This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
202 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 202
  1. Henry E. Allison (1991). On a Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Topics 19 (1):1-15.
  2. Henry E. Allison (1986). Morality and Freedom: Kant's Reciprocity Thesis. Philosophical Review 95 (3):393-425.
  3. Henry E. Allison (1986). The Concept of Freedom in Kant's “Semi-Critical” Ethics. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1):96-115.
  4. Marcus Arvan (2012). Unifying the Categorical Imperative. Southwest Philosophy Review 28 (1):217-225.
    This paper demonstrates something that Kant notoriously claimed to be possible, but which Kant scholars today widely believe to be impossible: unification of all three formulations of the Categorical Imperative. Part 1 of this paper tells a broad-brush story of how I understand Kant’s theory of practical reason and morality, showing how the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative appear to me to be unified. Part 2 then provides clear textual support for each premise in the argument for my interpretation.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carla Bagnoli (forthcoming). “Respect and Obligation. The Scope of Kant’s Constructivism”,. In S. Bacin, C. la Rocca & M. Ruffing (eds.), Proceedings of the XI International Congress of the Kantian Society. De Gruyter.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Francine Baker (2007). Review: Hill, Zweig, Wood, Abbott, Denis, (Trans/Ed), Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 12 (1):134-154.
  7. Paul Bamford (1979). The Ambiguity of the Categorical Imperative. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (2):135-141.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Michael Barber (2009). Review of Bill Martin, Ethical Marxism: The Categorical Imperative of Liberation. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anders Bordum (2005). Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the Categorical Imperative. Philosophy and Social Criticism 31 (7):851-874.
    It has often been said that discourse ethics as developed by Jürgen Habermas can be understood as a dialogical continuation of the monological ethics developed by Immanuel Kant, as formulated in the categorical imperative in Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Like Kant’s categorical imperative, Habermas’ principle of universalization specifies a rule for impartial testing of norms for their moral worthiness. This article will substantiate that discourse ethics develops a dialogical version of the categorical imperative, and will make this explicit. (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul J. Borowski (1998). Manager-Employee Relationships: Guided by Kant's Categorical Imperative or by Dilbert's Business Principle. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1623-1632.
    The relationship between Employer and Employees is a central one in the world of business. While an important relationship, it is one that is often a source of tension for the workplace. Employers are seemingly in constant mistrust of workers, while workers often look upon their bosses as "less than competent". In the American world of business today, should this "adversarial" relationship continue or should the Employer–Employee Relationship be governed by different rules. Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative offers some insights into (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Antonio Frederico Saturnino Braga (2008). Brief Comments on the Concept of Categorical Imperative. In Valerio Rohden, Ricardo Terra & Guido Almeida (eds.), Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. de Gruyter. vol. 3, pp. 13-22.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Henry Walter Brann (1970). Kant's Ethics and the Problem of Unity of Freedom and Law. Philosophy and History 3 (2):185-187.
  13. Stuart M. Brown Jr & H. J. Paton (1949). The Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Review 58 (6):599 - 611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Stuart M. Brown Jr & H. J. Paton (1949). The Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Review 58 (6):599 - 611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Bruno Brülisauer (1980). Die Goldene Regel. Analyse einer dem Kategorischen Imperativ verwandten Grundnorm. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):325-345.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Samuel V. Bruton (2000). Establishing Kant's Formula of Humanity. Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (1):41-49.
  17. Cheshire Calhoun (1994). Kant and Compliance With Conventionalized Injustice. Southern Journal of Philosophy 32 (2):135-159.
  18. Ruth F. Chadwick (1989). The Market for Bodily Parts: Kant and Duties to Oneself. Journal of Applied Philosophy 6 (2):129-140.
    The demand for bodily parts such as organs is increasing, and individuals in certain circumstances are responding by offering parts of their bodies for sale. Is there anything wrong in this? Kant had arguments to suggest that there is, namely that we have duties towards our own bodies, among which is the duty not to sell parts of them. Kant's reasons for holding this view are examined, and found to depend on a notion of what is intrinsically degrading. Rom Harré's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Andrew Chignell (2006). Review: Moore, Noble in Reason, Infinite in Faculty: Themes and Varitation in Kant's Moral and Religious Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 115 (1):118-121.
  20. Yoon Choi (2008). Revisiting Kant's Ethics: Two Challenges to the Status Quo. Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):137-149.
  21. Michael Cholbi (2013). The Constitutive Approach to Kantian Rigorism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):439-448.
    Critics often charge that Kantian ethics is implausibly rigoristic: that Kantianism recognizes a set of perfect duties, encapsulated in rules such as ‘don’t lie,’ ‘keep one’s promises,’ etc., and that these rules apply without exception. Though a number of Kantians have plausibly argued that Kantianism can acknowledge exceptions to perfect duties, this acknowledgment alone does not indicate how and when such exceptions ought to be made. This article critiques a recent attempt to motivate how such exceptions are to be made, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jiří Chotaš & Jindřich Karásek (eds.) (2005). Kantův Kategorický Imperativ. Oikoumene.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Anton-Hermann Chroust (1942). About a Fourth Formula of the Categorical Imperative in Kant. Philosophical Review 51 (6):600-605.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. William W. Clohesy (1985). On Rereading the Categorical Imperative. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 10 (2):57-74.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. David Copp (1992). The "Possibility" of a Categorical Imperative: Kant's Groundwork, Part III. Philosophical Perspectives 6:261-284.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Adam Cureton (2013). From Self-Respect to Respect for Others. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (2):166-187.
    The leading accounts of respect for others usually assume that persons have a rational nature, which is a marvelous thing, so they should be respected like other objects of ‘awesome’ value. Kant's views about the ‘value’ of humanity, which have inspired contemporary discussions of respect, have been interpreted in this way. I propose an alternative interpretation in which Kant proceeds from our own rational self-regard, through our willingness to reciprocate with others, to duties of respect for others. This strategy, which (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen Darwall (2013). Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW] Legal Theory 19 (1):89-99.
  28. Stephen Darwall (1976). A Defense of the Kantian Interpretation. Ethics 86 (2):164-170.
  29. Richard Dean (2009). The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself. In Thomas E. Hill (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Kant's Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
  30. Katerina Deligiorgi (2012). Review: Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):369-374.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Katerina Deligiorgi (2012). Review: Engstrom, The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 17 (2):369-374.
  32. Lara Denis (2007). Kant's Formula of the End in Itself: Some Recent Debates. Philosophy Compass 2 (2):244–257.
    This is a survey article in which I explore some important recent work on the topic in question, Kant’s formula of the end in itself (or “formula of humanity”). I first provide an overview of the formulation, including what the formula seems roughly to be saying, and what Kant’s main argument for it seems to be. I then call the reader’s attention to a variety of questions one might have about the import of and argument for this formula, alluding to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Lara Denis (2001). Moral Self-Regard: Duties to Oneself in Kant's Moral Theory. Garland Pub..
    Moral Self-Regard draws on the work of Marcia Baron, Joseph Butler and Allen Wood, among others in this first extensive study of the nature, foundation and significance of duties to oneself in Kant's moral theory.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. R. C. Duncan (1970). The Concept of the Categorical Imperative. By T.C. Williams. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1968. Pp. Xii, 142, $4.85. [REVIEW] Dialogue 9 (03):436-439.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Julius Ebbinghaus (1954). Interpretation and Misinterpretation of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Quarterly 4 (15):97-108.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Theodor Ebert (1976). Kants kategorischer Imperativ und die Kriterien gebotener, verbotener und freigestellter Handlungen. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):570-583.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Richard W. Eggerman (1995). Competition and the Categorical Imperative. Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):59-68.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Richard W. Eggerman (1980). Kant and Rational Imperatives of Happiness. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):43-50.
  39. Dan Egonsson (1997). Kant's Vegetarianism. Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (4):473-483.
  40. David Ellerman (1995). Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life: Essays in Philosophy, Economics, and Mathematics. Rowman and Littlefield.
    Collection of published and unpublished essays covering most of my work up to 1990. Chapters 1 & 2 are about orthodox economics. Chapter 3 is the infamous pseudonymous spoof of Nozick, whose context and reaction is explained in the introduction. Chapter 4 puts the labor theory of property and democratic theory in a Kantian framework of treating persons as ends in themselves (instead of as rentable instruments of production). Chapter 5 shows how to reformulate marginal productivity theory using the fact (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr (2010). Moral Obligation After the Death of God: Critical Reflections on Concerns From Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Elizabeth Anscombe. [REVIEW] In Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.), Moral Obligation. Cambridge University Press. 317-340.
    Once God is no longer recognized as the ground and the enforcer of morality, the character and force of morality undergoes a significant change, a point made by G.E.M. Anscombe in her observation that without God the significance of morality is changed, as the word criminal would be changed if there were no criminal law and criminal courts. There is no longer in principle a God's-eye perspective from which one can envisage setting moral pluralism aside. In addition, it becomes impossible (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen Engstrom (1992). Review: O'Neill, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (3):653-.
  43. Stephen P. Engstrom (2009). The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Harvard University Press.
    Introduction -- Part I: Willing as practical knowing -- The will and practical judgment -- Fundamental practical judgments : the wish for happiness -- Part II: From presuppositions of judgment to the idea of a categorical imperative -- The formal presuppositions of practical judgment -- Constraints on willing -- Part III: Interpretation -- The categorical imperative -- Applications -- Conclusion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. A. C. Ewing (1948). Review: Paton, The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Philosophy 23 (85):172-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Arnold Farr (2002). Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative? Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (1):17–32.
  46. Rafael Ferber (1984). Der Grundgedanke des Tractatus als Metamorphose des obersten Grundsatzes der Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):460-468.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. James Fieser (2000). Moral Philosophy Through the Ages. Mayfield Pub..
    This book takes a middle ground between the topical and historical approaches to Western ethics. The chapters are topically arranged, but preserve the flow of history in two ways. First, each chapter explains the historical development of the topic under consideration. Second, most chapters focus on a specific famous philosopher who championed a particular tradition, such as Aristotle, Locke, or Kant, and the chapters are chronologically ordered based on when these key philosophers lived.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Katrin Flikschuh (2002). Review: Guyer, Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (03):606-.
  49. James Furner (forthcoming). Marx with Kant on Exploitation. Contemporary Political Theory.
  50. A. Campbell Garnett (1964). A New Look at the Categorical Imperative. Ethics 74 (4):295-299.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 202