This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
205 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 205
  1. A. (1982). J. L. Austin: A Critique of Ordinary Language Philosophy. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):872-873.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. K. A. (1982). J. L. Austin. Review of Metaphysics 35 (4):872-873.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. C. A. (1974). Essays on Austin. Review of Metaphysics 28 (1):118-119.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Olivier Abel (2004). Austin et la question éthique de la crédibilité. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):151-173.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mark Richard Alfino (1989). Representation and Closure in Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
    This dissertation examines the general problem of how to give a philosophical account of the nature of representation by looking at three specific philosophies of language and the philosophic treatment of fictional discourse. I argue that Edmund Husserl, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and J. L. Austin all try to give accounts of meaning by arguing for what I call a "closure of meaning" in language. The closure thesis is the claim that some set of criteria can exhaustively determine the ways in which (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Pedro Alves (unknown). Non-declarative Sentences and Communication in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Contributions to a Theory on Communicative Acts in the Light of Husserl and Austin. Phainomena 74.
    In this paper I discuss the consistency and accuracy of Husserl’s sketch of a theory about non-declarative sentences in the last chapter of Logical Investigations. Whereas the consistency is acknowledged, the accuracy is denied, because Husserl’s treatment of non-declarative phrases such as questions or orders implies that those phrases contain, in some way, a declarative sentence and an objectifying act. To construct a question like »is A B?« as being equivalent to a declarative sentence such as »I ask whether A (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Alice Ambrose (1963). Austin's 'Philosophical Papers'. Philosophy 38 (145):201 - 216.
    The author reviews the contents of the ten articles by j l austin which appear in the volume "philosophical papers". She tries to "single out what is unique about his contribution, In particular what features of his procedure, Falling as it does under the general classification 'linguistic analysis', Were so distinctive as to win for it the attention accorded to a new departure." (staff).
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Trevor Anderson (2013). Victor Lee Austin, Up with Authority. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical 39 (2):65-67.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. J. C. Angluin (1974). Austin's Mistake About 'Real'. Philosophy 49 (187):47 - 62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John E. Atwell (1966). Austin on Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
  11. J. Austin (1946). Other Minds. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20:148-87.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. L. Austin (1979). Philosophical Papers. Oxford University Press.
    The late J.L. Austin's influence on contemporary philosophy was substantial during his lifetime, and has grown greatly since his death in 1960. This third edition of Philosophical Papers, the first edition of which was published in 1961, includes all of Austin's published papers (except "Performatif-Constatif") as well as a new essay entitled "The Line and the Cave in Plato's Republic", which has been reconstructed from Austin's notes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
    For this second edition, the editors have returned to Austin's original lecture notes, amending the printed text where it seemed necessary.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. L. Austin (1966). Three Ways of Spilling Ink. Philosophical Review 75 (4):427-440.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. J. L. Austin (1964). A Plea for Excuses. In V. C. Chappell (ed.), Ordinary Language: Essays in Philosophical Method. Dover Publications. 1--30.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. L. Austin (1964). Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By G J Warnock. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. L. Austin (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.
    This book is the one to put into the hands of those who have been over-impressed by Austin's critics....[Warnock's] brilliant editing puts everybody who is concerned with philosophical problems in his debt.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. L. Austin (1961). A Plea for Excuses' in Austin. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers. Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. J. L. Austin (1946). Other minds, part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 148:148-187.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. James Austin (1978). Systemic Causation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (2):83-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. James W. Austin (1976). Denoting Phrases and Definite Descriptions. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):393-399.
    Russell's theory of descriptions has recently come under attack as being trivial and circular--Specifically, That it predicates uniqueness of definite descriptions only after identifying those descriptions as phrases analysable via the uniqueness criterion in the first place. It is shown that this criticism is quite off target. The confusion results largely from failure to distinguish the class of denoting phrases from its sub-Set, Definite descriptions. A few reminders are issued in hopes of facilitating the study and teaching of the theory (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. John Austin (1966). Law as the Sovereign's Command. In Martin P. Golding (ed.), The Nature of Law. New York, Random House.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. John Austin (1954). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
    This edition comprises the full text of Austin's The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, a classic work of moral, political, and legal philosophy, and Austin ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Review author[S.]: J. L. Austin (1952). Critical Notice. Mind 61 (243):395-404.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. A. J. Ayer (1967). Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory? Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. M. R. Ayers (1966). Austin on `Could' and `Could Have'. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (63):113-120.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. G. P. Aylward, I. Abramov, R. N. Adams, W. A. Ahroon, T. Alajouanine, M. Albert, J. Alegria, J. N. Allen, T. Allison & M. Alpern (1985). Austin, GA, 232. In Jacques Mehler & R. Fox (eds.), Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. R. J. B. (1970). Symposium on J. L. Austin. Review of Metaphysics 23 (4):756-756.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. R. J. B. (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Review of Metaphysics 15 (4):673-673.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. R. J. B. (1962). Philosophical Papers. Review of Metaphysics 15 (4):673-673.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. S. Dwight Ballentine (1923). "Austin", J. C., The Significant Name in Terence. Classical Weekly 17:195-197.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Tomás Barrero (forthcoming). Aserción, expresión y acción. Una lectura de J.L. Austin. Dianoia: Anuario de Filosofía 74 (LX).
    This paper offers a new interpretation of John Austin’s views both on assertion and on adverbs, as result of which an expressivist thesis concerning the semantics for action sentences is advanced. First, Austin’s analysis of assertion based on various, specific assertive forces and his remarks on adverbs are systematically connected in order to obtain assertive schemata for action sentences. Finally, those schemata are put to work as the expression of inferential commitments implicit in argumentative practices of different sorts (exculpatory, justificatory (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Avner Baz (2010). Geach's 'Refutation' of Austin Revisited. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):pp. 41-62.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Hugo A. Bedau (1965). J. L. Austin's Philosophical Writings. Mind 74 (294):252.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Isaiah Berlin (ed.) (1973). Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford,Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. W. Berriman (1973). Saying and Meaning: A Main Theme in J. L. Austin's Philosophy. By Mats Furberg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; Toronto: Copp Clark. 1971. Pp. 299. $14.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 12 (01):159-161.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Kathleen Biddick (1983). The Austin Friars, Leicester. [REVIEW] Speculum 58 (3):1073-1074.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David W. Bishop (1966). Fertilization C. R. Austin. BioScience 16 (7):489-490.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Brian Bix, John Austin. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. William S. Boardman, Austin and the Inferential Account of Perception.
    O SET THE STAGE for the discussion[1], I will rehearse and clarify a well-known dispute between A. J. Ayer and J. L. Austin concerning whether perceptual judgments are inferences. Both in his Sense and Sensibilia[2] and in his "Other Minds,"[3] Austin carefully distinguishes recognizing that p from inferring that p. For the purpose of comparing his position to Ayer's, we might put his basic claim in this way: given the way words such as "recognize" and "infer" are used outside philosophical (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jeanette Grillion Boers (1983). J. L. Austin's Contribution to the Philosophical Study of Perception. Dissertation, University of South Africa (South Africa)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Norman J. P. Brown (1962). Philosophical Papers. By J. L. Austin. Edited by J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock. Oxford University Press, 1961, Pp. 242.$ 5.25. [REVIEW] Dialogue 1 (02):205-207.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert Brown (1962). AUSTIN, J. L.: "Sense and Sensibilia". Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40:347.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert Brown (1962). AUSTIN, J. L.: "Philosophical Papers". Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40:347.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Herbert Burhenn (1980). J. L. Austin and the Analysis of Ritual. Philosophical Investigations 3 (3):39-50.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stanley Cavell (2000). Beginning to Read Barbara Cassin. Hypatia 15 (4):99-101.
    Stanley Cavell reflects on the writing of Barbara Cassin in light of his interest in interpreting certain philosophers as "philosophically destructive," where this destructiveness may in fact be understood as philosophically creative. Cavell suggests that the writings of Austin and Wittgenstein may be considered in these terms, and speculates on the potential interest these writers might have for Cassin. Cassin's call for a rethinking of philosophy might be seen as uniquely essential to the practice of Austin and Wittgenstein.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Stanley Cavell (1995). Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida. Blackwell.
    Introduction Cavell's Voices and Derrida's Grammatology The stature of Stanley Cavell is increasingly considered unique among living American philosophers ...
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stanley Cavell (1965). Austin at Criticism. Philosophical Review 74 (2):204-219.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. W. Cerf (1966). AUSTIN, J. L. - "How to Do Things with Words". [REVIEW] Mind 75:262.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 205