This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
105 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 105
  1. Emmanuel Alloa (2014). Reflexiones del cuerpo: sobre la relación entre cuerpo y lenguaje. Eidos 21:200-220.
    Aunque fueron muchos los intentos en la modernidad de superar el dualismo cuerpo y mente, las teorías filosóficas del lenguaje en muchos casos lo reintrodujeron de manera sutil pero no menos eficaz. El artículo discute varios teoremas para pensar la materialidad del signo y muestra la preponderancia, desde Kierkegaard hasta el estructuralismo post-Saussuriano, de pensar la materialización como algo necesario, pero arbitrario en su modalidad. En esta concepción, el cuerpo del lenguaje no es solamente aquello que se puede sino aquello (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (1997). Husserl's Theory of Language as Calculus Ratiocinator. Synthese 112 (3):303-321.
    This paper defends an interpretation of Husserl''s theory of language, specifically as it appears in the Logical Investigations, as an example of a larger body of theories dubbed ''language as calculus''. Although this particular interpretation has been previously defended by other authors, such as Hintikka and Kusch, this paper proposes to contribute to the discussion by arguing that what makes this interpretation plausible are Husserl''s distinction between the notions of meaning-intention and meaning-fulfillment, his view that meaning is instantiated through meaning-intending (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Wolfgang Becker (1990). Indexikalität, Wahrnehmung und Bedeutung bei Husserl. Conceptus 24 (61):51-71.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jocelyn Benoist (2008). Grammatik und Intentionalität (Ⅳ. Logische Untersuchung). In Verena Mayer (ed.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jocelyn Benoist (2001). La théorie phénoménologique de la négation, entre acte et sens. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):21-35.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jocelyn Benoist (2001). Intentionalit'e Et Langage Dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  7. Jocelyn Benoist (1999). L’a Priori Conceptuel: Bolzano, Husserl, Schlick. Vrin.
    Ce livre est consacré à la question du synthétique a priori, telle qu’elle peut se poser en termes modernes, à la lumière d’une confrontation entre les origines de la philosophie analytique et celles de la phénoménologie. On a souvent l’impression que, après la critique virulente adressée par le Cercle de Vienne à Husserl, la question serait aujourd’hui définitivement réglée. Le problème serait plutôt de savoir si on peut sauver la pureté d’une certaine forme d’analyticité de la remise en question quinienne (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jocelyn Benoist (1997). De Kant à Bolzano : Husserl et l'analyticité. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale:217-238.
    Dans les Recherches Logiques, Husserl a recours à un concept d'analyticité qui s'écarte des définitions kantiennes. En fait, pour le comprendre, il faut se plonger dans la tradition d'analyse logique autrichienne qui remonte à Bolzano. L'analyticité est ici une propriété formelle, qui s'illustre par la possibilité de la mise en variables de propositions, leur vérité étant maintenue. Husserl ne laisse toutefois pas la question dans l'état dans lequel Bolzano l'avait laissée : surgit la question propre aux Recherches Logiques, qui est (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jocelyn Benoist, Robert Brisart & Jacques English (1998). Liminaires Ph'enom'enologiques Recherches Sur le d'Eveloppement de la Th'eorie de la Signification de Husserl. Facultâes Universitaires Saint-Louis.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jocelyn Benoist & Sandra Laugier (eds.) (2004). Husserl Et Wittgenstein: De la Description de l'Experience a la Phenomenologie Linguistique. Olms.
  11. Christian Bermes (1997). Philosophie der Bedeutung Bedeutung Als Bestimmung Und Bestimmbarkeit : Eine Studie Zu Frege, Husserl, Cassirer Und Hönigswald.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Christian Beyer (2011). Husserl über Begriffe. In Verena Mayer, Christopher Erhard, Marisa Scherini & Uwe Meixner (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls. Karl Alber.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christian Beyer (2001). A Neo-Husserlian Theory of Speaker's Reference. Erkenntnis 54 (3):277-297.
    It is not well known that in his Göttingen period (1900–1916) Edmund Husserl developed a kind of direct reference theory, anticipating,among other things, the distinction between referential and attributive use of adefinite description, which was rediscovered by Keith Donnellan in 1966 and further analysed by Saul Kripke in 1977. This paper defends the claim that Husserl''s idea of the mental act given voice to in an utterance sheds new light on that distinction and particularly on cases where semantic referent and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Philip Blosser (1990). The A Priori in Phenomenology and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy Today 34 (3):195-205.
  15. Davide Bordini (2011). The Analytic, the Synthetic and the a Priori: A Matter of Form. The Debate Between Husserlian Phenomenology and Logical Empiricism. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 66 (2):205-230.
  16. Philip J. Bossert (1976). "Husserlian Meditations: How Words Present Things," by Robert Sokolowski. Modern Schoolman 53 (3):307-308.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Peer F. Bundgaard (2004). The Ideal Scaffolding of Language: Husser's Fourth Logical Investigation in the Light of Cognitive Linguistics. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):49-80.
    One of the central issues in linguistics is whether or not language should be considered a self-contained, autonomous formal system, essentially reducible to the syntactic algorithms of meaning construction (as Chomskyan grammar would have it), or a holistic-functional system serving the means of expressing pre-organized intentional contents and thus accessible with respect to features and structures pertaining to other cognitive subsystems or to human experience as such (as Cognitive Linguistics would have it). The latter claim depends critically on the existence (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gary L. Cesarz (1985). Meaning, Individuals, and the Problem of Bare Particulars: A Study in Husserl's Ideas. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):157-168.
  19. A. Chrudzimski (2002). From Brentano to Ingarden. Phenomenological Theory of Meaning. Husserl Studies 18 (3):185-208.
  20. Francisco Conde (2007). Derrida contra Husserl: la crítica de la voz y el fenómeno a la teoría del signo de la primera investigación lógica de Husserl. Investigaciones Fenomenológicas 5:153-207.
    In this article the author tries to deconstruct the critic against Husserl´s analysis of the signs in the first logical investigation as it is exposed in Derridas ´s work Speech and Phenomena . Derrida’s main critic is that the husserlian distinction between two kinds of signs – expressions and indications- is unjustified and artificial. He also rejects the husserlian topic that sustains the ideality of significations and misinterprets the concept of meaning by understanding it as “the intention to say something”. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Simona Cresti (2012). Contesto e prospettiva. Note sull'indicalità fenomenologica. Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 18 (1):99-126.
    The aim of this paper is to analyze some rising issues that indexicality places to Husserl’s phenomenological semantics. We will conduct the discussion availing ourselves of the husserlian formulation of the problem and his attempt to solution, and of approaches to the problem from analytic philosophy and linguistics. In particular, in order to understand what essentially characterize indexicality and make it a puzzling problem, we will examine two of its fundamental features, that is the relationships it maintains with context and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Steven Galt Crowell (1996). Husserl, Derrida, and the Phenomenology of Expression. Philosophy Today 40 (1-4):61-70.
    This article examines the presuppositions underlying Derrida's criticisms of Husserl's theory of expression, and philosophy of language generally. I argue that Derrida's claim that indication (and so the sign-function) is present at the heart of phenomenological "expression" is based on an unwarranted substitution of a Hegelian structure of reflection for Husserl's own phenomenological concept of reflection and evidence. I then criticize a different sort of unclarity in Husserl's analysis of the noetic and noematic relations between "expressive" (linguistic) and "preexpressive" sense. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Suzanne Cunningham (1983). Husserl and Private Languages: A Response to Hutcheson. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44 (1):103-111.
  24. Suzanne Cunningham (1976). Language and the Phenomenological Reductions of Edmund Husserl. Nijhoff.
    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Rene" Descartes started modern Western philosophy on its search for an absolutely certain foundation for knowledge. ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Suzanne M. Cunningham (1972). Language and Intersubjectivity in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl. Dissertation, The Florida State University
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Suzanne Cunningham & Lenore Langsdorf (1979). Language, the Reductions, and "Immanence". Research in Phenomenology 9 (1):247-259.
  27. Jacques Derrida (2011). Voice and Phenomenon: Introduction to the Problem of the Sign in Husserl's Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
    Translator's introduction: The germinal structure of Derrida's thought -- Translator's note -- Introduction -- Sign and signs -- The reduction of indication -- Meaning as soliloquy -- Meaning and representation -- The sign and the blink of an eye -- The voice that keeps silent -- The originative supplement.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Christian Ferencz-Flatz (2010). The Term" Expression" in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies 26 (3):189-203.
  29. José Ruiz Fernández (2009). Evidencia, juegos de lenguaje y la posibilidad de la fenomenología. Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 41:259-284.
    En este ensayo se trata de pensar cómo tiene que asumirse la posibilidad de una evidencia significativa toda vez que a nuestro quehacer lingüístico parece ser inherente moverse en un horizonte de usos en el que estamos arraigados. Se trata además de pensar cómo lo anterior pueda condicionar la realización de un quehacer fenomenológico. Para ello, en primer lugar, se distinguirán con claridad dos fenómenos: la posibilidad de la evidencia significativa, de un lado, y el arraigo horizóntico inherente a nuestro (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Denis Fisette (1998). The Horizon of the Self: Husserl on Indexicals. In Dan Zahavi (ed.), Self-Awareness, Temporality, and Alterity. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 119--135.
    One of the questions raised by the conference’s topic, in particular the relationship between the self and the other, a matter much discussed since Merleau-Ponty’s death, is the question of husserlian phenomenology’s cartesianism. Some believe that despite his reservations towards cartesianism, Husserl never disavowed his commitment to the Cartesian program of a first philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Fausto Fraisopi (2008). Les deux faces du logos chez Husserl : Du couple expression/signification au couple signification/syntaxe. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (1).
    À partir de la définition de la phénoménologie dans les Recherches logiques , Husserl revient systématiquement sur la définition des structures fondamentales de sa pensée dans ses cours à l’Université de Göttingen. Parmi ces cours, celui de logique de l’année 1902-1903 (Logik Vorlesung 1902/03) revêt une importance essentielle pour la définition de l’orientation de la phénoménologie vers le tournant « transcendantal ». En commentant les textes de trois paragraphes fondamentaux de ce cours, ceux qui traitent du lien entre la théorie (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Alain Gallerand (2013). Indexicalité Et Horizon Chez Husserl. Dialogue 52 (1):129-163.
    Because the meaning of indexical expressions fluctuates, they have long been enigmatic for the theory of signification in phenomenology. In Husserlsymbolicintentional horizonproper concept” provide answers. Without the new phenomenological value of the theory of concept and intentionality, it is impossible to understand the linguistic operation of indexicality.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Alain Gallerand (2011). Le problème de la transcendance des significations dans l'idéalisme phénoménologique transcendantal. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (3):1-27.
    Sur le modèle des représentations et des propositions en soi de Bolzano, Husserl a envisagé les significations comme des unités idéales-objectives qui sont accessibles à plusieurs consciences et qui perdurent au-delà des actes psychiques passagers dans lesquels elles se réalisent. Indépen­dantes des opérations subjectives, les unités sémantiques seraient donc transcendantes, c’est-à-dire extérieures à la conscience. Cependant, en posant la subjectivité transcendantale comme un absolu par rapport auquel tout objet, réel ou idéal, se définit, la phénoménologie transcendantale-constitutive est finalement incapable de (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. Giorgi (1998). Logic and Time: An Essay on Husserl's Theory of Meaning, by Krzysztof Michalski. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 29:150-151.
  35. Luz María Guerrero (2001). Dinámica Social y Contenido Fenomenológico de la Expresión y Significación. Cinta de Moebio 11.
    This essay tries to answer the question about the actual relationship between social dynamics and the phenomenological content of expression and meaning.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Guillermo Haddock (2007). On the Semantics of Mathematical Statements/Sobre a Semântica Dos Enunciados Matemáticos. Manuscrito 30 (2):317-340.
    Husserl developed – independently of Frege – a semantics of sense and reference. There are, however, some important differences, specially with respect to the references of statements. According to Husserl, an assertive sentence refers to a state of affairs, which was its basis what he called a situation of affairs. Situations of affairs could also be considered as an alternative referent for statements on their own right, although for Husserl they were simply a sort of referential basis. Both Husserlian states (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1982). Remarks on Sense and Reference in Frege and Husserl. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):425-439.
    Frege's semantics of sense and reference and two husserlian alternatives are discussed. it is shown that husserl neither took his semantics of sense and reference from frege nor abandoned psychologism under his influence. frege's arguments on behalf of his choice of truth values as the reference of statements and of concepts as the reference of conceptual words are submitted to criticism. some algebraic considerations are sketched in the last part of the article.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Charles W. Harvey (1986). Husserl's Phenomenology and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Reexamination. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 3 (3):191-207.
  39. Risto Hilpinen (2013). Conception, Sense, and Reference in Peircean Semiotics. Synthese:1-28.
    In his Logical Investigations Edmund Husserl criticizes John Stuart Mill’s account of meaning as connotation, especially Mill’s failure to separate the distinction between connotative and non-connotative names from the distinction between the meaningful and the meaningless. According to Husserl, both connotative and non-connotative names have meaning or “signification”, that is, what Gottlob Frege calls the sense (“Sinn”) of an expression. The distinction between connotative and non-connotative names is a distinction between two kinds of meaning (or sense), attributive and non-attributive meaning (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Peter Hutcheson (1987). Transcendental Phenomenology and Possible Worlds Semantics. Husserl Studies 4 (3):225-242.
    Are transcendental phenomenology and possible worlds semantics, two seemingly disparate, perhaps even incompatible philosophical traditions, actually complementary? Have two well-known representatives of each tradition, J.N. Mohanty and J. Hintikka, misinterpreted the other's philosophical "program" in such a way that they did not recognize the complementarity? Charles Harvey 1 has recently argued that the answer to both questions is "yes." Here I intend to argue that the answer to the first is unclear, whereas the answer to the second is "no." Mohanty (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter Hutcheson (1981). Husserl and Private Languages. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):111-118.
  42. Carlo Ierna (2008). Husserl's Critique of Double Judgments. In Filip Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives. Springer. 49--73.
    In this paper I will discuss Edmund Husserl’s critique of Franz Brentano’s interpretation of categorical judgments as Double Judgments (Doppelurteile). This will be developed mostly as an internal critique, within the framework of the school of Brentano, and not through a direct contrast with Husserl’s own theory of judgment, as presented e.g. in the Fifth Investigation. Already during the 1890s Husserl overcame the psychologistic aspects of Brentano’s approach, advocating the importance of analysing the logical structure underlying language independently from psychology. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Hans Ineichen (1982). Intentionalität und Sprache. Grazer Philosophische Studien 15:21-41.
    Der theoretische Sinn von "intentional" wird vom praktischen unterschieden. Brentano vermag nicht zu erklären, was er unter "intentionaler Inexistenz eines Gegenstandes", d.h. "immanenter Gegenständlichkeit" versteht. Erst Husserl erklärt innerhalb seiner Analyse intentionaler Akte, was Brentano mit "intentionaler Beziehung" gemeint hat. Dabei zeigt sich, daß Bedeutungsintentionen auf Sprache bezogen sind. Husserl aber übersieht, daß intentionale Verben Dispositionsverben sind; der Zusammenhang zwischen sprachlichem Verhalten und Dispositionen bleibt ungeklärt. Aus Husserls Analyse lassen sich leicht die Kriterien gewinnen welche Chisholm u.a. als sprachliche Kriterien (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Fred Kersten (1977). Robert Sokolowski, "Husserlian Meditations. How Words Present Things". [REVIEW] Man and World 10 (3):351.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Hubert Knoblauch (1985). Zwischen Einsamkeit Und Wechselrede: Zur Kommunikation Und Ihrer Konstitution Bei Edmund Husserl. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (1):33-52.
  46. D. R. Koukal (2001). The Rhetorical Impulse in Husserl's Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 34 (1):21-43.
  47. Martin Kusch (1989). Language as Calculus Vs. Language as Universal Medium a Study in Husserl, Heidegger, and Gadamer.
  48. Martin Kusch (1988). Husserl and Heidegger on Meaning. Synthese 77 (1):99 - 127.
  49. Bruno Leclercq (2012). Le tournant linguistique et son contre-virage phénoménologique. Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):7-26.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Nam-In Lee (2010). Phenomenology of Language Beyond the Deconstructive Philosophy of Language. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):465-481.
    In Speech and Phenomena and other works, Derrida criticizes Husserl’s phenomenology and attempts to pave the way to his deconstructive philosophy. The starting point of his criticism of Husserl’s phenomenology is his assessment of the latter’s phenomenology of language developed in the Logical Investigations . Derrida claims that Husserl’s phenomenology of language in the Logical Investigations and the subsequent works is guided by the premise of the metaphysics of presence. The aim of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 105