This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
152 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 152
  1. T. Achourioti, H. Galinon, J. Martínez Fernández & K. Fujimoto, Unifying the Philosophy of Truth.
    This anthology of the very latest research on truth features the work of recognized luminaries in the field, put together following a rigorous refereeing process. Along with an introduction outlining the central issues in the field, it provides a unique and unrivaled view of contemporary work on the nature of truth, with papers selected from key conferences in 2011 such as Truth Be Told (Amsterdam), Truth at Work (Paris), Paradoxes of Truth and Denotation (Barcelona) and Axiomatic Theories of Truth (Oxford).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Mark Richard Alfino (1989). Representation and Closure in Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
    This dissertation examines the general problem of how to give a philosophical account of the nature of representation by looking at three specific philosophies of language and the philosophic treatment of fictional discourse. I argue that Edmund Husserl, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and J. L. Austin all try to give accounts of meaning by arguing for what I call a "closure of meaning" in language. The closure thesis is the claim that some set of criteria can exhaustively determine the ways in which (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Emmanuel Alloa (2014). Reflexiones del cuerpo: sobre la relación entre cuerpo y lenguaje. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 21:200-220.
    Aunque fueron muchos los intentos en la modernidad de superar el dualismo cuerpo y mente, las teorías filosóficas del lenguaje en muchos casos lo reintrodujeron de manera sutil pero no menos eficaz. El artículo discute varios teoremas para pensar la materialidad del signo y muestra la preponderancia, desde Kierkegaard hasta el estructuralismo post-Saussuriano, de pensar la materialización como algo necesario, pero arbitrario en su modalidad. En esta concepción, el cuerpo del lenguaje no es solamente aquello que se puede sino aquello (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Pedro Alves (unknown). Non-declarative Sentences and Communication in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Contributions to a Theory on Communicative Acts in the Light of Husserl and Austin. Phainomena 74.
    In this paper I discuss the consistency and accuracy of Husserl’s sketch of a theory about non-declarative sentences in the last chapter of Logical Investigations. Whereas the consistency is acknowledged, the accuracy is denied, because Husserl’s treatment of non-declarative phrases such as questions or orders implies that those phrases contain, in some way, a declarative sentence and an objectifying act. To construct a question like »is A B?« as being equivalent to a declarative sentence such as »I ask whether A (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Gérard Amicel (2006). La question du sens des noms propres dans les "Recherches logiques" de Husserl. Recherches Husserliennes 24:35-64.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Heidi Aschenberg (1987). Phänomenologische Philosophie und Sprache. Grundzüge der Sprachtheorien von Husserl, Pos und Merleau-Ponty, 1978, coll. « Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik », n° 96. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 177 (4):506-506.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Heidi Aschenberg (1978). Phänomenologische Philosophie Und Sprache Grundzüge D. Sprachtheorien von Husserl, Pos U. Merleau-Ponty. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Simone Aurora (2015). A Forgotten Source in the History of Linguistics: Husserl's Logical Investigations. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 11 (5).
    In appearance, Husserl’s writings seem not to have had any influence on linguistic research, nor does what the German philosopher wrote about language seem to be worth a place in the history of linguistics. The purpose of the paper is exactly to contrast this view, by reassessing both the position and the role of Husserl’s early masterpiece — the Logical Investigations — within the history of linguistics. To this end, I will focus mainly on the third (On the theory of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. SImone Aurora (2014). Lo "Strutturalismo" di Edmund Husserl. Janus. Quaderni Del Circolo Glossematico 13:21-36.
  10. Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (1997). Husserl's Theory of Language as Calculus Ratiocinator. Synthese 112 (3):303-321.
    This paper defends an interpretation of Husserl''s theory of language, specifically as it appears in the Logical Investigations, as an example of a larger body of theories dubbed ''language as calculus''. Although this particular interpretation has been previously defended by other authors, such as Hintikka and Kusch, this paper proposes to contribute to the discussion by arguing that what makes this interpretation plausible are Husserl''s distinction between the notions of meaning-intention and meaning-fulfillment, his view that meaning is instantiated through meaning-intending (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Wolfgang Becker (1990). Indexikalität, Wahrnehmung und Bedeutung bei Husserl. Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 24 (61):51-71.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. J. Benoist (1995). Husserl Et le Mythe de la Signification (Ie Recherche Logique). Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):526 - 552.
    The author attempts to demonstrate that the way in which Husserl is analysing 'meaning' in his 1st Logical Investigation, may be considered to be a test case for intentionality. Even at this early stage intentionality, which henceforth becomes a permanent model, is recognized as 'meaning', i.e. as signifying an object. Such an interpretation of the 'meaning' phenomenon is greatly diverging from the reductive intuitionism often attributed to Husserl. 'Meaning' is not dependent on intuition but constitutes by itselfa relation to an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Jocelyn Benoist (2008). Grammatik und Intentionalität (Ⅳ. Logische Untersuchung). In Verena Mayer (ed.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Jocelyn Benoist (2001). La théorie phénoménologique de la négation, entre acte et sens. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):21-35.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Jocelyn Benoist (2001). Intentionalit'e Et Langage Dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  16. Jocelyn Benoist (1999). L’a Priori Conceptuel: Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick. Vrin.
    Ce livre est consacré à la question du synthétique a priori, telle qu’elle peut se poser en termes modernes, à la lumière d’une confrontation entre les origines de la philosophie analytique et celles de la phénoménologie. On a souvent l’impression que, après la critique virulente adressée par le Cercle de Vienne à Husserl, la question serait aujourd’hui définitivement réglée. Le problème serait plutôt de savoir si on peut sauver la pureté d’une certaine forme d’analyticité de la remise en question quinienne (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Jocelyn Benoist (1997). De Kant à Bolzano: Husserl et l'analyticité. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale:217-238.
    Dans les Recherches Logiques, Husserl a recours à un concept d'analyticité qui s'écarte des définitions kantiennes. En fait, pour le comprendre, il faut se plonger dans la tradition d'analyse logique autrichienne qui remonte à Bolzano. L'analyticité est ici une propriété formelle, qui s'illustre par la possibilité de la mise en variables de propositions, leur vérité étant maintenue. Husserl ne laisse toutefois pas la question dans l'état dans lequel Bolzano l'avait laissée : surgit la question propre aux Recherches Logiques, qui est (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Jocelyn Benoist, Robert Brisart & Jacques English (1998). Liminaires Ph'enom'enologiques Recherches Sur le d'Eveloppement de la Th'eorie de la Signification de Husserl. Facultâes Universitaires Saint-Louis.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jocelyn Benoist & Sandra Laugier (eds.) (2004). Husserl Et Wittgenstein: De la Description de l'Experience a la Phenomenologie Linguistique. Olms.
  20. Christian Bermes (1997). Philosophie der Bedeutung Bedeutung Als Bestimmung Und Bestimmbarkeit : Eine Studie Zu Frege, Husserl, Cassirer Und Hönigswald.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Christian Beyer (2011). Husserl über Begriffe. In Verena Mayer, Christopher Erhard, Marisa Scherini & Uwe Meixner (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls. Karl Alber
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Christian Beyer (2001). A Neo-Husserlian Theory of Speaker's Reference. Erkenntnis 54 (3):277-297.
    It is not well known that in his Göttingen period (1900–1916) Edmund Husserl developed a kind of direct reference theory, anticipating,among other things, the distinction between referential and attributive use of adefinite description, which was rediscovered by Keith Donnellan in 1966 and further analysed by Saul Kripke in 1977. This paper defends the claim that Husserl''s idea of the mental act given voice to in an utterance sheds new light on that distinction and particularly on cases where semantic referent and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Christian Beyer (1998). Von Bolzano zu Husserl. Eine Untersuchung über den Ursprung der phänomenologischen Bedeutungslehre. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 60 (4):767-768.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Philip Blosser (1990). The A Priori in Phenomenology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy Today 34 (3):195-205.
  25. Davide Bordini (2011). The Analytic, the Synthetic and the a Priori: A Matter of Form. The Debate Between Husserlian Phenomenology and Logical Empiricism. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 66 (2):205-230.
  26. Davide Bordini (2011). Analitico, sintetico e a priori: questioni di forma. Il dibattito tra fenomenologia husserliana e empirismo logico. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 2.
    This article sketches out the key features of the debate on the analytic-synthetic distinction between phenomenology and logical empiricism, which took place in the early part of the twentieth century. On the one side, the author reconstructs the debate itself from an historical angle; on the other, he gives a theoretical account of the different positions and arguments. In particular, he has three main aims: a) to clarify how, according to Husserl, the analyticsynthetic opposition is to be understood as the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Philip J. Bossert (1976). "Husserlian Meditations: How Words Present Things," by Robert Sokolowski. Modern Schoolman 53 (3):307-308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. C. Struyker Boudier (1979). Husserls bijdrage aan de logika en de genealogie Van de vraag. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 41 (2):217 - 259.
    Husserl war wie die meisten Logiker seiner Zeit vor allem am apophantischen Sprachgebrauch, an der logischen Problematik des Urteils, interessiert : mehr als seine Vorgänger und Zeitgenossen jedoch hat er sich auch eingehend mit der Problematik des nicht-apophantischen Sprachgebrauchs, im besonderen mit Logik und Genealogie der Frage beschäftigt. Im ersten Teil dieses Beitrags wird ein Uebersicht über die Positionen seiner Zeitgenossen und Vorgänger in diesem Bereich gegeben : implizit oder explizit hat Husserl gegen diese Auffassungen, in der Weise einer mittelalterlichen (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Peer F. Bundgaard (2004). The Ideal Scaffolding of Language: Husser's Fourth Logical Investigation in the Light of Cognitive Linguistics. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):49-80.
    One of the central issues in linguistics is whether or not language should be considered a self-contained, autonomous formal system, essentially reducible to the syntactic algorithms of meaning construction (as Chomskyan grammar would have it), or a holistic-functional system serving the means of expressing pre-organized intentional contents and thus accessible with respect to features and structures pertaining to other cognitive subsystems or to human experience as such (as Cognitive Linguistics would have it). The latter claim depends critically on the existence (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. O. S. C. (1977). Language and the Phenomenological Reductions of Edmund Husserl. Review of Metaphysics 31 (2):314-315.
  31. Gary L. Cesarz (1985). Meaning, Individuals, and the Problem of Bare Particulars: A Study in Husserl's Ideas. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):157-168.
  32. A. Chrudzimski (2002). From Brentano to Ingarden. Phenomenological Theory of Meaning. Husserl Studies 18 (3):185-208.
  33. R. Cobb-Stevens (1985). G. Heffernan, "Bedeutung Und Evidenz Bei Edmund Husserl". [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):225.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Francisco Conde (2007). Derrida contra Husserl: la crítica de la voz y el fenómeno a la teoría del signo de la primera investigación lógica de Husserl. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas 5:153-207.
    In this article the author tries to deconstruct the critic against Husserl´s analysis of the signs in the first logical investigation as it is exposed in Derridas ´s work Speech and Phenomena . Derrida’s main critic is that the husserlian distinction between two kinds of signs – expressions and indications- is unjustified and artificial. He also rejects the husserlian topic that sustains the ideality of significations and misinterprets the concept of meaning by understanding it as “the intention to say something”. (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Simona Cresti (2012). Contesto e prospettiva. Note sull'indicalità fenomenologica. Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 18 (1):99-126.
    The aim of this paper is to analyze some rising issues that indexicality places to Husserl’s phenomenological semantics. We will conduct the discussion availing ourselves of the husserlian formulation of the problem and his attempt to solution, and of approaches to the problem from analytic philosophy and linguistics. In particular, in order to understand what essentially characterize indexicality and make it a puzzling problem, we will examine two of its fundamental features, that is the relationships it maintains with context and (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Steven Galt Crowell (1996). Husserl, Derrida, and the Phenomenology of Expression. Philosophy Today 40 (1-4):61-70.
    This article examines the presuppositions underlying Derrida's criticisms of Husserl's theory of expression, and philosophy of language generally. I argue that Derrida's claim that indication (and so the sign-function) is present at the heart of phenomenological "expression" is based on an unwarranted substitution of a Hegelian structure of reflection for Husserl's own phenomenological concept of reflection and evidence. I then criticize a different sort of unclarity in Husserl's analysis of the noetic and noematic relations between "expressive" (linguistic) and "preexpressive" sense. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Suzanne Cunningham (1983). Husserl and Private Languages: A Response to Hutcheson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (1):103-111.
  38. Suzanne Cunningham (1976). Language and the Phenomenological Reductions of Edmund Husserl. Nijhoff.
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Rene" Descartes started modern Western philosophy on its search for an absolutely certain foundation for knowledge. ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  39. Suzanne M. Cunningham (1972). Language and Intersubjectivity in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. Dissertation, The Florida State University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Suzanne Cunningham & Lenore Langsdorf (1979). Language, the Reductions, and "Immanence". Research in Phenomenology 9 (1):247-259.
  41. Vittorio De Palma (2008). Husserls phänomenologische Semiotik (Ⅰ. Logische Untersuchung, §§ 1-23 ). In Verena Mayer (ed.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen.
  42. Jacques Derrida (2011). Voice and Phenomenon: Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl's Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
    Translator's introduction: The germinal structure of Derrida's thought -- Translator's note -- Introduction -- Sign and signs -- The reduction of indication -- Meaning as soliloquy -- Meaning and representation -- The sign and the blink of an eye -- The voice that keeps silent -- The originative supplement.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. George Duke & Peter Woelert (2016). Husserl and the Problem of Abstract Objects. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):27-47.
    One major difficulty confronting attempts to clarify the epistemological and ontological status of abstract objects is determining the sense, if any, in which such entities may be characterised as mind and language independent. Our contention is that the tolerant reductionist position of Michael Dummett can be strengthened by drawing on Husserl's mature account of the constitution of ideal objects and mathematical objectivity. According to the Husserlian position we advocate, abstract singular terms pick out weakly mind-independent sedimented meaning-contents. These meaning-contents serve (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Christopher Erhard (2011). Empirische Bedeutung und Twin Earth - Husserls Bedeutungstheorie modifiziert. In Verena Mayer, Christopher Erhard, Marisa Scherini & Uwe Meixner (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls. Karl Alber
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Faustino Fabbianelli (2015). Bezeichnung Und Kennzeichnung. Theodor Conrads Bedeutungslehre in Auseinandersetzung MIT Husserl. Studia Phaenomenologica 15:207-226.
    This paper aims to show how Th eodor Conrad’s theory of meaning goes beyond that of Husserl. By drawing on an unedited typescript dating from the 1950s in which the Munich phenomenologist outlines the controversy between Husserl and the so-called Munich-Göttingen group, I interpret the Bezeichnung–Kennzeichung opposition that Conrad introduces in an article from 1910 as a realist position opposing Husserl’s act-phenomenological concept of meaning. This position stands in contrast not only to the phansisch or phänologisch theory of meaning in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Christian Ferencz-Flatz (2010). ""The Term" Expression" in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies 26 (3):189-203.
  47. José Ruiz Fernández (2009). Evidencia, juegos de lenguaje y la posibilidad de la fenomenología. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 41:259-284.
    En este ensayo se trata de pensar cómo tiene que asumirse la posibilidad de una evidencia significativa toda vez que a nuestro quehacer lingüístico parece ser inherente moverse en un horizonte de usos en el que estamos arraigados. Se trata además de pensar cómo lo anterior pueda condicionar la realización de un quehacer fenomenológico. Para ello, en primer lugar, se distinguirán con claridad dos fenómenos: la posibilidad de la evidencia significativa, de un lado, y el arraigo horizóntico inherente a nuestro (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Denis Fisette (1998). The Horizon of the Self: Husserl on Indexicals. In Dan Zahavi (ed.), Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity. Dordrecht: Kluwer 119--135.
    One of the questions raised by the conference’s topic, in particular the relationship between the self and the other, a matter much discussed since Merleau-Ponty’s death, is the question of husserlian phenomenology’s cartesianism. Some believe that despite his reservations towards cartesianism, Husserl never disavowed his commitment to the Cartesian program of a first philosophy.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Fausto Fraisopi (2008). Les deux faces du logos chez Husserl : Du couple expression/signification au couple signification/syntaxe. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (1).
    À partir de la définition de la phénoménologie dans les Recherches logiques , Husserl revient systématiquement sur la définition des structures fondamentales de sa pensée dans ses cours à l’Université de Göttingen. Parmi ces cours, celui de logique de l’année 1902-1903 (Logik Vorlesung 1902/03) revêt une importance essentielle pour la définition de l’orientation de la phénoménologie vers le tournant « transcendantal ». En commentant les textes de trois paragraphes fondamentaux de ce cours, ceux qui traitent du lien entre la théorie (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Alain Gallerand (2014). Husserl Et le Phénomène de la Signification. Vrin.
    Le présent ouvrage propose une étude historique et critique d’une des questions les plus importantes de la philosophie contemporaine et des sciences humaines : qu’est-ce que signifier veut dire? L’auteur envisage la théorie de la signification dans l’ensemble du corpus husserlien et prend en compte ces différents aspects . En inscrivant la théorie husserlienne dans son contexte historique , ce travail s’attache ainsi à éclairer d’un jour nouveau un moment clé de l’histoire de la philosophie. Pour Husserl, la signification n’est (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 152