This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
16 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
  1. Emmanuel Alloa (2016). Le monde existe-t-il sans nous? Le perspectivisme selon HUsserl. Philosophie:3-19.
  2. Lilian Alweiss (2009). Review of Robert Sokolowski, Phenomenology of the Human Person. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (3).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Alejandro Arango (2014). Husserl's Concept of Position-Taking and Second Nature. Phenomenology and Mind 6:168-176.
    I argue that Husserl’s concept of position-taking, Stellungnahme, is adequate to understand the idea of second nature as an issue of philosophical anthropology. I claim that the methodological focus must be the living subject that acts and lives among others, and that the notion of second nature must respond to precisely this fundamental active character of subjectivity. The appropriate concept should satisfy two additional desiderata. First, it should be able to develop alongside the biological, psychological, and social individual development. Second, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Thomas Attig (1980). Husserl and Descartes on the foundations of philosophy. Metaphilosophy 11 (1):17–35.
    The article considers a) husserl's adoption of a cartesian rationalistic goal of philosophy, B) his charge that descartes failed to make the transcendental turn toward the subject, And c) the divergent view of husserl and descartes on the "cogito" which determine the crucial differences in the priorities which they assign to metaphysics and epistemology within their first philosophies.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jocelyn Benoist & Sandra Laugier (eds.) (2004). Husserl Et Wittgenstein: De la Description de l'Experience a la Phenomenologie Linguistique. Olms.
  6. Gaston Berger (1972). The Cogito in Husserl's Philosophy. Evanston [Ill.]Northwestern University Press.
  7. Marcus Brainard (2007). “For a New World”: On the Practical Impulse of Husserlian Theory. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 23 (1):17–31.
    The thesis of this article is that in Husserlian phenomenology there is no opposition between theory and praxis. On the contrary, he understands the former to serve the latter, so as to usher in a new world. The means for doing is the phenomenological reduction or epoché. It gives the phenomenologist access to the starting point, the “first things,” and orients his/her striving towards reason and the renewal of humanity. Careful attention to the significance of the epoché also sheds light (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8. John J. Drummond (1992). Edmund Husserl's Reformation of Philosophy. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 66 (2):135-154.
  9. Wolfgang Walter Fuchs (1976). Phenomenology and the Metaphysics of Presence: An Essay in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. Nijhoff.
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE BEGINNING Phenomenology begins in the work of Edmund Husserl; the first of his phenomenological publications ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. James G. Hart (1989). Constitution and Reference in Husserl's Phenomenology of Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 6 (1):43-72.
    Reflection is the basic attitude of transcendental phenomenology. However, as we shall see in this essay, prereflective experiencing may make a unique claim for philosophical foundations - albeit a claim which can only occur when mediated by reflection.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Burt C. Hopkins (1985). Derrida's Reading of Husserl in Speech and Phenomena: Ontologism and the Metaphysics of Presence. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):193-214.
  12. Pierre Keller (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book Pierre Keller examines the distinctive contributions, and the respective limitations, of Husserl's and Heidegger's approach to fundamental elements of human experience. He shows how their accounts of time, meaning, and personal identity are embedded in important alternative conceptions of how experience may be significant for us, and discusses both how these conceptions are related to each other and how they fit into a wider philosophical context. His sophisticated and accessible account of the phenomenological philosophy of Husserl and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  13. Howard Damian Kelly (2013). Being and Time, §15: Around-for References and the Content of Mundane Concern. Dissertation, The University of Manchester
    This thesis articulates a novel interpretation of Heidegger’s explication of the being (Seins) of gear (Zeugs) in §15 of his masterwork Being and Time (1927/2006) and develops and applies the position attributed to Heidegger to explain three phenomena of unreflective action discussed in recent literature and articulate a partial Heideggerian ecological metaphysics. Since §15 of BT explicates the being of gear, Part 1 expounds Heidegger’s concept of the ‘being’ (Seins) of beings (Seienden) and two issues raised in the ‘preliminary methodological (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. J. N. Mohanty (1996). Kant and Husserl. Husserl Studies 13 (1):19-30.
  15. H. Pietersma (1966). Husserl's Concept of Philosophy. Dialogue 5 (3):425-442.
    As philosophers speak, they think that there are things whicht they can see and speak about as philosophers. But what are these things? And what is the general character of the philosopher's statements? How can we find out whether they are true? If, as is widely agreed, the philosopher does not rely on empirical research, in which direction ought we to look for the evidence to support philosophical statements? Husserl's transcendental-phenomenological reduction, we propose to show, can best be understood as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jeff Yoshimi (2015). The Metaphysical Neutrality of Husserlian Phenomenology. Husserl Studies 31 (1):1-15.
    I argue that Husserlian phenomenology is metaphysically neutral, in the sense of being compatible with multiple metaphysical frameworks. For example, though Husserl dismisses the concept of an unknowable thing in itself as “material nonsense”, I argue that the concept is coherent and that the existence of such things is compatible with Husserl’s phenomenology. I defend this metaphysical neutrality approach against a number of objections and consider some of its implications for Husserl interpretation.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography