This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
243 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 243
  1. Binod Agarwala (2004). Phronesis and Categorical Imperative. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 31 (1-4):119.
  2. John Alexander (2005). Did God Violate the Categorical Imperative? Philosophy Pathways 108.
  3. Henry E. Allison (2013). The Singleness of the Categorical Imperative. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 37-54.
  4. Henry E. Allison (1991). On a Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Topics 19 (1):1-15.
  5. Henry E. Allison (1986). Morality and Freedom: Kant's Reciprocity Thesis. Philosophical Review 95 (3):393-425.
  6. Henry E. Allison (1986). The Concept of Freedom in Kant's “Semi-Critical” Ethics. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1):96-115.
  7. Richard E. Aquila (1984). Duty and Inclination: The Fundamentals of Morality Discussed and Redefined with Special Regard to Kant and Schiller. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 1 (1):307-330.
  8. Marcus Arvan (2012). Unifying the Categorical Imperative. Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225.
    This paper demonstrates something that Kant notoriously claimed to be possible, but which Kant scholars today widely believe to be impossible: unification of all three formulations of the Categorical Imperative. Part 1 of this paper tells a broad-brush story of how I understand Kant’s theory of practical reason and morality, showing how the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative appear to me to be unified. Part 2 then provides clear textual support for each premise in the argument for my interpretation.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Roy Ascott (2006). The Syncretic Imperative. Technoetic Arts 4 (2):109-113.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stefano Bacin (2010). The Form of Practical Knowledge. A Study of the Categorical Imperative. [REVIEW] Studi Kantiani 23.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Carla Bagnoli (2013). Respect and Obligation: The Scope of Kant’s Constructivism. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 29-40.
  12. Sorin Baiasu (2013). The Deontic Force of the Formula of Universal Law. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 41-50.
  13. Francine Baker (2007). Review: Hill, Zweig, Wood, Abbott, Denis, (Trans/Ed), Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (1):134-154.
  14. Paul Bamford (1979). The Ambiguity of the Categorical Imperative. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (2):135-141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Michael Barber (2009). Review of Bill Martin, Ethical Marxism: The Categorical Imperative of Liberation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. H. Barker (1948). PATON, H. J. - The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 57:93.
  17. E. J. Bond (1968). The Supreme Principle of Morality. Dialogue 7 (02):167-179.
  18. Anders Bordum (2005). Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the Categorical Imperative. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):851-874.
    It has often been said that discourse ethics as developed by Jürgen Habermas can be understood as a dialogical continuation of the monological ethics developed by Immanuel Kant, as formulated in the categorical imperative in Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Like Kant’s categorical imperative, Habermas’ principle of universalization specifies a rule for impartial testing of norms for their moral worthiness. This article will substantiate that discourse ethics develops a dialogical version of the categorical imperative, and will make this explicit. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Paul J. Borowski (1998). Manager-Employee Relationships: Guided by Kant's Categorical Imperative or by Dilbert's Business Principle. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1623-1632.
    The relationship between Employer and Employees is a central one in the world of business. While an important relationship, it is one that is often a source of tension for the workplace. Employers are seemingly in constant mistrust of workers, while workers often look upon their bosses as "less than competent". In the American world of business today, should this "adversarial" relationship continue or should the Employer–Employee Relationship be governed by different rules. Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative offers some insights into (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Antonio Frederico Saturnino Braga (2008). Brief Comments on the Concept of Categorical Imperative. In Valerio Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. De Gruyter vol. 3, pp. 13-22.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Matthew Braham & Martin van Hees (2015). The Formula of Universal Law: A Reconstruction. Erkenntnis 80 (2):243-260.
    This paper provides a methodologically original construction of Kant’s “Formula of Universal Law” . A formal structure consisting of possible worlds and games—a “game frame”—is used to implement Kant’s concept of a maxim and to define the two tests FUL comprises: the “contradiction in conception” and “contradiction in the will” tests. The paper makes two contributions. Firstly, the model provides a formal account of the variables that are built into FUL: agents, maxims, intentions, actions, and outcomes. This establishes a clear (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Henry Walter Brann (1970). Kant's Ethics and the Problem of Unity of Freedom and Law. Philosophy and History 3 (2):185-187.
  23. Stuart M. Brown Jr & H. J. Paton (1949). The Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Review 58 (6):599 - 611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stuart M. Brown Jr & H. J. Paton (1949). The Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Review 58 (6):599 - 611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Bruno Brülisauer (1980). Die Goldene Regel. Analyse einer dem Kategorischen Imperativ verwandten Grundnorm. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):325-345.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Samuel V. Bruton (2000). Establishing Kant's Formula of Humanity. Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):41-49.
  27. Steven M. Cahn (2009). A Supreme Moral Principle? In Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press
  28. Cheshire Calhoun (1994). Kant and Compliance With Conventionalized Injustice. Southern Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):135-159.
  29. Lenval A. Callender (2013). Puzzle Maxims and the Formula of Universal Law. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 97-108.
  30. Ruth F. Chadwick (1989). The Market for Bodily Parts: Kant and Duties to Oneself. Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):129-140.
    The demand for bodily parts such as organs is increasing, and individuals in certain circumstances are responding by offering parts of their bodies for sale. Is there anything wrong in this? Kant had arguments to suggest that there is, namely that we have duties towards our own bodies, among which is the duty not to sell parts of them. Kant's reasons for holding this view are examined, and found to depend on a notion of what is intrinsically degrading. Rom Harré's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Andrew Chignell (2006). Review: Moore, Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty: Themes and Variation in Kant's Moral and Religious Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 115 (1):118-121.
  32. Yoon Choi (2008). Revisiting Kant's Ethics: Two Challenges to the Status Quo. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):137-149.
  33. Michael Cholbi (2013). The Constitutive Approach to Kantian Rigorism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):439-448.
    Critics often charge that Kantian ethics is implausibly rigoristic: that Kantianism recognizes a set of perfect duties, encapsulated in rules such as ‘don’t lie,’ ‘keep one’s promises,’ etc., and that these rules apply without exception. Though a number of Kantians have plausibly argued that Kantianism can acknowledge exceptions to perfect duties, this acknowledgment alone does not indicate how and when such exceptions ought to be made. This article critiques a recent attempt to motivate how such exceptions are to be made, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jiří Chotaš & Jindřich Karásek (eds.) (2005). Kantův Kategorický Imperativ. Oikoumene.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Anton-Hermann Chroust (1942). About a Fourth Formula of the Categorical Imperative in Kant. Philosophical Review 51 (6):600-605.
  36. William W. Clohesy (1985). On Rereading the Categorical Imperative. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 10 (2):57-74.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ardis B. Collins (1983). Kant's Conceptions of the Categorical Imperative and the Will. By T. N. Pelegrinis. Modern Schoolman 60 (2):138-139.
  38. David Copp (1992). The "Possibility" of a Categorical Imperative: Kant's Groundwork, Part III. Philosophical Perspectives 6:261-284.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. M. Corradi (1988). The Categorical Imperative in the Foundation of Kant'metafisica Dei Costumi'. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 80 (2):223-241.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Adam Cureton (2013). From Self-Respect to Respect for Others. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):166-187.
    The leading accounts of respect for others usually assume that persons have a rational nature, which is a marvelous thing, so they should be respected like other objects of ‘awesome’ value. Kant's views about the ‘value’ of humanity, which have inspired contemporary discussions of respect, have been interpreted in this way. I propose an alternative interpretation in which Kant proceeds from our own rational self-regard, through our willingness to reciprocate with others, to duties of respect for others. This strategy, which (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. L. L. D. (1980). Kant's Moral Philosophy, an Interpretation of the Categorical Imperative. Review of Metaphysics 34 (1):158-159.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen Darwall (2013). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Legal Theory 19 (1):89-99.
  43. Stephen Darwall (1976). A Defense of the Kantian Interpretation. Ethics 86 (2):164-170.
  44. Richard Dean (2009). The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself. In Thomas E. Hill (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell
  45. Katerina Deligiorgi (2012). Review: Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):369-374.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Katerina Deligiorgi (2012). Review: Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):369-374.
  47. Lara Denis (2007). Kant's Formula of the End in Itself: Some Recent Debates. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):244–257.
    This is a survey article in which I explore some important recent work on the topic in question, Kant’s formula of the end in itself (or “formula of humanity”). I first provide an overview of the formulation, including what the formula seems roughly to be saying, and what Kant’s main argument for it seems to be. I then call the reader’s attention to a variety of questions one might have about the import of and argument for this formula, alluding to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Lara Denis (2001). Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant's Moral Theory. Garland Pub..
    Moral Self-Regard draws on the work of Marcia Baron, Joseph Butler and Allen Wood, among others in this first extensive study of the nature, foundation and significance of duties to oneself in Kant's moral theory.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William Desmond (1980). Phronesis and the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Studies 27:7-15.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Cristian Dimitriu (2013). The practical interpretation of the categorical imperative: A defense. Ideas Y Valores 62 (151):105-113.
    The article compares two different interpretations of Kant's categorical imperative −the practical and the logical one− and defends the practical one, arguing that it is superior because it rejects cases of free riding without necessarily rejecting cases of coordination or timing. The logical interpretation, on the other hand, leads to the undesirable outcome that it does not reject immoral cases of free riding, and to the desired outcome that it does not reject maxims of coordination/timing. Given that neither of them (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 243