 | 1 — 100 / 101 |  |
- Scott Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert Talisse (2010). Evolution, Intelligent Design and Public Education: A Comment on Thomas Nagel. Spontaneous Generations 3 (1).
- Francisco J. Ayala (2010). There is No Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design is Not Science. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
- John Beaudoin (2008). Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):432-442.
- Michael Behe (2003). The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis : Breaking Rules. In Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. Routledge.
- Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman (2011). Simulation of Biological Evolution Under Attack, but Not Really: A Response to Meester. Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):113-118.
- Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Johan Braeckman (2010). How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Foundations of Science 15 (3):227-244.
- Ingo Brigandt (forthcoming). Intelligent Design and the Nature of Science: Philosophical and Pedagogical Points. In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Springer.
- Ingo Brigandt (2011). Critical Notice of Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science by Elliott Sober, Cambridge University of Press, 2008. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41:159–186.
- John Brockman (ed.) (2006). Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage.
- John Angus Campbell, Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology.
- Noam Chomsky, Intelligent Design?
- David Clarke (2007). Intelligent Design: Neither Scientific nor Religious. Theoria 73 (2):148-171.
- Joachim L. Dagg (2011). Exploring Mouse Trap History. Evolution Education and Outreach 4 (3):397-414.
- Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt (2010). Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology. Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
- William Dembski, The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design.
- William Dembski, Commentary on Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch's "Guest Viewpoint: 'Intelligent Design' Not Accepted by Most Scientists," 7/2/02. [REVIEW]
- William Dembski, Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evil.
- William Dembski, In Defense of Intelligent Design.
- William Dembski, Infinite Universe or Intelligent Design?
- William Dembski, Can Functional Logic Take the Place of Intelligent Design? A Response to Walter Thorson.
- William A. Dembski, Dealing with the Backlash Against Intelligent Design.
- William A. Dembski, Why President Bush Got It Right About Intelligent Design By.
- William A. Dembski, Skepticism's Prospects for Unseating Intelligent Design.
- William A. Dembski, Three Frequently Asked Questions About Intelligent Design.
- William A. Dembski, The Intelligent Design Movement.
- Chunyu Dong (2010). Intelligent Design From the Viewpoint of Complex Systems Theory. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):461-470.
- Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2008). Review Of: O. Gingerich: God’s Universe. [REVIEW] Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 11:232-234.
- Bernard Feltz (2009). L'Intelligent Design. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 107 (3):387-409.
- Branden Fitelson, Remarks on Probability and “Intelligent Design”.
- Barbara Forrest (forthcoming). The Non-Epistemology of Intelligent Design: Its Implications for Public Policy. Synthese.
- Philippe Gagnon (2007). Contenu, Enjeux Et Diversité des Acceptions de L’Intelligent Design En Contexte Étatsunien. Connaître. Cahiers de l'Association Foi Et Culture Scientifique 26:9-43.
- Alvin Goldman (2006). Social Epistemology, Theory of Evidence, and Intelligent Design: Deciding What to Teach. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):1-22.
- Alvin Goldman (2005). Social Epistemology, Theory of Evidence, and Intelligent Design. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):1-22.
- Peter J. Graham (2011). Intelligent Design and Selective History: Two Sources of Purpose and Plan. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:67-88.
- Olle Häggström (2007). Intelligent Design and the NFL Theorems. Biology and Philosophy 22 (2):217-230.
- William Hasker (2009). Intelligent Design. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):586-597.
- David L. Hildebrand (2008). Epistemic and Rhetorical Remedies for the Evolution/Intelligent Design Predicament. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):43-52.
- David L. Hildebrand (2006). Does Every Theory Deserve a Hearing? Evolution, Intelligent Design, and the Limits of Democratic Inquiry. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):217-236.
- Robert C. Koons & Logan Paul Gage (2011). St. Thomas Aquinas on Intelligent Design. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:79-97.
- Jeffrey Koperski (2008). Two Bad Ways to Attack Intelligent Design and Two Good Ones. Zygon 43 (2):433-449.
- Jeffrey Koperski (2003). Intelligent Design and the End of Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
- Jeffrey Koperski & Andrés Ruiz (2012). Motives Still Don't Matter: Reply to Pynes. Zygon 47 (4):662-665.
- Richard D. Kortum (2005). Niall Shanks God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). Pp. XIII+273. Foreword by Richard Dawkins. £21.00 (Hbk). ISBN 0 19 516199. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 41 (3):357-362.
- James A. T. Lancaster (2011). The Semantic Structure of Evolutionary Biology as an Argument Against Intelligent Design. Zygon 46 (1):26-46.
- Tim Lewens (2006). Flagellant Priests. Biology and Philosophy 21 (3):411-421.
- Jonathan Loesberg (2007). Kant, Hume, Darwin, and Design: Why Intelligent Design Wasn't Science Before Darwin and Still Isn't. Philosophical Forum 38 (2):95–123.
- Mary B. Mahowald (2008). Babies by (Intelligent) Design? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (4):629-635.
- Neil A. Manson (2004). Review of Niall Shanks, God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (5).
- Bradford McCall (2011). Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism. By Steve Fuller. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):318-319.
- Kevin Mongrain (2011). The Eyes of Reason: Intelligent Design Apologetics as the New Preambula Fidei? Heythrop Journal 52 (2):191-210.
- Bradley Monton, Is Intelligent Design Science? Dissecting the Dover Decision.
- Donald Moss (2008). Immaculate Attachment/Intelligent Design: Masculinity as Masquerade, Masculinity as Authentic. Constellations 15 (3):390-396.
- Thomas Nagel (2008). Public Education and Intelligent Design. Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (2):187-205.
- George Nakhnikian (2004). It Ain't Necessarily So: An Essay Review of Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Philosophy of Science 71 (4):593-604.
- Paul A. Nelson (1999). Is "Intelligent Design" Unavoidable-Even by Howard Van Till? A Response. Zygon 34 (4):677-682.
- Ryan Nichold (2003). Scientific Content, Testability, and the Vacuity of Intelligent Design Theory. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):591-611.
- Ronald L. Numbers (2010). Creationism, Intelligent Design, and Modern Biology. In Denis Alexander & Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), Biology and Ideology From Descartes to Dawkins. The University of Chicago Press.
- Peter Olofsson (2008). Intelligent Design and Mathematical Statistics: A Troubled Alliance. Biology and Philosophy 23 (4):545-553.
- George Pappas (2006). Comments on Goldman and on Intelligent Design. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):23-27.
- Robert Pennock, The Pre-Modern Sins of Intelligent Design.
- Robert T. Pennock, The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism.
- Robert T. Pennock (2003). Creationism and Intelligent Design. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 4:143-163.
- Gregory R. Peterson (2002). The Intelligent-Design Movement: Science or Ideology? Zygon 37 (1):7-23.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2009). Is Intelligent Design Creationism? In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2007). The Evolution-Creation Wars: Why Teaching More Science Just is Not Enough. McGill Journal of Education 42 (2):285-306.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2005). More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Intelligent Design. [REVIEW] Evolution 59 (12):2717-2720.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2001). Intelligent Design "Theory". [REVIEW] BioScience 51 (5):411-414.
- Massimo Pigliucci (2000). Chance, Necessity, and the War Against Science. [REVIEW] BioScience 50 (1):79-87.
- Alvin Plantinga (2001). Creation and Evolution: A Modest Proposal. In Robert T. Pennock (ed.), In Intelligent Design Creationism and its critics. MIT.
- Anya Plutynski (2010). Should Intelligent Design Be Taught in Public School Science Classrooms? Science and Education 19 (6-8):779-795.
- Ratzscdelh (2010). There is a Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design in (Philosophy of) Biology : Some Legitimate Roles. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
- Del Ratzsch (2010). There is a Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design in (Philosophy of) Biology : Some Legitimate Roles. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub..
- Del Ratzsch (2002). Design Theory and its Critics: Monologues Passing in the Night. [REVIEW] Ars Disputandi 2.
- Doren Recker (2010). How to Confuse Organisms with Mousetraps: Machine Metaphors and Intelligent Design. Zygon 45 (3):647-664.
- Doren Recker (2007). Scientific Creationism, Intelligent Design, and the Demarcation Problem. Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1):27-38.
- Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
- Reed Richter (2002). What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
- Bradley Rives, Intelligent Design, Science, and the Supernatural.
- Sahotra Sarkar (forthcoming). The Science Question in Intelligent Design. Synthese.
- Sahotra Sarkar (2008). Review of Steve Fuller, Science V. Religion? Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evolution. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (8).
- Niall Shanks & Keith Green (forthcoming). Intelligent Design in Theological Perspective. Synthese.
- Niall Shanks & Karl H. Joplin (1999). Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry. Philosophy of Science 66 (2):268-282.
- J. Shearmur (2010). Steve Fuller and Intelligent Design. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):433-445.
- Jeremy Shearmur (2010). Why the 'Hopeless War'?: Approaching Intelligent Design. Sophia 49 (4):475-488.
- Jim D. Shelton (2003). Intelligent Design. Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (2):113-117.
- Aaron Sloman, Why Scientists and Philosophers of Science Should Teach Intelligent Design (ID) Alongside the Theory of Evolution.
- Thomas Wayne Smythe (2008). Naill Shanks. God, the Devil, and Darwin: A Critique of Intelligent Design Theory. Philosophia 36 (2):251-254.
- Elliott Sober, What is Wrong with Intelligent Design?
- Elliott Sober, Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern — an 18th Century Debate About Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology.
- Elliott Sober (2008). Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and Minds—a Reply to John Beaudoin. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446.
- Elliott Sober (2007). Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural—the 'God or Extra-Terrestrials' Reply. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):72-82.
- Elliott Sober (2005). Intelligent Design is Untestable : What About Natural Selection? In António Zilhão (ed.), Evolution, Rationality, and Cognition: A Cognitive Science for the Twenty-First Century. Routledge.
- Elliott Sober (2002). Intelligent Design and Probability Reasoning. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):65-80.
- William Sweet (2008). Intelligent Design, Science, and Religion. In Manimala, Varghese & J. (eds.), Fides Et Ratio in a Post-Modern Era: Indian Philosophical Studies, Xiii. Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
- Roger S. Taylor & Michel Ferrari (eds.) (2010). Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution Vs. Intelligent Design Controversy. Routledge.
- B. A. Thomasson (2011). Arguing From the Evidence: The Correct Approach to Intelligent Design's Challenge in the U.S. Courts. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (4):495-534.
- Howard J. van Till (1999). Does "Intelligent Design" Have a Chance? An Essay Review. Zygon 34 (4):667-675.
- Michael Weisberg, The Intelligent Design Controversy: Lessons From Psychology and Education.
- John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). The Salem Region: Two Mindsets About Science. In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), The Philosophy of Pseudoscience. University of Chicago Press.
- John S. Wilkins & Wesley R. Elsberry (2001). The Advantages of Theft Over Toil: The Design Inference and Arguing From Ignorance. Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):711-724.
 | 1 — 100 / 101 |  |
|
Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
Monitor this page
Be alerted of all new items appearing on this page. Choose how you want to monitor it:
Email
|
RSS feed
|
|