein's argument against the isomorphism principle comprises two steps. First, he diffuses the substantiveness of the principle by undermining an important assumption that underpins this principle, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas Baldwin (ed.) (2003/2012). The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1870-1945. Cambridge University Press.
    The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870-1945 comprises over sixty specially commissioned essays by experts on the philosophy of this period, and is designed to be accessible to non-specialists. The first part of the book traces the history of philosophy from its remarkable flowering in the 1870s through to the early years of the twentieth century. After a brief discussion of the impact of the First World War, the second part of the book describes further developments in philosophy in the first (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Russell A. Bell & William Bevan (1968). Influence of Anchors Upon the Operation of Certain Gestalt Organizing Principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):670.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Rudolph Berlinger (1982). Das Individuum in Gestalt der Person. Perspektiven der Philosophie 8:101-114.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Christian Bermes (2012). Radikalitat Etikett oder Gestalt? Zum Ort des Radikalen in der Kultur. Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie 2012 (2):273-285.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Luciano Boi (2007). Phénoménologie et méréologie de la perception spatiale, de Husserl aux théoriciens de la Gestalt. In Luciano Boi, Pierre Kerszberg & Frédéric Patras (eds.), Rediscovering Phenomenology: Phenomenological Essays on Mathematical Beings, Physical Reality, Perception and Consciousness (Phaenomenologica) (English and French Edition). Springer. 33-66.
  10. Robert Briscoe, Depiction, Pictorial Experience, and Vision Science.
    Pictures are 2D surfaces designed to elicit 3D-scene-representing experiences from their viewers. In this essay, I argue that philosophers have tended to underestimate the relevance of research in vision science to understanding the nature of pictorial experience or ‘seeing-in’, to use Richard Wollheim’s familiar expression. Both the deeply entrenched methodology of virtual psychophysics as well as empirical studies of pictorial space perception provide compelling support for the view that seeing-in and seeing face-to-face are experiences of the same psychological, explanatory kind. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert Briscoe (2011). Mental Imagery and the Varieties of Amodal Perception. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):153-173.
    The problem of amodal perception is the problem of how we represent features of perceived objects that are occluded or otherwise hidden from us. Bence Nanay (2010) has recently proposed that we amodally perceive an object's occluded features by imaginatively projecting them into the relevant regions of visual egocentric space. In this paper, I argue that amodal perception is not a single, unitary capacity. Drawing appropriate distinctions reveals amodal perception to be characterized not only by mental imagery, as Nanay suggests, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert Briscoe (2008). Vision, Action, and Make‐Perceive. Mind and Language 23 (4):457-497.
    In this paper, I critically assess the enactive account of visual perception recently defended by Alva Noë (2004). I argue inter alia that the enactive account falsely identifies an object’s apparent shape with its 2D perspectival shape; that it mistakenly assimilates visual shape perception and volumetric object recognition; and that it seriously misrepresents the constitutive role of bodily action in visual awareness. I argue further that noticing an object’s perspectival shape involves a hybrid experience combining both perceptual and imaginative elements (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Cairns Cairns (1954). AWLINS' Aesthetics and the Gestalt. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15:430.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Carmelo Calì (2013). Gestalt Models for Data Decomposition and Functional Architecture in Visual Neuroscience. Gestalt Theory 35 (227-264).
    Attempts to introduce Gestalt theory into the realm of visual neuroscience are discussed on both theoretical and experimental grounds. To define the framework in which these proposals can be defended, this paper outlines the characteristics of a standard model, which qualifies as a received view in the visual neurosciences, and of the research into natural images statistics. The objections to the standard model and the main questions of the natural images research are presented. On these grounds, this paper defends the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi (2003). Sfondo e figura. Rivista di Estetica 43 (24):38-40.
    A dialogue between a figure and its background, illustrating that the perceptual conditions that determine which is which are not as clear as standard Gestalt theory dictates.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2013). Gestalt, Equivalency, and Functional Dependency. Kurt Grelling’s Formal Ontology. In Nikolay Milkov & Volker Peckhaus (eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Springer. 245--261.
    In his ontological works Kurt Grelling tries to give a rigorous analysis of the foundations of the so-called Gestalt-psychology. Gestalten are peculiar emergent qualities, ontologically dependent on their foundations, but nonetheless non reducible to them. Grelling shows that this concept, as used in psychology and ontology, is often ambiguous. He distinguishes two important meanings in which the word “Gestalt” is used: Gestalten as structural aspects available to transposition and Gestalten as causally self-regulating wholes. Gestalten in the first meaning are, according (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. T. F. Cloonan (2006). Verstegen, I.(2005). Arnheim, Gestalt and Art: A Psychological Theory. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 37 (2):272.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Thomas E. Davitt (1936). Gestalt Psychology: A Survey of Facts and Principles. [REVIEW] Modern Schoolman 14:20.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Christian Diehm (2006). Arne Naess and the Task of Gestalt Ontology. Environmental Ethics 28 (1):21-35.
    While much of Arne Naess’s ecosophy underscores the importance of understanding one’s ecological Self, his analyses of gestaltism are significant in that they center less on questions of the self than on questions of nature and what is other-than-human. Rather than the realization of a more expansive Self, gestalt ontology calls for a “gestalt shift” in our thinking about nature, one that allows for its intrinsic value to emerge clearly. Taking such a gestalt shift as a central task enables Naess (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. M. C. Dillon (1971). Gestalt Theory and Merleau-Ponty's Concept of Intentionality. Man and World 4 (4):436-459.
    The intent of the article is to define merleau-ponty's place in the phenomenological tradition and, at the same time, to defend his standpoint, especially on those issues where his thought represents a departure from the tradition. although merleau-ponty espouses a form of the husserlian doctrine of the intentionality of consciousness, his understanding of intentionality differs in several fundamental respects from husserl's. the article attempts to show specifically where merleau-ponty's gestalt- theoretical orientation leads him to modify such basic aspects of husserl's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. C. Von Ehrenfels (1988). On'Gestalt Qualities'. In Barry Smith (ed.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Philosophia. 82--117.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Christian von Ehrenfels (1988). Gestalt Level and Gestalt Purity. In Barry Smith (ed.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Philosophia.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Walter H. Ehrenstein, Lothar Spillmann & Viktor Sarris (2003). Gestalt Issues in Modern Neuroscience. Axiomathes 13 (3-4):433-458.
    We present select examples of how visual phenomena can serve as tools to uncoverbrain mechanisms. Specifically, receptive field organization is proposed as a Gestalt-like neural mechanism of perceptual organization. Appropriate phenomena, such as brightness and orientation contrast, subjective contours, filling-in, and aperture-viewed motion, allow for a quantitative comparison between receptive fields and their psychophysical counterparts, perceptive fields. Phenomenology might thus be extended from the study of perceptual qualities to their transphenomenal substrates, including memory functions. In conclusion, classic issues of Gestalt (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Willis D. Ellis (1939). A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 36 (11):302-304.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Willis D. Ellis (ed.) (1938). Source Book of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace and Co.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. William M. Epstein & Gary Hatfield (1994). Gestalt Psychology and the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophical Psychology 7 (2):163-181.
    The Gestalt psychologists adopted a set of positions on mind-body issues that seem like an odd mix. They sought to combine a version of naturalism and physiological reductionism with an insistence on the reality of the phenomenal and the attribution of meanings to objects as natural characteristics. After reviewing basic positions in contemporary philosophy of mind, we examine the Gestalt position, characterizing it m terms of phenomenal realism and programmatic reductionism. We then distinguish Gestalt philosophy of mind from instrumentalism and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. William Epstein & Gary Hatfield, The Status of the Minimum Principle in the Theoretical Analysis of Visual Perception.
    metric. A minimum principle is a theoretical construct imputed to the visual system to explain minimum tendencies. After examining a number of studies of..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Evan Fales (1996). A Defense of the Given. Lanham: Rowman &Amp; Littlefield.
    The Doctrine of the Given The Myth of the Given A Methodological Problem To a convinced foundationalist, the project of establishing the existence of the ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Uljana Feest (2014). Phenomenal Experiences, First-Person Methods, and the Artificiality of Experimental Data. Philosophy of Science 81:927-939.
    This paper argues that whereas philosophical discussions of first-person methods often turn on the veridicality of first-person reports, more attention should be paid to the experimental circumstances under which the reports are generated, and to the purposes of designing such experiments. After pointing to the ‘constructedness’ of first-person reports in the science of perception, I raise questions about the criteria by which to judge whether the reports illuminate something about the nature of perception. I illustrate this point with a historical (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Risieri Frondizi (1976). The Self as a Dynamic Gestalt. Personalist 57 (1):55-63.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ash Gobar (1968). Philosophic Foundations Of Genetic Psychology And Gestalt Psychology. Martinus Nilboff.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jorge J. E. Gracia (1976). Frondizi's Theory of the Self as a Dynamic Gestalt. [REVIEW] Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 57 (1):64.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. K. Grelling & P. Oppenheim (1988). The Concept of Gestalt in the Light of Modern Logic. In Barry Smith (ed.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory. Philosophia.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Kuft Grelling & Paul Oppenheim (1937). Supplementary Remarks on the Concept of Gestalt. Erkenntnis 7 (1):357-359.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Reinhardt S. Grossman (1977). Structures Versus Sets: The Philosophical Background of Gestalt Psychology. Critica 9 (December):3-21.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Aron Gurwitsch (1964). The Field of Consciousness. Duquesne University Press.
  37. Petr Hájek (1965). Modelle Der Mengenlehre, in Denen Mengen Gegebener Gestalt Existieren. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 11 (2):103-115.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. D. Hamlyn (1952). KATZ, D. -Gestalt Psychology. [REVIEW] Mind 61:287.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. D. W. Hamlyn (1951). Psychological Explanation and the Gestalt Hypothesis. Mind 60 (240):506-520.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David W. Hamlyn (1957). The Psychology Of Perception: A Philosophical Examination Of Gestalt Theory And Derivative Theories Of Perception. The Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. George W. Hartmann (1936). Gestalt Psychology. Philosophical Review 45:427.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gary Hatfield (2012). Koffka, Köhler, and the “Crisis” in Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):483-492.
  43. Gary Hatfield (2011). Good Gestalt: Metzger on Seeing. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (1):81-85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Vincent V. Heer (1943). Gestalt Psychology. New Scholasticism 17 (4):358-379.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. H. L. Hollingworth (1938). Verbal Gestalt Experiments with Children. Journal of Experimental Psychology 23 (1):90.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Percy Hughes (1931). Kohler's Gestalt Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 28:75.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Eugene H. Hunt & Ronald K. Bullis (1991). Applying the Principles of Gestalt Theory to Teaching Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (5):341 - 347.
    Teaching ethics poses a dilemma for professors of business. First, they have little or no formal training in ethics. Second, they have established ethical values that they may not want to impose upon their students. What is needed is a well-recognized, yet non-sectarian model to facilitate the clarification of ethical questions. Gestalt theory offers such a framework. Four Gestalt principles facilitate ethical clarification and another four Gestalt principles anesthetize ethical clarification. This article examines each principle, illustrates that principle through current (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Robert Innis (1992). Tacit Knowing, Gestalt Theory, and the Model of Perceptual Consciousness. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 27.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Gaetano Kanizsa (1994). Gestalt Theory has Been Misinterpreted, but has Had Some Real Conceptual Difficulties. Philosophical Psychology 7 (2):149-162.
    In the present article, the role of Gestalt concepts in clarifying the issues of perception is evaluated. Grounded in anti-atomism, Gestalt assumed organizing forces intrinsic to perception. Insofar these were identified with singularity preference, Gestalt is criticized for having failed to distinguish between perception and thought.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Jacob Robert Kantor (1925). The Significance of the Gestalt Conception in Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 22 (9):234-241.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 128