Related categories
Siblings:
244 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 244
  1. Lucy Allais (2007). Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (2):164-173.
  2. Henry E. Allison (2003). Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg. Inquiry 46 (2):182 – 194.
    In this discussion I respond to some of the criticisms raised by Béatrice Longuenesse and Hannah Ginsborg to my account of Kant's aesthetic theory presents in Kant's Theory of Taste.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Karl Ameriks (1994). Review: Guyer, Paul, Kant and the Experience of Freedom: Essays on Aesthetics and Morality. [REVIEW] Ethics 105 (1):207-.
  4. Karl Ameriks (1983). Kant and the Objectivity of Taste. British Journal of Aesthetics 23 (1):3-17.
  5. Karl Ameriks (1982). How to Save Kant's Deduction of Taste. Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (4):295-302.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. H. Appelqvist (2013). Wittgenstein and the Limits of Musical Grammar. British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (3):299-319.
    This paper offers a Kantian reading of Wittgenstein’s later conception of rules. Building on the continuity of Wittgenstein’s comparison between a sentence and a musical theme, the paper argues that central elements of the Kantianism one may find in Wittgenstein’s early philosophy carry over to his mature conception of grammar. Moreover, this Kantian reading offers a novel perspective on the puzzle about the normativity of Wittgenstein’s later notion of rules. It is argued that the normativity of an aesthetic judgement, understood (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Richard E. Aquila (1979). A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgment. Kant-Studien 70 (1-4):17-34.
    One approach sees aesthetic pleasure as distinctively caused (by interplay of the cognitive faculties involved in apprehending an object) and accompanied by a distinctive judgment (that everyone ought to respond thus). I suggest a closer tie between affective and cognitive aspects: the pleasure is referred to its object, Not simply through causal relations with the cognitive faculties involved, But through itself receiving the very form constituting apprehension in the first place. This avoids certain difficulties concerning intentionality. It also respects kant's (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. O. Bakos (2003). Ethical Dimensions of the Pure Judgement of Taste in Kant's Aesthetics. Filozofia 58 (3):147-154.
    The paper deals with pure judgments of taste in Kant's aesthetics regarding the meaning they achieve due to the presence of the other subject. In his Critique of Judgment Kant defines the subject as a physical individual endowed with feelings, related not only to objects, but rather expanding this relation on the community of others. Therefore, the aesthetic relation to an object, which is the precondition of the pure judgment of taste, involves implicitly a recquirement on the subject to renounce (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Dorit Barchana-Lorand (2002). The Kantian Beautiful, or, the Utterly Useless: Prolegomena to Any Future Aesthetics. Kant-Studien 93 (3):309–323.
  10. Peter Baumanns (1981). Kant's Logic of Aesthetic Judgment. Philosophy and History 14 (1):23-25.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Avner Baz (2015). The Sound of Bedrock: Lines of Grammar Between Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2).
    In ‘Aesthetics Problems of Modern Philosophy’ Stanley Cavell proposes, first, that Kant's characterization of judgments of beauty may be read as a Wittgensteinian grammatical characterization, and, second, that the philosophical appeal to ‘what we say and mean’ partakes of the grammar of judgment of beauty. I argue first that the expression of the dawning of an aspect partakes of the grammar of judgments of beauty as characterized by Kant, and may also be seen—on a prevailing way of thinking about concepts (...)
    Kant: Aesthetic Judgment in 17th/18th Century Philosophy
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Avner Baz (2005). Kant's Principle of Purposiveness and the Missing Point of (Aesthetic) Judgements. Kantian Review 10 (1):1-32.
    My plan in this article is to begin by raising the question of the point of judgements of beauty, and then to examine Kant's account of beauty in the third Critique from the perspective opened up by that question. Having raised the question of the point, I will argue, first, that there is an implied answer to it in Kant's text, and, second, that the answer is ultimately unsatisfying in that it falsely assumes that there is a ‘need’, or ‘task’, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. Avner Baz (2004). What's the Point of Calling Out Beauty? British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):57-72.
    The purpose of this paper is to use Kant's Critique of Judgement in order to raise and motivate the question of the point of judgements of beauty, to illustrate the philosophical tendency to neglect or even repress it, and to begin to look for an answer to that question. On the way, I will consider Kant's implied answer to the question and will argue that it is unsatisfactory in that it relies on a false picture of the everyday subject's relation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Avner Baz (2000). On the Point of What We Say: Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell on When Words Are Called For. Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
    The dissertation consists of three separate but related papers. The papers investigate various ways in which questions of value bear on questions of intelligibility, and vice versa. The guiding idea is the Wittgensteinian insight, explored by Stanley Cavell, that our intelligibility, to ourselves and to others, and in particular our saying anything with our words, is a matter of making a point. In the first paper I offer a reading guided by this insight, of Wittgenstein's remarks on 'seeing aspects'. In (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Ronald Beiner (1997). Rereading Hannah Arendt's Kant Lectures. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1):21-32.
    This paper offers a restatement of the basic project of Hannah Arendt's Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, tries to trace its theoretical motivation, and presents some criticisms of Arendt's interpretation of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Arendt's political philosophy as a whole is an attempt to ground the idea of human dignity on the publicly displayed 'words and deeds' that con stitute the realm of human affairs. This project involves a philo sophical response both to Plato's impugning of the dignity of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. David Bell (1987). The Art of Judgement. Mind 96 (382):221-244.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17. David Berger (2009). Kant's Aesthetic Theory: The Beautiful and Agreeable. Continuum.
    The twofold conception of taste -- The beautiful and the agreeable -- Sensations and interests -- Some varieties of normativity.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Ruben Berrios (2003). Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):422-424.
  19. Kenneth Berry (2008). Kandinsky, Kant, and a Modern Mandala. Journal of Aesthetic Education 42 (4):pp. 105-110.
    Aesthetics
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. M. Bianchi (2005). Commento Alla Critica Della Facoltà di Giudizio di Kant. Le Monnier Università.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Ioana Boghian (2013). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. The European Legacy 18 (3):374-375.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Angela Breitenbach (2013). Beauty in Proofs: Kant on Aesthetics in Mathematics. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):n/a-n/a.
    It is a common thought that mathematics can be not only true but also beautiful, and many of the greatest mathematicians have attached central importance to the aesthetic merit of their theorems, proofs and theories. But how, exactly, should we conceive of the character of beauty in mathematics? In this paper I suggest that Kant's philosophy provides the resources for a compelling answer to this question. Focusing on §62 of the ‘Critique of Aesthetic Judgment’, I argue against the common view (...)
  23. Angela Breitenbach (2013). Aesthetics in Science: A Kantian Proposal. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (1pt1):83-100.
    Can aesthetic judgements legitimately be linked to the success of scientific theories? I suggest that a satisfactory answer to this question should account for the persistent attraction that aesthetic considerations seem to have for scientists, while also explaining the apparent instability of the link between the beauty of a theory and its truth. I argue that two widespread tendencies in the literature, Pythagorean and subjectivist approaches, have difficulties meeting this twofold challenge. I propose a Kantian conception of aesthetic judgements as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Francesca Brencio (2013). Sul gusto e sul giudizio di gusto. In M. Marchi & G. Di Renzo (eds.), Le declinazioni del gusto. Aracne
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Harold W. Brogan (1996). The Ontological Motif in Kant's Account of Reflective Judgment. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
    This dissertation argues the position that the Critique of Judgment is the realization of Kant's intent throughout the critical project to provide a transcendental justification of the metaphysics of Leibniz. With this objective in view the dissertation examines Kant's writing in the Eberhard Controversy and The Prize Essay in order to bring into relief Kant's own avowed commitment to Leibniz, and to show how this faithfulness to the tenets of Leibniz' metaphysics formed Kant's arguments in the Critique of Judgment. The (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. G. Anthony Bruno (2009). Aesthetic Value, Intersubjectivity and the Absolute Conception of the World. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (3).
    In the Critique of the Power of Judgment, Kant diagnoses an antinomy of taste: either determinate concepts exhaust judgments of taste or they do not. That is to say, judgments of taste are either objective and public or subjective and private. On the objectivity thesis, aesthetic value is predicable of objects. But determining the concepts that would make a judgment of taste objective is a vexing matter. Who can say which concepts these would be? To what authority does one appeal? (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Malcolm Budd (2001). The Pure Judgement of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgement. British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (3):247-260.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Malcolm Budd (1998). Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Part I: Natural Beauty. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1):1-18.
  29. Malcolm Budd (1998). Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature Part III: The Sublime in Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (3):233-250.
  30. Charlotte Bühler (1921). Die Aufgaben der Ästhetik. Kant-Studien 26 (1-2):403-415.
  31. Craig Burgess (1989). Kant's Key to the Critique of Taste. Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):484-492.
  32. Joseph Cannon (2011). Reply to Paul Guyer. Kantian Review 16 (1):135-139.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Joseph Cannon (2008). The Intentionality of Judgments of Taste in Kant's Critique of Judgment. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (1):53–65.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Luigi Caranti (2005). Logical Purposiveness and the Principle of Taste. Kant-Studien 96 (3):364-374.
    In both Introductions to the Critique of Judgment Kant seems to identify the a priori principle at the basis of aesthetic judgments with the principle that guides reflective judgment in its cognitive inquiry of nature, i.e. the purposiveness of nature or systematicity. For instance Kant writes.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Anthony J. Cascardi (1991). Aesthetic Liberalism: Kant and the Ethics of Modernity. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 45 (176):10-23.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Clive Cazeaux (2004). Kant and Metaphor in Contemporary Aesthetics. Kantian Review 8 (1):1-37.
    Trying to assess Kant's impact on contemporary aesthetics is by no means a straightforward task, for the simple reason that the subject is saturated with his influence. In all aspects of the theory and practice of art, it is possible to observe concepts and attitudes at work which are either a reflection of, or a response to, Kant's thinking. This might seem a rather overblown claim and a difficult one to substantiate but, without going into too much detail at this (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Clive Cazeaux (2001). Review: Banham, Kant and the Ends of Aesthetics. Kantian Review 5:141.
  38. Andrew Chignell (2013). Ogilby, Milton, Canary Wine, and the Red Scorpion: Another Look at Kant's Deduction of Taste. In Dina Emundts (ed.), Self, World, and Art. Walter De Gruyter 261-282.
    An effort to expand and defend aspects of my earlier reading of the Deduction of Taste. The Red Scorpion is just for fun. -/- .
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Andrew Chignell (2007). Kant on the Normativity of Taste: The Role of Aesthetic Ideas. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):415 – 433.
    For Kant, the form of a subject's experience of an object provides the normative basis for an aesthetic judgement about it. In other words, if the subject's experience of an object has certain structural properties, then Kant thinks she can legitimately judge that the object is beautiful - and that it is beautiful for everyone. My goal in this paper is to provide a new account of how this 'subjective universalism' is supposed to work. In doing so, I appeal to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. Andrew Chignell (2006). Beauty as a Symbol of Natural Systematicity. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):406-415.
    I examine Kant's claim that a relation of symbolization links judgments of beauty and judgments of ‘systematicity’ in nature (that is, judgments concerning the ordering of natural forms under hierarchies of laws). My aim is to show that the symbolic relation between the two is, for Kant, much closer than many commentators think: it is not only the form but also the objects of some of our judgments of taste that symbolize the systematicity of nature. -/- .
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41. Andrew Chignell (1999). The Problem of Particularity in Kant's Aesthetic Theory. In Kevin A. Stoehr (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. 197-208.
    An early version of "Kant on the Normativity of Taste" above. -/- .
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Robert R. Clewis (2006). Kant's Consistency Regarding the Regime Change in France. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):443-460.
    Can it be consistent to be interested, for moral reasons, in the fact that uninvolved spectators of a regime change are enthusiastic about that change, when the latter is carried out according to means considered immoral or unjust? Yes. In ‘An Old Question Raised Again’ ( The Conflict of the Faculties , 1798), Kant demonstrates a morally based interest in disinterested spectators’ expressions (aesthetic judgments) of enthusiasm for the idea of a republican form of government. This interest is puzzling. Kant's (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Ted Cohen (2002). Three Problems in Kant's Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):1-12.
    What does the faculty of Understanding do during the execution of a judgement of taste? How are singular judgements of beauty related to general judgements of beauty? For what reason is beauty the symbol of morality? The first question has a tentative answer, although one not obviously congenial to Kant. The second two questions have no compelling answers.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44. Ted Cohen (1990). An Emendation in Kant's Theory of Taste. Noûs 24 (1):137-145.
  45. Diarmuid Costello (2007). Greenberg's Kant and the Fate of Aesthetics in Contemporary Art Theory. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):217–228.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Timothy M. Costelloe (2003). Hume, Kant, and the "Antinomy of Taste". Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):165-185.
  47. Donald W. Crawford (1974). Kant's Aesthetic Theory. [Madison]University of Wisconsin Press.
  48. Paul Crowther (1996). The Significance of Kant's Pure Aesthetic Judgement. British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (2):109-121.
  49. Paul Crowther (1984). Kant and Greenberg's Varieties of Aesthetic Formalism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42 (4):442-445.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Stuart Dalton (2000). Nancy and Kant on Inoperative Communities. Critical Horizons 1 (1):29-50.
    This essay argues that Kant's explanation of the purposiveness-without-a-purpose of beauty (in the third Critique) can help to make sense of Nancy's theory of the inoperative community.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 244