This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
83 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 83
  1. Richard E. Aquila (1974). Husserl and Frege on Meaning. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):377-383.
    Husserl's theory of meaning is often regarded as a somewhat obscure attempt at a view which frege stated more clearly. I argue that while this may be true with respect to the "ideas," it is false with respect to the "logical investigations." the theory presented in the latter work is superior to frege's theory. It provides an objective foundation for the semantical distinctions which concerned frege while remaining within the confines of an ontology that is more economical than frege's.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marina Paola Banchetti (1993). Føllesdal on the Notion of the Noema: A Critique. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 10 (2):81-95.
    This paper critiques Dagfinn Follesdal's influential interpretation of the Husserlian noema as a Fregean sense. Though other philosophers have argued that Follesdal's interpretation is mistaken, this paper demonstrates that the origin of the error is a fundamental misunderstanding, on Follesdal's part, of Husserlian terminology. The paper also examines the views of David Woodruff Smith and Ronald McIntyre who, influenced by Follesdal, mistakenly read the Husserl of the "Ideas" as a linguistically motivated philosopher. The paper concludes that, if Follesdal and his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Pilar Fernández Beites (1993). Evidencia y verdad. Unproblema en la fenomenología de E. Husserl. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 27:195-216.
    This paper reflects on how the possibility of meaningful evidence is to be assumed in view that all our linguistic exercises take place in the context of a discursive horizon where we are situated. To do this, the paper starts distinguishing two phenomena: first, the possibility of meaningful evidence and second, the horizontal character that is inherent to the deployment of linguistic meaning. Furthermore, through a discussion with Husserl and Wittgenstein, the paper considers how those two phenomena are to be (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. Benoist (2001). Categorial Intuition (Husserl) And'seeing As'(Wittgenstein)(Aspect Seeing). Revue Philosophique De Louvain 99 (4):593-612.
  5. Christian Beyer (2006). Mentale Simulation Und Radikale Interpretation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):25-45.
    The notion of empathy has more recently seen a considerable revival—notably (first) in connection with Quine's empathy model of radical interpretation, in contrast to which Davidson has developed his triangulation model, and (secondly) in the context of the debate between simulation theory vs. theory theory about propositional attitude ascription. So far, these debates have been carried on fairly independently of each other. This paper is an attempt to utilize the interpretation-theoretical discussion in order to argue for a moderate version of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Philip Blosser (1990). The A Priori in Phenomenology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy Today 34 (3):195-205.
  7. Davide Bordini (2011). The Analytic, the Synthetic and the a Priori: A Matter of Form. The Debate Between Husserlian Phenomenology and Logical Empiricism. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 66 (2):205-230.
  8. Oscar Lucas González Castán (2001). Lógica, conocimiento y valor: un tríptico filosófico. Revista de Filosofía 25:187-212.
    Según se considere cuál es el ámbito de investigación al que debe circunscribirse la lógica y en qué consiste propiamente el conocimiento, tendremos una u otra idea de cómo los valores están relacionados con estos ámbitos de la actividad humana. En este artículo investigo críticamente la postura filosófica agnóstica de Wittgenstein en torno a los años en que escribió el Tractatus, las tesis neopragmatistas de Putnam y la fenomenología genética de Husserl en tanto que doctrinas relevantes para el estudio de (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John J. Compton (1964). Hare, Husserl, and Philosophic Discovery. Dialogue 3 (01):42-51.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jairo da Silva (2000). Resenha 'Husserl or Frege: Meaning, Objectivity and Mathematics' (Claire Ortiz Hill & Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock). Manuscrito 23 (2).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Dan Dahlstrom (forthcoming). The Intentionality of Passive Experience: Husserl and A Contemporary Debate. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy.
  12. Dan Dahlstrom (2007). The Intentionality of Passive Experience. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 7:25-42.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Elizabeth Davis (1996). Husserl, With and Against Frege. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 6 (1):95-116.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. M. P. Drost (1994). Husserl and Goodman on the Role of Resemblance in Pictorial Representation. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):17-27.
  15. John J. Drummond (1985). Frege and Husserl: Another Look at the Issue of Influence. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (3):245-265.
    This paper argues that frege did not significantly influence husserl's departure from psychologism by (1) examining husserl's early logical reflections, Especially those concerning the meaning of the term ""vorstellung"," and (2) determining which parts of husserl's "philosophy of arithmetic", Criticized for its psychologism by frege, Were psychologistic and when husserl rejected them. It concludes that the logical writings show an independent movement toward a non-Psychologistic position and that the psychologism of "philosophy of arithmetic" was abandoned by 1891 apart from any (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. José Ruiz Fernández (2009). Evidencia, juegos de lenguaje y la posibilidad de la fenomenología. Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 41:259-284.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Edoardo Fugali (2011). Husserl e Searle su Intenzionalita e Coscienza: La Fenomenologia e Veramente Un'illusione? Rivista di Estetica 51 (47):113-153.
  18. Dagfinn Føllesdal (1990). Noema and Meaning in Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50:263-271.
  19. Grant Gillett (1997). Husserl, Wittgenstein and the Snark: Intentionality and Social Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):331-349.
    The Snark is an intentional object. I examine the general philosophical characteristics of thoughts of objects from the perspective of Husserl's, hyle, noesis, and noema and show how this meets constraints of opacity, normativity, and possible existence as generated by a sensitive theory of intentionality. Husserl introduces terms which indicate the normative features of intentional content and attempts to forge a direct relationship between the norms he generates and the actual world object which a thought intends. I then attempt to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Serafín Vegas González (1990). ¿Qué pensar acerca del mundo?: Husserl y la Filosofía de Davidson y de Rorty. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 8:147-162.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Leila Haaparanta (1988). Analysis as the Method of Logical Discovery: Some Remarks on Frege and Husserl. Synthese 77 (1):73 - 97.
  22. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1982). Remarks on Sense and Reference in Frege and Husserl. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):425-439.
    Frege's semantics of sense and reference and two husserlian alternatives are discussed. it is shown that husserl neither took his semantics of sense and reference from frege nor abandoned psychologism under his influence. frege's arguments on behalf of his choice of truth values as the reference of statements and of concepts as the reference of conceptual words are submitted to criticism. some algebraic considerations are sketched in the last part of the article.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Garth L. Hallett (1991). The Genesis of Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy in His Failure as a Phenomenologist. Philosophy and Theology 5 (4):297-312.
    The history of Wittgenstein’s failed attempt at pure phenomenology illumines his later thought, both globally and in detail, as well as its relation to Husserlian phenomenology.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Claire Oritz Hill (1994). Frege's Attack on Husserl and Cantor. The Monist 77 (3):345-357.
  25. Claire Ortiz Hill (2002). Tackling Three of Frege's Problems: Edmund Husserl on Sets and Manifolds. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 13 (1):79-104.
    Edmund Husserl was one of the very first to experience the direct impact of challenging problems in set theory and his phenomenology first began to take shape while he was struggling to solve such problems. Here I study three difficulties associated with Frege's use of sets that Husserl explicitly addressed: reference to non-existent, impossible, imaginary objects; the introduction of extensions; and 'Russell's paradox'.I do so within the context of Husserl's struggle to overcome the shortcomings of set theory and to develop (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jaakko Hintikka (1995). The Phenomenological Dimension. In Barry Smith & David Woodruff Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy). Cambridge University Press.
  27. Carlo Ierna (2012). Husserl's Psychology of Arithmetic. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 8 (1):97-120.
    In 1913, in a draft for a new Preface for the second edition of the Logical Investigations, Edmund Husserl reveals to his readers that "The source of all my studies and the first source of my epistemological difficul­ties lies in my first works on the philosophy of arithmetic and mathematics in general", i.e. his Habilitationsschrift and the Philosophy of Arithmetic: "I carefully studied the consciousness constituting the amount, first the collec­tive consciousness (consciousness of quantity, of multiplicity) in its simplest and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Dale Jacquette (2009). The Young Carnap's Unknown Master: Husserl's Influence onDer RaumandDer Logische Aufbau Der Welt. History and Philosophy of Logic 30 (2):194-200.
  29. Kelly Dean Jolley (2001). Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):311-312.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Bruno Leclercq (2012). Le tournant linguistique et son contre-virage phénoménologique. Les Études Philosophiques 1 (1):7-26.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Mary Leng (2002). Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillenno E. Rosado Haddock, Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (5):325-327.
  32. Patrick Madigan (2011). The Young Carnap's Unknown Master: Husserl's Influence on Der Raum and Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. By Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock. Heythrop Journal 52 (1):157-157.
  33. Verena Mayer (2007). Evidence, Judgment and Truth. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75 (1):175-197.
    Although Frege was eager to theoretically eliminate the judging subject from logic and mathematics, his system is permeated with notions that refer to subjective mental processes, such as grasping a thought, assuming, judging, and value. His semantic system depends on such notions, but since Frege in general shuns explaining them, his central conception of judgment and truth remains dark. In this paper it is proposed to fill out the gaps in Frege's explanations with the help of Husserl's phenomenological descriptions, especially (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Verena E. Mayer (1991). Die Konstruktion der Erfahrungswelt: Carnap Und Husserl. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):287 - 303.
  35. Peter James McCormick (1985). Husserl and Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):121-124.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Ronald McIntyre (1987). Husserl and Frege. Journal of Philosophy 84 (10):528-535.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Uwe Meixner (2014). Defending Husserl: A Plea in the Case of Wittgenstein & Company Versus Phenomenology. De Gruyter.
    The phenomenological approach to the philosophy of mind, as worked out by Husserl, has been severely criticized by philosophers within the Wittgensteinian tradition and, implicitly, by Wittgenstein himself. This book examines this criticism in detail, looking at the writings of Wittgenstein, Ryle, Hacker, Dennett, and others. In defending Husserl against his critics, it offers a comprehensive fresh view of phenomenology as a philosophy of mind.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. N. Mohanty (1974). Husserl and Frege: A New Look at Their Relationship. Research in Phenomenology 4 (1):51-62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ray Monk (2014). The Temptations of Phenomenology: Wittgenstein, the Synthetic a Priori and the 'Analytic a Posteriori'. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (3):312-340.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Timothy Mooney (2012). Michael D. Barber: The Intentional Spectrum and Intersubjectivity: Phenomenology and the Pittsburgh Neo-Hegelians. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 28 (2):167-177.
  41. Kevin Mulligan (2009). Tractarian Beginnings and Endings. Worlds, Values, Facts and Subjects. In Giuseppe Primiero (ed.), Acts of Knowledge: History, Philosophy and Logic. College Publications. 151--168.
  42. Christopher Norris (1999). Theory-Change and the Logic of Enquiry : New Bearings in Philosophy of Science Theory-Change of Enquiry : New Bearings in of Science Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):21-68.
    This article examines various (in my view) failed or problematic attempts to overcome the limits of logical empiricism in epistemology and philosophy of science. It focuses on Quine's influential critique of that doctrine and on subsequent critiques of Quine that challenge his appeal to the scheme/content dichotomy as a third residual 'dogma' of empiricism (Davidson) or his espousal of a radically physicalist approach that rejects the possibility of quantifying into modal contexts (Marcus). I endorse these criticisms as valid on their (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John K. O.’Connor (2012). Category Mistakes and Logical Grammar: Ryle's Husserlian Tutelage. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 16 (2):235-250.
    Gilbert Ryle never pursued research under Edmund Husserl. However, Ryle was indeed Husserl’s student in a broader sense, as much of his own work was deeply influenced by his studies of Husserl’s pre-World War I writings. While Ryle is the thinker whose name typically comes to mind in connection with the concern over category mistakes I argue that (1) Husserl deserves to be known for precisely this concern as well, and (2) the similarity between them is no accident. Developing this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. John K. O.’Connor (2012). Category Mistakes and Logical Grammar. Symposium 16 (2):235-250.
    Gilbert Ryle never pursued research under Edmund Husserl. However, Ryle was indeed Husserl’s student in a broader sense, as much of his own work was deeply influenced by his studies of Husserl’s pre-World War I writings. While Ryle is the thinker whose name typically comes to mind in connection with the concern over category mistakes I argue that (1) Husserl deserves to be known for precisely this concern as well, and (2) the similarity between them is no accident. Developing this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
    This article discusses Jaakko Hintikka's interpretation of the aims and method of Husserl's phenomenology. I argue that Hintikka misrepresents Husserl's phenomenology on certain crucial points. More specifically, Hintikka misconstrues Husserl's notion of "immediate experience" and consequently fails to grasp the functions of the central methodological tools known as the "epoché" and the "phenomenological reduction." The result is that the conception of phenomenology he attributes to Husserl is very far from realizing the philosophical potential of Husserl's position. Hence if we want (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John K. O.’Connor (forthcoming). Husserl and Carnap: Structural Objectivity, Constitution, Grammar in Advance. International Philosophical Quarterly.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Ivonne V. Pallares Vega (2003). Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock: Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 19 (2):179-191.
  48. Charles Parsons (2012). From Kant to Husserl: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
    The transcendental aesthetic -- Arithmetic and the categories -- Remarks on pure natural science -- Two studies in the reception of Kant's philosophy of arithmetic: postscript to part I -- Some remarks on Frege's conception of extension -- Postscript to essay 5 -- Frege's correspondence: postscript to essay 6 -- Brentano on judgment and truth -- Husserl and the linguistic turn.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Charles Parsons (2001). Husserl and the Linguistic Turn. In Juliet Floyd & Sanford Shieh (eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 123--41.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Tommaso Piazza (2004). The Quest for the Synthetic a Priori: Husserl and Schlick's Debate Revisited. In Arkadiusz Chrudzimski & Wolfgang Huemer (eds.), Phenomenology and Analysis: Essays on Central European Philosophy. Ontos.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 83