Related categories
Subcategories:
252 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 252
Material to categorize
  1. G. A. (1973). Metakritik der Formalen Logik. Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):381-382.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Saʻīd Akbarī (2007). .
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Quṭb al-Taḥtānī & Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad (2003). .
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robert Albin (2012). BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY. Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
    ABSTRACT: Frege, and others who followed him, stressed the role of fallibility as a means to defining ‘objectivity.’ By defining objective judgments as fallible, these philosophers contributed to the consolidation of a theory of objectivity which suggested interpreting epistemological, as well as other judgements, as being objective. An important philosophical implication of this theory lies in its disclosure of the interrelations between truth and objectivity. In light of this insight, and based on an analysis of instances of false (epistemological and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Layman E. Allen (1968). Review: A. N. Prior, A. I. Melden, Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):610-611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Enrique Alvarez & Manuel Correia (2012). Syllogistic with Indefinite Terms. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):297-306.
    This paper presents a restructured set of axioms for categorical logic. In virtue of it, the syllogistic with indefinite terms is deduced and proved, within the categorical logic boundaries. As a result, the number of all the conclusive syllogisms is deduced through a simple and axiomatic methodology. Moreover, the distinction between immediate and mediate inferences disappears, which reinstitutes the unity of Aristotelian logic.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387 - 418.
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran's deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Editor's Introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, Historical Development of Modern Logic. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):301-326.
    Van Heijenoort’s account of the historical development of modern logic was composed in 1974 and first published in 1992 with an introduction by his former student. What follows is a new edition with a revised and expanded introduction and additional notes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.
    I use van Heijenoort’s published writings and manuscript materials to provide a comprehensive overview of his conception of modern logic as a first-order functional calculus and of the historical developments which led to this conception of mathematical logic, its defining characteristics, and in particular to provide an integral account, from his most important publications as well as his unpublished notes and scattered shorter historico-philosophical articles, of how and why the mathematical logic, whose he traced to Frege and the culmination of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robert L. Armstrong (1970). Reduction and Deduction of Syllogisms. New Scholasticism 44 (2):273-277.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. E. J. Ashworth (1974). Some Additions to Risse's Bibliographia Logica. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):361-365.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. L. K. B. (1959). Formale Logik. Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):665-665.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. Banas (2003). Aristotelian Versus Stoic Logic. Filozofia 58 (8):551-563.
    This paper deals with Aristotelian and Stoic logic. In the first part the author writes about the history of logic and shows, why Stoic logic had not been studied properly from the Middle Ages up to the beginning of the 20th century, when an increasing interest in the study of Stoic logic is visible. The paper describes the character of Aristotelian and Stoic logic respectively. Stoic logic is first introduced as a system of propositional logic. On this basis a complementarity (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr (1985). Aristotle Vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate? Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic , and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jonathan Barnes (1999). Aristotle and Stoic Logic. In Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Barnes (1990). The Prior Analytics. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (2):234-236.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gary Bedell (1992). Aristotelian Logic. Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):175-176.
  18. W. Bednarowski (1955). Hamilton's Quantification of the Predicate. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:217 - 240.
    This paper consists roughly of three parts. In the first part, an attempt has been made to find some tenable interpretation of Hamilton's logic. This results in accepting that Hamilton's logic can be "saved" if it is understood as being an everday language version of Euler's relations, i.e., extensional relations between terms (classes). In the second part, the propositions of Euler and the propositions of Aristotle are compared and found to be interdefinable: every proposition of Aristotle can be defined by (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ian Begg & J. Peter Denny (1969). Empirical Reconciliation of Atmosphere and Conversion Interpretations of Syllogistic Reasoning Errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):351.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Albert A. Bennett (1938). Review: Emanuele Abita, Compatibilita degli Assiomi della Logica. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):162-162.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. K. Berka (1978). Aristotle Theory of Deduction. Filosoficky Casopis 26 (6):879-895.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Max Black (1947). Review: Jean Cavailles, Albert Lautman, La Pensee Mathematique. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):21-22.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Albert Blumberg (1967). Logic, Modern. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 5--6.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Susanne Bobzien (2006). Ancient Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    ABSTRACT: A comprehensive introduction to ancient (western) logic from earliest times to the 6th century CE, with an emphasis on topics which may be of interest to contemporary logicians. Content: 1. Pre-Aristotelian Logic 1.1 Syntax and Semantics 1.2 Argument Patterns and Valid Inference 2. Aristotle 2.1 Dialectics 2.2 Sub-sentential Classifications 2.3 Syntax and Semantics of Sentences 2.4 Non-modal Syllogistic 2.5 Modal Logic 3. The early Peripatetics: Theophrastus and Eudemus 3.1 Improvements and Modifications of Aristotle's Logic 3.2 Prosleptic Syllogisms 3.3 Forerunners (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Susanne Bobzien (2003). Stoic Logic. In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    ABSTRACT: An introduction to Stoic logic. Stoic logic can in many respects be regarded as a fore-runner of modern propositional logic. I discuss: 1. the Stoic notion of sayables or meanings (lekta); the Stoic assertibles (axiomata) and their similarities and differences to modern propositions; the time-dependency of their truth; 2.-3. assertibles with demonstratives and quantified assertibles and their truth-conditions; truth-functionality of negations and conjunctions; non-truth-functionality of disjunctions and conditionals; language regimentation and ‘bracketing’ devices; Stoic basic principles of propositional logic; 4. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. George Boger (2004). Aristotle's Underlying Logic. In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. 1--101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. S. Bozzi (2013). Logica Dimostrativa. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):183 - 187.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bernd Buldt, Review of "Irving H. Anellis: Historical Development of Modern Logic”. [REVIEW]
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jean Buridan (2005). Summulae de Propositionibus. Brepols.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. E. B. C. (1964). Short Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 17 (4):623-623.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. V. C. C. (1956). Logik. Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):362-362.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. V. C. C. (1956). Logik. Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):362-362.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Javier Picón Casas (2009). Los futuros contingentes y De Interpretatione, IX. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 26:51-61.
    Some authors have talken about the problem of the future contingents Aristotle exposed in De Interpretatione IX. But most of them do not explain the role of that chapter in his own work. Last analysis always try to find a formal solution. And this is very significative because De Interpretatione is a treatise that belongs to the semantic of the Organon. In this article we show that: 1. The aim of the problem of future contigents is not only formal and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Hypothetical Syllogisms Was Changed (2000). Why the Order of the Figures of the Hypothetical Syllogisms Was Changed. Classical Quarterly 50:247-251.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Alonzo Church (1970). Review: Paul Kurtz, American Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: A Sourcebook. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (2):312-313.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Alonzo Church (1954). Review: A. N. Prior, The Parva Logicalia in Modern Dress. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1):73-74.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. J. Corcoran & G. Boger (2011). Protasis in Prior Analytics: Proposition or Premise. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17:151 - 2.
    The word pro-tasis is etymologically a near equivalent of pre-mise, pro-position, and ante-cedent—all having positional, relational connotations now totally absent in contemporary use of proposition. Taking protasis for premise, Aristotle’s statement (24a16) -/- A protasis is a sentence affirming or denying something of something…. -/- is not a definition of premise—intensionally: the relational feature is absent. Likewise, it is not a general definition of proposition—extensionally: it is too narrow. This paper explores recent literature on these issues.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John Corcoran, A BIBLIOGRAPHY: JOHN CORCORAN's PUBLICATIONS ON ARISTOTLE 1972–2015.
    This presentation includes a complete bibliography of John Corcoran’s publications devoted at least in part to Aristotle’s logic. Sections I–IV list 20 articles, 43 abstracts, 3 books, and 10 reviews. It starts with two watershed articles published in 1972: the Philosophy & Phenomenological Research article that antedates Corcoran’s Aristotle’s studies and the Journal of Symbolic Logic article first reporting his original results; it ends with works published in 2015. A few of the items are annotated with endnotes connecting them with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John Corcoran (2011). Hare and Others on the Proposition. Principia 15 (1):51-76.
    History witnesses alternative approaches to “the proposition”. The proposition has been referred to as the object of belief, disbelief, and doubt: generally as the object of propositional attitudes, that which can be said to be believed, disbelieved, understood, etc. It has also been taken to be the object of grasping, judging, assuming, affirming, denying, and inquiring: generally as the object of propositional actions, that which can be said to be grasped, judged true or false, assumed for reasoning purposes, etc. The (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John Corcoran (2008). Meanings of Form. Manuscrito 31 (1):223-266.
    The expressions ‘form’, ‘structure’, ‘schema’, ‘shape’, ‘pattern’, ‘figure’, ‘mold’, and related locutions are used in logic both as technical terms and in metaphors. This paper juxtaposes, distinguishes, and analyses uses of [FOR these PUT such] expressions by logicians. No [FOR such PUT similar] project has been attempted previously. After establishing general terminology, we present a variant of traditional usage of the expression ‘logical form’ followed by a discussion of the usage found in the two-volume Chateaubriand book Logical Forms (2001 and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John Corcoran (1974). Remarks on Stoic Deduction. In , Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Boston,Reidel. 169--181.
    This paper raises obvious questions undermining any residual confidence in Mates work and revealing our embarrassing ignorance of true nature of Stoic deduction. It was inspired by the challenging exploratory work of JOSIAH GOULD.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Manuel Correia (2012). Boethius on the Square of Opposition. In J.-Y. Beziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser. 41--52.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Daniele Cozzoli (2007). Alessandro Piccolomini and the Certitude of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2):151-171.
    This paper offers a reconstruction of Alessandro Piccolomini's philosophy of mathematics, and reconstructs the role of Themistius and Averroes in the Renaissance debate on Aristotle's theory of proof. It also describes the interpretative context within which Piccolomini was working in order to show that he was not an isolated figure, but rather that he was fully involved in the debate on mathematics and physics of Italian Aristotelians of his time. The ideas of Lodovico Boccadiferro and Sperone Speroni will be analysed. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Paolo Crivelli (2012). Aristotle's Logic. In Christopher Shields (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oup Usa. 113.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Tadeusz Czezowski (1960). Review: Tadeusz Kotarbinski, La Logique en Pologne. Son Originalite et les Influences Etrangeres. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (3):259-259.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Valeria de Paiva & Andrei Rodin (2013). Elements of Categorical Logic: Fifty Years Later. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 7 (3):265-273.
  47. Michaelj Degnan (1994). Aristotle's Logic. Philosophical Books 35 (2):81-89.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Francoise Delon (1991). Review: Alexander Prestel, Einfuhrung in die Mathematische Logik und Modelltheorie. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):341-343.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. James Duerlinger (1968). Drawing Conclusions From Aristotelian Syllogisms. The Monist 52 (2):229-236.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. J. R. Erickson (1978). Research on Syllogistic Reasoning. In Russell Revlin & Richard E. Mayer (eds.), Human Reasoning. Distributed Solely by Halsted Press. 39--50.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 252