Related categories
Subcategories:
202 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 202
Material to categorize
  1. Jeffner Allen (1982). What is Husserl's First Philosophy? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (4):610-620.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jesús M. Díaz Álvarez (2011). ¿Es Husserl un fundacionalista? Algunas reflexiones con motivo de un fragmento de "La crisis de las ciencias europeas". Laguna 28:23-38.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Michele Avercjo (2010). Prolegomena zu einer Phänomenologie des Zeugnisses. In Philippe Merz, Andrea Staiti & Frank Steffen (eds.), Geist-Person-Gemeinschaft: Freiburger Beiträge zur Aktualität Husserls. Ergon-Verlag GmbH.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gaston Berger (1972). The Cogito in Husserl's Philosophy. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  5. Christian Beyer (2007). Contextualism and the Background of (Philosophical) Justification. Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):291-305.
    I propose to apply a version of contextualism about knowledge to the special case that represents the topic of this volume. I begin by motivating my preferred version of contextualism, which may be labelled as conventionalist contextualism; here I start from a well-known problem that besets epistemic internalism (section I). Following this, I pose a problem for conventionalist contextualism and argue that it can be solved by invoking, first, the idea of what I shall call the lifewordly background of epistemic (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Blinder (1981). Phenomenology and Skepticism: A Critical Study of Husserl's Transcendental Idealism. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
    The dissertation critically examines Husserl's transcendental idealism as a response to epistemological skepticism. Contrary to prevailing interpretations, I argue that Husserl intended to formulate a non-reductive, idealist justification of empirical knowledge. I take the standard phenomenalistic interpretation of Husserl's idealism to be right in discerning his basic concern with the refutation of skepticism, but wrong in construing the transcendental reduction as an ontological reduction of the natural world to "ideal" sets of transcendental experiences. On the other hand, recent "neutrality views" (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Philip Blosser (1990). The A Priori in Phenomenology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy Today 34 (3):195-205.
  8. Davide Bordini (2011). The Analytic, the Synthetic and the a Priori: A Matter of Form. The Debate Between Husserlian Phenomenology and Logical Empiricism. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 66 (2):205-230.
  9. Damian Byers (2003). Intentionality and Transcendence: Closure and Openness in Husserl's Phenomonoloy. University of Wisconsin Press.
    Damian Byers analyzes the form Husserl gives to the problem of knowledge--the way this form influences the development of the phenomenological method, and the results of its application.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. Chadzynski (2008). Husserl's and Ingarden's Conception of the Cognitive Impasse. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 36 (2):93-99.
  11. Matthew Kimball Davis (1995). Ancient and Modern Approaches to the Problem of Relativism: A Study of Husserl, Locke and Plato. Dissertation, Boston College
    Relativism, provisionally definable as the view that no view is knowably better than any other, is widely accepted today. The purpose of this dissertation is to understand more fully what relativism is by looking at ancient and modern discussions of this view. ;Chapter one begins by considering Michael J. Sandel's recent discussion of a difficulty that modern liberalism faces in its acceptance of relativism. Sandel argues that relativism renders ineffective the attempt to promote toleration of various practices, and thus we (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Daniel Dwyer (2006). A Phenomenology of Cognitive Desire. Idealistic Studies 36 (1):47-60.
    In this article I articulate how phenomenology can and should appropriate the theme of Platonic cognitive erôs. Erôs has two principal meanings: sexual passion and the desire for the whole that characterizes the philosophical life; in its cognitive sense, it implies dissatisfaction with partial truth and aiming at the givenness of the whole. The kind of lived-experience in which the being-true of the world is presented to and affectively allures the knower is a phenomenological analogue to what in Plato is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Dagfinn Follesdal (2013). Rechtfertigung bei Husserl und Wittgenstein. In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Versuche über Husserl. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Amanda Gibeault, Toward an Engaged Account of Objectivity: Contributions From Early Phenomenology.
    In this dissertation, I develop an engaged understanding of objectivity, or good knowledge practices. I argue that for knowledge practices to be good, they must both be truth-conducive and engaged, that is, explicitly implicated in the critical appraisal of background values and assumptions. I pursue this argument in six stages. First, I consider work in epistemology that countenances a place for values in objectivity. I conclude from this that truth-conduciveness is not sufficient for objectivity, and that a social approach to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Leila Haaparanta (1999). On the Possibility of Naturalistic and of Pure Epistemology. Synthese 118 (1):31-47.
    This paper deals with two opposite metaphilosophical doctrines concerning the nature of philosophy. More specifically, it is a study of the naturalistic view that philosophical, hence also epistemological, knowledge cannot be distinguished from empirical knowledge, and of the antinaturalistic view that philosophical, hence also epistemological, knowledge, is pure, that is, independent of empirical knowledge and particularly of the special sciences. The conditions of the possibility of naturalistic and of pure epistemology are studied in terms of phenomenological philosophy. It is concluded (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Leo Jay Lipis (1999). Beyond Foundationalism and Relativism: A Phenomenological Critique of Truth, Knowledge, and Subjectivity in Husserl and Hegel. Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
    The dissertation examines Hegel's and Husserl's notions of truth, knowledge and subjectivity. Both philosophers are read as advocates of absolute truth, reached through phenomenological analyses in which subject and object putatively coincide. After reviewing Husserl's thought, the dissertation criticizes the concepts of subject and object, and transcendence and immanence, in three different examples: the perceptual object, the experience of the body, and the connection of individual subjects to time and other subjects. The dissertation concludes that Husserl's philosophical project is fundamentally (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Javier San Martín (1971). AGUIRRE, ANTONIO: Genetische Phänomenologie und Reduktion zur Letztbegründungder Wissenschaft aus der radikalen Skepsis im Denken E. Husserls. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 6 (6):121-123.
  18. Arne Naess (1954). Husserl on the Apodictic Evidence of Ideal Laws. Theoria 20 (1-3):53-63.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. U. Oktem (2009). Husserl's Evidence Problem. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 9 (1).
    This paper examines the concept of evidence, with specific focus on the problem of evidence in Husserl's phenomenology. How this problem was dealt with and resolved by philosophers such as Plato, Descartes and Kant is compared and contrasted with Husserl's approach, and the implications of the solution offered by Husserl discussed. Finally, in light of the issues outlined, it is assessed whether or not Husserl can be said possibly to have been philosophically inclined towards notions such as idealism, empiricism, solipsism (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Henry Pietersma (1979). The Phenomenological Reduction: Some Remarks on Its Role in Philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):37 - 44.
    The paper begins with a characterization of its methodological point designed to bring out those features that would recommend it to philosophers. The concept of this method is emphatically distinguished from the scope given to it by philosophers who actually use it. Husserl, For instance, Held that all philosophical questions are accessible by this method of reduction. In the last part of the paper I am suggesting that there is a legitimate form of skepticism which husserl's position fails to recognize.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Yrjö Reenpää (1966). Über Die Lehre Vom Wissen Darstellung Und Kommentar der Wissenslehren von Edmund Husserl Und Viktor von Weizsäcker Sowie Hinweis Auf Die Jenigen von Richard Bevan Braithwaite, Unsere Zeitzentrierte Theorie Und Die Theorie von Gotthard Günther. Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Claude Romano (2012). La phénoménologie doit-elle demeurer cartésienne ? Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):27-48.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Carlos Sanchez (2007). The Nature of Belief and the Method of Its Justification in Husserl's Philosophy. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 7 (2).
    The present paper attempts to accomplish the following: (1) to clarify and critically discuss the phenomenology of “belief” as we find it in Husserl’s Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, First Book (1913) (henceforward, Ideas I); (2) to clarify and critically discuss the manner in which the phenomenological method treats beliefs; (3) to clarify and critically discuss the manner of belief justification as described by the phenomenological method; and (4) to argue that, just as the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Lloyd Wayne Saunders (1980). Descriptive Certainty in Husserl and the Later Wittgenstein. Dissertation, Drew University
    The final chapter can only suggest how philosophy might respond to such a conclusion. Because descriptivism cannot conclusively be argued against on the basis of mediate assumptions, descriptivists can lose ground only by "losing faith" in their own descriptions, in this case by finding no criteria by which to choose between two mutually-exclusive and exhaustive descriptive systems. Belief should not here become unbelief--which is only a species of belief--but a suspension of belief, and maybe even the atrophy of the desire (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Janusz Sidorek (2010). Edmund Husserl’s Polemic Over Relativism and Skepticism. Early Phase. Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 55.
    Danger of skeptic consequences of relativism was one of the main motives which led Edmund Husserl to taking up polemic with psychologism. This polemic was discussed and analyzed repeatedly, so instead of speculating on validity and importance of each of the arguments used, I rather focus on the structure of argumentation articulated in Prolegomena to pure logic and to consider the role of frequently dismissed thread of the epistemological absolutism’s apology. For Husserl this absolutism is strictly connected with a conception (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Andrea Staiti (forthcoming). On Husserl’s Alleged Cartesianism and Conjunctivism: A Critical Reply to Claude Romano. Husserl Studies:1-19.
    In this paper I criticize Claude Romano’s recent characterization of Husserl’s phenomenology as a form of Cartesianism. Contra Romano, Husserl is not committed to the view that since individual things in the world are dubitable, then the world as a whole is dubitable. On the contrary, for Husserl doubt is a merely transitional phenomenon which can only characterize a temporary span of experience. Similarly, illusion is not a mode of experience in its own right but a retrospective way of characterizing (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Dallas Willard (1995). Knowledge. In Barry Smith & David Woodruff Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Husserl (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Woelert (2013). Technology, Knowledge, Governance: The Political Relevance of Husserl's Critique of the Epistemic Effects of Formalization. Continental Philosophy Review 46 (4):487-507.
    This paper explores the political import of Husserl’s critical discussion of the epistemic effects of the formalization of rational thinking. More specifically, it argues that this discussion is of direct relevance to make sense of the pervasive processes of ‘technization’, that is, of a mechanistic and superficial generation and use of knowledge, to be observed in current contexts of governance. Building upon Husserl’s understanding of formalization as a symbolic technique for abstraction in the thinking with and about numbers, I argue (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Gary Benjamin Wyner (1988). Toward a Phenomenology of Conscientious Action and a Theory of the Practicality of Reason: Studies in the History of the Problem. Dissertation, University of Southern California
    My thesis is that there is a way of understanding moral knowledge in terms of Husserl's theory of the fulfillment of consciousness which may unify the main types of views held with respect to "the practicality of reason." By "the practicality of reason" I mean the claim that moral knowledge of the appropriate kind constrains moral action. This knowledge is intuitive or experiential knowledge in contrast to mere thought, intentionality or reasoning. I claim that such knowledge is possible and that (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Reenpää Yrjö (1968). Über die Lehre vom Wissen. Darstellung und Kommentar der Wissenslehren von Edmund Husserl und Viktor von Weizsäcker sowie Hinweis auf diejenigen von Richard Bevan Braithwaite, unsere zeitzentrierte Theorie und die Theorie von Gotthard Günther. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 30 (1):177-180.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. V. Zatka (1990). On Husserl's Theory of the Constitution of Objectiving Meaning (in Czechoslovakian). Filosoficky Casopis (3):333-345.
    This study offers a critical analysis of Husserl's theory of meaning. The author commences by delineating the position and function of Husserl's meaning theory in the sum total of his phenomenological philosophy. He goes on to demonstrate that this theory was conceived as an integral component of Husserl's theory of knowledge. (edited).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Wei Zhang (2011). Scheler's Critique of Husserl's Phenomenological Understanding of "Objective a Priori". Prolegomena 10 (2):265-280.
    On the one hand, Scheler's critique of Kant's concept of a priori benefits from Husserl to a large extent, and it complements and deepens Husserl's. On the other hand, Scheler also critiques Husserl's definition of a priori. Husserl's material a priori as ideal object primarily thanks to his so-called "Bolzano- turn". In this connection, Scheler grabs hold of the relation of Husserl to Bolzano from the very beginning. For Scheler, Husserl thinks in a "platonic" way, and still falls in a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Wei Zhang (2011). Schelers Kritik an der phänomenologischen Auffassung des gegenständlichen Apriori bei Husserl. Prolegomena 10 (2):265-280.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
Husserl: Evidence
  1. Pilar Fernández Beites (1993). Evidencia y verdad. Unproblema en la fenomenología de E. Husserl. Logos 27:195-216.
    This paper reflects on how the possibility of meaningful evidence is to be assumed in view that all our linguistic exercises take place in the context of a discursive horizon where we are situated. To do this, the paper starts distinguishing two phenomena: first, the possibility of meaningful evidence and second, the horizontal character that is inherent to the deployment of linguistic meaning. Furthermore, through a discussion with Husserl and Wittgenstein, the paper considers how those two phenomena are to be (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rudolf Bernet (2008). Intention und Erfüllung, Evidenz und Wahrheit (VI. Logische Untersuchung. In Verena E. Mayer & Christopher Erhard (eds.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen. Akademie Verlag Berlin. 35--189.
  3. Leo J. Bostar (1987). The Methodological Significance of Husserl's Concept of Evidence and its Relation to the Idea of Reason. Husserl Studies 4 (2):143-167.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Leo Joseph Bostar (1986). The Development of Husserl's Concept of Evidence. Dissertation, New School for Social Research
    This study approaches the philosophy of Edmund Husserl as a theory of reason through an elaboration of his developing phenomenological determination of the experiential and methodological dimensions of the experience of evidence. The task is, then, two-fold: to trace Husserl's deepening understanding of the nature and theoretical centrality of the phenomenological concept of evidence and to uncover at the same time its relation to his growing insight into the nature of reason. To this end, the study is divided into chapters (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Deborah Chaffin (1985). Edmund Husserl, 'The Apodicticity of Recollection'. Husserl Studies 2 (1):3-32.
    The text "The Apodicticity of Recollection" dates from 1922-23, and may be viewed as Husserl's clear recognition of the extent to which the descriptive phenomenology of immediacy is bound up with a reconstructive phenomenology of justificiation. Such recognition is manifest through the original treatment he gives the analysis of internal time-consciousness, and especially memory. In addition, his remarks on the nature of the transcendental ego add much strength to the interpretation of this text as a contribution to Husserl's longstanding concern (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. R. Cobb-Stevens (1985). G. Heffernan, "Bedeutung Und Evidenz Bei Edmund Husserl". [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):225.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bernard P. Dauenhauer (1976). Husserl's Phenomenological Justification of Universal Rigorous Science. International Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):63-80.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George Heffernan (2013). Vom Wesen der Evidenz zur Evidenz vom Wesen. Eine kritische Analyse der methodologischen Reduktion der Evidenz auf adäquate Selbstgegebenheit in Husserls Die Idee der Phänomenologie. In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Versuche über Husserl. Meiner.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George Heffernan (2009). On Husserl's Remark That “[s]Elbst Eine Sich Als Apodiktisch Ausgebende Evidenz Kann Sich Als Täuschung Enthüllen …” (XVII 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (1):15-43.
    Addressing Walter Hopp’s original application of the distinction between agent-fallibility and method-fallibility to phenomenological inquiry concerning epistemic justification, I question whether these are the only two forms of fallibility that are useful or whether there are not also others that are needed. In doing so, I draw my inspiration from Husserl, who in the beginnings of his phenomenological investigations struggled with the distinction between noetic and noematic analyses. For example, in the Preface to the Second Edition of the Logical Investigations (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. George Heffernan (1999). A Study in the Sedimented Origins of Evidence: Husserl and His Contemporaries Engaged in a Collective Essay in the Phenomenology and Psychology of Epistemic Justification. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 16 (2):83-181.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. George Heffernan (1998). Miscellaneous Lucubrations on Husserl's Answer to the Question 'Was Die Evidenz Sei': A Contribution to the Phenomenology of Evidence on the Occasion of the Publication of Husserliana Volume XXX. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 15 (1):1-75.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. George Heffernan (1987). Bedeutung und Evidenz bei Edmund Husserl. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 177 (4):508-509.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. George Heffernan (1983). Bedeutung Und Evidenz Bei Edmund Husserl Das Verhältnis Zwischen der Bedeutungs- Und der Evidenztheorie in den "Logischen Untersuchungen" Und der "Formalen Und Transzendentalen Logik".
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Hemmendinger (1975). Husserl's Concepts of Evidence and Science. The Monist 59 (1):81-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Juha Himanka (2006). How Does a Dark Room Appear: Husserl's Illumination of the Breakthrough of Logical Investigations. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 6 (2):1-8.
    Evidence is the very core of Husserlian phenomenology, with the term “evidence” signifying for Husserl the phenomenological perspective on the question of truth. In contrast to the conventional philosophical understanding of “truth” in mainly epistemological terms, Husserl’s notion of “evidence”, as elaborated in his Logical Investigations (1900–1), is more essentially ontological, pointing to the way in which a phenomenon becomes clear to us in its constitution. Husserl’s main point in the Sixth Investigation was that we can “see” how evidence functions (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Walter Hopp (2009). Reply to Heffernan. Husserl Studies 25 (1):45-49.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nam-In Lee (2007). Experience and Evidence. Husserl Studies 23 (3):229-246.
    It is the aim of this paper to assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 1, I will summarize Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 2, I will delineate Husserl’s concept of experience and in Sect. 3, I will try to define the concept of evidence in Husserl. In Sect. 4–6, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concepts of evidence and show that Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence is out of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 202