This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
207 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 207
  1. A. (1982). J. L. Austin: A Critique of Ordinary Language Philosophy. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):872-873.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. K. A. (1982). J. L. Austin. Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):872-873.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. S. C. A. (1974). Essays on Austin. Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):118-119.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Olivier Abel (2004). Austin et la question éthique de la crédibilité. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):151-173.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Mark Richard Alfino (1989). Representation and Closure in Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
    This dissertation examines the general problem of how to give a philosophical account of the nature of representation by looking at three specific philosophies of language and the philosophic treatment of fictional discourse. I argue that Edmund Husserl, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and J. L. Austin all try to give accounts of meaning by arguing for what I call a "closure of meaning" in language. The closure thesis is the claim that some set of criteria can exhaustively determine the ways in which (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Pedro Alves (unknown). Non-declarative Sentences and Communication in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Contributions to a Theory on Communicative Acts in the Light of Husserl and Austin. Phainomena 74.
    In this paper I discuss the consistency and accuracy of Husserl’s sketch of a theory about non-declarative sentences in the last chapter of Logical Investigations. Whereas the consistency is acknowledged, the accuracy is denied, because Husserl’s treatment of non-declarative phrases such as questions or orders implies that those phrases contain, in some way, a declarative sentence and an objectifying act. To construct a question like »is A B?« as being equivalent to a declarative sentence such as »I ask whether A (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Alice Ambrose (1963). Austin's 'Philosophical Papers'. Philosophy 38 (145):201 - 216.
    The author reviews the contents of the ten articles by j l austin which appear in the volume "philosophical papers". She tries to "single out what is unique about his contribution, In particular what features of his procedure, Falling as it does under the general classification 'linguistic analysis', Were so distinctive as to win for it the attention accorded to a new departure." (staff).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Trevor Anderson (2013). Victor Lee Austin, Up with Authority. Tradition and Discovery 39 (2):65-67.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. D. J. C. Angluin (1974). Austin's Mistake About 'Real'. Philosophy 49 (187):47 - 62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. John E. Atwell (1966). Austin on Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. J. Austin (1946). Other Minds. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20:148-87.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  12. J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
    The influence of J. L. Austin on contemporary philosophy was substantial during his lifetime, and has grown greatly since his death, at the height of his powers, in 1960. Philosophical Papers, first published in 1961, was the first of three volumes of Austin's work to be edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Together with Sense and Sensibilia and How to do things with Words, it has extended Austin's influence far beyond the circle who knew him or read (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   262 citations  
  13. J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
    For this second edition, the editors have returned to Austin's original lecture notes, amending the printed text where it seemed necessary.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   516 citations  
  14. J. L. Austin (1966). Three Ways of Spilling Ink. Philosophical Review 75 (4):427-440.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15. J. L. Austin (1964). A Plea for Excuses. In V. C. Chappell (ed.), Ordinary Language: Essays in Philosophical Method. Dover Publications 1--30.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  16. J. L. Austin (1964). Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By G J Warnock. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17. J. L. Austin (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.
    This book is the one to put into the hands of those who have been over-impressed by Austin 's critics....[Warnock's] brilliant editing puts everybody who is concerned with philosophical problems in his debt.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   191 citations  
  18. J. L. Austin (1961). A Plea for Excuses' in Austin. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers. Clarendon Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. J. L. Austin (1946). Other minds, part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 148:148-187.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  20. James Austin (1978). Systemic Causation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (2):83-97.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. James W. Austin (1976). Denoting Phrases and Definite Descriptions. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):393-399.
    Russell's theory of descriptions has recently come under attack as being trivial and circular--Specifically, That it predicates uniqueness of definite descriptions only after identifying those descriptions as phrases analysable via the uniqueness criterion in the first place. It is shown that this criticism is quite off target. The confusion results largely from failure to distinguish the class of denoting phrases from its sub-Set, Definite descriptions. A few reminders are issued in hopes of facilitating the study and teaching of the theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. John Austin (1966). Law as the Sovereign's Command. In Martin P. Golding (ed.), The Nature of Law. New York, Random House
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. John Austin (1954). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
    This edition comprises the full text of Austin's The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, a classic work of moral, political, and legal philosophy, and Austin ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24. Review author[S.]: J. L. Austin (1952). Critical Notice. Mind 61 (243):395-404.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. A. J. Ayer (1967). Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory? Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
  26. M. R. Ayers (1966). Austin on `Could' and `Could Have'. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):113-120.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. G. P. Aylward, I. Abramov, R. N. Adams, W. A. Ahroon, T. Alajouanine, M. Albert, J. Alegria, J. N. Allen, T. Allison & M. Alpern (1985). Austin, GA, 232. In Jacques Mehler & R. Fox (eds.), Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion. Lawrence Erlbaum
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. R. J. B. (1970). Symposium on J. L. Austin. Review of Metaphysics 23 (4):756-756.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. R. J. B. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Review of Metaphysics 15 (4):673-673.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. R. J. B. (1962). Philosophical Papers. Review of Metaphysics 15 (4):673-673.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. S. Dwight Ballentine (1923). "Austin", J. C., The Significant Name in Terence. Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 17:195-197.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Tomás Barrero (2015). Aserción, expresión y acción. Una lectura de J.L. Austin. Dianoia: Anuario de Filosofía 74 (LX):81-107.
    This paper offers a new interpretation of John Austin’s views both on assertion and on adverbs, as result of which an expressivist thesis concerning the semantics for action sentences is advanced. First, Austin’s analysis of assertion based on various, specific assertive forces and his remarks on adverbs are systematically connected in order to obtain assertive schemata for action sentences. Finally, those schemata are put to work as the expression of inferential commitments implicit in argumentative practices of different sorts (exculpatory, justificatory (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Avner Baz (2010). Geach's 'Refutation' of Austin Revisited. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):pp. 41-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Hugo A. Bedau (1965). J. L. Austin's Philosophical Writings. Mind 74 (294):252.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Isaiah Berlin (ed.) (1973). Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. W. Berriman (1973). Saying and Meaning: A Main Theme in J. L. Austin's Philosophy. By Mats Furberg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Toronto: Copp Clark. 1971. Pp. 299. $14.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 12 (1):159-161.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Kathleen Biddick (1983). The Austin Friars, Leicester. [REVIEW] Speculum 58 (3):1073-1074.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Brian Bix, John Austin. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. William S. Boardman, Austin and the Inferential Account of Perception.
    O SET THE STAGE for the discussion[1], I will rehearse and clarify a well-known dispute between A. J. Ayer and J. L. Austin concerning whether perceptual judgments are inferences. Both in his Sense and Sensibilia[2] and in his "Other Minds,"[3] Austin carefully distinguishes recognizing that p from inferring that p. For the purpose of comparing his position to Ayer's, we might put his basic claim in this way: given the way words such as "recognize" and "infer" are used outside philosophical (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Jeanette Grillion Boers (1983). J. L. Austin's Contribution to the Philosophical Study of Perception. Dissertation, University of South Africa (South Africa)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Norman J. P. Brown (1962). Philosophical Papers. By J. L. Austin. Edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Oxford University Press, 1961, Pp. 242.$ 5.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 1 (2):205-207.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Robert Brown (1962). AUSTIN, J. L.: "Sense and Sensibilia". Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40:347.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Robert Brown (1962). AUSTIN, J. L.: "Philosophical Papers". Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40:347.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Herbert Burhenn (1980). J. L. Austin and the Analysis of Ritual. Philosophical Investigations 3 (3):39-50.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Stanley Cavell (2000). Beginning to Read Barbara Cassin. Hypatia 15 (4):99-101.
    Stanley Cavell reflects on the writing of Barbara Cassin in light of his interest in interpreting certain philosophers as "philosophically destructive," where this destructiveness may in fact be understood as philosophically creative. Cavell suggests that the writings of Austin and Wittgenstein may be considered in these terms, and speculates on the potential interest these writers might have for Cassin. Cassin's call for a rethinking of philosophy might be seen as uniquely essential to the practice of Austin and Wittgenstein.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Stanley Cavell (1995). Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida. Blackwell.
    Introduction Cavell's Voices and Derrida's Grammatology The stature of Stanley Cavell is increasingly considered unique among living American philosophers ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  48. Stanley Cavell (1965). Austin at Criticism. Philosophical Review 74 (2):204-219.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. W. Cerf (1966). AUSTIN, J. L. - "How to Do Things with Words". [REVIEW] Mind 75:262.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. T. S. Champlin (1990). J. L. Austin By G. L. Warnock London and New York: Routledge, 1989, I + 165 Pp., £30.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy 65 (254):526-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 207