This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
234 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 100 / 234
  1. Jair Minoro Abe (1992). A Obra de Newton C.A. Da Costa Em Logica. Theoria 7 (1/2/3).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Vicente Aboites (2002). Some Remarks About Newton's Demonstrations in Optics: Newton's Missing Experiment. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (3):455-458.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. D' Abro (1950). The Evolution of Scientific Thought From Newton to Einstein. [New York]Dover Publications.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Timo Airaksinen (2010). Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris. In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
  5. James L. Anderson (1990). Newton's First Two Laws Are Not Definitions. American Journal of Physics 58 (12):1192--5.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter R. Anstey (2004). The Methodological Origins of Newton's Queries. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):247-269.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Richard Arthur, Leery Bedfellows: Newton and Leibniz on the Status of Infinitesimals.
    Newton and Leibniz had profound disagreements concerning metaphysics and the relationship of mathematics to natural philosophy, as well as deeply opposed attitudes towards analysis. Nevertheless, or so I shall argue, despite these deeply held and distracting differences in their background assumptions and metaphysical views, there was a considerable consilience in their positions on the status of infinitesimals. In this paper I compare the foundation Newton provides in his Method Of First and Ultimate Ratios (sketched at some time between 1671 and (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Richard Arthur (1994). Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
    In this paper I challenge the usual interpretations of Newton's and Leibniz's views on the nature of space and the relativity of motion. Newton's ‘relative space’ is not a reference frame; and Leibniz did not regard space as defined with respect to actual enduring bodies. Newton did not subscribe to the relativity of intertial motions; whereas Leibniz believed no body to be at rest, and Newton's absolute motion to be a useful fiction. A more accurate rendering of the opposition between (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Richard T. W. Arthur (1995). Newton's Fluxions and Equably Flowing Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 26 (2):323-351.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Brian S. Baigrie (1987). Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion, Before and After Newton's Principia: An Essay on the Transformation of Scientific Problems. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (2):177-208.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William M. Baum & Suzanne H. Mitchell (2000). Newton and Darwin: Can This Marriage Be Saved? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):91-92.
    The insights described by Nevin & Grace may be summarized without reference to the Newtonian concepts they suggest. The metaphor to Newtonian mechanics seems dubious in three ways: (1) extensions seem to lead to paradoxes; (2) many well-known phenomena are ignored; (3) the Newtonian concepts seem difficult to reconcile with the larger framework of evolutionary theory.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ori Belkind (forthcoming). Leibniz and Newton on Space. Foundations of Science.
    This paper reexamines the historical debate between Leibniz and Newton on the nature of space. According to the traditional reading, Leibniz (in his correspondence with Clarke) produced metaphysical arguments (relying on the Principle of Sufficient Reason and the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles) in favor of a relational account of space. Newton, according to the traditional account, refuted the metaphysical arguments with the help of an empirical argument based on the bucket experiment. The paper claims that Leibniz’s and Newton’s arguments (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Martin Bell (1997). Hume and Causal Power: The Influences of Malebranche and Newton. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1):67 – 86.
  14. D. Bertoloni Meli (1991). Public Claims, Private Worries: Newton's Principia and Leibniz's Theory of Planetary Motion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (3):415-449.
  15. A. E. Best (1968). Theories of Light From Descartes to Newton. By A. I. Sabra. (Oldbourne, 1967. Pp. 363. Price 70s.). Philosophy 43 (165):291-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Akeel Bilgrami (2010). Gandhi, Newton, and the Enlightenment. In Aakash Singh & Silika Mohapatra (eds.), Indian Political Thought: A Reader. Routledge.
  17. Katherine A. Brading & Dana Jalobeanu, All Alone in the Universe: Individuals in Descartes and Newton.
    In this paper we argue that the primary issue in Descartes’ Principles of Philosophy, Part II, articles 1-40, is the problem of individuating bodies. We demonstrate that Descartes departs from the traditional quest for a principle of individuation, moving to a different strategy with the more modest aim of constructing bodies adequate to the needs of his cosmology. In doing this he meets with a series of difficulties, and this is precisely the challenge that Newton took up. We show that (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stuart C. Brown (ed.) (1996). British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment. Routledge.
    European philosophy from the late seventeenth century through most of the eighteenth is broadly conceived as the "Enlightenment," a period of empricist reaction to the great seventeeth century Rationalists. This volume begins with Herbert of Cherbury and the Cambridge Platonists and with Newton and the early English Enlightenment. Locke is a key figure, as a result of his importance both in the development of British and Irish philosophy and because of his seminal influence in the Enlightenment as a whole. British (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. James E. Broyles (1981). Talk About Space: Wittgenstein and Newton. Philosophical Investigations 4 (4):45-55.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Henry R. Burke (1936). Sir Isaac Newton's Formal Conception of Scientific Method. The New Scholasticism 10 (2):93-115.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. E. A. Burtt (1943). Method and Metaphysics in Sir Isaac Newton. Philosophy of Science 10 (2):57-66.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert Callergård (1999). The Hypothesis of Ether and Reid's Interpretation of Newton's First Rule of Philosophizing. Synthese 120 (1):19-26.
    My object is to question a recurrent claim made to the point that Thomas Reid (1710–1796) was hostile to ether theories and that this hostility had its source in his distinctive interpretation of the first of Newton's regulæ philosophandi. Against this view I will argue that Reid did not have any quarrel at all with unobservable or theoretical entities as such, and that his objections against actual theories concerning ether were scientific rather than philosophical, even when based on Newton's first (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Martin Carrier (1986). Newton's Ideas on the Structure of Matter and Their Impact on Eighteenth-Century Chemistry: Some Historical and Methodological Remarks. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):85 – 105.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Alejandro Cassini (2005). Newton and Leibniz on Non-Substantival Space. Theoria 20 (1):25-43.
    The aim of this paper is to analyze Leibniz and Newton’s conception of space, and to point out where their agreements and disagreements lie with respect to its mode of existence. I shall offer a definite characterization of Leibniz and Newton’s conceptions of space. I will show that, according to their own concepts of substance, both Newtonian and Leibnizian spaces are not substantiva!. The reason of that consists in the fact that space is not capable of action. Moreover, there is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Alejandro Cassini (2005). Newton and Leibniz on Non-Substantival Space. Theoria 20 (1):25-43.
    The aim of this paper is to analyze Leibniz and Newton’s conception of space, and to point out where their agreements and disagreements lie with respect to its mode of existence. I shall offer a definite characterization of Leibniz and Newton’s conceptions of space. I will show that, according to their own concepts of substance, both Newtonian and Leibnizian spaces are not substantiva!. The reason of that consists in the fact that space is not capable of action. Moreover, there is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ernst Cassirer (1943). Newton and Leibniz. Philosophical Review 52 (4):366-391.
  27. Hiram Caton (1986). Die Philosophie der Neuzeit 2. Von Newton Bis Rousseau. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (4):561-562.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Pravas Jivan Chaudhury (1962). Newton and Hypothesis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (3):344-353.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Samuel Clarke (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts From Newton's Principia and Opticks. Barnes & Noble.
    This book presents extracts from Leibniz's letters to Newtonian scientist Samuel Clarke.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. I. Bernard Cohen (unknown). “Quantum in Se Est”: Newton, Kepler, Galileo, Descartes & Lucretius. :36-46.
  31. I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.) (2002). The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press.
    In this volume a team of distinguished contributors examine all the main aspects of Newton s thought, including not only his approach to space, time, mechanics, ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Malcolm A. R. Colledge (1979). K. S. Painter: The Water Newton Early Christian Silver. Pp. 48; 11 Text Figures, 16 Plates. London: British Museum Publications, 1977. Paper, £1·50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 29 (01):186-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. J. M. Cook (1976). Brian Dicks: Rhodes. Pp. 200; 26 Text Figs., 16 Plates. Newton Abbot, David & Charles, 1974. Cloth, £3·75. The Classical Review 26 (02):288-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Angela Coventry (2005). A Re-Examination of Hume’s Debt to Newton. Ensaios Sobre Hume.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. D'Abro (1927). The Evolution of Scientific Thought From Newton to Einstein. New York, Boni & Liveright.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Georges de Bothezat (1936). Back to Newton. London [Etc.]G. E. Stechert.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jaime de Salas (1991). Hume and Newton. Philosophy and Theology 6 (1):21-38.
    I argue that, while Hume’s approach to Newton is sometimes critical and sometimes not, Hume’s position with regard to newtonian method is coherent overall. Rather than speaking of two Humes (one a newtonian, the other not), from an humean perspective we should rather speak of two Newtons: the positivist and the theologian.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Rudolf De Smet & Karin Verelst (2001). Newton's Scholium Generale: The Platonic and Stoic Legacy — Philo, Justus Lipsius and the Cambridge Platonists. History of Science 39:30.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Tamás Demeter (forthcoming). Post-Mechanical Explanation in the Natural and Moral Sciences: The Language of Nature and Human Nature in David Hume and William Cullen. Jahrbuch für Europäische Wissenschaftskultur.
    It is common wisdom in intellectual history that eighteenth-century science of man evolved under the aegis of Newton. It is also frequently suggested that David Hume, one of the most influential practitioners of this kind of inquiry, aspired to be the Newton of the moral sciences. Usually this goes hand in hand with a more or less explicit reading of Hume’s theory of human nature as written in an idiom of particulate inert matter and active forces acting on it, i.e. (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Tamás Demeter & Gábor Á Zemplén (2010). Being Charitable to Scientific Controversies: On the Demonstrativity of Newton's Experimentum Crucis. The Monist 93 (4):640-656.
    Current philosophical reflections on science have departed from mainstream history of science with respect to both methodology and conclusions. The article investigates how different approaches to reconstructing commitments can explain these differences and facilitate a mutual understanding and communication of these two perspectives on science. Translating the differences into problems pertaining to principles of charity, the paper offers a platform for clarification and resolution of the differences between the two perspectives. The outlined contextual approach occupies a middle ground between mainstream (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Liam Dempsey (2006). Written in the Flesh: Isaac Newton on the Mind–Body Relation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (3):420-441.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Liam P. Dempsey (2011). 'A Compound Wholly Mortal' : Locke and Newton on the Metaphysics of (Personal) Immortality. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):241-264.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robert DiSalle (2006). Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics From Newton to Einstein. Cambridge University Press.
    Presenting the history of space-time physics, from Newton to Einstein, as a philosophical development DiSalle reflects our increasing understanding of the connections between ideas of space and time and our physical knowledge. He suggests that philosophy's greatest impact on physics has come about, less by the influence of philosophical hypotheses, than by the philosophical analysis of concepts of space, time, and motion and the roles they play in our assumptions about physical objects and physical measurements. This way of thinking leads (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert DiSalle (2002). Newton's Philosophical Analysis of Space and Time. In I. Bernard Cohen & George E. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert DiSalle (1992). Einstein, Newton and the Empirical Foundations of Space Time Geometry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):181 – 189.
    Abstract Einstein intended the general theory of relativity to be a generalization of the relativity of motion and, therefore, a radical departure from previous spacetime theories. It has since become clear, however, that this intention was not fulfilled. I try to explain Einstein's misunderstanding on this point as a misunderstanding of the role that spacetime plays in physics. According to Einstein, earlier spacetime theories introduced spacetime as the unobservable cause of observable relative motions and, in particular, as the cause of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. B. J. T. Dobbs (1985). Newton and Stoicism. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (S1):109-123.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. B. J. T. Dobbs (1982). Newton's Alchemy and His Theory of Matter. Isis 73:511--528.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Mary Domski (2010). Newton as Historically-Minded Philosopher. In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Mary Domski (2010). Newton's Empiricism and Metaphysics. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):525-534.
    Commentators attempting to understand the empirical method that Isaac Newton applies in his Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1687) are forced to grapple with the thorny issue of how to reconcile Newton's rejection of hypotheses with his appeal to absolute space. On the one hand, Newton claims that his experimental philosophy does not rely on claims that are assumed without empirical evidence, and on the other hand, Newton appeals to an absolute space that, by his own characterization, does not make (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Mary Domski (2003). The Constructible and the Intelligible in Newton's Philosophy of Geometry. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1114-1124.
    In the Preface to the Principia (1687) Newton famously states that “geometry is founded on mechanical practice”. Several commentators have taken this and similar remarks as an indication that Newton was firmly situated in the constructivist tradition of geometry that was prevalent in the seventeenth century. By drawing on a selection of Newton’s unpublished texts, I hope to show the faults of such an interpretation. In these texts, Newton not only rejects the constructivism that took its birth in Descartes’ Géométrie (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Steffen Ducheyne (2011). Mathematical and Philosophical Newton. Metascience 20 (3):467-476.
    Mathematical and philosophical Newton Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-10 DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9520-2 Authors Steffen Ducheyne, Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Steffen Ducheyne (2009). Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (2).
    In this essay, I attempt to assess Henk de Regt and Dennis Dieks recent pragmatic and contextual account of scientific understanding on the basis of an important historical case-study: understanding in Newton’s theory of universal gravitation and Huygens’ reception of universal gravitation. It will be shown that de Regt and Dieks’ Criterion for the Intelligibility of a Theory (CIT), which stipulates that the appropriate combination of scientists’ skills and intelligibility-enhancing theoretical virtues is a condition for scientific understanding, is too strong. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J. B. Van Helmont's de Tempore as an Influence on Isaac Newton's Doctrine of Absolute Time. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):216-228.
    Here, I shall argue that Van Helmont needs to be added to the list of sources on which Newton drew when formulating his doctrine of absolute time. This by no means implies that Van Helmont is the factual source of Newton's views on absolute time (I have found no clear-cut evidence in support of this claim). It is by no means my aim to debunk the importance of the other sources, but rather to broaden them. Different authors help to explain (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Steffen Ducheyne (2005). Newton's Notion and Practice of Unification. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):61-78.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Steffen Ducheyne (2005). Book Review The Cambridge Companion to Newton. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72 (3):506-508.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Yehuda Elkana (1974). The Annus Mirabilis of Sir Isaac Newton: 1666–1966. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 5 (1):87-93.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. B. Ellis (1996). Review. Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia. Francois de Gandt (Translated by Curtis Wilson). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):636-639.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Dorothy M. Emmet (1935). Studies in the Philosophy of Creation. With Especial Reference to Bergson and Whitehead. By Newton P. Stallknecht . (Princeton: University Press; London: Humphrey Milford. 1934. Pp. Xiii + 170. Price 9s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 10 (40):495-.
  59. Patricia Fara & David Money (2004). Isaac Newton and Augustan Anglo-Latin Poetry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):549-571.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Marta Feh (1986). The Method of Analysis-Synthesis and the Structure of Causal Explanation in Newton. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):60 – 84.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Marta Fehér (1986). The Method of Analysis‐Synthesis and the Structure of Causal Explanation in Newton. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):60-84.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1988). Science and Society in Newton and in Marx. Inquiry 31 (1):103 – 121.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. Maurice A. Finocchiaro (1981). Newton on Matter and Activity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (4):507-510.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Gordon N. Fleming (2000). Reeh-Schlieder Meets Newton-Wigner. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):515.
    The Reeh-Schlieder theorem asserts the vacuum and certain other states to be spacelike superentangled relative to local fields. This motivates an inquiry into the physical status of various concepts of localization. It is argued that a covariant generalization of Newton-Wigner localization is a physically illuminating concept. When analyzed in terms of nonlocally covariant quantum fields, creating and annihilating quanta in Newton-Wigner localized states, the vacuum is seen to not possess the spacelike superentanglement that the Reeh-Schlieder theorem displays relative to local (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Eduardo H. Flichman (2001). Newton's Dynamics, Kuhn, and Incommensurability. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:89-96.
    In this paper I will attempt to show how incommensurability between theories is usually manifested, framing this notion in a sense similar to the Kuhnian one in certain aspects, though very different in others. Further, I will show that it is possible, and desirable, to rid Kuhn’s thesis of the idea that in many important theories a certain part of the theoretical nucleus partially contains in a more or less vague sense, synthetic a priori or even analytic statements. Alternatively, I (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. James E. Force (1987). Hume's Interest in Newton and Science. Hume Studies 13 (2):166-216.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. T. M. Forsyth (1932). The New Cosmology in Its Historical Aspect: Plato, Newton, Whitehead. Philosophy 7 (25):54-.
  68. Allan Franklin & Colin Howson (1985). Newton and Kepler, a Bayesian Approach. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (4):379-385.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Doreen L. Fraser (2005). The Third Law in Newton's Waste Book (or, the Road Less Taken to the Second Law). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (1):43-60.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. A. Gabbey (2003). Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence. Philosophical Review 112 (4):570-572.
  71. John Gage (1971). Blake's Newton. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 34:372-377.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. Maurice Gagnon (1986). Les Arguments de Newton Concernant l'Existence du Mouvement, de l'Espace Et du Temps Absolus. Dialogue 25 (04):629-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. James W. Garrison (1988). Hintikka, Laudan and Newton: An Interrogative Model of Scientific Inquiry. Synthese 74 (2):145 - 171.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Yvon Gauthier (1994). L'inertie Et l'Espace-Temps Absolu de Newton à Einstein. Une Analyse Philosophique Michel Ghins Bruxelles, Palais des Académies, 1990, 238 P. [REVIEW] Dialogue 33 (02):353-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Trish Glazebrook (2000). From Φvσις to Nature, Τε′Χνη to Technology: Heidegger on Aristotle, Galileo, and Newton. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (1):95-118.
  76. Bernard R. Goldstein (1992). Book Review:The General History of Astronomy. Vol. 2: Planetary Astronomy From the Renaissance to the Rise of Astrophysics. Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton Rene Taton, Curtis Wilson. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 59 (4):698-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Nelson Goodman (1973). "That Is": A Reply to Isaac Newton Nozick. Journal of Philosophy 70 (6):166.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Penelope Gouk (1986). Newton and Music: From the Microcosm to the Macrocosm. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):36 – 59.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Emily Grosholz (1987). Some Uses of Proportion in Newton's Principia, Book I: A Case Study in Applied Mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 18 (2):209-220.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Emily R. Grosholz (1988). Geometry, Time and Force in the Diagrams of Descartes, Galileo, Torricelli and Newton. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:237 - 248.
    Cartesian method both organizes and impoverishes the domains to which Descartes applies it. It adjusts geometry so that it can be better integrated with algebra, and yet deflects a full-scale investigation of curves. It provides a comprehensive conceptual framework for physics, and yet interferes with the exploitation of its dynamical and temporal aspects. Most significantly, it bars a fuller unification of mathematics and physics, despite Descartes' claims to quantify nature. The work of his contemporaries Galileo and Torricelli, and of his (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. Niccolò Guicciardini (2004). Geometry and Mechanics in the Preface to Newton's Principia. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (2):119-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Niccolò Guicciardini (2004). Isaac Newton and the Publication of His Mathematical Manuscripts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):455-470.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. Niccolò Guicciardini (2004). Isaac Newton's Natural Philosophy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):670-674.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. A. Rupert Hall (1992). Newton and the Absolutes : Sources. In Peter M. Harman & Alan E. Shapiro (eds.), The Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of D.~T. Whiteside. Cambridge University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Robert Hanna (2010). Review of Ralph D. Ellis, Natika Newton, How the Mind Uses the Brain (to Move the Body and Image the Universe). [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (10).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. William Harper (2000). Michael Friedman on Kant and Newton. Dialogue 39 (02):279-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. David Boyd Haycock (2005). Claiming Him as Her Son : William Stukeley, Isaac Newton, and the Archaeology of the Trinity. In John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.), Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. David Boyd Haycock (2004). 'The Long-Lost Truth': Sir Isaac Newton and the Newtonian Pursuit of Ancient Knowledge. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):605-623.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. John W. Herivel (1988). L'influence de Descartes Sur Newton En Dynamique. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 86 (4):467-484.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Rolf-Dieter Herrmann (1975). Newton's Positivism and the a Priori Constitution of the World. International Philosophical Quarterly 15 (2):205-214.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Boris Hessen (2009). The Social and Economic Roots of Newton's Principia. In Boris Hessen, Henryk Grossmann, Gideon Freudenthal & Peter McLaughlin (eds.), The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann. Springer.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. Florence M. Hetzler (1989). The Newton Handbook. International Philosophical Quarterly 29 (2):237-241.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Benjamin Hill (2003). Newton's de Gravitatione Et Aequipondio Fluidorum and Lockean Four-Dimensionalism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):309 – 321.
  94. Kenneth Einar Himma (2002). It's the Rationale That Counts: A Reply to Newton. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (4):407 - 412.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. J. M. Hinton (1976). Language, Truth and Politics By Trevor Pateman Published by Jean Stroud and the Author at 1 Church Green, Newton Poppleford, Sidmouth, £1.50 Post Free. [REVIEW] Philosophy 51 (196):235-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Carl Hoefer (2008). Review of Robert DiSalle, Understanding Space-Time: The Philosophical Development of Physics From Newton to Einstein. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (9).
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Carl Hoefer (1998). Absolute Versus Relational Spacetime: For Better or Worse, the Debate Goes On. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):451-467.
    The traditional absolutist-relationist debate is still clearly formulable in the context of General Relativity Theory (GTR), despite the important differences between Einstein's theory and the earlier context of Newtonian physics. This paper answers recent arguments by Robert Rynasiewicz against the significance of the debate in the GTR context. In his (1996) (‘Absolute vs. Relational Spacetime: An Outmoded Debate?’), Rynasiewicz argues that already in the late nineteenth century, and even more so in the context of General Relativity theory, the terms of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. I. L. Horowitz (1959). Book Reviews : Isaac Newton's Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy and Related Documents Edited by 1. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958.) Pp. 501. Science and Religion in Seventeenth Century England by Richard S. Westfall (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1958.) Pp. 235. [REVIEW] Diogenes 7 (27):125-128.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. Christian Houzel (1995). Sharaf Al-Dīn Al- Ūsī Et le Polygone de Newton. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 5 (02):239-.
  100. Nicholas Huggett, Ch 1: Motion and Relativity Before Newton.
    Where should we begin our story? Many books start with Newton, but Newton was responding to both Galileo1 and especially (for our purposes) Descartes. But Galileo and Descartes themselves were writing in the context of late Aristotelianism, and so were trained in and critical of that rich school of thought, so if we want to fully understand their work we would need to understand scholastic views on space and motion (see Grant, 1974, Murdoch and Sylla, 1978 and Ariew and Gabbey, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 234