This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
160 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 160
  1. P. Alexander (1959). HARROD, R. F. -Foundations of Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Mind 68:108.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. S. Bagchi (1953). Inductive Reasoning a Study of Tarka and its Role in Indian Logic. Calcutta Oriental Press Ltd.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Alexander Bain (1874). Logic Deductive and Inductive. D. Appleton.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Malcolm Forster (eds.) (forthcoming). Philosophy of Statistics, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 7. Elsevier.
  5. Y. Bar-Hillel (1968). Bunge and Watkins on Inductive Logic. In Imre Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland Pub. Co. 282--85.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (1968). ""Inductive Logic as" the" Guide of Life'. In Imre Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland Pub. Co. 66--69.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (1964). On an Alleged Contradiction in Carnap's Theory of Inductive Logic. Mind 73 (290):265-267.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Yehoshua Bar-Hillel (1953). A Note on Comparative Inductive Logic. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (12):308-310.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9. Yann Benétreau-Dupin (2015). The Bayesian Who Knew Too Much. Synthese 192 (5):1527-1542.
    In several papers, John Norton has argued that Bayesianism cannot handle ignorance adequately due to its inability to distinguish between neutral and disconfirming evidence. He argued that this inability sows confusion in, e.g., anthropic reasoning in cosmology or the Doomsday argument, by allowing one to draw unwarranted conclusions from a lack of knowledge. Norton has suggested criteria for a candidate for representation of neutral support. Imprecise credences (families of credal probability functions) constitute a Bayesian-friendly framework that allows us to avoid (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10. Benthem Johan Van (2011). Logic in a Social Setting. Episteme 8 (3):227-247.
    Taking Backward Induction as its running example, this paper explores avenues for a logic of information-driven social action. We use recent results on limit phenomena in knowledge updating and belief revision, procedural rationality, and a ‘Theory of Play’ analyzing how games are played by different agents.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Ken Binmore (2011). Interpreting Knowledge in the Backward Induction Problem. Episteme 8 (3):248-261.
    Robert Aumann argues that common knowledge of rationality implies backward induction in finite games of perfect information. I have argued that it does not. A literature now exists in which various formal arguments are offered in support of both positions. This paper argues that Aumann's claim can be justified if knowledge is suitably reinterpreted.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Richard J. Blackwell (1979). "Studies in Inductive Probability and Rational Expectation," by Theo A. F. Kuipers. Modern Schoolman 56 (4):386-387.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Jonny Blamey (2013). Upping the Stakes and the Preface Paradox. In Frank Zenker (ed.), Bayesian Argumentation. Springer 195-210.
    Abstract The Preface Paradox, first introduced by David Makinson (1961), presents a plausible scenario where an agent is evidentially certain of each of a set of propositions without being evidentially certain of the conjunction of the set of propositions. Given reasonable assumptions about the nature of evidential certainty, this appears to be a straightforward contradiction. We solve the paradox by appeal to stake size sensitivity, which is the claim that evidential probability is sensitive to stake size. The argument is that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Peter Mcpherson Brown (1973). Toward the Guidance of Thought: The Inductive Logic of Rudolf Carnap. Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. S. Butterfield (1983). "Applications of Inductive Logic", Edited by L. J. Cohen and M. B. Hesse. [REVIEW] Mind 92:145.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. R. Carnap & R. Jeffrey (eds.) (1971). Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. University of California Press.
    Introduction Much delayed, here is the second, final volume of Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Carnap projected the series ca. as a ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   52 citations  
  17. Rudolf Carnap (1996). The Aim of Inductive Logic. In Sahotra Sarkar (ed.), Journal of Symbolic Logic. Garland Pub. Co. 3--259.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  18. Rudolf Carnap (1980). A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II. In Richard C. Jeffrey (ed.), Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press 2--7.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  19. Rudolf Carnap (1963). Variety, Analogy, and Periodicity in Inductive Logic. Philosophy of Science 30 (3):222-227.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20. Rudolf Carnap (1951). The Nature and Application of Inductive Logic. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. Rudolf Carnap (1951). The Problem of Relations in Inductive Logic. Philosophical Studies 2 (5):75 - 80.
  22. Rudolf Carnap (1947). On the Application of Inductive Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (1):133-148.
  23. Rudolf Carnap (1945). On Inductive Logic. Philosophy of Science 12 (2):72-97.
  24. Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey (1974). Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability. Volume I. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 35 (1):128-129.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey (1972). Book Review:Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability Rudolf Carnap, Richard C. Jeffrey. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 39 (4):549-.
  26. B. Carr (1974). PIETARINEN, J. "Lawllikeness, Analogy, and Inductive Logic". [REVIEW] Mind 83:625.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. C. West Churchman (1946). Carnap's "on Inductive Logic". Philosophy of Science 13 (4):339-342.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. L. J. Cohen & M. B. Hesse (1983). Applications of Inductive Logic. Mind 92 (365):145-147.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. L. J. Cohen & Mary Hesse (eds.) (1983). Aspects of Inductive Logic. Oxford Up.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. L. Jonathan Cohen (1973). A Note on Inductive Logic. Journal of Philosophy 70 (2):27-40.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. L. Jonathan Cohen & Mary B. Hesse (eds.) (1980). Applications of Inductive Logic: Proceedings of a Conference at the Queen's College, Oxford 21-24, August 1978. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  32. N. C. A. Da Costa (1987). Outlines of a System of Inductive Logic'. Theoria 7:3-13.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33. Wilhelm K. Essler (1986). How to Apply and Justify Inductive Logic. Erkenntnis 24 (1):47 - 55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. S. M. F. (1967). Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 20 (4):733-733.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Roberto Festa (1999). Bayesian Confirmation. In M. C. Galavotti & A. Pagnini (eds.), Experience, Reality, and Scientific Explanation. Kluwer 55–87.
  36. Branden Fitelson (2003). Review of I. Hacking, An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):5006-5008.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Thomas Fowler (1893). Logic Deductive and Inductive. At the Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Thomas Fowler (1872). The Elements of Inductive Logic Designed Mainly for the Use of Students in the Universities. At the Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Thomas Fowler (1870). The Elements of Inductive Logic.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Christopher F. French (2015). Rudolf Carnap: Philosophy of Science as Engineering Explications. In Uskali Mäki, Stephanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer 293-303.
    One way of explaining Rudolf Carnap’s mature philosophical view is by drawing an analogy between his technical projects—like his work on inductive logic—with a certain kind of conceptual engineering. After all, there are many mathematical similarities between Carnap’s work in inductive logic and a number of results from contemporary confirmation theory, statistics and mathematical probability theory. However, in stressing these similarities, the conceptual dependence of Carnap’s inductive logic on his work on semantics is downplayed. Yet it is precisely the conceptual (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41. George Stuart Fullerton (1908). Enn's Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 5 (11):297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. G. G. G. G. (1908). VENN, J. -Principles of Empirical or Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Mind 17:280.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. P. K. H. (1967). Aspects of Inductive Logic. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 20 (4):737-737.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Ian Hacking (2001). An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic. Cambridge University Press.
    This is an introductory textbook on probability and induction written by one of the world's foremost philosophers of science. The book has been designed to offer maximal accessibility to the widest range of students and assumes no formal training in elementary symbolic logic. It offers a comprehensive course covering all basic definitions of induction and probability, and considers such topics as decision theory, Bayesianism, frequency ideas, and the philosophical problem of induction. The key features of this book are a lively (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  45. Ian Hacking (1971). The Leibniz-Carnap Program for Inductive Logic. Journal of Philosophy 68 (19):597-610.
  46. Ian Hacking (1969). Linguistically Invariant Inductive Logic. Synthese 20 (1):25 - 47.
    Carnap's early system of inductive logic make degrees of confirmation depend on the languages in which they are expressed. They are sensitive to which predicates are, in the language, taken as primitive. Hence they fail to be ‘linguistically invariant’. His later systems, in which prior probabilities are assigned to elements of a model rather than sentences of a language, are sensitive to which properties in the model are called primitive. Critics have often protested against these features of his work. This (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47. D. W. Hamlyn (1958). Foundations of Inductive Logic. By R. F. Harrod. (London: Macmillan. 1956. Pp. Xviii + 290. Price 24s.). Philosophy 33 (127):369-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Roy Forbes Harrod (1974). Foundations of Inductive Logic. Macmillan.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Cael L. Hasse, A Comprehensive Theory of Induction and Abstraction, Part I.
    I present a solution to the epistemological or characterisation problem of induction. In part I, Bayesian Confirmation Theory (BCT) is discussed as a good contender for such a solution but with a fundamental explanatory gap (along with other well discussed problems); useful assigned probabilities like priors require substantive degrees of belief about the world. I assert that one does not have such substantive information about the world. Consequently, an explanation is needed for how one can be licensed to act as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. E. L. Hawkins (1925). The Oxford Handbook of Logic Deductive and Inductive. A. Thomas Shrimpton.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 160