This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
68 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 68
  1. Joseph Becker (1993). The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
  2. Angela Ales Bello (1994). Peirce and Husserl: Abduction, Apperception and Aesthetics. In Herman Parret (ed.). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 113-121.
  3. Darrin W. Belousek (1998). Husserl on Scientific Method and Conceptual Change: A Realist Appraisal. Synthese 115 (1):71-98.
    Husserl claimed that all theoretical scientific concepts originate in and are valid in reference to 'life-world' experience and that scientific traditions preserve the sense and validity of such concepts through unitary and cumulative change. Each of these claims will, in turn, be sympathetically laid out and assessed in comparison with more standard characterizations of scientific method and conceptual change as well as the history of physics, concerning particularly the challenge they may pose for scientific realism. The Husserlian phenomenological framework is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Daniel Bischur (2011). Animated Bodies in Immunological Practices: Craftsmanship, Embodied Knowledge, Emotions and Attitudes Toward Animals. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):407-429.
    Taking up the body turn in sociology, this paper discusses scientific practices as embodied action from the perspective of Husserl’s phenomenological theory of the “Body”. Based on ethnographic data on a biology laboratory it will discuss the importance of the scientist’s Body for the performance of scientific activities. Successful researchers have to be skilled workers using their embodied knowledge for the process of tinkering towards the material transformation of their objects for data production. The researcher’s body then is an instrument (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michel Bitbol (2010). Facts and Time in Quantum Mechanics: A Study in Phenomenology and Pragmatics. Manuscrito 33 (1):73-121.
    The concept of well-defined and mutually exclusive objective facts has no counterpart in the formalism of standard quantum mechanics. Bypassing decoherence theories, we then inquire into the conditions of use of this concept of objective fact, and find that it is grounded on the possibility of making reference to spatio-temporal continuants and permanent properties. Since these conditions are not fulfilled within the quantum paradigm, one must look for appropriate substitutes. Two such substitutes are discussed. The first one is phenomenal fact (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Lawrence E. Cahoone (1986). The Interpretation of Galilean Science: Cassirer Contrasted with Husserl and Heidegger. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (1):1-21.
  7. Guido Caniglia (2006). La matematizzazione dei plena. Un esempio di analisi fenomenologica. Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 12:119-144.
    Plena are the characteristic properties of material thing, of the thing we perceive in our daily experience. According to Husserl, the attempt to explain their features into the language of Physics is the core of the modern science of nature. Colours and smells are not directly reducible to geometrical forms and algebraic functions. In order to explain natural processes using mathematical terms, scientists need to find out how it is possible to measure them. Galileo claims that the world is made (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Maria Eliza Cruz, The Self and Its World: Husserlian Contributions to a Metaphysics of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Principle in Quantum Physics.
    This paper centers on the implicit metaphysics beyond the Theory of Relativity and the Principle of Indeterminacy – two revolutionary theories that have changed 20th Century Physics – using the perspective of Husserlian Transcedental Phenomenology. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) and Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976) abolished the theoretical framework of Classical (Galilean- Newtonian) physics that has been complemented, strengthened by Cartesian metaphysics. Rene Descartes (1596- 1850) introduced a separation between subject and object (as two different and self- enclosed substances) while Galileo and Newton (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Robert D'Amico (1981). Husserl on the Foundational Structures of Natural and Cultural Sciences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):5-22.
  10. James W. Garrison (1986). Husserl, Galileo, and the Processes of Idealization. Synthese 66 (2):329 - 338.
    This essay is concerned with the processes of idealization as described by Husserl in his last work, "The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology". Central as the processes of idealization are to Husserl's reflections on the origin of natural scientific knowledge and his attempt to reground that knowledge in the "forgotten meaning-fundament of natural science," they have not always been well understood. One reason for this is the lack of concrete historical examples. The main purpose of this paper is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gary Gutting (1978). Husserl and Scientific Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):42-56.
    THE GOAL OF THIS PAPER IS TO DEFEND SCIENTIFIC REALISM (OF\nTHE SORT PROPOSED BY WILFRID SELLARS) AGAINST THE ATTACK ON\nIT IMPLICIT IN HUSSERL'S "CRISIS". IN PARTICULAR, I DISCUSS\nTHREE ANTI-REALIST HUSSERLIAN THESES: (1) THAT THE METHOD\nOF SCIENCE IS IN ESSENCE ONE OF THE IDEALIZATION; (2) THAT\nALL SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS CAN BE TRACED BACK TO OUR\nLIFE-WORLD EXPERIENCE; (3) THAT ANY SCIENTIFIC DESCRIPTION\nOF THE WORLD NECESSARILY OMITS MAJOR DIMENSIONS OF OUR\nLIFE-WORLD EXPERIENCES. I ARGUE THAT EACH OF THESE THESES\nIS INCONSISTENT WITH A CORRECT UNDERSTANDING OF (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Lee Patrick Hardy (1988). The Problem of Theoretical Existence in Husserl's Philosophy of the Physical Sciences. Dissertation, Duquesne University
    The thesis of this dissertation is that in the Crisis Edmund Husserl held to an instrumentalist interpretation of scientific laws only. His position is therefore compatible with the realist construal of scientific theories. The study is divided into three parts. In part one, one chapter is devoted to an explication of Husserl's idea of science, deductive and empirical; the second chapter traces the development of Husserl's phenomenological approach to the foundations of the sciences--from the pure logic of the Logical Investigations, (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Charles W. Harvey (1986). Husserl and the Problem of Theoretical Entities. Synthese 66 (2):291 - 309.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Charles William Harvey (1989). Husserl's Phenomenology and the Foundations of Natural Science. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Husserl's Phenomenology and the Foundations of Natural Science develops a reading of Husserl's phenomenology as a response to the philosophical problems motivated by the metaphysics of early natural science; in particular, the problems which grew from the methodological distinction between a real objective world and the so-called "subjective" world in which we live. ;Husserl's unfulfilled claim in the Ideas 33) that the epoche and reductions will be developed in a graded series is taken to heart, and this graded series is (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Patrick A. Heelan (2003). Husserl, Lonergan, and Paradoxes of Measurement. Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis 3.
    My scientific field is theoretical physics. My philosophical orientation is phenomenology, especially hermeneutical phenomenology, as modified and extended under the influence of Bernard Lonergan's cognitional theory. In fact, I was already deeply under the influence of Bernard Lonergan's workbefore I went to Louvain/Leuven to study phenomenology as a propaedeutic to my preparation in the philosophy of science. The specific topic of this paper is one close to the center of Philip's interest, namely, to articulate the right balance among theory, experiment, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Patrick A. Heelan (1991). Charles W. Harvey: 'Husserl’s Phenomenology and the Foundations of Natural Science'. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 8 (1):57.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Patrick A. Heelan (1987). Husserl's Later Philosophy of Natural Science. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):368-390.
    Husserl argues in the Crisis that the prevalent tradition of positive science in his time had a philosophical core, called by him "Galilean science", that mistook the quest for objective theory with the quest for truth. Husserl is here referring to Gottingen science of the Golden Years. For Husserl, theory "grows" out of the "soil" of the prescientific, that is, pretheoretical, life-world. Scientific truth finally is to be sought not in theory but rather in the pragmatic-perceptual praxes of measurement. Husserl (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Hemmendinger (1975). Husserl's Concepts of Evidence and Science. The Monist 59 (1):81-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Juha Himanka (2005). Husserl's Argumentation for the Pre-Copernican View of the Earth. Review of Metaphysics 58 (3):621 - 644.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Burt C. Hopkins (2003). Crisis, History, and Husserl's Phenomenological Project of Desedimenting the Formalization of Meaning. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 24 (1):75-102.
  21. Masaki Hrada (2008). Revision of Phenomenology for Mathematical Physics. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 43:73-80.
    Fundamental notions Husserl introduced in Ideen I, such as epochè, reality, and empty X as substrate, might be useful for elucidating how mathematical physics concepts are produced. However, this is obscured in the context of Husserl’s phenomenology itself. For this possibility, the author modifies Husserl’s fundamental notions introduced for pure phenomenology, which found all sciences on the absolute Ego. Subsequently, the author displaces Husserl's phenomenological notions toward the notions operating inside scientific activities themselves and shows this using a case study (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences.
  23. Edmund Husserl (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston,Northwestern University Press.
    In this book, which remained unfinished at his death, Husserl attempts to forge a union between phenomenology and existentialism.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. David Hyder (2003). Foucault, Cavaillès, and Husserl on the Historical Epistemology of the Sciences. Perspectives on Science 11 (1):107-129.
    : This paper discusses the origins of two key notions in Foucault's work up to and including The Archaeology of Knowledge. The first of these notions is the notion of "archaeology" itself, a form of historical investigation of knowledge that is distinguished from the mere history of ideas in part by its unearthing what Foucault calls "historical a prioris". Both notions, I argue, are derived from Husserlian phenomenology. But both are modified by Foucault in the light of Jean Cavaillès's critique (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Carlo Ierna, Filip Mattens & Hanne Jacobs (eds.) (2010). Philosophy, Phenomenology, Sciences. Essays in Commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Springer.
    This volume is a broad anthology addressing many if not most major topics in phenomenology and philosophy in general: from foundational and methodological ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Don Ihde (2011). Husserl's Galileo Needed a Telescope! Philosophy and Technology 24 (1):69-82.
    Husserl’s Crisis argues that early modern science, exemplified in Galileo, separates the Lifeworld from a world of science by forgetting its origins in bodily perception on the one side, and the practices which found the science on the other. This essay argues that, rather, by overemphasizing mathematization and underemphasizing instruments or technologies which mediate perception, Husserl creates the division he describes. Positively, through the embodied use of instruments science remains thoroughly immersed in the Lifeworld.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Cary Talmage Isley (1996). Intentionality, Experience, and the Lifeworld: Phenomenological Presupposition and the Challenge of Contemporary Scientism. Dissertation, Emory University
    In this study, I examine the relationship between "the real" as understood by the positive sciences and as it is experienced and thought about in commonsensical life . ;Husserl argues that the lifeworld is a presupposition of the achievements of the positive sciences. I show that Husserl provides three different kinds of arguments, and that only one of them is a likely candidate for functioning as a potential antidote to a scientistic agenda. I define this agenda in terms of recent (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. René Jagnow (2006). Edmund Husserl on the Applicability of Formal Geometry. In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer. 67--85.
    In this paper, I reconstruct Edmund Husserl's view on the relationship between formal inquiry and the life-world, using the example of formal geometry. I first outline Husserl's account of geometry and then argue that he believed that the applicability of formal geometry to intuitive space (the space of everyday-experience) guarantees the conceptual continuity between different notions of space.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Theodore Kisiel (1973). Dimensions of a Phenomenology of Science in Husserl and Young Dr Heidegger. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 4 (3):217-234.
  30. Jeff Kochan (2011). Husserl and the Phenomenology of Science. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42 (3):467-471.
    This article critically reviews an outstanding collection of new essays addressing Edmund Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences. In Science and the Life-World (Stanford, 2010), David Hyder and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger bring together an impressive range of first-rate philosophers and historians. The collection explicates key concepts in Husserl’s often obscure work, compares Husserl’s phenomenology of science to the parallel tradition of historical epistemology, and provocatively challenges Husserl’s views on science. The explications are uniformly clear and helpful, the comparative work intriguing, and the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jeff Kochan & Hans Bernhard Schmid (2011). Philosophy of Science. In Sebastian Luft & Søren Overgaard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology.
    This chapter briefly summarises work by four key figures in the phenomenological philosophy of science: Edmund Husserl; Martin Heidegger; Patrick Heelan; and Joseph J. Kockelmans. In addition, some comparison is made with well-known figures in mainstream philosophy of science, and suggestions are given for further readings in the phenomenological philosophy of science.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Erazim Kohák (1985). Jan Patočka, Edmund Husserl's Philosophy of the Crisis of Science and His Conception of a Phenomenology of the “Life-World”. Husserl Studies 2 (2):129-155.
  33. Adam Konopka (2009). The Role of Umwelt in Husserl's Aufbau and Abbau of the Natur/Geist Distinction. Human Studies 32 (3):313 - 333.
    In this essay I argue that Husserl’s development of the nineteenth century Natur/Geist distinction is grounded in the intentional correlate between the pre-theoretical natural attitude and environing world ( Umwelt ). By reconsidering the Natur/Geist distinction through its historical context in the nineteenth century debate between Wilhelm Dilthey and the Neo-Kantians from the Baden or Southwest school, it is possible to understand more clearly Husserl’s appropriations and novel contributions. One of Husserl’s contributions lies in his rigorous thematization and clarification of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. K. Kuypers (1974). De idee Van filosofie AlS strenge wetenschap bij Husserl. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 36 (4):673 - 706.
    Die Forderung einer Philosophie als strenger Wissenschaft, von Husserl zum ersten Mal in dem bekannten Logosaufsatz erhoben, richtet sich nicht, wie meistens gedacht und auch von Dilthey selbst so verstanden ist, gegen den Historizismus von Dilthey, sondern vielmehr gegen dessen Identifizierung von Philosophie mit Weltanschauungsphilosophie und damit mit Weisheitslehre. Husserl hat vom Anfang an bis zum Ende seines Lebens sich der Herausarbeitung dieer Idee gewidmet und die Phänomenologie als Verwirklichung dieser Idee betrachtet. Dementsprechend soll man auch der geläufigen Auffassung zuwider (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Andrew W. Lamb (2002). No Longer the Cave of History. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):41-62.
    This essay argues against David Carr’s relativism by clarifying the in principle requirements appropriate to non-relative truths and showing that de facto differences of conceptual frameworks threaten none of them. Non-relative truths are not threatened by history. This defense of non-relative truth belongs to a larger defense of Husserlian “science” that shows how essences, even those “delivered” by history, have a universal (non-relative) “governance” and can be affirmed in nonrelative truths-as such science requires. If history also allows the other qualities (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew William Lamb (1999). Situated Science: A Phenomenological Defense of Philosophy as Rigorous Science. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    Human knowledge seems clearly to be situated and conditioned by history and tradition, culture and value, language and meaning, and the contingent faculties of the human body and mind. This fact is often thought to undermine of itself the possibility of the human achievement of rigorous, "scientific" knowledge---the certainty of truth and, in particular, the certainty of objectively relevant truth and of the truth of what counts as a universal essence. Such is the thinking of many who depart from Edmund (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Leonard Lawlor (2002). Verflechtung: The Triple Significance of Merleau-Ponty’s Course Notes on Husserl’s 'The Origin of Geometry'. In Maurice Merleau-ponty: Husserl at the limits of phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Karl-Heinz Lembeck (1988). Wahrheitsähnlichkeit AlS Regulativ der Intentionalität? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 19 (2):252-265.
    Is there still any importance of Husserl's Phenomenology for contemporary forms of philosophy of science? A comparison between Phenomenology and a prominent form of such modern philosophy of science, the so-called 'Critical Rationalism' of Karl Popper, may help to answer this question. Therefore, the different levels of argumentation have to be worked out to make the respective arguments applicable to one another. We are arguing for the following thesis: the strategy of corroboration in Critical Rationalism can be justified by means (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Brian Lightbody (2009). Charting the Future Course for a Truly Humanistic Science: Husserl, the Epoche, and the Life-World. Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism (A Journal of the American Humanist Association) 17 (1):61-71.
  40. Laura Therese Long (1998). A Husserlian Investigation Into the Origins of Physics and Cognitive Science. Dissertation, Temple University
    There has been a great deal of literature devoted to the temporal paradoxes that arise in physics. These temporal paradoxes include the conflict between reversible time and 'lived' time in Newtonian mechanics, the twin paradox that arises from the theories of Special and General Relativity and the paradoxes of measurement found in quantum mechanics . These paradoxes have led to laying blame on the ignorance of human understanding and to assertions that we need to choose between conceiving of time as (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. François Lurçat (2007). Understanding Quantum Mechanics with Bohr and Husserl. In Luciano Boi, Pierre Kerszberg & Frédéric Patras (eds.), Rediscovering Phenomenology: Phenomenological Essays on Mathematical Beings, Physical Reality, Perception and Consciousness (Phaenomenologica) (English and French Edition). Springer. 229-258.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Glenn McGee (2001). Dewey and Husserl on Natural Science and Values: Learning From the Sokal Debate. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 14 (4):286-299.
  43. Christian Möckel (2005). Krisis der Wissenschaftlichen Kultur? Edmund Husserls Forderung nach „Besinnung". Cultura 2 (2):26-39.
    Phenomenological philosophizing is practiced out of a sense of responsibility for contemporary culture, which is experienced as existing in a profoundcrisis. The first part of this contribution contains a systematization of the theory of crisis, a theory developed in many of Husserl's works: the description of the main phenomena of the consciousness of crisis, the explanation of crisis with regard to its causes, and the demands raised in order to overcome the crisis of scientific culture (»reflection«). Husserl's teachings on crisis (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Matthew Morgan (2009). Edmund Husserl and the Limitations of Biorobotic Research. Philosophical Forum 40 (3):411-424.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Thomas Mormann (1991). Husserl's Philosophy of Science and the Semantic Approach. Philosophy of Science 58 (1):61-83.
    Husserl's mathematical philosophy of science can be considered an anticipation of the contemporary postpositivistic semantic approach, which regards mathematics and not logic as the appropriate tool for the exact philosophical reconstruction of scientific theories. According to Husserl, an essential part of a theory's reconstruction is the mathematical description of its domain, that is, the world (or the part of the world) the theory intends to talk about. Contrary to the traditional micrological approach favored by the members of the Vienna Circle, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Ismail El Mossadeq (ed.) (1995). Kritik der Neuzeitlichen Naturwissenschaft : Phänomenologie in der Alternative Zwischen Husserl Und Heidegger. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Erst in Husserls und Heideggers Spätzeit rückt die kritische Besinnung auf das gegenwärtige, durch die Herrschaft der naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Rationalität geprägte Zeitalter ins Zentrum ihres Denkens. Der eigentliche Ursprung dieser Besinnung liegt aber in dem phänomenologischen Denkweg, den beide Philosophen von früh an beschritten haben. Nur weil sie der Urmaxime der Phänomenologie Zu den Sachen selbst! verpflichtet waren, konnte ihnen eine Wissenschaftsanalyse gelingen, durch die sich die wissenschaftliche Erkenntnis als ein abgeleitetes Verhalten des Menschen gegenüber den Dingen herausstellt, das auf ein (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Günther Neumann (2001). Galilei und der Geist der Neuzeit: Husserls Rekonstruktion der Galileischen Naturwissenschaft in der Krisis-Schrift. Phänomenologische Forschungen.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. T. Nuyen (1990). Truth, Method, and Objectivity Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (4):437-452.
    There is a common concern in some of the writings of Husserl and Gadamer. It is the concern to defend the legitimacy and dignity of the "human sciences." They argue from the methodological standpoint that the method of the natural sciences leaves out the relationship between the object of inquiry and the inquirer. This relationship plays a key role in "understanding," which is the concem of the human sciences. In explicating it, Husserl and Gadamer stress the role of the community (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John O'Neill (1988). Marcuse, Husserl and the Crisis of the Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (3):327-342.
  50. D. Pradelle (2010). Husserl contra Carnap: la dé marcation des sciences. In Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jaccobs & Filip Mattens (eds.), PHILOSOPHY PHENOMENOLOGY SCIENCES. Springer. 157--189.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 68